Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6271 Staff AnalysisApril 17, 1997 ITEM NO.: FILE NO.: Z-6271 Owner: E. R. and Lessie Curtis Applicant: Earl Curtis Location: 710 Kirk Road Request: Rezone from 0-2 to C-3 Purpose: Future commercial development; no specific use proposed at this time. Size: 1.9± acres Existing Use: One-story single family residence and accessory building SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Undeveloped tract; zoned 0-2 South - Nonconforming auto repair business; zoned 0-2 East - Undeveloped pasture; zoned 0-2 West - Undeveloped tract; zoned 0-2 and undeveloped PD -O PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS Kirk Road is a collector street on the Master Street Plan. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. With construction: 1. Grading permit will be required on this new development, if it disturbs more than one acre. 2. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. 3. Construct collector street widening with sidewalk. 4. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance 16,577. 5. Chenal Parkway at Kirk Road has a 1995 average daily traffic count of 11,000. LAND USE ELEMENT The property is located in the Chenal District. The Land use Plan recommends Office for this site. April 17, 1997 ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-6271 The request is not in conformance with the land use plan. The area in question is currently being studied by the Kanis Road Study Committee. The Kanis Road Study Committee had requested that no action be taken on this request. The site in question is bordered on three sides by office land uses. After review of the area, staff finds that a change to the land use plan would not be appropriate. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The site is not located on a Central Arkansas Transit Bus Route. STAFF ANALYSIS The request before the Commission is to rezone this 1.9± acre tract from "0-2" Office and Institutional District to "C-3" General Commercial District. The property currently contains an older single family residence and an accessory structure. No specific development is proposed at this time. The tract was zoned 0-2 through adoption of the 1987 Chenal Valley Zoning Plan. The site is located on the west side of Kirk Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of its intersection with Chenal Parkway. The area is still very rural in nature although new development is occurring along Chenal Parkway. The new Arkansas Systems development is located on the 0-2 zoned property to the north. A post office was approved on the adjacent PD -0 zoned tract. The large area of 0-2 zoned property across Kirk Road to the east is undeveloped. A nonconforming auto repair service is located on the 0-2 zoned property to the south and a newer convenience store is located on a C-3 zoned tract at the corner of Kirk Road and Chenal Parkway. Many of the properties in the area are undeveloped or contain older homesites. The Chenal District Land Use Plan recommends Office use for this tract. Properties to the south, as far as Chenal Parkway, are shown as Neighborhood Commercial. Staff believes the current plan designations are appropriate and this area should remain office. Any commercial should be clustered closer to the intersection and should not be permitted to extend further up Kirk Road. There is available undeveloped, or underdeveloped commercial property in the area. This rezoning request is not driven by a specific development and staff believes it more reasonable to leave the property zoned 0-2. 2 April 17, 1997 ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-5271 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the requested C-3 zoning. The request conflicts with the Land Use Plan and inappropriately extends commercial zoning too far north of the Kirk Road/Chenal intersection. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 17, 1997) The applicant was not present although he had been present earlier. There was one objector present, John Flake. Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had stated, only minutes before the public hearing for this item, that he wished to withdraw the C-3 rezoning request. A motion was made to withdraw the item. The motion was approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. 3