Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6806-A Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z -6806-A NAME: Pleasant Hill Road Short -form POD LOCATION: 13701 Pleasant Hill Road DEVELOPER: WXA Enterprises P.O. Box 260 Roopville, GA 30170 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 319 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 202 Little Roc, AR 72201 AREA: 7.50 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 URRENT ZONING: PD -I ALLOWED USES: Excavating Company PROPOSED ZONING: POD FT. NEW STREET: 0 PROPOSED USE: Single-family Residential and Office VARIAN C ESMAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: The site housed a nonconforming industrial status until the site was rezoned to PD -I on March 21, 2000 (Ordinance No. 18,237). The proposal included the existing business FILE NO.: Z -6806-A (Cont. at the time, CSR Hydro Conduit and James Rogers Excavation and gave the owners the ability to expand their operation. The request included the placement of additional new buildings, building additions and equipment storage and the placement of parking areas. The nonconforming status had been in existence since prior to the property's annexation into the City of Little Rock in 1980. The additions were never made. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The current proposal consists of 7.5 acres, located on Pleasant Hill Road (a private street), west of Vimy Ridge Road. The property is currently approved as PD -I. The owners desire to rezone the site to POD to allow the residential unit located on the site to function as corporate residential unit and the office building located on the site as a quite office unit. The site currently contains a graveled area behind the single-family home. The applicant proposes to remove the gravel area and place topsoil in this area and reseed the site to give a residential appearance. There is a single story concrete block building to be remodeled and used as an engineering design office, specializing in the design of pole structures for power line facilities all construction materials, equipment etc. currently on the site will be removed from the site. The applicant was issued a notice of violation of the Land Alteration Ordinance. The applicant removed the trees around the perimeter of the site. A restoration plan was been submitted to Public Works and approved subject to the rezoning approval. If the zoning is approved the applicant will be required to replant one tree for each tree cut on the non-residential portion of the site. If the rezoning is not approved the applicant will be required to replant one tree for each tree removed from the entire site. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: C The site contains a single-family structure along with two non-residential buildings. The single-family structure contains a large area in the rear that has been graveled and equipment is being stored. There are not any trees located along the perimeter of the site. The area to the east of the site contains single-family residential homes located on large lots. The area to the north, south and west are currently vacant tree covered site. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one letter in opposition of the proposed request. The Quail Run and the Alexander Road Neighborhood Associations and Southwest United for Progress, along with all residents who could be 2 NO.: Z -6806-A identified located within 300 feet of the site and all owners of property located within 200 feet of the site were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A 50 -foot access easement for Pleasant Hill Road should be shown on the plat. 2. Any future construction will require widening Pleasant Hill Road for two lane access. 3. Compliance with the approved site restoration plan is required. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: F Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Ener : If project requires relocation of any facilities, this will be at the expense of the owner. If this is conflict with current easements for lines "A" and "LM - 4" Center -Point Entergy Arkla will retain this easement. Contact Arkla at 377-4549 for additional details. SBC: Approved as submitted. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water at 992-2438 if additional water service is needed. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Fire Department- Approved as submitted. County Planning- No comment received. CATH: No comment received. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN, Planning Division: This request is located in the Otter Creek Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Office Development for a new engineering office. Since this application is a change from an existing PZD (PD -1) to a new PZD (POD), with a resulting reduction in use (from PD -I to POD), the request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. 3 FILE NO.: Z -6806-A G City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the Chicot / 1-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan. The plan does not contain any goals, objectives, or action statements that are relative to this application. Landscape: No comment. Building Codes: No comment. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT (May 22, 2003) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the application. Staff introduced the proposal stating the case was a rezoning request and the applicant had violated the Land Alteration Ordinance. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a plan to Public Works and staff was agreeable to the restoration plan. Staff indicated to Mr. McGetrick there were additional items needed to complete the review of the rezoning request. Staff requested the days and hours of operation and the number of employees reporting to the site. Staff also questioned if there would be any outdoor storage areas. Mr. McGetrick stated he would verify with his clients but to his knowledge there was to be no outdoor storage. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the road was a private street and if there was to be any future construction the road would have to be widened to two travel lanes. Staff also stated compliance with the approved restoration site plan would be required. There being no further items for discussion. