The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZ-6532-G Application 2February 2, 2015 Page 5 (e) Landsca in : Deltic acknowledges that Mr. Crain's limited site plan generally identifies areas which will be landscaped and the handwritten application filed with the ACC identifies the varieties of certain plants, shrubs and trees which are to be incorporated into the site plan. However, Section 3.3.e of the Guidelines contemplates a detailed landscaping plan showing all planting areas at a scale of 1 = equals 20 = or larger showing each of seven different elements including, plant materials (size, quantity and type), bed areas, screening, buffer strips, irrigation limits, detention ponds and walkways. The site plan as submitted does not meet these specifications and more detail is required before the submission is complete. (f) Gradin Plan: As contemplated in Section 3.3.a of the submission requirements, the site plan should show the existing topography of the site and further demonstrate what grading must be accomplished in order to accommodate the proposed construction on the site. Mr. Crain's email of October 27 indicates that the site plan "stipulates the area of advanced grading" and goes on to say that "because ATRS (the prior owner) completed the original advanced grading, very little area that is not already graded will be disturbed" by additional advanced grading. As submitted, none of the site plan materials include anything approaching either a topographical depiction of the site or a detailed grading plan. Without having a detailed grading plan which takes into account any topographical or elevation challenges implicit in the Property, it is extremely difficult, if not virtually impossible, to determine whether the proposed structures shown in Mr. Crain's two-dimensional site plan, together with necessary infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, driveways, easements, retaining walls and other structural elements, can be constructed within the area covered by the site plan. In addition, as noted above, the site plan must also show all "existing trees" 12" in diameter or greater (although Deltic acknowledges that reasonable latitude should be permitted with regard to this portion of the Guidelines). Portions of the site plan have been "cleared" (which may not be the same as "grading" with Mr. Crain's site plan in mind), but other portions have not and a review of the site plan confirms that no changes in elevation are shown as required. Until such time as these detailed elements are available, no final approval for the site plan and the development can be given. Furthermore, without a detailed grading plan, there are serious questions about whether the site plan as presented to the City can be built. 1244896-v1 February 2, 2015 Page 6 (g) Detention and Draina e: Another of the elements contemplated in Section 3.3.c of the Guidelines is the adequacy of how "existing" detention ponds will be affected by grading of the site and whether the relocation of such detention ponds and related facilities will be adequate under both the Guidelines as well as the City's detention requirements. In Mr. Crain's email dated October 27, 2014, he stated that the existing detention pond on the property is not "dedicated" and is "unnecessary" to accommodate storm water detention on the "broader development." Yet Mr. Crain has offered nothing more than the bare statement that "our preliminary calculations" demonstrate that the two small detention ponds shown on the site plans will "handle all required detention," Without a detailed grading plan and demonstration of such calculations, it is not clear that Deltic, the ACC or the City can or should rely upon Mr, Crain's conclusions. While such statements may ultimately be demonstrated as accurate, the Guidelines contemplate a demonstration that such detention issues have been adequately addressed as part of the review and approval process. Here again the site plan and supporting materials submitted so far are inadequate for review by and comments from either Deltic or the ACC. (h) Utility Easements: The Guidelines also require identification and location on the site plan of all necessary utility easements to provide water, sewer, electricity, gas, communications and other public utility services to the site. The site plan submitted by Mr. Crain included no such elements and therefore it is impossible to determine if adequate allowances for such utility easements have been factored into the site plan, and the site plan cannot be approved in its current state. (i) Signage: Section 5.5 of the Guidelines provides that ", . . no signs may be erected on any lot, common area, or building without approval of the Architectural Control Committee." Presently neither the limited site plan nor the ACC application includes any mention of signage or whore the proposed development signs would be located. In view of Deltic's objection to direct access to the site from Chenal Valley Drive, it is unlikely that a request for a sign on Chenal Valley Drive would be approved in any form. 1244896-vl February 2, 2015 Page 7 Conclusion: The foregoing list is a continuing good faith attempt to both identify features of the site plan presently before the City which may not be acceptable to either Deltic or the ACC, and to highlight some of the portions of the site plan which are deficient when viewed in the context of the Guidelines and ACC submission requirements. Because Mr. Crain seeks approval of a new PD -R, all of the elements identified herein are indeed relevant to a determination of whether the proposed development in its present configuration and density can be built on the site. It is Deltic's view that unless these elements, and probably others as well, are addressed in detail and in advance of final zoning approval, Deltic, the ACC and the City