HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6809 Staff AnalysisMarch 20, 2003
ITEM NO.: 12 FILE NO.: Z-6809
NAME: Bed and Breakfast Inn Short -form PD -C
LOCATION: 700 South Cedar Street
DEVELOPER:
Brad Bell
4112 "A" Street
Little Rock, AR 72205
ENGINEER:
White-Daters and Associates
#24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 0.83 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0
CURRENT ZONING: PD -C
ALLOWED USES: Hotel
PROPOSED ZONING: PD -C —Time Extension
PROPOSED USE: Hotel
VARIAN CESANAIVE RS REQUESTED: None requested.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 18,287 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 6, 2000
established a Planned Zoning District for the Bed and Breakfast Inn located on the
March 20, 2003
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-6809
southwest corner of West 7th Street and South Cedar Street. The proposal included the
construction of a 26,426 square foot 60 room hotel with approximately 34 on-site
parking spaces. The site was approved for a reduced number of on-site parking spaces
but required the applicant to secure a long-term lease with UAMS for an additional 32
parking spaces. The site plan was approved with two (2) sign locations; a four foot
high, 24 square foot monument -type sign along West 7th Street and a 30 foot high, 130
square foot maximum ground -mounted sign at the southwest corner of the property.
A. PROPOSAUREQUEST:
Per Section 36-454(e), the applicant is to file a final development plan within
three (3) years of the date of the ordinance approving the preliminary plan. As
per the same Section, the applicant may request from the Planning Commission
an extension of not more than three (3) years. The applicant has submitted a
request for a one-year time extension of the PD -C zoning. The applicant has
stated the hotel's ground breaking has been slowed somewhat due to economic
reasons and the unexpected passing of one of the partners in the venture. The
applicant has stated the additional one-year time extension will insure the time
necessary to begin construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested one (1) year time extension. All
previous conditions, comments and recommendations will continue to be in effect
for the PD -C.
2
March 20, 2003
ITEM NO_: 12
NAME: Bed and Breakfast Inn Short -form PD -C
LOCATION: 700 South Cedar Street
DEVELOPER:
Brad Bell
4112 "A" Street
Little Rock, AR 72205
ENGINEER:
White-Daters and Associates
#24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 0.83 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
CURRENT ZONING: PD -C
LLOWED USES: Hotel
PROPOSED ZONING: PD -C — Time Extension
PROPOSED USE: Hotel
FILE NO.: Z-6809
FT. NEW STREET: 0
VARIAN CESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 18,287 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 6, 2000
established a Planned Zoning District for the Bed and Breakfast Inn located on the
March 20, 2003
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-6809
southwest corner of West 7th Street and South Cedar Street. The proposal included the
construction of a 26,426 square foot 60 room hotel with approximately 34 on-site
parking spaces. The site was approved for a reduced number of on-site parking spaces
but required the applicant to secure a long-term lease with UAMS for an additional 32
parking spaces. The site plan was approved with two (2) sign locations; a four foot
high, 24 square foot monument -type sign along West 7th Street and a 30 foot high. 130
square foot maximum ground -mounted sign at the southwest corner of the property.
Q
PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Per Section 36-454(e), the applicant is to file a final development plan within
three (3) years of the date of the ordinance approving the preliminary plan. As
per the same Section, the applicant may request from the Planning Commission
an extension of not more than three (3) years. The applicant has submitted a
request for a one-year time extension of the PD -C zoning. The applicant has
stated the hotel's ground breaking has been slowed somewhat due to economic
reasons and the unexpected passing of one of the partners in the venture. The
applicant has stated the additional one-year time extension will insure the time
necessary to begin construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested one (1) year time extension. All
previous conditions, comments and recommendations will continue to be in effect
for the PD -C.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MARCH 20, 2003)
Mr. Mark Burkle was present representing the application. There was one objector
present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the requested
one (1) year time extension. Staff stated all previous conditions, comments and
recommendations would continue to be in effect for the PD -C.
Mr. Mark Burkle addressed the Commission. He stated due to economic times and the
passing of one of the partners the development was slow to begin. He stated the
applicant had contracted with a contractor, bids had been let and a lease agreement
had been reached with the VA Hospital.
Mr. Herb Hawn spoke in opposition of the proposed time extension. He stated he was
representing the Capitol View/Stifft Station Neighborhood Association in his opposition.
