Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6843 Staff AnalysisApril 24, 2000 Item No.: 6 File No. Owner: Address: Description: Zoned: Variance Requested: Justification: Present Use of Property: Z-6843 William B. and Genie J. Sigler Revocable Trust 129 Normandy Road Lots 105 and 106, Normandy Addition R-2 Variances are requested from the area regulations of Section 36-254 and the building line provisions of Sections 31-12 to permit an addition with reduced side and rear yard setbacks and which crosses a platted building line. Applicant's Statement: This request for variance will allow me to construct a one story, downstairs bedroom and bath on a two story, single family residence. We have lived in this house for twenty-four years and look forward to remaining there in retirement. A downstairs bedroom is becoming a necessity as stairs get more difficult to climb. The lot provides adequate space for this room addition and there will remain a good deal of separation between me and the adjacent residences. Single Family Proposed Use of Property: Single Family April 24, 2000 Item No.: 6 (Cont. Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at 129 Normandy Road is occupied by a two-story, brick and frame, single-family residence. The applicants propose to construct a one-story master bedroom suite onto the rear of the house. The new addition will have a side yard setback of 6.5 feet and a rear yard setback of 21 feet. The Code requires side and rear yard setbacks of 8 feet and 25 feet respectively for this lot. A 35 foot building line extends across the rear of the property. The proposed addition is to extend across the building line which may require a variance. Staff is supportive of the requested variances. The 1.5 foot side yard and 4 foot rear yard variances are both very minor and should have no impact on adjacent properties. There remains good separation between the addition and the residences on the lots to the south and east. The property has a 20 foot front building line but the existing house has a front yard setback of 37 feet. If the house were actually located at the front building line, no rear yard variance would be necessary. As was previously mentioned, the property has a 35 foot building line across the rear. A portion of the existing house and the proposed addition are located across this building line. Staff believes it is very likely that this building line is an "out building" setback line. Such setback lines were common in neighborhoods such as Normandy, Crestwood and Edgehill to require that "out buildings" be located at the rear of the lot. Zoning setback requirements for accessory buildings now accomplish the same goal. The survey, unfortunately, does not indicate this building line specifically as an outbuilding setback line and staff must treat the issue as a building line variance. If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to do a one -lot replat, reflecting the change in the building line as approved by the Board. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of 2 April 24, 2000 Item No.: 6 (Cont.) Assurance. If the applicant can provide proof, prior to requesting a building permit, that the building line is an "out building" setback line, no replat is necessary. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line variances subject to a one -lot replat (if necessary as described above) reflecting the change in the building line as approved by the Board. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (APRIL 24, 2000) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval subject to a one -lot replat. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. 3