cannot be confident that the plan presently under consideration is indeed the final site plan, Sincerely yours, WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP J 1 John William Spive IT Attorneys for Deltic imber rporation JWS/jlh Cc: Mayor Mark Stodola Bruce Moore, City Manager Tom Carpenter, City Attorney 1244896-v l Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 111 Center Street Suite 1900 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 379-1700 • (501) 379-1701 — Fax J, Cliff McKinney, 11 Direct Dial emekinney@ggtiaw.com 501-379-1725 Liccnsed in Arkwms, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas Direct Fax LEEDO Accredited Professional 501-379-3825 January 7, 2015 John William Spivey III Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Re: Chenal Heights Long Form PD -R (Z -6532-C), located East of Chenal Parkway and South of Chenal Heights Drive Dear Bill: We are in receipt of your January 6, 2015 letter regarding the above -referenced rezoning. We maintain our belief that the City of Little Rock Board of Directors should not have deferred this matter as all we requested was a vote on a purely city issue, while the issues between my client and Deltic Timber Corporation ("Deltic") are purely private issues. There is no reason that the Board of Directors should not approve Mr. Crain's requested rezoning knowing that his development remains subject to the approval of the Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee. That being said, as the new owner of the property in question, Mr. Crain remains willing to work with Deltic, though Mr. Crain is still reluctant to spend the literally tens of thousands of dollars that Deltic is demanding be spent just to determine if Mr. Crain's plans might possibly be approved. Mr. Crain's needs the assurance that the City will approve the rezoning request before making such an enormous investment of time and resources. However, he is willing to request a deferral of the January 20, 2015 Board of Directors hearing if a representative of Deltic will agree to attend a meeting with him, which you and I can attend. Our hope would be to find a middle ground where Mr. Crain can provide the information that Deltic can reasonably expect at this time while not having to generate full, construction -ready plans without knowing whether the Board of Directors will approve the rezoning. If this proposal is acceptable to you, please provide dates when we can schedule a meeting between Deltic's representative and Mr. Crain. We will then request that the Board of Directors defer the hearing scheduled for January 20, 2015. Sincerely, QUATTLEBAUM, GROOMS & TULL PLLC J. Cliff McKinney, II Cc: Mayor Mark Stodola Mr. Bruce Moore Mr. Tom Carpenter RDWARD L. WRIGHT (Inn3.I n77) RODER'I' S. LINDSrY (1013.1001) ALSTON119NNINGS (1017.2004) GORDONS. RATITER. ,IR. ,1011N II. TISDAUr ,IOIIN WII,LIAM SPIVEY IH 11NIR J. Mu )ROW N.M. NORTON CIIARLiSS'I'. COLEMAN EDWIN L. LOW9'III:R. ,111. r RI(C O IIY'1'. '10NP;8 WALTER MnSPADDrN ,IOIIN D. DAVIS JUDY SIMMONS I•IRNRY RIMBERI.Y WO O O 'I'UCI(13fI TROY A. PRICE KATIIRYN A. PRYOR ,I, MARI( DAVIS JERRY J. SALLINGS WILLIAM STUART IACK80N MICIIAEI, D. RARNNS ST13PTIEN 11. LANCASTISR XYI.I( R. WILSON ,I. CIIARLRS no Urllrll'rV 1IUSTIN T. AI,I,I'N MICNrLLr M. I(ARNIMNIILINr SCO'T'T ANDRPW IRIIY PATRICK 1). WI1,90N DAVID P, GLOVE It REGINA A. YOUNG PAUL D. MORRIS GARY D. MAR'T'S, ,113. WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 2300 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 . FAX (501) 376-9442 NORTHWEST ARKANSAS 3333 PINNACLE HILLS PARKWAY, SUITE 610 ROOERS, ARKANSAS 72768.8880 (478) 886-0888 . FAX (478) 088.8832 www.wlj.com Writer's Direct Dial No. 501-212-1310 jspivey®wlj.com Reply to Little Rock Office December 9, 2014 Cliff McKinney Quattlebaum, Grooms, Tull PLLC 111 Center Street, Suite 1900 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 rRIC "R015R P. DrI,ANNA IIADILLA CAI.15Y 13. VO ,JOIINA'1'IIAN D. 11ORTON ,IANI: A. RIM ADRI rNNr 1.. 13AI(11,13 DAVID 1,. ,IONrS W. CARSON TUCI(ER KRISTRN S. MOYCRS ERIN S. IIROGUON 111:1, PREY 1,. 91NCLr1'ON RICIIARD DLAI(rLY GLASGOW DIANA ROROOGNONI SNYDrR PATRICI( M. YOUNO 131ANCA M. RUCI(ER ANTWAN D. PHILLIPS DAX'I'1)R P. ❑R RNNON M3Cll AIi December 9, 2014 Page 2 I have described the review process as a "back and forth" exchange. The materials you submit will be carefully reviewed and depending upon the level of detail and how soon these materials are delivered, completion of the process could take several weeks. Accordingly, on behalf of Deltic, I would ask that Mr. Crain commence the review process immediately rather than delay until a relatively short period before the January 20th meeting. I would direct your attention to my letter to Mr. Crain dated September 15, 2014, as a guide for the scope and content of the information previously requested by Deltic. We are, of course, prepared to discuss with you each of the areas of concern and will consider any reasonable proposal for addressing the suggested scope of review. Should the review provoke additional questions or identify other areas of concern, Deltic will inform Mr. Crain as promptly as possible. Once again, I am available to discuss with you your questions and to assist you in facilitating the review process. Cordially, WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP John William Spivey III JWS/jlh Cc: Mayor Mark Stodola Mr. Bruce Moore Mr. Tom Carpenter 1238885-v1 November 24, 2014 Mayor Mark Stodola Members of the Board of Directors City Hall 500 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Lot 2, Chenal Heights Long Form PD -R (Z -6532-C), located East of Chenal Parkway and South of Chenal Heights Drive Dear Mayor Stodola and Members of the Board of Directors: On behalf of the Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee (the "ACC"), we wish