He stated the plan shown to the neighborhood was not the same plan as was approved
by the Commission and the Board three years earlier. He stated the parking agreement
was with the VA Hospital and not UAMS. He stated the sign area had decreased from
what was previously approved. Mr. Hawn stated this was not negative from the
2
March 20, 2003
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-6809
neighborhoods standpoint but the neighborhood would like additional information on the
proposed development.
Mr. Jim Lawson, Director of Planning, stated the Commission's role was to consider the
one-year time extension. He stated if there were any significant changes to the plan the
PD -C would have to be revised and review by the Commission and the Board of
Directors.
There was no further discussion of the item. A motion was made to approve the
application as filed for a one-year time extension. The motion carried by a vote of
9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
3
FILE NO.: Z-6809
NAME: Bed and Breakfast Inn - Short -Form PD -C
LOCATION: Southwest corner of West 7�h and Cedar Streets
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Brad Bell White-Daters and Associates
4112 "A" Street 401 S. Victory Street
Little Rock, AR 72205 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 0.83 acre NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: R-5
& O-3
ALLOWED USES:
Multifamily Residential and
Office
PROPOSED USE: Hotel
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to rezone the property at the
southwest corner of West 7t' and Cedar Streets from R-5/0-3
to PD -C to allow for the construction of a hotel. The
proposed hotel will consist of 26,426 square feet (heated
and cooled area) and 60 rooms. The proposed building will
be a three-story structure with an overall height of
approximately 44 feet from finished grade to the peak of
the roof (approximately 35 feet to mid -roof line.).
The proposed site plan includes a parking area for 34
vehicles within the east portion of the property and along
the north side of the building. The applicant has noted an
intent to lease 32 parking spaces from DAMS, in order to
comply with the typical ordinance minimum for a 60 room
hotel (66 parking spaces typically required by ordinance).
The applicant is proposing two (2) access points from West
7t' Street. The westernmost drive is proposed to be an
"entry only" drive as requested by Public Works. A 2 foot
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.
by 3 foot "entry only" sign is proposed at this drive
location.
The proposed building, drives and parking areas are noted
on the attached site plan.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There are two (2) existing multifamily structures and
parking areas on the site, which will be removed with the
proposed construction. The UAMS campus is located to the
north (across West 7t' Street) and west.' Interstate 630
is immediately south, with two (2) office buildings across
I-630. There are single family residential structures to
the northeast, across Cedar Street.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received no neighborhood
comment. The Capitol View Stifft Station, Forest Hills and
Pine to Woodrow Neighborhood Associations were notified of
the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. West 7t' and Cedar Streets are classified on the Master
Street Plan as commercial streets. Dedicate right-of-
way to 30 feet from centerline.
2. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required
at the corner of West 7t' and Cedar Streets.
3. Provide design of streets conforming to "MSP" (Master
Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to
these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned
development.
4. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
5. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
6. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
7. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing
street lights as required by Section 31-403 of the
Little Rock Code. All requests should be forwarded to
Traffic Engineering.
8. Cedar Street has a 1996 average
9. Driveways shall conform to Sec.
18,031. Redesign west drive to
10. Obtain permits for improvements
right-of-way from AHTD, District
E
traffic count of 5,100.
3-210 or Ordinance
entry only.
within State Highway
VI.
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.)
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected.
AP&L: There is an existing primary circuit located on the
north and east sides of the existing buildings.
Relocation or removal cost may be incurred by the
developer. 15 foot easement requested. Contact Jerome
Strickland at 569-5448 for details.
Arkla: No Comment.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
Water: There appears to be a conflict with a 12" water
main in Elm Street (abandoned). Any required relocation
of water facilities will be at developer's expense.
On-site fire protection may be required.
Fire Department: No Comment.
County Planning: No Comment received.
CATA: No Comment received.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
This request is located in the I-630 Planning District. The
Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this location.
If the proposed use is not a public use, Staff considers
that proposed use to be consistent if it fits the adjoining
land use categories. The proposed zone changes from R-5
Urban Residential and 0-3 General Office to a Planned
Office District for a motel is consistent with the
adjoining Land Use Plan categories of Mixed Use and Office.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The Woodruff
Neighborhood Area Plan recommends land uses that are
consistent with the Public Institutional category west of
Cedar Street. Other goals include reviewing neighborhood
zoning for appropriateness to preserve the character of the
neighborhood's community and to work with UAMS to stabilize
the western edge of the neighborhood.
