Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6218 Staff AnalysisJanuary 9, 1997 ITEM NO.: A FILE NO.; Z-6218 NAME: "THE POINTE" APARTMENT COM14UNITY -- SITE PLAN REVIEW LOCATION: On Kanis Road west and east of Pointe West Drive DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: Thomas E. Vogler Henry B. Vogler, Jr. 500 Napa Valley Drive #1316 2101 Gunpowder Road Little Rock, AR 72211 Little Rock, AR 72207 AREA: 4.27 ACRES NUMBER OF UNITS: 73 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: MF -18 PROPOSED USES: Multifamily Residential PLANNING DISTRICT: #18 Ellis mountain CENSUS TRACT: 42.06 VARIANCES REQUESTED: None BACKGROUND: The developer held an informational meeting on November 18, 1996. About 45 Pointe West residents attended the meeting. Issues discussed included site zoning, project density, location and height of proposed buildings. A. PROPOSA-L/REQUEST: The developer has reduced the total number of units to 73. The zoning is MF -18 which allows a maximum of one unit per 2,400 square feet of lot area. The maximum density on this 4.27 acre site is 76 units. The maximum height of structures in the MF -18 zone are 35 feet. The developer proposes to construct two and three story buildings of one and two bedroom apartments. In response to concerns of the neighbors the developer has removed all third story windows that would look north towards the Pointe West Subdivision. The site plan as revised conforms to the density, height, and setback requirements of the ordinance. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site was rezoned to MP -18 in 1978. The property is vacant and covered with trees. LTanuary 9, 1997 SUBDIVISI ITEM NO. : A Cont. FTT..'g NO.: Z-6218 C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: To date staff has received more than 73 letters opposed to the requested Site Plan Review. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS COMMEN : A sketch plan and grading permit are required prior to construction. Driveway locations will not be approved without a profile verifying adequate site distance according to Traffic Engineer. At Point West Drive north of Kanis Road is a residential street on the Master Street Plan, it is currently a 27 foot asphalt street divided at the entrance with islands, it does contain sidewalks, it will require sidewalks on both sides of the street for this commercial construction to be permitted on each side of Pointe West Drive. The width of Pointe West Drive should be increased to collect standards 36 feet minimum and a left turn lane should be provided for turning access into these drives. A widening of Pointe West Drive may involve removing a portion of or all of the northern island. The southern island may have to be removed to facilitate a left turn lane onto ]Kanis Road. Right -of -way shown does appear to have adequate right-of-way to facilitate this construction. Kanis Road is a minor arterial on the Master Street Plan dedication of right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline and construction of pavement 30 feet ' from centerline with the sidewalk as required by City ordinance. The frontage shown does adequately have enough frontage to include a construction of drives as shown, if sight distance can be met. The northern drives entering these two complexes are located less than 25 feet from the property line as required by City ordinance, section 30-43. The 6 foot turnout radii are acceptable, however would recommend that they be increased if the drives are moved south from property line. Recommend that parking adjacent to offices be relocated. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this apartment complex. Dedication of right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline for Timber Ridge Drive is required with this permit, the sidewalk on Timber Ridge Drive will also be required. E. UTILITIES/FIRE DEPARTMENTICOUNTY PLANNIUG: Wastewater: Sewer located on site.- Will require relocation by Developer prior to construction of apartment complex. Capacity Contribution Analysis required for this project to determine fees. 2 January 9, 1997 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO-,. A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6218 Arkla: No comment southwestern Bell: OK Water: on-site lines will be private. installation will be to LRMWW specs, inspection by an engineer and a Customer Owned Line Agreement will be required. RPZ backflow preventers are required for buildings with 3 floors. An acreage charge of $300/acre applies. AP&L: OK Fire Department: on the west end of the north drive take the dumpster out and give fire department an exit onto Timber Ridge Drive. County Planning: No comment F. ISSUES/TECHNICALIDESIGN: Laq!j,�a e�: Areas set aside for buffers meet with zoning ordinance requirements when averaged out. The buffers along Timber Ridge Road and west of Point west Drive drop below the full requirement of 20 feet but meet the minimum requirement of 13 1/2 feet because of the additional buffer area provided along Kanis Road. Areas set aside for perimeter and building landscaping meet with Landscape ordinance requirements. Issues: None outstanding Planning Division: No land use issues G. ANALYSIS: The project density, setbacks and building heights are consistent with the MF -18 multifamily District standards. The landscape plan conforms to the ordinance requirements. Section 36-131 of the Subdivision and zoning ordinance through supplement No. 23 states the following in respect to Site Plan Review applications. Sec. 36-131. Standards for site plan disapproval. The planning commission shall not disapprove an application for a site plan except on the basis of findings directed to one (1) or more specified particular of the following standards: (1) The proposed site plan is incomplete or contains or reveals violations of this chapter or 3 January 9, 1997 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A Wont.) FILE NO.: z-6218 applicable district regulations which the applicant has, after written request, failed or refused to supply or correct. (2) The proposed site plan does not comply with the minimum screening and landscaping requirements of the city. (3) The proposed site plan interferes unnecessarily with easements, roadways, rail lines, utilities, and other public or private rights-of-way. (4) The proposed pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems incorporated in the site plan subsequently create hazards to safety on or off the site. (5) The proposed site plan does not conform to the minimum drainage requirements found in chapter 31. (6) The proposed site plan violates the basic intent of this chapter or does not comply with those conditions which were stipulated at the time of rezoning. (Code 1961, Ch. 43, S 4-103(f); Ord. No. 15,247, SI, 2-17-87) H. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVAL of the proposed Site Plan Review which conforms to the requirements of the ordinance. No waivers or variances have been requested. Project Approval is based on the revised site plan dated December 9, 1996 and is subject to conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E, and F of this report. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (OCTOBER 31, 1996) Project architect Henry "Buddy" Vogler presented the development to the Committee for review. Larry Jones asked Mr. Vogler to reduce the project density from 78 to 76 units to conform with MF -18. Staff also asked that the dumpsters be relocated and a signage/lighting plan be submitted for review. The Commission forwarded the proposal to the November 21, 1996 Planning Commission meeting for determination. 4 January 9, 1997 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: A (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6218 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 21, 1996) Just before the start of the public hearing, the applicant requested a deferral to the January 9, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. This item was included in the Consent Deferral Agenda. A motion to approve the Consent Agenda was passed with 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (DECEMBER 12, 1996) Buddy Vogler, project architect presented the revised development to the Committee for review. Larry Jones asked Mr. Vogler to eliminate 3 parking spaces on the western corner of the site plan that create hazardous parking conditions. Mr. Vogler should reduce the total unit county by 3 units to offset the parking loss. The driveways onto Pointe West Drive have been redesigned so that no waiver request is needed. The commission forwarded the proposal to the January 9, 1997 Planning Commission meeting for determination. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JANUARY 9, 1997) Mr. Jones indicated that he had just received a request f rom the applicant to withdraw the item. The Commission accepted the applicant's request to withdrawal Site Plan Review (Z-6218) by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays, and I absent. 5