to address you with regard to the captioned matter which will be before the City Board for consideration at your regular meeting on December 2, 2014. As you know from past experience, all developments, whether commercial or residential, located in the Chenal Valley Neighborhoods in West Little Rock are subject to review and approval by the ACC. The ACC review process, while similar to that undertaken by the City's Planning and Public Works Staffs, the Planning Commission and the Little Rock Board of Directors, is rigorous and requires that the Applicant provide detailed plans and specifications before approval to commence construction can be given. It has been the ACC's consistent experience that prior consideration and approval by the ACC eliminates the probability that an application such as the present one must come back through the Little Rock Planning process for approval of changes necessitated by compliance with development guidelines enforced by the ACC. The present Application involves property located in the Chenal Valley Commercial Neighborhood and is a part of a larger tract which was originally the subject of a PD -R the City approved for the benefit of the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (the "ATRS") a number of years ago. Although the ATRS subsequently abandoned its plans to develop the larger tract, since that time a number of smaller developments have occurred within the boundaries of the original ATRS property, each of which was approved by both the ACC and Deltic Timber Corporation, grantor of the property to ATRS, and each such prior development has been completed in a manner consistent with development restrictions placed or the 1236764-v 1 November 24, 2014 Page 2 larger tract at the time it was purchased by ATRS and as otherwise prescribed by the ACC. The present Applicant has pledged to adhere to both the development restrictions and to the Chenal Valley Commercial Neighborhood Design Guidelines, however, the Applicant has failed to provide the ACC with either detailed development plans or other preliminary information necessary to the review and approval of the proposed project by the ACC. The ACC also notes that based upon the information provided to the ACC and that submitted to the City in connection with the review of the Application by the Little Rock Planning Commission, the ACC cannot say whether the development can be or will be approved in its present format. Subsequent ACC review and approval may well necessitate the resubmission of the Application to the City for reconsideration by the Staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Directors. In general, the ACC has no objection to the proposed purpose of the Applicant's proposed development, however, we believe consideration of this Application by the City Board at the present time is premature and may make it necessary for the Board of Directors to reconsider the revised development plan at a future date. It is with the highest regard for the Board's prerogatives that we respectfully ask that this Application and approval of the Ordinance before you on December 2, 2014, be deferred until such time as the Applicant has completed the ACC review process and obtained approval for all elements of its proposed development. Sincerely, CHENAL VALLEY ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE By: 1�CC, 1236764-v1 RDWARD L. WRIGII7' (IRD 10WR WRIGHT LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP I,IG 131, I,GKI` "l", P. nISLANNA PADILI,A RODRRT S. LINDST,Y CA1,KY 13. VO ,IOIiNA'I'IIAN D. MORTON (1R13•IRRI) ATTORNEYS AT LAW IANI, A. KIM ALSTON ,1INNINGS ADRIRNNd I, UAICfR (IR17•anR4l R L. GORDO14 S. RATIIKR. ,IR. W. C N .11UC W.CARSON '1' 11 CI,KR ,IOIIN It 'r1s DAI,C JOHN WILTTAM SP1Vl,Y In 200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 2300 I'll, r 171 N1 S.. r1)I?OGDONIIS N.M.I O RTOI N)ROW LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201.-3698 R11=A1317 RGOG I,Y Scow N CIIARLKS T. COI,P:MAN 44. (601) 371-0808 . FAX (601) 376-8442 I S DIANA DO M. YOUNG SNYnSI, n EDWIN I,. LOWTHER, GRRGORY'1, ,1ON11,S i ANGArRIC`MM RUCRNR ANTWAN D. PIIILT,II'S WAVIER MaSPADOEN BAXTER D. DRI,NNON ,IOIIN D. DAVIS JUDY SIMMONS TIRNRY NORTHWEST ARKANSAS MICIIAKI, A.'I'IIOMPSON I(IM136RI,Y WOOD TUCKKIt sKTll ii. .1"WI, I.1, )IAYDKN W. SHUROAR TROY A PRICK 3333 PINNACLE HILLS PARKWAY, SUITE 810 ,IAIMIK G. MOSS KATIIRYN A. PRY011 ROGI:K6, ARKANSAS 72766.8900 AMAII A. E5MAR11,POUR d. MART( DAVIS ,II,RRY d. SALLTNGS (479) 060.0588 . FAX (470) 08(,•8932 R. AARON 13ROOK5 it. CA IU1. STAIII, WILLIAM STUAIVI',IACKSON DAVID ,113 NG DAVID MICIIART, n. RARNKS A.C. SCOT'I' A. 0U0'I'ON STEPIIEN It. I,ANCASTE.R www,wlj.cotll KYI,T, It. WILSON nr coN1. ,I. CIlAR1,J,S n00011"R'rY Writer's Direct Dial No, 601-212-1$10 MOODY MO ,JOAN ,IUS'NN 1'. AL1,1:N MIOHEI,LE M. KAIIMMI,I?LING 9 )IVe O� WlJ,00M 1V G. d011N C.. LK ROGI,H A. GLASGOW SGO'1'9'ANDREW 11111Y Reply to Little Rock Office PRKD M. I'I,RI(INS III PA'PRIGI( 1). WII,SON JASON 13. III,NDREN DAVIT) P. GLOVKR ,11311FRRY L. SINGI,KTON RNOINA A. YOUNG PAUL n. MORRIS January 6, 2015 DRUCR R, LINDSKY ,IAMNS R. VAN DOVI411 GARY D. MAR'I'S, ,IR. Vice Email Cliff McKinney Quattlebaum, Grooms, Tull PLLC 111 Center Street, Suite 1900 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Lot 2, Chenal Heights Long Form PD -R (Z -6532-C), located East of Chenal Parkway and South of Chenal Heights Drive Dear Cliff: It has now been five weeks since the Little Rock Board of Directors voted to defer your client's application for rezoning until such time as both Deltic Timber Corporation and the Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee ("ACC") had received detailed information about his project, had time to review the same and had issued responses to his plans for the project. As of today's date, Tuesday, January 6, 2015, we have