Landscape Issues:
Areas set aside for buffers meet with ordinance
requirements.
3
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.
G.
The proposed areas set aside
short of the 954 square feet
Ordinance by 438 square feet.
ANALYSIS:
for interior landscaping fall
required by the Landscape
The applicant submitted a revised site plan and additional
information to staff on February 2, 2000. The revised plan
changes the parking design and shows a dumpster area (the
original site plan had a basement parking area, which has
been eliminated). Additional interior landscaping has been
shown.
As noted in paragraph A of this report, the applicant is
proposing 34 on-site parking spaces. The ordinance would
typically require 66 on-site parking spaces for a 60 room
hotel. The applicant has noted that 32 spaces will be
leased from a nearby UAMS parking lot. The applicant needs
to provide staff with an executed lease for the additional
parking.
Also noted in paragraph A, the applicant has shown a 2 foot
by 3 foot "entry only" sign at the westernmost drive. This
is the only sign shown on the site plan. The applicant
needs to provide staff with the additional sign details.
Along with the revised site plan, the applicant submitted a
north/south section of the property showing the existing
and finished grades. The section notes that the site will
be lowered approximately 10 feet from the existing
elevation at the curb line of West 7t' Street to a retaining
wall located on the south side of the building (approximate
distance of 125 feet). The retaining wall on the south
side of the building will be approximately 10 feet in
height.
Otherwise, to staff's knowledge there are no additional
outstanding issues associated with this site plan. With an
approved signage plan and executed lease for the additional
parking, the proposed PD -C rezoning should have no adverse
effect on the general area.
H. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the PD -C rezoning subject to
the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D, E and F of this report.
2. The applicant must submit an executed lease agreement for
the additional parking on the UAMS property.
3. The applicant must provide sign details to staff.
4. The dumpster must be screened on three (3) sides with an
8 foot opaque fence or wall.
4
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.)
5. Any site lighting should be low-level and directed away
from adjacent property.
6. The westernmost access drive from West 7t' Street must be
an "entry only" drive.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(JANUARY 27, 2000)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application. Staff
briefly described the proposed PD -C site plan, noting that
information on signage and north/south sections needed to be
provided. Staff also noted that if the applicant wished to
receive credit for parking spaces on the UAMS property, a
written agreement from UAMS needed to be provided.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed. It was
noted that the west drive needed to be an entry drive only.
This issue was briefly discussed.
The landscape requirements were also discussed. It was noted
that additional interior landscaping needed to be provided. Mr.
Daters noted that the required interior landscaping would be
provided.
There being no further issues for discussion, the Committee
forwarded the PD -C to the full Commission for resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(FEBRUARY 17, 2000)
Tim Daters and Brad Bell were present, representing the
application. Staff briefly described the PD -C rezoning, with a
recommendation of approval with conditions. Staff noted that
the issues relating to signage and parking had been resolved.
Staff noted that two (2) ground -mounted signs were shown on the
site plan (a 4 foot high, 24 square foot monument -type sign
along West 7t' Street and a 30 foot high, 160 square foot maximum
ground -mounted sign at the southwest corner of the property).
Staff also noted that a letter from UAMS had been received,
agreeing to lease the applicant 30 parking spaces. Staff noted
that a building permit for the project would not be issued until
a executed lease for the parking is submitted to staff.
Antoinette Fiduccia, of the Capital View Stifft Station
Neighborhood Association, addressed the Commission with
concerns. She stated that she had a concern with the parking
issue. She stated that UAMS is currently parking on the
A
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.)
residential streets in the area. She also stated that she did
not want additional parking lots along Cedar Street. She noted
that there are two (2) other hotels in the area that she would
like to see renovated. She concluded by stating that UAMS could
use this property for office uses.
Tim Daters addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He briefly described the property and the proposed
project. He stated that he was not familiar with the parking
problem on the UAMS campus.
Robert Hamilton, of the Capitol View Stifft Station Neighborhood
Association, addressed the Commission. He stated that he was
not opposed to the hotel use, but he wished to work with the
applicant to resolve the parking issue.
Brad Bell addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He addressed the parking issue. He noted that
there is ample parking on the UAMS campus. He stated that the
parking for the hotel will not effect the neighborhood.
Mr. Bell stated that there had been 90 police calls to this
property over the last two (2) years, and that eliminating the
existing apartment buildings will be on asset to the
neighborhood. He noted that renovation of the two (2) existing
hotels in the area was not an option.
