Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6712 Staff AnalysisJuly 26, 1999 Item No.: 11 File No.: Z-6712 Owner: Robert Powers Address: 224 Normandy Road Description: West 40 feet of Lot 89 and all of Lots 90 and 91, Normandy Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the building line provisions of Section 31-12 and the accessory building area provisions of Section 36-156. Justification: Applicant's Statement: The variance for the property located at 224 Normandy Road is requested for the removal of a twenty (20) feet building line. The building line runs horizontally through the center of the property that functions as the backyard. It prohibits any additions that would better accommodate our family in using the backyard as a recreational area. We request to have the building line removed in order to build a lap pool and to install a child -life play gym for our children. The lap pool would be approximately as long as standard pool and about one-half the width. The child -life gym is slightly taller than a standard swingset to accommodate a fort on one end. (The information concerning the child -life gym is included here because it is bolted to the ground, i.e., removable but not readily moveable.) Present Use of Property: Single Family July 26, 1999 Item No.: 11 (Cont.) Proposed Use of Property: Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: Single Family The R-2 zoned property located at 224 Normandy Road is occupied by a two-story, brick and frame, single-family residence. A 25 foot building line extends along the street side (front) property line and a 20 foot building line extends along the rear property line. The applicant proposes to build a small swimming pool and a Child -Life play gym in the rear yard. The pool and gym would be built across the rear platted building line. The proposed pool is to have a front yard setback of 54 feet. The code requires a front yard setback of 60 feet for accessory structures in the R-2 district. During staff's review of the application, it was noted that a portion of the existing house extends across the front building line. As part of this action, staff proposed amending the front building line to address that encroachment. Staff believes the requests to be reasonable. Staff suggests eliminating the rear platted building line altogether. The properties to the rear are also occupied by single-family residences. Other than for the minor 6 foot front yard setback variance, the proposed pool meets or exceeds all setback requirements. The playground equipment is exempt from zoning setback requirements (Sec. 36-5(7)). The existing carport, which appears to be many years old, extends across the front platted building line by approximately 12 feet at the far corner. In so much as this situation has existed for many years and is obviously a permanent structure, staff believes it is appropriate to approve a building line variance, adjusting the building line around the carport. If the Board approves the building line variances, the applicant will have to do a replat, reflecting the changes in the building line. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's Office to 2 July 26, 1999 Item No.: 11 (Cont.) determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends -approval of the 6 foot front yard setback variance for the proposed pool, the building line variance for the existing carport and eliminating the rear 20 foot building line subject to a replat reflecting the change in the building lines as approved by the Board. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JULY 26, 1999) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval subject to a replat reflecting the change in the building lines. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff. The vote was 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. 3