received no response from either Mr. Crain or you concerning the project and have received no information with regard to the contemplated review by the ACC and Deltic. Only two weeks remain before the Little Rock Board of Directors is scheduled to reconsider your client's rezoning application. Given the complexity of Mr, Crain's project and the amount of detailed information which is typically produced and reviewed in connection with the similar projects, it is most unlikely that Deltic, and we presume the ACC as well, will be able to receive, review and issue comments before the January 20th meeting date even if all of the necessary information is received this week. Of course, Deltic will make every effort to consider any information your client offers but we are unable to tell you that agreement on the 1241681-vl WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP January 6, 2015 Page 2 final project details can be assured prior to the City Board meeting on January 20th. We urge you to consider seeking the Little Rock City Board's agreement, in advance of January 20th, to extend the deferral period for a reasonable additional amount of time during which project review can be completed. This is, of course, merely a suggestion and one which Deltic believes is in the best interest of all parties concerned with this matter. I will be happy to discuss this suggestion with you at your convenience should you be interested in making such a request to the City. Cordially, WRIGHT, LIND Y & JENNINGS LLP 4 John William Spivey III JWS/jlh Cc: Mayor Mark Stodola Mr. Bruce Moore Mr. Tom Carpenter 1241581-vl Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 1 11 Center Street Suite 1900 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 379-1700 • (501) 379-1701 — Fax J. Cliff McKinney, Il Direct Dial cmckinney@ggtlaw.00m 501-379-1725 Licensed in Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas Direct Fax LEED® Accredited Professional 501-379-3825 January 7, 2015 John William Spivey III Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Re: Chenal Heights Long Form PD -R (Z -6532-C), located East of Chenal Parkway and South of Chenal Heights Drive Dear Bill: We are in receipt of your January 6, 2015 letter regarding the above -referenced rezoning. We maintain our belief that the City of Little Rock Board of Directors should not have deferred this matter as all we requested was a vote on a purely city issue, while the issues between my client and Deltic Timber Corporation ("Deltic") are purely private issues. There is no reason that the Board of Directors should not approve Mr. Crain's requested rezoning knowing that his development remains subject to the approval of the Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee. That being said, as the new owner of the property in question, Mr. Crain remains willing to work with Deltic, though Mr. Crain is still reluctant to spend the literally tens of thousands of dollars that Deltic is demanding be spent just to determine if Mr. Crain's plans might possibly be approved. Mr. Crain's needs the assurance that the City will approve the rezoning request before making such an enormous investment of time and resources. However, he is willing to request a deferral of the January 20, 2015 Board of Directors hearing if a representative of Deltic will agree to attend a meeting with him, which you and I can attend. Our hope would be to find a middle ground where Mr. Crain can provide the information that Deltic can reasonably expect at this time while not having to generate full, construction -ready plans without knowing whether the Board of Directors will approve the rezoning. If this proposal is acceptable to you, please provide dates when we can schedule a meeting between Deltic's representative and Mr. Crain. We will then request that the Board of Directors defer the hearing scheduled for January 20, 2015. Sincerely, QUATTLEBAUM, GROOMS & TULL PLLC J. Cliff McKinney, II Cc: Mayor Mark Stodola Mr. Bruce Moore Mr. Tom Carpenter James, Donna To: larrycrain@crainho!dings.com Subject: Chenal Village PD -R Tony and I have reviewed the information submitted concerning the proposed development plan for this project. It appears from the information provided, the information in the file and the information located on the City's web site the approval would allow for the construction of 94 buildings each containing 2 units (188 units). As we discussed staff can not increase the density of a multi -family development. Staff can however allow for slight modifications of the building coverage. If you desire to modify the plan to allow an increase in the number of units this will take approval of the planning commission and board of directors. If you wish to revise the building layout and the unit configuration we can potentially work with you at staff level. Based on the plan submitted it appears you are requesting to modify the site plan to allow for 2 and 3 units attached. To determine if the proposal falls within the allowable building coverages approved staff will need the currently approved plan building coverages and the proposed new plan building coverages. Please let me know if I can provide you with any additional information. Crain Family Holdings, LLC June 29, 2016 Ms. Donna James City of Little Rock Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Chenal Village ACC information and Building Coverage information Dear Donna, Attached is my letter to the Chenal Valley ACC dated today. Also attached is a copy of the 50' scale Site Plan and Grading Plan which you can use to calculate building coverage areas. Let me know if you need any additional information. S' r I Lar Crain, Jr. Cc: Donna James 428 VALLEY RANCH CIRCLE • LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS • 72211 PHONE: (501) 712-1369 • FAX: (501) 712-1369 Larry Crain From: Mark