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the May 22, 2003 Subdivision Committee Meeting. The applicant has indicated there are 15 employees of the company reporting to the site periodically. The applicant has also indicated there are approximately 3 customers daily. The applicant proposes the days and hours of operation to be from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. There are five parking spaces proposed as a part of the development. The site contains an existing 2550 square foot building and the applicant has indicated a 2000 square foot future addition. The site is a large area and although the parking proposed is not sufficient to meet the typical minimum parking demand for 2550 square foot office (6 spaces typical minimum) staff feels parking should not be an issue. El FILE NO.: Z -6806-A The applicant has indicated there will be three to four pickups stored on the site. These trucks will be parked near the office building, which is located to the rear of the site and should have limited effect on the area residents. There is to be no other outdoor storage of materials or vehicles. There will not be a dumpster located on the site. The existing fencing will remain on the site. The non-residential portion of the site is enclosed with a six foot chain link fence. The residential portion is not fenced and will remain open. The applicant has indicated the single-family portion will become a corporate residence. There is an area in the rear, which is currently covered in gravel. The gravel will be removed and the applicant proposes to place topsoil in this area and reseed the site. This will give a more residential appearance to the site. The applicant has indicated the garage will be used for automobile parking only. The applicant has proposed the placement of a single ground mounted sign near the entrance of the site. The sign is proposed to conform to signage allowed in office zones or no more than six feet in height and sixty-four square feet in area. Staff recommends approval of the requested signage. The site has been used for non-residential uses for a number of years and will more than likely not redevelop as a residential use. Staff feels the proposed use is less intense than the previous use and should have minimal to no adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request as filed subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of this report. PLANNING -COMM ISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 2003) Mr. Pat McGetrick of McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers was present representing the application. There was one objector present. Staff presented the item stating the request was for a rezoning from PD -I to POD a less intensive use. Staff stated they had received one letter in opposition of the proposed request. Staff stated the Public Works conditions should be revised to include, the dedication of right-of-way 30—feet from the center line of Pleasant Hill Road would be required and with any future construction the roadway would need to be constructed to Master Street Plan standard. Mr. Gary Briggs addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. He stated his desire was to return the site to R-2, Single-family zoning. 5 FILE NO.: Z -6806-A (Cont.) Mr. McGetrick stated the desire of the applicant was to return the existing single-family structure to a residential structure to be used as a corporate residence. He stated the applicant would also clean the site of the remaining industrial equipment stored on the site. Mr. McGetrick stated the use was a low intensity use with approximately five (5) of the fifteen (15) employees accessing the site daily and there would be limited customer traffic. There was a limited discussion concerning the feasibility of the site returning to a residential use. Staff stated this was not likely. A motion was made to approve the application as filed. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 no and 1 absent. C. June 12, 2003 ITEM NO.: 14 FILE NO.: Z -6806-A NAME: Pleasant Hill Road Short -form POD LOCATION: 13701 Pleasant Hill Road DEVELOPER: WXA Enterprises P.O. Box 260 Roopville, GA 30170 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 319 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 202 Little Roc, AR 72201 AREA: 7.50 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS FT. NEW STREET: 0 CURRENT ZONING: PD -1 ALLOWED USES: Excavating Company PROPOSED ZONING: POD PROPOSED USE: Single-family Residential and Office VARIANCESMAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: The site housed a nonconforming industrial status until the site was rezoned to PD -1 on March 21, 2000 (Ordinance No. 18,237). The proposal included the existing business at the time, CSR Hydro Conduit and James Rogers Excavation and gave the owners the ability to expand their operation. The request included the placement of additional new buildings, building additions and equipment storage and the placement of parking areas. The nonconforming status had been in existence since prior to the property's annexation into the City of Little Rock in 1980. The additions were never made. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The current proposal consists of 7.5 acres, located on Pleasant Hill Road (a private street), west of Vimy Ridge Road. The property is currently approved as PD -1. The owners desire to rezone the site to POD to allow the residential unit located on the site to function as corporate residential unit and the office building located on the site as a quite office unit. June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con't. Wk i;91WA1001:11I:f_1 The site currently contains a graveled area behind the single-family home. The applicant proposes to remove the gravel area and place topsoil in this area and reseed the site to give a residential appearance. There is a single story concrete block building to be remodeled and used as an engineering design office, specializing in the design of pole structures for power line facilities all construction materials, equipment etc. currently on the site will be removed from the site. The applicant was issued a notice of violation of the Land Alteration Ordinance. The applicant removed the trees around the perimeter of the site. A restoration plan was been submitted to Public Works and approved subject to the rezoning approval. If the zoning is approved the applicant will be required to replant one tree for each tree cut on the non-residential portion of the site. If the rezoning is not approved the applicant will be required to replant one tree for each tree removed from the entire site. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a single-family structure along with two non-residential buildings. The single-family structure contains a large area in the rear that has been graveled and equipment is being stored. There are not any trees located along the perimeter of the site. The area to the east of the site contains single-family residential homes located on large lots. The area to the north, south and west are currently vacant tree covered site. D. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one letter in opposition of the proposed request. The Quail Run and the Alexander Road Neighborhood Associations and Southwest United for Progress, along with all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site and all owners of property located within 200 feet of the site were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A 50 -foot access easement for Pleasant Hill plat. 2. Any future construction will require widening access. 3. Compliance with the approved site restoration 2 Road should be shown on the Pleasant Hill Road for two lane plan is required. June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con't.) FILE NO.: Z -6806-A E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: If project requires relocation of any facilities, this will be at the expense of the owner. If this is conflict with current easements for lines "A" and "LM - 4" Center -Point Entergy Arkla will retain this easement. Contact Arkla at 377-4549 for additional details. SBC: Approved as submitted. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water at 992-2438 if additional water service is needed. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment received. CATA: No comment received. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Otter Creek Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Office Development for a new engineering office. Since this application is a change from an existing PZD (PD -1) to a new PZD (POD), with a resulting reduction in use (from PD -I to POD), the request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the Chicot / 1-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan. The plan does not contain any goals, objectives, or action statements that are relative to this application. Landscape: No comment. Buildin Codes: No comment. 3 June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con FILE NO.: Z -6806-A G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (May 22, 2003) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the application. Staff introduced the proposal stating the case was a rezoning request and the applicant had violated the Land Alteration Ordinance. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a plan to Public Works and staff was agreeable to the restoration plan. Staff indicated to Mr. McGetrick there were additional items needed to complete the review of the rezoning request. Staff requested the days and hours of operation and the number of employees reporting to the site. Staff also questioned if there would be any outdoor storage areas. Mr. McGetrick stated he would verify with his clients but to his knowledge there was to be no outdoor storage. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the road was a private street and if there was to be any future construction the road would have to be widened to two travel lanes. Staff also stated compliance with the approved restoration site plan would be required. There being no further items for discussion. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the May 22, 2003 Subdivision Committee Meeting. The applicant has indicated there are 15 employees of the company reporting to the site periodically. The applicant has also indicated there are approximately 3 customers daily. The applicant proposes the days and hours of operation to be from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. There are five parking spaces proposed as a part of the development. The site contains an existing 2550 square foot building and the applicant has indicated a 2000 square foot future addition. The site is a large area and although the parking proposed is not sufficient to meet the typical minimum parking demand for 2550 square foot office (6 spaces typical minimum) staff feels parking should not be an issue. The applicant has indicated there will be three to four pickups stored on the site. These trucks will be parked near the office building, which is located to the rear of the site and should have limited effect on the area residents. There is to be no other outdoor storage of materials or vehicles. There will not be a dumpster located on the site. rd June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con't. FILE NO.: Z -6806-A The existing fencing will remain on the site. The non-residential portion of the site is enclosed with a six foot chain link fence. The residential portion is not fenced and will remain open. The applicant has indicated the single-family portion will become a corporate residence. There is an area in the rear, which is currently covered in gravel. The gravel will be removed and the applicant proposes to place topsoil in this area and reseed the site. This will give a more residential appearance to the site. The applicant has indicated the garage will be used for automobile parking only. The applicant has proposed the placement of a single ground mounted sign near the entrance of the site. The sign is proposed to conform to signage allowed in office zones or no more than six feet in height and sixty-four square feet in area. Staff recommends approval of the requested signage. The site has been used for