HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6780 Staff AnalysisJanuary 6, 2000
ITEM NO.: 23 FILE NO.: Z-6780
NAME: Southwestern Bell Telephone Exchange -
Conditional Use Permit
LOCATION: 6410 Highway 300
OWNER/APPLICANT: Southwestern Bell Telephone
PROPOSAL: To obtain a conditional use permit to
enlarge an existing telephone exchange
facility on property Zoned R-2, Single
Family Residential, at 6410 Highway 300.
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. SITE LOCATION:
This Southwestern Bell Telephone (SWBT) site is located
on the east side of Highway 300, just north of the
intersection with Highway 10.
2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD:
This site is Zoned R-2, Single Family Residential, and
is surrounded by the same zoning. Church property
surrounds the site to the north, east, and south. The
property across Highway 300 is currently undeveloped.
The property adjacent to the north of the church is
Zoned MF 18, Multi -family Residential. The church is
the only structure near the existing telephone exchange
building.
Staff believes the proposed expansion will not have an
adverse impact on the surrounding area when properly
screened from the church.
The Aberdeen Court Property Owners Association was
notified of the public hearing.
3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING:
An access drive to the church abuts the SWBT property
along its entire north property line. SWBT has a an
access easement from that drive and proposes to
January 6, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 23 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6780
continue to take access from it. They propose five
head -in parking spaces adjacent but perpendicular to
the drive in the northeast corner of their property.
That would result in asphalt covering the area between
the new building and the driveway for about 765 of the
north side of the SWBT property. That should adequately
serve the site.
4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS:
A screen consisting of either a 6 foot high opaque wood
fence with its face side directed outward, or dense
evergreen plantings which grow to 6 feet within three
years, is required along the eastern side of the
property. Save any trees possible on the site.
5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS:
a. Hwy. 300 is listed on the Master Street Plan as a
collector. A dedication of right-of-way to 30 feet
from centerline is required.
b. Provide design of streets conforming to "MSP"
(Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street
improvements to these streets including 5 -foot
sidewalks with planned development.
c. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be
submitted for approval prior to start of work.
d. Show access easements and construct improvements to
access easement per City standards.
e. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this
property.
f. A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec.
29-186(e) is required.
g. A Grading Permit per Secs. 29-186(c) and (d) is
required.
6. UTILITY AND FIRE DEPT. COMMENTS:
Water: Execution of a pre -annexation agreement is
required if water service is desired. An acreage charge
of $300 per acre applies in addition to normal charges.
E
January 6, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 23 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6780
Wastewater: No sewer service appears to be required
for this project. Contact the Wastewater Utility if
service is desired.
Southwestern Bell: Applicant for this submittal.
ARKLA: Approved as submitted.
Entergy: No comments received.
Fire Department: Contact Dennis Free, 371-3752, at the
fire department concerning fire protection.
CATA: No comment.
7. STAFF ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to
add 5300 square feet to an existing exchange building
that has existed at this site since 1958. The applicant
has stated that the expansion is needed to provide room
for equipment to service the growing population in West
Little Rock, and to provide federally mandated space
for competitors to locate equipment in the facility.
The addition would be one story, approximately 17 feet
high. SWBT planners estimate that this addition would
satisfy their needs for at least five years. They have
included a proposed future addition up to 3026 square
feet on the east side of this addition to meet future
growth as it occurs. The final proposed building would
require setback variances on all four sides as follows:
front 22 feet, rear 2 feet, north side 3 feet, and
south side 2 feet. Other siting requirements are
satisfied. Standard setbacks are 25 feet front and
rear, and 8 feet on the sides.
The applicant has stated that they have met with the
Winfield United Methodist Church leaders, the neighbor
to the east, and incorporated design features into the
new building to help lesson the impact on the church
such as: using a brick exterior to match the church
exterior, lowering the site into the ground on the side
adjacent to the church so that the building and
3
January 6, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 23 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z-6780
equipment will be less imposing, agreeing to install a
6 foot decorative wood fence above the retaining wall
on the east to further lesson that impact, and instal-
ling an emergency generator designed for maximum quiet
operation.
Staff believes SWBT has proposed to do as much as they
can to make this proposal compatible with the
neighborhood for a site that is critical to current and
future growth of phone service in West Little Rock.
8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit
subject to compliance with the following conditions:
a. Comply with the City's Landscape and Buffer
Ordinances.
b. Comply with Public Works Comments.
c. Comply with Fire Department Comment.
d. All exterior lighting must be low intensity and
directed downward and inward to the property and
not towards any residential zoned area.
Staff also recommends approval of the reduced setback
variance on all four sides of the expanded building as
shown on the site plan.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (December 9, 1999)
Don Walker of SWBT and Bill Canino of Canino/Peckham
Architects were present representing the application. Staff
gave a brief description of the proposal.
The areas reviewed concentrated on Public Works Comments,
Screening and Buffer requirements, setback requirements
versus proposed setbacks, and site lighting requirements if
exterior lighting is installed. The applicant reviewed the
steps they planned to take to lesson the impact on the
church and what was driving the need for expansion.
4
January 6, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 23 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6780
There being no further issues, the Committee accepted the
proposal and forwarded the item to the full Commission for
final action.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(January 6, 2000)
Don Walker was present representing the application. There
were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the
item with a recommendation for approval subject to
compliance with the conditions listed under "Staff
Recommendation," paragraph 8 above.
The item was placed
submitted to include
vote was 11 ayes, 0
on the Consent Agenda and approved as
staff comments and recommendations. The
nays and 0 absent.
After the Consent Agenda had been passed and the people
whose items had been approved had left, Mr. Lawson brought
to the attention of the Chairperson that Mr. Charles Randel
wanted to make a comment about the item. He had completed a
card marking that he was in support of the item, and so he
hadn't been recognized earlier since the item was listed for
consent approval. The Chair recognized Mr. Randel.
Mr. Randel commented that the Winfield United Methodist
Church would like some additional shrubbery placed along
the area shown to be a privacy fence on the site plan to
break up the austerity of the fence. They also wanted some
sod placed on a bare area along the south side of SWBT's
property near the church's parking lot.
The item had been approved so it was too late to
more conditions, but Mr. Lawson suggested to the
Staff pass on the desires to SWBT and let the two
work it out. The Chair agreed.
5
add any
Chair that
parties