Rickett <mrickett@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:50 AM To: Larry Crain Subject: Chenal Village Area calculations Attachments: Area Calculations.pdf Attached are the area calculations you requested Mark E. Rickett, PE (501) 690-6068 Chenal Village Areas Items Previous Plan New Plan Square Feet Acreage Square Feet Acreage Buildings 424236 9.74 413090 9.48 Driveways 75200 1.73 75200 1.73 Streets/Parking 199360 4.58 182580 4.19 Sidewalk 37850 0.87 18910 0.43 Patio 4400 Total 736646 16.91 694180 15.94 Total Property 1665454 38.23 1665454 38.23 Coverage 44% 42% Crain Family Holdings, LLC June 29, 2016 Mr. Tom Russell Chenal Valley Commercial Neighborhood, Architectural Control Committee 7 Chenal Club Boulevard Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 RE: ACC review of Chenal Village Plans as Revised — July 6, 2016 Dear Tom: As I committed to you on the phone a few weeks ago, we have made significant changes to the site and grading plans as well refining and increasing the variety of the exterior elevations of the units. These changes were prompted by our discussion in your office in May. We are providing with this letter the following revisions for the ACC to approve: • Revised Site Plan and Grading Plan in 50' scale (four copies each) • Revised Front Elevations of two types of units (four copies each) o Type A Units with garages at opposite ends of front elevation o Type B Units with garages side by side in center of building. These revisions resolve the concerns you brought up in our meeting. Site Plan and Grading Plan: o Increased landscape buffer and undisturbed areas along Chenal Valley Drive from about 20 feet wide to 50 to 70 feet wide, an increase of 30 to 50 feet. Also increased the undisturbed buffer on the Northeast corner of the Property. o Dramatically reduced retaining walls throughout the development. O Added gentle sloping walking trail in Northeast of property with connecting 5' walking path from entrance of property on CVD to clubhouse, to Northeast Walking trail and back to entrance at CVD. o Added landscaped traffic circles to Alignments A, B and C. These breaks along with the natural slope of the streets will interrupt the appearance of repetitive buildings. Also introduced three unit buildings to increase green space and reduce repetition. o Added park and pavilion at south end of Alignment D. o The plan includes a total of 188 units which is the total number of units approved by the ACC and City of Little Rock in November 2015. 428 VALLEY RANCH CIRCLE • LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS • 72211 PHONE: (501) 712-1369 • FAX: (501) 712-1369 June 29, 2016 Page 2 • Front Elevations o Created four unique front elevations which will be combined with the variety of roof and brick and mortar selections approved by the ACC at the November 4, 2015 meeting. Our request is for the ACC to grant approval to the Site Plan, the Grading Plan and the Front elevations at your July 6th meeting. We would then submit the following items for your July 20th meeting for final ACC approval: 1. Landscaping ■ Revision to incorporate the changes to the Site Plan; landscaping to be consistent with the approved landscape of November 4, 2016. 2. Fences, Fence Columns and Retaining Walls • There are no changes to these items as approved on November 4, 2016 except as related to the change in Site Plan and grading plan. 3. Street Lighting ■ There are no changes to these items as approved on November 4, 2016. 4. Exterior Finishes ■ There are no changes to these items as approved on November 4, 2016. 5. Floor Plans ■ Floor Plans will be revised to incorporate the revised elevations. 6. Architecture plans • Revisions including elevations of all four sides, foundation plans and typical wall sections to be submitted for July 20th meeting to incorporate the revised elevations. 7. The location and detail of all signage, dumpsters and other site amenities ■ Revised to fit on revised Site Plan and Grading Plan. Streets will be named in final submission of Site Plan on July 20th We would like to present these items to the ACC in person on July 6th. Please let me know what time we should arrive at the meeting. Please call me if you have any questions at 501-529-9550. 1 am available to meet to discuss. RCrain, Larr. Cc: Donna James a 0 E 0 V O N L! -j O N Ln r -I O Ln Al LM 7 u c .(n cn .E E O U cm .C: f1 A, U O -C i =3 N Z V)0 m m >- 0) m '� 0 L m — m m c O s U O -0 U O 0 4-- ac O UO 4 -J N i m W N M S � m N Q m N O E 6 -0 C: E ::- to O .N 0au s .rL U = x c O 0) v _ -C CL v a o + v ._ tw m U m LnL � •— oCL O 0 N 4-J J 4-J E E Q1 N E dA O f6 i ) O O U U . ••i 0 LL GSC Li � Q M N = � N r -I �M-I v L (C � � 4 -JL N ate-+ (Ij CU N • • ■ ■ J W W dA = Q U • s • a O N �j c O .cn cn .E E O U i a w N a,N N X Q Q -E M � N M D Ln r- ■ ,f 0) a_ Ln luN N X Q �L +_+ ~ C N kD D rl . . 00 0 Al C: 0 cn (n E E 0 0 -E C: m SVSNV)INV'>IDON 311in G 9 I1HE113H -1VN3HD 11 I z E; Z w 0 i'M Q) Lel O .cn cn .E E O U cm .C: m n a U N :il SHSNMINV'ND0213lLUI g �? �� a S1HD13H IVN3HD ° � � Z k 0 O N �� f0 CL LM O U. O .co cn .E E O U a� N 0 O -C `U W U a.., .� � O C v aA b.0 cu b.0 aUO -C fu z o O +-1 � O N cli' 0 O U N � f6 N O E N U cr . �_ ate., cn C = U �. � ' O O +j C:p i Ln " Q. M • s.. i +, 4J CaA Q C6 ate-+ N OO W u > N oNsJ•� a O a - M c6 u i � N i i E hAU :3'+- O :3 E v c: f6 -a U Er u _ LU C E.� Z) O> m O S U p N i i CLN 'X ��n LQ� os0tto > —_ +-' i O N o -a C s o +� auo �, aj ago in N p s (v -0 O ff' E L O a_+ U fB U w :3'j t]A m _ -o N E Q CL con w "0 ch < C-4 at ) < r O N U cm C: m ^N W U - cu E 2 a--+ L U W 0 Z W 1 a U N t]A O U N O L 4-1 a f0 E O C W vi N t (U LA N tL 72 to A U N io a� W N L fa C (-0 4-0 N V) LU (/) W � t]A L � �N Ln =3 _O C U O LU E � L N O S m U �--- , C: -1-j v °C OLn s a to Q 2 U • to dA •m U a U to � v L � W tiA O � O a- `" o uo (too m N E C U � a) Ln .