Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6856 Staff AnalysisJune 26, 2000 Item No.: 4 File No.. Z-6856 Owner: - Bobby Makin Address: 14900 Gorgeous View Trail Description: Lot 113, Spring Valley Manor Zoned: R-2 Variance Rec pested: A variance is requested from the area regulations of Section 36-156 to permit construction of an accessory building with a reduced front yard setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: 14900 Gorgeous View Trail is located in Spring Valley Manor, a residential subdivision at the City's western edge that developed prior to its annexation in 1993. This R-2 zoned lot currently contains a one-story, rock and frame, single family residence. The house was constructed without a carport or garage. The applicant proposes to construct a 16' X 261, open carport in front of the house. The carport construction will match the house and the structure will be connected to the house by an unenclosed, covered walkway. The carport will have a front yard setback of 26 feet. The code requires accessory structures to have a front yard setback of at least 60 feet. June 26, 2000 Item No.: 4 (Cont.) Staff is supportive of the requested setback variance. The lot slopes down steeply from the street so that the ridge of the house is actually below street grade. The house and parking pad are constructed on terraces with about 5 feet of difference in elevation, making it difficult to build the carport as an attached addition to the house. If it was practical to construct an addition onto the front of the house, the addition could come to within 15 feet of the front property line. Staff believes this proposed carport will have no effect on neighboring properties. C . Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested front yard setback for the proposed unenclosed carport structure, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JUNE 26, 2000) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved with a vote of 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 2