Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6520 Staff AnalysisAugust 6,,11998- ITEM ,,1998_ITEM NO.: D NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location: FILE NO.: Z-6520 Pulaski Academy - Conditional Use Permit 19,000 Block of Denny Road Pulaski Academy, Inc./ Don Swanson To allow the phased construction of a multigrade school complex on 48.5 acres of R-2 zoned land along Denny Road at Gordon Road. At this time the Commission is asked to consider approval of the overall concept shown in the Master Plan layout and approval to construct phase 1. Future phases would be submitted to staff for administrative approval as long as there are not significant changes from the original Master Plan. This site is located on the south side of Denny Road at its intersection with Gordon Road approximately 0.6 miles west of the intersection of Denny Road and Kanis Road. 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood: This R-2 zoned property is currently undeveloped, tree covered land. This site is surrounded by R-2 property. Across Denny to the north are large tracts with single family residences. To the west and south are undeveloped tree covered tracts. To the southeast is another large tract with a single family residence. This proposed use should be able to minimize the effects on the surrounding properties and area in general by maintaining all existing trees where ever possible, and with proper screening of this site from Denny Road and adjacent residential properties. There are no neighborhood associations in close proximity to this site. August 6, 1998_ ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin Access to the site will be primarily through a loop road off Denny Road. The loop would intersect Denny Road near the west and east ends of the property. There will be another access, to serve a faculty parking lot and after school dropoff/pickup point, with a smaller loop road off of Denny Road in the west half of the property near the Gordon Road intersection. The primary "Loop" road will vary between 24, to 36, wide with a 12' wide drop off lane provided at the west end buildings. Direction of traffic flow on the final completed loop road will be decided through traffic studies and coordination with City Traffic Engineers. General parking areas are blocked off in the master plan with the number of spaces for each area shown. A total of 534 spaces are indicated for the whole campus. Phase 1 parking requirements are based on the number of classrooms and employees, and number of students included in phase 1. Phase 1 provides 108 parking spaces which will exceed ordinance parking requirements. Phase 1 access will be the west end of the final loop road. It will extend to the first parking lot which will serve as a drive through turn around so traffic may return to the single access point. Half of the faculty/visitor parking lot will also be constructed in phase 1. 4. Screening and Buffers: The conceptual plan submitted appears to show that areas set aside for buffers and landscaping meet and exceed ordinance requirements when averaged out. It does, however, indicate that portions of proposed buffers along Denny Road drop about 5 feet below the full 20 foot width requirement. Also, portions of the land use buffers along the western and southern perimeters appear to drop below the full width requirement of 40 feet. A 6 foot high opaque screen is required along the western and southern perimeters of the site. Unless otherwise provided for, this screen may be dense evergreen plantings or a wooden fence with its face side directed outward. At least sixty percent of the required 40 foot wide land use buffers are required to remain in their natural state. 2 August 6., 1998 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 Curb and gutter or another approved border will be required to protect landscaped areas from vehicular traffic. Dumpster locations should be identified and screened on three sides to a height of 8 feet. The City Beautiful Commission recommends saving as many trees as feasible. Extra credit toward complying with the landscape ordinance can be given when saving trees of 6 inch caliper or larger. Site clearing should be limited to each phase as developed, no total clearing should occur. Prior to construction, three copies of a detailed landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by Bob Brown, Plans Review Specialist. He may be reached at 371-4864. 5. Public Works Comments: 1. Participate in traffic signal cost installation (75% of engineering cost, inspection, and construction cost), when warranted by standard criteria. 2. Denny Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline is required. 3. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance 31 4. Provide design of streets conforming to "MSP" (Master Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development. 5. Stormwater detention Ordinance applies to this property. 6. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities are required. 