— N Ln V) • N 5 dA C: ca s O O to •�O a U U O bUp MC Q a..+ N W t]A �_ +� +, 1 a� O `~ Ln N a� i— N a --i• w N (/) Q� > E tts MM U W Q. c to Q U Q (Ij C Q E U +J � � m O 0 Q N O N a -J L Ln >- cn N 2 N ate-+ J 4-J F— (/ ) > N to 2 Q o a•� O t]J N 'L W E N U 4z UJ ■ W • e U E W W— • • 10 u O .cn cn .E E O U cm .c— c� U r •' I1I �Ib �I o, o, w w z O F - w J w H z w LL �N 41 4- 0 CL E x LU u ol O .cn cn .E E O U cm .C: CIO U 0 Q� w 7 z 0 w z a 4w s Al i O .U) cn .E E O U R. ,` w • C: un i W c O Lj— aA f I t x 1 y' - 15 1 u i = Q ---I TP-- Z M se m L r x F i of E Nil V- C) N O M ^L1 W O U Al O D .E E O U .E m a_ a U 41 O L W Ll cu 0 0 CL E X W iF qt vlO N Ie] c O .cn U) .E E O U c .c: A U� s N U f� co Ln C7 N O =3 C v U Y N �p � • C E C O N U }' U :01C CA E = tA N O 0 C7 0 4m = E U Q s N U f� co Ln C7 N O =3 O N O M ^L1 W O U Al c O .cn cn .E E O U .C: N ul O �' L U O L cn N U L • Q) +� ?j on O cv E Q Q0 • • • Nt TIO N MO C' J L O U Al O .cn cn .E E O 'U''�� U dA tup U O .> N T D L � N v O V) U Qf� N O Q 4J O - O LU U O +-+ O _ E > - U N U Q U Q9 e 0 m e N o O c N N u O + Ln ::3 y L Lr) N (6 O Q U _c Q o Ocn a =3 -0 a O = v } L- U X L N Q a 14-- a..� O Ora LL � m O O CL N L V O -C > 4-J •� C: -E O z O v c ..' i cn to aJ . in •� a_'aJ O N E c. o 0 CU O taA :3'' m U O E v a� 'n •� Ln O O N J cB N cli cn 76 u . �— .c +-+ a-+ U •� +_+ p rL cnN ca .CL cu bD Of Q O Q " • • U m O N O (') L 0 U r•� u O .cn .E E O U cm .C: C6 d. rle O O U v; Q C: r-- oo m m k6 O v 00 ONO Q Q �, VCL O ` N 07 N L a--+ N S �_ .Q c� � U N N CL U = fB aN-+ N t1A N f6 V _ > •� a-+ 2 ca ca _0O U V) _ a -J Ca L _0 S W i i Q .� c C6 U U Q O M c c > +j > _ O O N � > > � Q .v •� N N a) i Q cn cn — O c c O— m fu v O V V V E U a --J � — aN-+ l � fa L � N O c f6 O C aCL uw O O Qo)- O U C 1, Iti + u N cu a) U fu a) °? LLto •� o >ff C:c � U aJ V � O � t� 76 O Q M 4-J O Q N o° Q. > U 0 E Z a v Q U cn O O a CLM Q a O a �--+ E U � O 'E_ v +J v � v � U O X W 00 i 4J O 5 4- DC N � ca O r -I v 00 'O N N — N � C: Z O 0 o Ln 4- 'E O a� E O E U Z Cy) E E CIO0 ca E U" W '4— cu LL N C ti LO oi cn CD Q 00 M cn 0 N U c6 Q 0 CO O M L 0 U Al 0 . cn T • E E 0 U i cu n W, 1 > a m m� o a m egm ¢� a 41 0 a m_ I'M �se$Q@F 2 ggpp c �oJa `� C m E s" E c y c $ m Y OQm= E�■Ey oO oB� Ems aQs� m E n m a� n b' L�� Ey v •° c fl _x o yang` a Fgo¢Qy9g�o me�Enq g o em a � m 's iegym O U m?aS wE�n$n ��Y Ea3aK ifF SVSNV>IMV �ADOM 3111F] �93 7 S1H913H 1VN3HD 9 Al I I 11 I z 0- P. , I 1110, LO EtCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 17, 2016 Mr. Joe White White-Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Planning Zoning and Subdivision Re: The Villas at Chenal Short -form PD -R (Z -6532-H), located on Chenal Valley Drive at LaMarche Drive Dear Mr. White: Ordinance No. 21,224 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on May 3, 2016, approving the Villa's at Chenal Short -form PD -R contained an incorrect legal description. Staff is preparing a revised ordinance for the Board of Directors approval but cannot get the corrected ordinance on the Board's agenda before July 19, 2016. The following legal description will be placed within the corrective ordinance to correctly identify the property intended for rezoning at the Board of Directors May 3, 2016, public hearing: PART OF THE SW1/4, SECTION 25, T -2-N, R -14-W, LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 7A, CHENAL VALLEY, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; THENCE N74°35'01"E, 60.02 FT. TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CHENAL VALLEY DRIVE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, BEING THE ARC OF A 1115.92 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N04051'03"W, 347.39 FT.; THENCE N04008'32"E AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 412.06 FT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, BEING THE ARC OF A 507.46 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N3904413911W, 703.58 FT.; THENCE N83°37'35"W AND ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CHENAL VALLEY DRIVE, 317.79 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N83°37'35"W, 37.76 FT.; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, BEING THE ARC OF A 1402.40 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N72040'49"W, 532.79 FT.; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N61°43'45"W, 111.89 FT.; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, BEING THE ARC OF A 25.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N24°38'09"W, 29.95 FT. TO A POINT' ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAMARCHE DRIVE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, BEING THE ARC OF A 507.46 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N00°17'50"E, 194.27 FT.; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N10`44'20"W, 224.10 FT.; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A 542.96 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N18033'34"W, 179.26 FT.; THENCE N79027'31"E, 188.18 FT.; THENCE S68°13'10"E, 738 32 FT.; THENCE S51`08'57"W, 140.21 FT.; THENCE S00°44'16"W, 499.97 FT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 10.8000 ACRES MORE OR LESS. We regret any inconvenience this error may have caused YOU and your client. Please let me know if you have any question or need any additional information from our office. Respectfu , 1 }, onna Jamq Subdivision Administrator James, Donna From: Larry Crain <larrycrain@crainholdings.com> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 6:50 AM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: Chenal Village Revisions Attachments: Chenal Village Revisons 061416.pdf Donna, This is the current plan which is 90% complete with grading, etc. it has 201 units: 21 buildings with 3 units each and 69 units with 2 units each. Larry Crain, Jr. Crain Family Holdings, LLC 17300 Chenal Parkway, Ste 330 Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 501-570-3700 501-529-9550 Cell Lary Crain CrainHoldin s.Com From: Rickett, Mark[mailto:mark. rickett@bnbsinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 2:21 AM To: Larry Crain; Allen Smith (allen.smith@smithandgoodson.com) Subject: Chenal Village Revisions Attached is the latest drawing. I'm still working on revising contour lines to all of the new building locations, etc. I will hopefully finish that tomorrow and can start working on the subsurface system and storm water detention. NO ACCESS rq EILD . �s 38- 0 ■ w", 71D 0.000 C -7T DET. V& - UME (5300 CF REQLARED FROM 0pw roli 25 YEAR EVENT) 4Mt WATER oEpv8- MIN. NOTE: I. DECORA 'I VE IRON ' FENCE ALONG FRONT OF F PROPERTY A-1,10 ALONG TOP OF RETAINING WALL tiAmr m+AL POTEN— _.PL Z -6532-G 9 EAST OF OF CHENAL CHENAL HEAIVGHTS CIRLLEY DR, SOUTH PD -R fl"NI I \'� I 1 m �1 � �� it •�5 • '. - J r,.,�°� �•, - .•t` - �ANN� � :� •tiy' ' r J/ .r -.• '�y�R•�L W .�.� f . n • . � r ( ^.r' - . Act :' . . �� y/' r.rstk ti' "`• P 1� ;f 4• r�• y I #+f � �`� r �Y % 1 `T,_ • -�� f � �t. `�• rF� • '. .'1 y%`-+r"� ! A ,':..1..• ^ 3F �.•� t•^,1,� � �• � �{�/ rr / 63, .. • � ''r' /�, I •SB4'� �•' �� ;t'•1~ ••,A r+ ..�:a." r..: •. , � � tis _ ��^r' t .ts '• ••' �� -„ -. •••V..- R`.r '+:f r \ �' r : int •'•r .,. a• :5fl's 016 �~s� ; r t -L J ��,�— � -� � is r '�,• .r Z -6532-G EAST OF CHENAL VALLEY DR, SOUTH 4p PD-R�� OF CHENAL HEIGHTS CIR 1 PA �v ORDINANCE NO. 3 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 1 OF LITTLE 4 ROCK, ARK., ORDINANCE NO. 21,224 (MAY 3, 2016) TO 5 CORRECT THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR THE 6 VILLAS AT CHENAL REVISED LONG -FORM PD -R, 7 LOCATED ON CHENAL VALLEY DRIVE AT LAMARCHE 8 (Z -6532-H); TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR 9 OTHER PURPOSES. 10 11 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors passed Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 21,224 (May 3, 12 2016) on May 3, 2016, to permit a revised long -form PD -R for The Villas at Chenal, but the 13 ordinance inadvertently included an erroneous property description; and, 14 WHEREAS, the parties are about to change their situations in this matter and to close on the 15 financing for this project, but cannot do so until this property description is corrected; and, 16 WHEREAS, the notices, descriptions in the record before the Planning Commission, and all 17 other matters correctly and clearly identified the property that is the subject of this zoning revision, 18 so that the correction of the property description is merely an administrative matter; 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE 20 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: 21 Section 1. Section 1 of Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 21,224 (May 3, 2016) is hereby amended to 22 read as follows: 23 SECTION 1. That the zoning classification of the following described 24 property be changed from R-2, Single -Family District, to PD -R, Planned 25 Development — Residential: 26 Z -6532-H: Part of the SW 1/4, Section 25, T -2-N, R-14- 27 W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more 28 particularly described as: Commencing at the 29 Southeast corner of Tract 7A, Chenal Valley, an 30 Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence 31 N74°35'01 "E, 60.02 feet to a point on the East right - 32 of -way line of Chenal Valley Drive; thence northerly [Page 1 of 3] I along said east right-of-way line, being the arc of a 2 1115.92 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing 3 and distance of N04051'03"W, 347.39 feet; thence 4 N04008'32"E and continuing along said east right -of - 5 way line, 412.06 feet; thence northwesterly and 6 continuing along said east right-of-way line, being the 7 arc of a 507.46 foot radius curve to the left, a chord 8 bearing and distance of N39°44'39"W, 703.58 feet; 9 thence N83°37'35"W and along the north right-of-way 10 line of Chenal Valley Drive, 317.79 feet to the point of 11 beginning; thence continuing along said north right - 12 of -way line N83137'35"W, 37.76 feet; thence westerly 13 along said right-of-way line, being the arc of a 1402.40 14 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and 15 distance of N72140'49"W, 532.79 feet; thence continue 16 along said right-of-way line N61143'45"W, 111.89 17 feet; thence northwesterly, being the arc of a 25.00 foot 18 radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance 19 of N24°38'09"W, 29.95 feet to a point on the east right - 20 of -way line of LaMarche Drive; thence northerly 21 along said east right-of-way line, being the arc of a 22 507.46 foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing 23 and distance of N00°17'50"E, 194.27 feet; thence 24 continuing along said east right-of-way line 25 N10°44'20"W, 224.10 feet; thence continuing along 26 said east right-of-way line northwesterly, along the arc 27 of a 542.96 foot radius curve to the left, a chord 28 bearing and distance of N18°33'34"W, 179.26 feet; 29 thence N79127'31"E, 188.18 feet; thence S68°13'10"E, 30 738.32 feet; thence S51°08'57"W, 140.21 feet; thence 31 S00°44' 16"W, 499.97 feet to the point of beginning, 32 containing 10.8000 acres more or less. 33 Section 2. Severability. In the event any title, subtitle, section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, 34 subparagraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or work of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid [Page 2 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of this ordinance. Section 3. Repealer. All ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency including, but not limited to, Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 21,224 (May 3, 2016). Section 5. Emergency Clause. The ability to accurately note changings in the zoning map for the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and to permit approved projects to move forward with financing and construction is essential to the public health, safety, and welfare, particularly where, as here, parties have materially changed their positions in reliance upon approved changes to the zoning map; therefore, an emergency, therefore, is declared to exist and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. PASSED: June 21, 2016 ATTEST: APPROVED: Susan Langley, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney // [Page 3 of 31 Mark Stodola, Mayor `L`t,{{{111k11{ry11��I X 2016039865 PRESENTED: 06-29-201606:0D:06 AM RECORDED: 06-29-201609:10:40 AM In Official Records of Larry Crane Circuit/County Clerk I'ULASKI CO, AR FEE $25.00 ORDINANCE N. . 