non-residential uses for a number of years and will more than likely not redevelop as a residential use. Staff feels the proposed use is less intense than the previous use and should have minimal to no adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request as filed subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of this report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 12, 2003) Mr. Pat McGetrick of McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers was present representing the application. There was one objector present. Staff presented the item stating the request was for a rezoning from PD -I to POD a less intensive use. Staff stated they had received one letter in opposition of the proposed request. Staff stated the Public Works conditions should be revised to include, the dedication of right-of-way 30—feet from the center line of Pleasant Hill Road would be required and with any future construction the roadway would need to be constructed to Master Street Plan standard. Mr. Gary Briggs addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. He stated his desire was to return the site to R-2, Single-family zoning. Mr. McGetrick stated the desire of the applicant was to return the existing single-family structure to a residential structure to be used as a corporate residence. He stated the applicant would also clean the site of the remaining industrial equipment stored on the site. Mr. McGetrick stated the use was a low intensity use with approximately five (5) of the fifteen (15) employees accessing the site daily and there would be limited customer traffic. 5 • June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con't. FILE NO.: Z -6806-A There was a limited discussion concerning the feasibility of the site returning to a residential use. Staff stated this was not likely. A motion was made to approve the application as filed. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 no and 1 absent. L June 12, 2003 ITEM NO.: 14 FILE NO.: Z -6806-A NAME: Pleasant Hill Road Short -form POD LOCATION: 13701 Pleasant Hill Road DEVELOPER: WXA Enterprises P.O. Box 260 Roopville, GA 30170 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 319 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 202 Little Roc, AR 72201 AREA: 7.50 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 CURRENT ZONING: PD -1 ALLOWED USES: Excavating Company PROPOSED ZONING: POD FT. NEW STREET: 0 PROPOSED USE: Single-family Residential and Office VARIANCESMAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: The site housed a nonconforming industrial status until the site was rezoned to PD -1 on March 21, 2000 (Ordinance No. 18,237). The proposal included the existing business at the time, CSR Hydro Conduit and James Rogers Excavation and gave the owners the ability to expand their operation. The request included the placement of additional new buildings, building additions and equipment storage and the placement of parking areas. The nonconforming status had been in existence since prior to the property's annexation into the City of Little Rock in 1980. The additions were never made. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The current proposal consists of 7.5 acres, located on Pleasant Hill Road (a private street), west of Vimy Ridge Road. The property is currently approved as PD -1. The owners desire to rezone the site to POD to allow the residential unit located on the site to function as corporate residential unit and the office building located on the site as a quite office unit. June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 1 LE NO.: Z -6806-A The site currently contains a graveled area behind the single-family home. The applicant proposes to remove the gravel area and place topsoil in this area and reseed the site to give a residential appearance. There is a single story concrete block building to be remodeled and used as an engineering design office, specializing in the design of pole structures for power line facilities all construction materials, equipment etc. currently on the site will be removed from the site. The applicant was issued a notice of violation of the Land Alteration Ordinance. The applicant removed the trees around the perimeter of the site. A restoration plan was been submitted to Public Works and approved subject to the rezoning approval. If the zoning is approved the applicant will be required to replant one tree for each tree cut on the non-residential portion of the site. If the rezoning is not approved the applicant will be required to replant one tree for each tree removed from the entire site. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains a single-family structure along with two non-residential buildings. The single-family structure contains a large area in the rear that has been graveled and equipment is being stored. There are not any trees located along the perimeter of the site. The area to the east of the site contains single-family residential homes located on large lots. The area to the north, south and west are currently vacant tree covered site. D. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received one letter in opposition of the proposed request. The Quail Run and the Alexander Road Neighborhood Associations and Southwest United for Progress, along with all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site and all owners of property located within 200 feet of the site were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A 50 -foot access easement for Pleasant Hill Road should be shown on the plat. p� 2. Any future construction will require widening Pleasant Hill Road -access 3. Compliance with the approved site restoration plan is required. P) June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con't.) FILE NO.: Z -6806-A E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: If project requires relocation of any facilities, this will be at the expense of the owner. If this is conflict with current easements for lines "A" and "LM - 4" Center -Point Entergy Arkla will retain this easement. Contact Arkla at 377-4549 for additional details. SBC: Approved as submitted. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water at 992-2438 if additional water service is needed. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment received. CATA: No comment received. F. iSSUESITECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Otter Creek Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Office Development for a new engineering office. Since this application is a change from an existing PZD (PD -1) to a new PZD (POD), with a resulting reduction in use (from PD -I to POD), the request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the Chicot / 1-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan. The plan does not contain any goals, objectives, or action statements that are relative to this application. Landscape: No comment. Buildina Codes: No comment. 3 June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: FILE NO.: Z -6806-A G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (May 22, 2003) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the application. Staff introduced the proposal stating the case was a rezoning request and the applicant had violated the Land Alteration Ordinance. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a plan to Public Works and staff was agreeable to the restoration plan. Staff indicated to Mr. McGetrick there were additional items needed to complete the review of the rezoning request. Staff requested the days and hours of operation and the number of employees reporting to the site. Staff also questioned if there would be any outdoor storage areas. Mr. McGetrick stated he would verify with his clients but to his knowledge there was to be no outdoor storage. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated the road was a private street and if there was to be any future construction the road would have to be widened to two travel lanes. Staff also stated compliance with the approved restoration site plan would be required. There being no further items for discussion. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the May 22, 2003 Subdivision Committee Meeting. The applicant has indicated there are 15 employees of the company reporting to the site periodically. The applicant has also indicated there are approximately 3 customers daily. The applicant proposes the days and hours of operation to be from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. There are five parking spaces proposed as a part of the development. The site contains an existing 2550 square foot building and the applicant has indicated a 2000 square foot future addition. The site is a large area and although the parking proposed is not sufficient to meet the typical minimum parking demand for 2550 square foot office (6 spaces typical minimum) staff feels parking should not be an issue. The applicant has indicated there will be three to four pickups stored on the site. These trucks will be parked near the office building, which is located to the rear of the site and should have limited effect on the area residents. There is to be no other outdoor storage of materials or vehicles. There will not be a dumpster located on the site. rd June 12, 2003 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 14 (con't. FILE NO.: Z -6806-A The existing fencing will remain on the site. The non-residential portion of the site is enclosed with a six foot chain link fence. The residential portion is not fenced and will remain open. The applicant has indicated the single-family portion will become a corporate residence. There is an area in the rear, which is currently covered in gravel. The gravel will be removed and the applicant proposes to place topsoil in this area and reseed the site. This will give a more residential appearance to the site. The applicant has indicated the garage will be used for automobile parking only. The applicant has proposed the placement of a single ground mounted sign near the entrance of the site. The sign is proposed to conform to signage allowed in office zones or no more than six feet in height and sixty-four square feet in area. Staff recommends approval of the requested signage. The site has been used for non-residential uses for more than likely not redevelop as a residential use. is less intense than the previous use and should impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: a number of years and will Staff feels the proposed use I ave minimal to no adverse Staff recommends approval of the request as filed subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of this report. 5 Subdivision Committee Comments ITEM NO.: 14 NAME: Pleasant Hill Road Short -form POD LOCATION: 13701 Pleasant Hill Road Planning Staff Comments: May 22, 2003 FILE NO.: Z -6806-A 1. Provide notification of property owners located within 200 -feet of the proposed development complete with the certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. 2. Provide details of the use of the garage adjacent to the residential structure. 3. Is any outdoor storage of equipment materials or vehicles proposed as a part of the development? 4. Provide the days and hours of operation. 5. Provide the number of employees and the anticipate customer traffic to the site. 6. Any additional site lighting must be low level and directional, directed inward, away from residentially zoned properties. 7. Will there be a dumpster located on the site? f so indicate the location along with screening details. 8. Is there any signage proposed as a part of the development? If so indicate the location and details (height/area) on the proposed site plan. Variance/Waivers: 1. None requested. Pi ihlin Wnrkc- 1. A 50 -foot access easement for Pleasant Hill Road should be shown on the plat. 2. Any future construction will require widening Pleasant Hill Road for two lane access. 3. Compliance with the approved site restoration plan is required. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Enery: If project requires relocation of any facilities, this will be at the expense of the owner. If this is conflict with current easements for lines "A" and "LM -4" Center -Point Entergy Arkla will retain this easement. Contact Arkla at 377-4549 for additional details. SBC: Approved as submitted. Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water at 992-2438 if additional water service is needed. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. County Planning: No comment received. CATA: No comment received. Planning Division: No comment. Landscape: No comment. Revised plat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised site plan (to include the additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, May 28, 2003. 3uno 12, 1994 SUBbrVISIGHS item No. 4 NAME1 Quail Run Subdivision LUCATION: Southeast intersection of pleasant Hills Gemetary Road and Vimy Ridge Road DEVELOPER: ENGINEER/APPLICANT: Jas:jes A. Rogers Mehlburger Tanner G Renshaw 13107 Pleasant Hill Road LiatlaBox o3037ckp AR 72203-3937 Little Rock, AR Phones 375-5331 ARBA: 24.457 acres N0. QE LOTS: 65 FT. OF NEW ST.s 3,000 ZOMNG: PRopOSED USES: Residential Subdivision A. Site History None. B. Sxietins Canditians This parcel is located in what can be generally described as a rural single family aria. It is bounded by Pleasant Hills Cemetery Road an the east and by Vimy Ridge Road on the west. ork-sitevegetatiocurrently n consists of mature treea. A 1001 p line bimportion of the property. C. Development Proposal %his is a proposal to plat 69 lots With an average size of 9,000 Llare feet. internal sv ba provided byresidentialstreets with50'Of right-of-way. The development will be Phased. Special requests include: (1) lot depth variances aLound Raylyn Court, (2) in -lieu contribution for construction of Vimy Ridge Road due to limited site distance a and the out parcel along this road, and (3) aCrset improvements on Pleasant hills Cemetery Road. D:, Eng ineer in Comment -s Dedicate right-of-way on e ROad l. arterial standards. Improve yVimy gRi Ridge toominor r arterial standards. �7sa>te l2, 19a4 SU] DIVISIONS Item No, 4 -- Continued 2. Enlarge turning radii at the entrance and at the Intersection of Sheri and Sandra Drives and Kaylyn Court. I I 3. Request status of Pleasant Hills Cemetery Road; street improvements may be required. E. Ansl 51s3 There is a pos5tbility that there aro subdivision and street name conflicts with this proposal., staff will research this. if so, tha applicant will be required to change the names. Variances have been requested for - :street improvements and lot depths. Staff reeommendS that no waiver be granted unless some hardship is established. A waiver of the minimum lot depth can be granted only if the applicant snakes tri# lots along Kaylyyn wider, so that they possess the minimum requirement of 7,004 square feet. We do not want to met a precedent for approving substandard lots. The applicant is requested to provide Juatification for Lata 29, 63, 64 and 65. what is the use proposed for Lots 63-65 since they are larger titan the remainder; The legal status of the out parcel .should be identified. If it was severed from its ownership, then i the owner must be a participant in this plat. F'.' Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SL IADIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: Thb item was reviewed by the Committee. It was determined that the applicant should: (lj Rename Sandra and Kaylyn Streetf �f (2) Seek participation in this plat of the owner of the to s out -parcel; no Provide informati❑n as to ha status a>= Pleasant rills_ 3toad; and �G '•+"?a C'.Yrr�r i4", Commit to none other than single family development on f this plat. i,^►f� x'64 ^.A'A .=;9GJ- k99 To. _ :13NJ'100 'a Wd ££=0y7 20 -'TT -Phil' "UBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: (Kkuku'lj 3. 4. 5- 6. 7. Pleasant Hill Road classified on the Master Street Plan as a c -gr l street. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. Provide design of street conforming to "MSP" (Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to this street including 5 -foot sidewalk with planned development. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance 16,577. Close one driveway. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing street lights as required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock Code. All requests should be forwarded to Traffic Engineering. A Grading Permit per Secs. 29-186(c) and (d) will be required with Building Permit. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements to serve property if necessary. AP&L: No Comment received. Arkla: No Comment. Southwestern Bell: No Comment. Water: Contact the Water Work if additional water service is needed. Fire Department: Place fire hydrant per city code. Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details. 3 Vk-�-- o6 9 s/EWdna- .: Z-6806 (Cont.] The Pleasant Hill property across Road to the north is ' undeveloped and wooded, as is the property immediately west. There are two (2) single family residences further west. There are single family residences to the east and southeast, with undeveloped property immediately south and southwest. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received two (2) phone calls from persons requesting information on this application. The Quail Run Neighborhood Association was notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: "UBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: (Kkuku'lj 3. 4. 5- 6. 7. Pleasant Hill Road classified on the Master Street Plan as a c -gr l street. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. Provide design of street conforming to "MSP" (Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to this street including 5 -foot sidewalk with planned development. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance 16,577. Close one driveway. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. Prepare a letter of pending development addressing street lights as required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock Code. All requests should be forwarded to Traffic Engineering. A Grading Permit per Secs. 29-186(c) and (d) will be required with Building Permit. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements to serve property if necessary. AP&L: No Comment received. Arkla: No Comment. Southwestern Bell: No Comment. Water: Contact the Water Work if additional water service is needed. Fire Department: Place fire hydrant per city code. Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details. 3