Mr. Daters noted that UAMS had declined to purchase this
property in the past.
Commissioner Hawn objected to Mr. Bell's attitude toward the
parking issue and the neighborhood. He asked about traffic flow
to and from the property.
Mr. Daters described the traffic flow with respect to the two
(2) proposed drives. There was additional discussion concerning
the traffic circulation issue.
Bob Turner, of Public Works, addressed the traffic circulation
issue. He described how the proposed drives would function.
Commissioner Muse commented on the 1996 traffic count as
provided by Public Works. He stated that UAMS had grown since
1996.
Mr. Turner stated that the 1996 count was the most recent. He
agreed that traffic has increased in this area since then.
6
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.)
Commissioner Muse made additional comments related to traffic
and parking. He noted that he was in favor of deferring the
application so the applicant could meet with the neighborhood.
Commissioner Lowery asked if a new traffic count could be done
if the item were deferred.
Mr. Turner stated that a traffic count could be done within a
week.
Commissioner Earnest stated that he viewed the proposed hotel as
an improvement to the area. He noted that the hotel could act
as a buffer between the neighborhood and UAMS, which would
benefit the neighborhood and UAMS long-term.
Commissioner Rahman stated that he had a problem with the
proposed lease for additional parking.
Chairman Berry referred to the previously approved PCD at the
corner of Kavanaugh Blvd. and Spruce Street, which has leased
parking.
Commissioner Nunnley asked if the applicant would consider
deferring the application.
Mr. Daters noted that he would defer the application and meet
with the neighborhood.
Commissioner Nunnley asked how many hotel rooms the parking on
the site plan would serve.
Jim Lawson, Director of Planning and Development, noted that the
parking would serve approximately 31 rooms.
There was a discussion of a possible deferral of the item. Mr.
Lawson suggested deferral to the March 30 agenda.
The Planning Commission asked that a new traffic count be done
by Public Works.
Commissioner Downing asked about vehicle circulation in this
area. This issue was briefly discussed.
The Commission took a brief recess at the request of the
television crew.
After the recess, Mr. Daters formally requested a deferral to
the March 30, 2000 agenda.
7
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.)
A motion was made to defer the application to the March 30, 2000
agenda. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and
2 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MARCH 30, 2000)
Tim Daters and John Seiter were present, representing the
application. Staff briefly described the proposed PD -C, with a
recommendation of approval with conditions. Staff noted that
the Capitol View Stifft Station Neighborhood Association had
submitted two letters with specific concerns, and that the
applicant had received a copy of the letters.
Bob Turner, Director of Public Works, presented the Commission
with the recent traffic counts for the area. In response to a
question from the Commission, Mr. Turner noted that the current
traffic counts were an increase from the previous counts.
Tim Daters addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He stated that he had met with.the neighborhood
association. Mr. Daters noted the following in response to the
neighborhood concern:
1. A long-term lease for the parking would be executed prior to
a building permit application.
2. Landscape screening would be installed between the parking
area and Cedar Street.
3. The maximum area for the proposed ground -mounted sign would
be reduced to 130 square feet.
In response to a question from the Commission, staff noted that
the applicant had requested a ground -mounted sign with a maximum
height of 30 feet and a maximum area of 160 square feet.
Commissioner Lowry asked Mr. Daters about the terms of the lease
for parking. Mr. Daters responded that the lease would be for a
minimum of 20 years.
Commissioner Muse asked about the sign type. Mr. Daters stated
that it would be a 30 foot high pylon sign and would be lighted.
Commissioner Berry suggested that the hotel would be primarily
supported by the VA and DAMS, and a minimal amount of signage
would be needed. Mr. Daters noted that there were franchise
requirements for signage. This issue was briefly discussed.
8
FILE NO.: Z-6809 (Cont.)
John Seiter noted that the franchise required that there be a
ground -mounted sign. Commissioner Berry suggested that the
franchise requirement may not be appropriate for this situation.
Commissioner Muse asked if anyone from the neighborhood
association wished to respond. There was no one from the
association present.
Commissioner Lowry asked that a condition be placed on the
application that the sign have a maximum height of 30 feet and a
maximum area of 130 square feet or the minimum size sign allowed
by the franchise, whichever is less. This issue was briefly
discussed.
There was a motion to approve the PD -C subject to the conditions
as noted by staff, the additional conditions offered by the
applicant and the condition on signage as noted in the previous
paragraph.