21,257 - RDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 1 OF LITTLE ROCK, ARK., 4 ORDINANCE NO. 21,224 (MAY 3, 2016) TO CORRECT THE PROPERTY 5 DESCRIPTION FOR THE VILLAS AT CHENAL REVISED LONG -FORM 6 PD -R, LOCATED ON CHENAL VALLEY DRIVE AT LAMARCHE DRIVE 7 (Z -6532-H); TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER 8 PURPOSES. 9 10 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors passed Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 21,224 (May 3, 2016) to 11 permit a Revised Long -Form PD -R for The Villas at Chenal, but the ordinance inadvertently included an 12 erroneous property description; and, 13 WHEREAS, the parties are about to change their situations in this matter and to close on the financing 14 for this project, but cannot do so until this property description is corrected; and, 15 WHEREAS, the notices, descriptions in the record before the Planning Commission, and all other 16 matters correctly and clearly identified the property that is the subject of this zoning revision, so that the 17 correction of the property description is merely an administrative matter; 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY 19 OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: 20 Section 1. Section 1 of Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 21,224 (May 3, 2016) is hereby amended to 21 read as follows: 22 Section 1. That the zoning classification of the following described property be changed from 23 R-2, Single -Family District, to PD -R, Planned Development — Residential: 24 Z -6532-H: Part of the SWI/4, Section 25, T -2-N, R -14-W, Little Rock, Pulaski 25 County, Arkansas, more particularly described as: Commencing at the southeast 26 corner of Tract 7A, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; 27 thence N74°35'01"E, 60.02 feet to a point on the east right-of-way line of Chenal 28 Valley Drive; thence northerly along said east right-of-way line, being the arc of a 29 1115.92 -foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of N04151'03"W, 30 347.39 feet; thence N04°08'32"E and continuing along said east right-of-way line, 31 412.06 feet; thence northwesterly and continuing along said east right-of-way line, 32 being the arc of a 507.46 -foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of 33 N39°44'39"W, 703.58 feet; thence N83°37'35"W and along the north right-of-way [Page 1 of 31 I line of Chenal Valley Drive, 317.79 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing 2 along said north right-of-way line N83137'35"W, 37.76 feet; thence westerly along 3 said right-of-way line, being the arc of a 1402.40 -foot radius curve to the right, a chord 4 bearing and distance of N72140'49"W, 532.79 feet; thence continue along said right - 5 of -way line N61143'45"W, 111.89 feet; thence northwesterly, being the arc of a 25.00- 6 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of N24°38'09"W, 29.95 7 feet to a point on the east right-of-way line of LaMarche Drive; thence northerly along 8 said east right-of-way line, being the arc of a 507.46 -foot radius curve to the left, a 9 chord bearing and distance of N00°17150"E, 194.27 feet; thence continuing along said 10 east right-of-way line N10°44'20"W, 224.10 feet; thence continuing along said east I 1 right-of-way line northwesterly, along the arc of a 542.96 -foot radius curve to the left, 12 a chord bearing and distance of N18133134"W, 179.26 feet; thence N79127'31"E, 13 188.18 feet; thence S68°13'10"E, 738.32 feet; thence S51°08'57"W, 140.21 feet; thence 14 S00°44'16"W, 499.97 feet to the point of beginning, containing 10.8000 acres, more 15 or less. 16 Section 2. Severability. In the event any title, subtitle, section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, 17 subparagraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or work of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid 18 or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance 19 which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or 20 unconstitutional was not originally a part of this ordinance. 21 Section 3. Repealer. All ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same that are inconsistent with the 22 provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency including, but not 23 limited to, Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 21,224 (May 3, 2016). 24 Section 5. Emergency Clause. The ability to accurately note changings in the zoning map for the City 25 of Little Rock, Arkansas, and to permit approvedprojects to move forward with financing and construction 26 is essential to the public health, safety, and welfare, particularly where, as here, parties have materially 27 changed their positions in reliance upon approved changes to the zoning map; therefore, an emergency, 28 therefore, is declared to exist and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of 29 30 31 32 33 34 its passage. PASSED: June 28, 2016 [Page 2 of 31 Hines, Vice -Mayor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attor y // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // [Page 3 of 31