Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6262 Staff AnalysisFebruary 24, 1997 Item No.: 3 File No. owner• Address• Description• Zoned• variance Requested: Z-6262 Winrock Development Company 21 Cherryhill Cove Lot 43, Block 4, Cherry Creek Addition R-2 A variance is requested from the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to permit a reduction in a rear building line from 25 feet to 15 feet. Justification: Applicant's Statement: Winrock Development Company requests a variance from the 25' rear building line on the above referenced lot. We are requesting a 15' rear building line in lieu of the 25, rear building line. Present Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: When we submitted our final plat of Cherry Creek Phase X which included Lots 42 and 43, Block 4, we were made aware that a larger portion of these two lots would need to be dedicated to accomplish the construction of Bowman Road to the adopted Master Street Plan standards. When our preliminary plat was approved, we were not aware of this larger portion of these two lots that would need to be dedicated. By complying with the dedication needed and requested by the Public Works Staff, typical houses would encroach into the 25' rear building line as shown on the enclosed plat and survey. Therefore, our request for the 15' rear building line. Vacant lot Single Family residence February 24, 1997 Item No.. 3 (Cont. Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: If possible, staff would prefer to move structure towards cul-de-sac and this provide a larger setback at rear. The rear lot line will involve close grading to facilitate construction of the minor arterial. B. Staff Analysis: 21 Cherryhill Cove is a vacant lot located in a newly developing phase of the Cherry Creek Addition. The lot is located at the end of a cul-de-sac and is literally "squeezed" between the end of the cul-de-sac and Bowman Road. The lot has 25 foot building lines on both the front and rear. The dedication of right-of-way for the new alignment of Bowman Road reduced the depth of the lot. The reduced lot depth, when combined with the front and rear building lines, greatly reduced the buildable area available on the lot. The applicant is requesting a variance from the building line provisions to allow for a reduction in the rear building line from 25 feet to 15 feet. Due to the narrow lot frontage on the cul-de-sac, the applicant does not wish to move the house toward the front building line. Staff believes the applicant has provided reasonable justification for building line relief. The question remains how best to accomplish it with the lot backing up to an arterial street; Bowman Road. Rather than a "blanket" reduction of the entire rear building line, staff proposes that the building line be reduced to a minimum of 15 feet only in the area necessary to accommodate the proposed residence. This would allow a portion of the proposed house to cross the 25 foot building line but would maintain it for the majority of the lot. Although the proposed building outline shown on the site plan is only illustrative, staff would encourage the applicant to use a similar design in which only a corner of the house crosses the 25 foot building line. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested building line variance subject to the following conditions: 1. The variance is to accommodate a proposed building footprint only and is not for the entire width of the lot. 2 February 24, 1997 Item No.: 3 Cont. 2. The plat is to reflect the building line variance for only that portion of the building which crosses the 25 foot building line. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (FEBRUARY 24, 1997) This item was discussed in conjunction with Item No. 2; Z-6261. Gary Langlais abstained. Ron Harrison was present representing Winrock. There were no objectors present although Miles Goggans had called in opposition to the request. Staff presented the item and recommended that the Board approve a building line reduction only in the area necessary to accommodate a proposed residence. Mr. Harrison addressed the Board. He stated that he basically agreed with staff's concept but he feared it would create difficulty in final platting the lot before it could be sold to a builder. He asked for greater latitude concerning the building line rather than tying it to a specific footprint. David Scherer, of Public Works, stated that it was very important that potential buyers of the property be made aware of the realignment of Bowman Road. He noted that the realigned street would be much closer to the lots than it now is. There was further discussion of means to accommodate the applicant and still address staff's concerns. It was determined that allowing a reduction in the building line in that area where a house would most likely be constructed would be reasonable. Thus, a motion was made to reduce the rear building line to 15 feet for the north half of Lot 43. The motion was approved by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent, 1 open position and 1 abstaining (Langlais). 3