Commissioner Earnest commented on the fact that the applicant
must have a long-term lease on the parking prior to a building
permit being issued. Staff noted that the lease must be
submitted prior to a building permit being issued and that the
franchise requirements for signage must also be submitted.
The previous motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and
2 absent.
0
March 30, 2000
ITEM NO.: B FILE NO.: Z-6809
NAME: Bed and Breakfast Inn - Short -Form PD -C
LOCATION: Southwest corner of West 7t' and Cedar Streets
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Brad Bell White-Daters and Associates
4112 "A" Street 401 S. Victory Street
Little Rock, AR 72205 Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: -0.83 acre NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: R-5
& O-3
ALLOWED USES:
PROPOSED USE:
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Multifamily Residential and
Office
Hotel
None requested.
The applicant proposes to rezone the property at the
southwest corner of West 7t' and Cedar Streets from R-5/0-3
to PD -C to allow for the construction of a hotel. The
proposed hotel will consist of 26,426 square feet (heated
and cooled area) and 60 rooms. The proposed building will
be a three-story structure with an overall height of
approximately 44 feet from finished grade to the peak of
the roof (approximately 35 feet to mid -roof line.).
The proposed site plan includes a parking area for 34
vehicles within the east portion of the property and along
the north side of the building. The applicant has noted an
intent to lease 32 parking spaces from DAMS, in order to
comply with the typical ordinance minimum for a 60 room
hotel (66 parking spaces typically required by ordinance).
The applicant is proposing two (2) access points from West
7t' Street. The westernmost drive is proposed to be an
"entry only" drive as requested by Public Works. A 2 foot
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z-6809
by 3 foot "entry only" sign is proposed at this drive
location.
The proposed building, drives and parking areas are noted
on the attached site plan.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
There are two (2) existing multifamily structures and
parking areas on the site, which will be removed with the
proposed construction. The UAMS campus is located to the
north (across West 7th Street) and west. Interstate 630
is immediately south, with two (2) office buildings across
I-630. There are single family residential structures to
the northeast, across Cedar Street.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received no neighborhood
comment. The Capitol View Stifft Station, Forest Hills and
Pine to Woodrow Neighborhood Associations were notified of
the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. West 7th and Cedar Streets are classified on the Master
Street Plan as commercial streets. Dedicate right-of-
way to 30 feet from centerline.
2. A 20 foot radial dedication of right-of-way is required
at the corner of West 7th and Cedar Streets.
3. Provide design of streets conforming to " MSP" (Master
Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to
these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned
development.
4. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
5. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
6. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
7. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing
street lights as required by Section 31-403 of the
Little Rock Code. All requests should be forwarded to
Traffic Engineering.
8. Cedar Street has a 1996 average traffic count of 5,100.
6
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z-6809
9. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 3-210 or Ordinance
18,031. Redesign west drive to entry only.
10. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway
right-of-way from AHTD, District VI.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected.
AP&L: There is an existing primary circuit located on the
north and east sides of the existing buildings.
Relocation or removal cost may be incurred by the
developer. 15 foot easement requested. Contact Jerome
Strickland at 569-5448 for details.
Arkla: No Comment.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment.
Water: There appears to be a conflict with a 12" water
main in Elm Street (abandoned). Any required relocation
of water facilities will be at developer's expense.
On-site fire protection may be required.
Fire Department: No Comment.
County Plannin : No Comment received.
CATA: No Comment received.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
This request is located in the I-630 Planning District. The
Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this location.
If the proposed use is not a public use, Staff considers
that proposed use to be consistent if it fits the adjoining
land use categories. The proposed zone changes from R-5
Urban Residential and 0-3 General Office to a Planned
Office District for a motel is consistent with the
adjoining Land Use Plan categories of Mixed Use and Office.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The Woodruff
Neighborhood Area Plan recommends land uses that are
consistent with the Public Institutional category west of
Cedar Street. Other goals include reviewing neighborhood
zoning for appropriateness to preserve the character of the
neighborhood's community and to work with UAMS to stabilize
the western edge of the neighborhood.
3
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
Landscape Issues:
FILE NO.: Z-6809
Areas set aside for buffers meet with ordinance
requirements.
The proposed areas set aside for interior landscaping fall
short of the 954 square feet required by the Landscape
Ordinance by 438 square feet.
G. ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan and additional
information to staff on February 2, 2000. The revised plan
changes the parking design and shows a dumpster area (the
original site plan had a basement parking area, which has
been eliminated). Additional interior landscaping has been
shown.
As noted in paragraph A of this report, the applicant is
proposing 34 on-site parking spaces. The ordinance would
typically require 66 on-site parking spaces for a 60 room
hotel. The applicant has noted that 32 spaces will be
leased from a nearby UAMS parking lot. The applicant needs
to provide staff with an executed lease for the additional
parking.
Also noted in paragraph A, the applicant has shown a 2 foot
by 3 foot "entry only" sign at the westernmost drive. This
is the only sign shown on the site plan. The applicant
needs to provide staff with the additional sign details.
Along with the revised site plan, the applicant submitted a
north/south section of the property showing the existing
and finished grades. The section notes that the site will
be lowered approximately 10 feet from the existing
elevation at the curb line of West 7t' Street to a retaining
wall located on the south side of the building (approximate
distance of 125 feet). The retaining wall on the south
side of the building will be approximately 10 feet in
height.
Otherwise, to staff's knowledge there are no additional
outstanding issues associated with this site plan. With an
approved signage plan and executed lease for the additional
parking, the proposed PD -C rezoning should have no adverse
effect on the general area.
4
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
H. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
FILE NO.: Z-6809
Staff recommends approval of the PD -C rezoning subject to
the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D, E and F of this report.
2. The applicant must submit an executed lease agreement for
the additional parking on the-UAMS property.
3. The applicant must provide sign details to staff.
4. The dumpster must be screened on three (3) sides with an
8 foot opaque fence or wall.
5. Any site lighting should be low-level and directed away
from adjacent property.
6. The westernmost access drive from West 7th Street must be
an "entry only" drive.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(JANUARY 27, 2000)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application. Staff
briefly described the proposed PD -C site plan, noting that
information on signage and north/south sections needed to be
provided. Staff also noted that if the applicant wished to
receive credit for parking spaces on the UAMS property, a
written agreement from UAMS needed to be provided.
The Public Works requirements were briefly discussed. It was
noted that the west drive needed to be an entry drive only.
This issue was briefly discussed.
The landscape requirements were also discussed. It was noted
that additional interior landscaping needed to be provided. Mr.
Daters noted that the required interior landscaping would be
provided.
There being no further issues for discussion, the Committee
forwarded the PD -C to the full Commission for resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(FEBRUARY 17, 2000)
Tim Daters and Brad Bell were present, representing the
application. Staff briefly described the PD -C rezoning, with a
recommendation of approval with conditions. Staff noted that
the issues relating to signage and parking had been resolved.
5
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6809
Staff noted that two (2) ground -mounted signs were shown on the
site plan (a 4 foot high, 24 square foot monument -type sign
along West 7th Street and a 30 foot high, 160 square foot maximum
ground -mounted sign at the southwest corner of the property).
Staff also noted that a letter from UAMS had been received,
agreeing to lease the applicant 30 parking spaces. Staff noted
that a building permit for the.project-.would not be.issued until
a executed lease for the parking is submitted to staff.
Antoinette Fiduccia, of the Capital View Stifft Station
Neighborhood Association, addressed the Commission with
concerns. She stated that she had a concern with the parking
issue. She stated that UAMS is currently parking on the
residential streets in the area. She also stated that she did
not want additional parking lots along Cedar Street. She noted
that there are two (2) other hotels in the area that she would
like to see renovated. She -concluded by stating that UAMS could
use this property for office uses.
Tim Daters addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He briefly described the property and the proposed
project. He stated that he was not familiar with the parking
problem on the UAMS campus.
Robert Hamilton, of the Capitol View Stifft Station Neighborhood
Association, addressed the Commission. He stated that he was
not opposed to the hotel use, but he wished to work with the
applicant to resolve the parking issue.
Brad Bell addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He addressed the parking issue. He noted that
there is ample parking on the UAMS campus. He stated that the
parking for the hotel will not effect the neighborhood.
Mr. Bell stated that there had been 90 police calls to this
property over the last two (2) years, and that eliminating the
existing apartment buildings will be on asset to the
neighborhood. He noted that renovation of the two (2) existing
hotels in the area was not an option.
Mr. Daters noted that UAMS had declined to purchase this
property in the past.
Commissioner Hawn objected to Mr. Bell's attitude toward the
parking issue and the neighborhood. He asked about traffic flow
to and from the property.
