HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6673 Staff AnalysisMay 24, 1999
Item No.: 5
File No.:
Owner:
Address:
Descri tion:
Zoned:
Variance Requested:
Justification:
Present Use of Property
Proposed Use of Property:
Staff Report:
Z-6673
Pebble Beach Company
1800 Sawgrass Dr.
Lot 1, Pebble Beach Estates Phase I
��
Variances are requested from the
area regulations of Section 36-254
and the building line provisions of
Section 31-12 to permit
construction with a reduced front
yard and which crosses a platted
building line.
The topography of the lot (steep
slope) makes it unfeasible and
undesirable to set back to the 25
foot building line.
Vacant lot
Single Family residence
A. Public Works Issues: No Comments.
B. Staff Analvsis:
The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family
residence on the R-2 zoned property located at 1800 Sawgrass
Drive. The applicant proposes to build across the platted
25 foot front building line, resulting in a front yard
setback of 15 feet. The Code requires a front yard setback
of 25 feet for this R-2 zoned lot.
Staff believes the variance request to be reasonable. The
lot has been filled near the front to provide a level
building area. A swale cuts across the lot approximately
2/3 of the distance from the front property line. Beyond
May 24, 1999
Item No.: 5 (Cont.
the swale, the property rises in elevation near the rear
property line. Putting the house behind the 25 foot
building line would require additional filling and grading
to provide a reasonable building site. Reduced front
building lines are not uncommon in the Pebble Beach Estate
Addition, including lots directly across the street from
this site. Allowing the reduced front yard setback is not
out of character with the neighborhood and should have no
impact on adjacent properties. The house will have a
setback from the curb of the street of 27± feet. All other
required setbacks will be met or exceeded.
The site plan submitted by the applicant proposes reducing
the building line to 15 feet across the entire width of the
property. Staff believes it is more appropriate to reduce
the building line only to the extent necessary to
accommodate the proposed house. The building line will
remain at 25 feet other than at the point the house is
proposed to encroach across the 25 foot line by 10 feet.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the
applicant will have to do a one -lot replat reflecting the
change in the building line as approved by the Board. The
applicant should review the filing procedure with the
Circuit Clerk's Office to determine if the replat requires a
revised Bill of Assurance.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested building line and
front yard setback variances only to the extent necessary to
accommodate the proposed house subject to compliance with
the following conditions:
1. A one -lot replat reflecting the change in the building
line as approved by the Board.
2. Submission of a revised site plan showing the building
line being varied only to the extent necessary to
accommodate the proposed house.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(MAY 24, 1999)
Items 4 (Z-6672) and 5 (Z-6673) were discussed concurrently and
voted on separately.
K
May 24, 1999
Item No.: 5 (Cont.)
Pat McGetrick was present representing the application. There
were no objectors present. Staff presented items 4 and 5 and
offered a recommendation of approval, subject to a one -lot replat
reflecting the change in the building line. Staff informed the
Board that the applicant had submitted revised site plans showing
the building line being varied only to the extent necessary to
accommodate the proposed homes.
In response to a question from Norm Floyd, Mr. McGetrick stated
that he originally platted the lots. Mr. Floyd stated that he
had a problem with developers platting unbuildable lots and then
coming to the Board of Adjustment for variances.
In response to a question from Mr. Floyd, Mr. McGetrick stated
that there was a specific home proposed for 1901 Sawgrass (No. 4,
Z-6672) but that no specific home was proposed for 1800 Sawgrass
(No. 5, Z-6673). Mr. Floyd stated that he had no problem with
the minor variance requested for 1901 Sawgrass but that he
questioned the need for the variance at 1800 Sawgrass.
There was further discussion of the swale and hillside on the
property at 1800 Sawgrass. Mr. McGetrick stated that a home
could be built on the lot without a variance but that it would
involve additional cutting and filling of the lot. Mr. Floyd
asked if drainage in the swale could be put underground. Mr.
McGetrick responded that the swale did not carry the amount of
water that would require a culvert. During the discussion, Tad
Borkowski of Public Works stated that the plat of the Subdivision
had been approved and that Public Works did not have a problem
with the drainage on the lot at 1800 Sawgrass.
A motion was made to approve the requested building line variance
for 1901 Sawgrass (No. 4, Z-6672) subject to a one -lot replat.
The motion was approved by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
A motion was then made to defer item 5, Z-6673 to allow Public
Works to further review the drainage issue. There was a brief
discussion of what information was expected from Public Works.
Mr. McGetrick stated that the question was not a Public Works
issue, since there was no drainage easement on the lot and since
the swale did not carry water run-off from other lots or the
street. The motion to defer was withdrawn.
A motion was made to approve the requested building line and
setback variances for 1800 Sawgrass (No. 5, Z-6673) subject to
a one lot replat. The motion was approved by a vote of 3 ayes,
2 noes and 0 absent.