HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6754 Staff AnalysisOctober 25, 1999
Item No.: 7
File No.
Owner:
Address:
Description:
Zoned:
Variance Requested:
Justification:
Present Use of Proper :
Proposed Use of Property:
Staff Report:
A. Public Works Issues:
Z-6754
Little Rock Chamber of Commerce
200 East Markham Street
Part of Block 34, Original City
GB
A variance is requested from
the off-street parking provisions
of Section 36-417.
There is a lack of space on the
site to accommodate the needed
building size and the required
parking.
Parking lot
New Chamber of Commerce building
Recommend Deferral until following:
1. Applicant needs to provide right-of-way documents
clearly defining right-of-way proposed and existing
right-of-way for Main Street Bridge and La Harpe Blvd.
for AHTD approval prior to Board of Adjustment Action.
Parking spaces shown will be changed significantly if
this approval is not obtained.
2. Variances in design standards for curb radii,
centerline radii, and pavement width must be submitted
to AHTD for approval.
3. Pavement width of 25 feet from face of curb to face of
curb and 33 feet from double yellow to face of curb on
La Harpe Blvd. is acceptable to Staff -subject to AHTD
approval.
However, right-of-way width and median width for both
La Harpe Blvd. and Markham Street require Board of
October 25, 1999
Item No.: 7 (Cont.)
Director's approval prior to issue going to Board of
Adjustment. Pavement on Markham Street shall align
with width west (40.5 wide back of curb to back of
curb). Curb radii shall be improved to 30 feet and
access ramp relocations will be required to include
angled ramp at La Harpe Blvd. and Markham Street and
ramp to west at Main Street.
4. Sidewalk on La Harpe Blvd. is to be buffered and be
minimum 5 feet wide.
5. Curb line on La Harpe Blvd. west of drive is to be
angled back to allow deceleration to maximum extent and
to allow 6 feet sidewalk at closest point.
6. Parking shall be angled in lot to indicate one way
movement and to make spaces accessible.
7. Right-of-way is to be widened on Markham to 5 feet from
back of curb in area of bus drop off.
8. 5 foot sidewalks are needed between ballards and tree
wells in bus drop off area.
9. Alignment on La Harpe Blvd. as shown, shall be
coordinated with curb construction to east. If not,
reconstruction will be required.
10. Traffic signals shall be relocated to accommodate
construction at La Harpe Blvd. and Markham Street.
B. Staff Analysis:
The Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce proposes to
construct a new, three story, 17,000 square feet building on
the GB zoned property located at 200 East Markham Street.
The project comprises the entirety of the block bounded by
East Markham, La Harpe and the Main Street bridge. The
proposed 17,000 office use requires 56 on-site parking
spaces. (1 space per 300 square feet of building). The
site plan proposes 27 parking spaces, 3 of which don't meet
ordinance standards and must be removed, leaving 24 on-site
parking spaces. The applicant is requesting a variance to
allow for a reduction in the number of spaces.
Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Although
there is a shortage of public parking immediately adjacent
to the site, there appears to be adequate parking available
within the larger area around the site. A public parking
deck is located one block to the south, at 2nd and Main
Streets. A public parking lot with a 3 hour parking limit,
is located across La Harpe, to the north. An hourly parking
lot is located to the northeast, also across La Harpe. A
2
October 25, 1999
Item No.: 7 (Cont.
substantial portion of the site is set aside for public
plazas, reducing the area available for on-site parking.
On September 16, 1999, the Planning Commission approved a
comprehensive rezoning plan for Downtown Little Rock. The
complex pattern of zoning, including the Central Little Rock
Urban Renewal Project Zoning, will be replaced by the Urban
Use (UU) and Low Density Residential (R4 -A) Districts. The
Chamber site is included within the Urban Use District. No
off-street parking is required in the'Urban Use District.
The Board of Directors is schedule to act on the zoning plan
on October 19, 1999. As it is currently worded, the
Rezoning Ordinance will not take effect for 6 months after
it is passed by the Board.
There are numerous right-of-way issues yet to be resolved,
as noted in Public Works Comments. Portions of the site
proposed for development lie within current right-of-way.
The applicant is working with the Arkansas Highway and
Transportation Department and the City's Public Works
Department to address those issues. The Public Works staff
has suggested deferral of this item until these issues are
resolved. The Planning Staff would prefer that the Board of
Adjustment address the issue before it, the parking
variance. Approval of the variance can be conditioned upon
the other issues being resolved. If the right-of-way issues
are not resolved, the site plan will have no value and the
applicant will have to "start from scratch."
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested parking variance
sublect to compliance with the following conditions:
1. Compliance with Public Works Comments including any
variance of those requirements as may be granted by the
Board of Directors.
2. Compliance with the
Ordinances.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
Pat McGetrick was present
were no objectors present.
recommendation of approval
conditions outlined in the
City's Landscape and Buffer
(OCTOBER 25, 1999)
representing the application. There
Staff presented the item and a
subject to compliance with the
" Staff Recommendation" above.
3
October 25, 1999
Item No.: 7 (Cont.)
In response to questions from the Board, Mr. McGetrick stated
that the Chamber employed 12-13 full-time persons and that 30
percent of the building area was taken up by an auditorium that
would not be used on a daily basis.
In response to a question from Norm Floyd, Mr. McGetrick stated
that parking available in the area was sufficient to meet the
Chamber's daily needs. Mr. McGetrick also stated that it was not
financially feasible to put a parking structure under the
building.
A motion was made to approve the parking variance subject to
compliance with the conditions proposed by staff. The motion was
approved by a vote of 4 ayes, 1 noes and 0 absent.
4