6. utility and Fire Department Comments: Water: Annexation to the City or execution of a Pre - Annexation Agreement is required. An acreage charge of $300 per acre and a development fee based on the size of connections applies in addition to the normal connection charges. On site fire protection is needed. Wastewater: Outside service boundary. No comment. Southwestern Bell: Approved as submitted. ARKLA and AP&L: No Comments received. 3 August 6, 1998 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 Fire Department: Coordinate with Fire Department for number and location of hydrants and to ensure access to three sides of all buildings. LATA: This site is not on a CATA bus route. 7. Staff Analysis: Pulaski Academy, Inc. is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for the phased construction of a private school on this R-2 zoned, 48.5 acre site. This would be a relocation from their Hinson Road location. The proposed site is about 1.5 miles outside the city limit via Kanis and Denny Road, or less than 200, from one point across Denny Road. However, it is within the City's extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction. The process for annexation of this property has been initiated. The development is proposed to take place in about six phases. The Commission is being asked to review and approve the overall Master Plan for the whole campus and the specifics of phase 1. Future phases would be submitted to staff with detailed site plans for each phase for administrative review. As long as there are no significant changes from the original master plan, staff would have administrative approval authority. Significant changes would necessitate going back to the Commission for approval. Significant to be determined by Planning and Development Department head. The phases for construction are dependent on funding and other factors. Only phase 1 is known in detail and it consists of building #1, Early Childhood Division, and the traffic facilities and parking that are shown going to and near that building. This first building will consist of 56,645 square feet, serving up to 273 students ages 3 and 4, kindergarten and 1st grade. There will be about 30 employees plus kitchen and custodial staff; 23 of those positions are teachers. There will be 16-20 classrooms plus a kitchen, gymnasium, and administrative staff offices. Access from Denny will be primarily at the point shown as the west end of the loop road on the Master Plan. That road will be'two-way to the first parking lot, which will also be. a drive through turn around to return traffic to Denny via the same road. That lot will provide 50 parking spaces. A secondary access will be the faculty/visitor parking lot shown on the Master Plan. Only the west half will be built in phase 4 August 6,_1998 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 1 along with the dropoff point at the southeast part of the building. This lot will initially provide 58 parking spaces. The applicant is requesting they be allowed to phase in street improvements to Denny Road. They will work with city traffic personnel to determine the improvements required and when they must be done. Less than normal 25, front setbacks have been requested along Denny Road for the tennis courts with fence located with only a 15' setback; practice field with fence with a 10' setback; baseball field with fence at 15' setback. These reduced setbacks will require a variance. The dark wind net on the tennis fence must not cause a blind spot for the service road next to it, making entry onto Denny dangerous. The applicant is requesting one main monument style lighted sign with marquee, 10, tall, located at either the east entrance or near the center of the property along Denny Road. In addition they requested up to five additional monument style informational/directional signs, one at each drive off of Denny Road. These will be reviewed in detail against the sign ordinance at the time the applicant applies for the sign permits. 8. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the overall master plan and the detailed phase 1 as shown on attached drawings, subject to all noted staff comments. Staff also recommends approval of the variance for the reduced setback along Denny for the sports facilities as long as that does not cause any visibility problems along Denny Road. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JULY. 2, 1998) Don Swanson, Fred Perkins and several other persons from Pulaski Academy and their architectural firm were present representing the application. Staff gave a brief description of the proposal. The Public Works and landscaping and buffer comments were reviewed and questions addressed with the applicant. The concept of the overall Master Plan development of this school campus, what phase 1 includes, and their desire to maintain as much of the natural beauty of the property as possible were explained by the applicant. A revised site plan was also presented for phase 1. 5 August 6, 19,98 ITEM NO.: D (Cont. Staff asked the applicant information regarding the for phase 1 and all future that parking requirements was also asked to provide the development such as si the future approval proces place. FILE NO.: Z-6520 to provide some additional number of classrooms and employees phases as they are submitted, so can be determined. The applicant a letter listing other aspects of gns, fencing/screening, and how s for future phases will take There being no other issues, the Committee accepted the proposal and forwarded it to the full Commission for final resolution, subject to receiving the above information. STAFF UPDATE: The information requested from the applicant at the Subdivision Committee has been provided. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 23, 1998) Arch McIntosh, "Head of Schools" for Pulaski Academy, Don Swanson, business manager for Pulaski Academy, and Tim Daters, Engineer were present representing the application. There were four persons present who were opposed to the proposal. Jim Lawson, Director of Planning and Development, gave some general comments to clarify the distinctions between this C.U.P. application and the annexation application. One of his main points was that these items can be addressed separately and considered independently. In considering the C.U.P., the issues to be considered are the overall plan and design, access to Denny Road and accompanying traffic concerns, and what impact this development will have on the neighborhood. Mr. Lawson also reminded the Commission that because of the problems with traffic and space at their current location the City has been encouraging them to find a larger site. He also made the point that approval of this C.U.P. does not bound the Commission to approve the annexation. Steve Giles from the City Attorney's Office made the point that this is a site development question and does stand alone from the annexation question. Bob Turner from Public Works addressed in general the concerns over traffic as seen by their staff. He stated that as the Academy develops this property, they would have to make improvements to the adjacent part of Denny Road including 75% of the cost of traffic signals when warranted. The school is also building an internal road on their G August 6, 1998. ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 property to take most of the activity off of Denny Road, particularly regarding dropoff/pickup. The Public Works staff felt that these actions would enable Denny Road to accommodate the increased traffic. As the detail plans for the various phases are brought in, their staff will continue to work with the Academy to address the traffic issue. In response to questions from Chairman Lichty, Mr. Turner stated the school is responsible for improvements to roads only adjacent to their property, and the closest improved segment of road to their property is Chenal Parkway at the present time. Arch McIntosh and Don Swanson gave a presentation of the proposal and Master Plan for the development of this new school campus. They described how and why they came to the current location and layout and the details of that plan. Mr. McIntosh stated that the school would be paying 100% of the cost of infrastructure improvements and making road improvements along Denny Road. They hope to begin construction in early 1999 if approved, and open Phase I in the fall of 2000. Ms. Ruth Bell from the League of Women Voters, and Kathy Wells representing the Downtown Neighborhood Association and the Coalition of Little Rock Neighborhoods, spoke in opposition. They both felt that the C.U.P. and annexation should be discussed together. Ms. Wells emphasized several questions that would be issues related to the annexation more so than the C.U.P., such as impact to the sewer and water systems, federal funding issues related to annexation, police and fire protection. Mr. and Mrs. Simmons, property owners adjacent on the southeast corner to the Academy's property also presented several concerns regarding impacts this development would have on them. In particular their concerns were: location of the ball fields and the related noise and lighting overflow of the traffic generated by activities there; impact to an access road to their property; existing drainage problems being increased by the development. Chris Barrier, the attorney for Pulaski Academy, stated that the access road would have to be maintained and be included in the plan when they get to that part of the project. He also agreed that drainage issues would also be dealt with as part of the plan. Staff agreed that these would be part of the conditions of the C.U.P. and are also looked at in review for building permits. Several commissioners engaged in a lengthy discussion regarding procedural issues, land use, comments about ties to the annexation question, depth of the Commission's review 7 August 6, 1998 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 of a C.U.P. application, and the idea of deferring this item to consider it with the annexation question. In response to a question from Commissioner Berry, Mr. McIntosh stated that the Pulaski Academy Board of Directors would have to decide if they would pursue this development if the annexation was disapproved. Mr. Lawson made the point that it is possible, and has occurred in other instances even along Denny Road, (i.e. Wildwood Performing Arts Center), that water, sewage and fire protection can be provided without annexation. That is a Board action and decision they will make. The Commission's decisions should be addressing the use, site