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z-6809
Mr. Daters described the traffic flow with respect to the two
(2) proposed drives. There was additional discussion concerning
the traffic circulation issue.
Bob Turner, of Public Works, addressed the traffic circulation
issue. He described how the proposed drives would function.
Commissioner Muse commented on the 1996 traffic count as
provided by Public Works. He stated that UAMS had grown since
1996.
Mr. Turner stated that the 1996 count was the most recent. He
agreed that traffic has increased in this area since then.
Commissioner Muse made additional comments related to traffic
and parking. He noted that he was in favor of deferring the
application so the applicant could meet with the neighborhood.
Commissioner Lowery asked if a new traffic count could be done
if the item were deferred.
Mr. Turner stated that a traffic count could be done within a
week.
Commissioner Earnest stated that he viewed the proposed hotel as
an improvement to the area. He noted that the hotel could act
as a buffer between the neighborhood and DAMS, which would
benefit the neighborhood and UAMS long-term.
Commissioner Rahman stated that he had a problem with the
proposed lease for additional parking.
Chairman Berry referred to the previously approved PCD at the
corner of Kavanaugh Blvd. and Spruce Street, which has leased
parking.
Commissioner Nunnley asked if the applicant would consider
deferring the application.
Mr. Daters noted that he would defer the application and meet
with the neighborhood.
Commissioner Nunnley asked how many hotel rooms the parking on
the site plan would serve.
7
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-6809
Jim Lawson, Director of Planning and Development, noted that the
parking would serve approximately 31 rooms.
There was a discussion of a possible deferral of the item. Mr.
Lawson suggested deferral to the March 30 agenda.
The Planning Commission asked that a new traffic count be done
by Public Works.
Commissioner Downing asked about vehicle circulation in this
area. This issue was briefly discussed.
The Commission took a brief recess at the request of the
television crew.
After the recess, Mr. Daters formally requested a deferral to
the March 30, 2000 agenda.
A motion was made to defer the application to the March 30, 2000
agenda. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and
2 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 30, 2000)
Tim Daters and John Seiter were present, representing the
application. Staff briefly described the proposed PD -C, with a
recommendation of approval with conditions. Staff noted that
the Capitol View Stifft Station Neighborhood Association had
submitted two letters with specific concerns, and that the
applicant had received a copy of the letters.
Bob Turner, Director of Public Works, presented the Commission
with the recent traffic counts for the area. In response to a
question from the Commission, Mr. Turner noted that the current
traffic counts were an increase from the previous counts.
Tim Daters addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He stated that he had met with the neighborhood
association. Mr. Daters noted the following in response to the
neighborhood concern:
1. A long-term lease for the parking would be executed prior to
a building permit application.
2. Landscape screening would be installed between the parking
area and Cedar Street.
8
March 30, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6809
3. The maximum area for the proposed ground -mounted sign would
be reduced to 130 square feet.
In response to a question from the Commission, staff noted that
the applicant had requested a ground -mounted sign with a maximum
height of 30 feet and a maximum area of 160 square feet.
Commissioner Lowry asked Mr. Daters about the terms of the lease
for parking. Mr. Daters responded that the lease would be for a
minimum of 20 years.
Commissioner Muse asked about the sign type. Mr. Daters stated
that it would be a 30 foot high pylon sign and would be lighted.
Commissioner Berry suggested that the hotel would be primarily
supported by the VA and UAMS, and a minimal amount of signage
would be needed. Mr. Daters noted that there were franchise
requirements for signage. This issue was briefly discussed.
John Seiter noted that the franchise required that there be a
ground -mounted sign. Commissioner Berry suggested that the
franchise requirement may not be appropriate for this situation.
Commissioner Muse asked if anyone from the neighborhood
association wished to respond. There was no one from the
association present.
Commissioner Lowry asked that a condition be placed on the
application that the sign have a maximum height of 30 feet and a
maximum area of 130 square feet or the minimum size sign allowed
by the franchise, whichever is less. This issue was briefly
discussed.
There was a motion to approve the PD -C subject to the conditions
as noted by staff, the additional conditions offered by the
applicant and the condition on signage as noted in the previous
paragraph.
Commissioner Earnest commented on the fact that the applicant
must have a long-term lease on the parking prior to a building
permit being issued. Staff noted that the lease must be
submitted prior to a building permit being issued and that the
franchise requirements for signage must also be submitted.
The previous motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and
2 absent.
0