plan, traffic and neighborhood impact. The Commission would make a statement through their decision on the C.U.P. about their view on these issues. Tim Daters responded to commissioner's questions regarding water, sewage and site information. He stated that this property is included in an existing water district fed by 12" and 16" mains, which is part of the Little Rock Municipal Water System. So water is already available and the supply system in place and paid for according to Mr. Daters. This property is also in what is known as the Rock Creek Drainage Basin Wastewater System. Therefore, other than attachment fees and charges for the Academy, there would be no large system expansion required. Mr. Daters stated, therefore, the Academy's needs can be met with the systems that are in place. Commissioner Earnest stated that he sees the Commission's role in the case of this application is to look at a public policy issue of whether the public's interest is being served by this expansion and annexation in an area not yet developed. For that reason annexation and the C.U.P. should be considered together. A motion was made to approve the application as applied for. Chairman Lichty then asked the applicant if they would like to ask for a deferral. The applicant said no they would not. Discussion ensued regarding the motion. A second motion was made to table the discussion and the motion on the floor until the August 6 hearing. The second motion for tabling passed by a vote of 9 ayes and 2 ayes. Mr. Lawson then asked Chairman Lichty to provide staff with a list by July 27 of any additional information or questions they want addressed for the August 6 meeting. Rl August -6, 1998 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: FILE NO.: Z-6520 (AUGUST 6, 1998) Arch McIntosh, "Head of Schools" for Pulaski Academy; Judge Wendell Griffen, member of the Academy's Board of Directors; Fred Perkins, architect for Pulaski Academy; -Greg Simmons from Peters and Associate.Engin.eers; and Chris Barrier, attorney for the Academy, were all present_ representing the application. There were three persons present who were opposed to the proposal. Staff briefly presented the item, gave a recommendation for approval, and gave the status of the item regarding action taken by the Commission at its July 23, 1998 meeting. Judge Wendell Griffen spoke for the Academy and briefly covered the background for why the Academy chose the Denny Road site to move to from the current site on Hinson Road. He then touched upon the Master Plan for the new site and the relation to having to vacate temporary buildings on the current site by August 2000. He emphasized that traffic safety and building density were the two primary reasons for moving from Hinson Road. Next Judge Griffen addressed in detail several issues that had been brought up by those in opposition to the proposal. He re-emphasized that Pulaski Academy would pay all costs for on-site infrastructure construction and utility connection, pay the cost of widening Denny Road adjacent to their site, and pay 75% of cost for a traffic light at Kanis and Denny intersection when warranted. Judge Griffen continued by saying the Academy has no intention to seek the City or any one else to subsidize the development of this site. He also quoted the City Police and Fire Department statements that this development will have no appreciable prospect for increased police or fire department costs. Fred Perkins explained the revised site plan for phase 1 covering in particular how the buildings, parking and drives are all layed out to fit the topography of the land. He also explained the cross-section view showing how much ground excavation will be needed. In response to Commissioner,Hawn's question regarding impacts on the adjacent resident to the southeast, Chris B4rrier, Attorney for Pulaski Academy, and staff responded that access to the property must be maintained, and that ordinance provisions would not allow this development to result in flooding runoff onto that adjacent property. In response to a question from Commissioner Nunnley, staff responding that there are no problems with the new on site Loop Road being located in the right-of-way for the overhead powerline. August 6,. 1998 ITEM NO.: D (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6520 In response to Commissioner Muse's questions regarding traffic flow on-site and along Denny Road, a lengthy discussion took place about the direction of traffic flow on the Loop Road and the ability of Denny Road to handle the future volume. Staff recommended that traffic flow through the site be in only one direction along the Loop Road and that its design will provide adequate traffic handling. Staff stated that Denny Road will handle its anticipated traffic flow and that the turning lanes that would be constructed by the Academy along Denny Road would adequately deal with the potential problems created by turning into the Academy's site. A motion was made to approve the application as submitted to include staff comments and the recommendation that the on- site Loop Road have one way traffic. The motion was approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 1 noe and 1 absent. 10