HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6125-B Staff AnalysisJuly 11, 2002
ITEM NO.: 11
Name: Sprint Spectrum — Tower Use Permit
Address: 4300 South Shackleford Road
Applicant: Sprint Spectrum/Tracy E. Gill
FILE NO.: Z -6125-B
Request: Sprint Spectrum is requesting approval of a deferral of the
requirement to install a landscape strip around the perimeter
of this existing Wireless Communications Facility. The
property is zoned 1-1, Industrial.
blic Works Comments: No Comments-
Landscape/Screening:
Landscaping is not required by the Landscape and Tree Protection Ordinance.
Only WCF landscape and screening standards apply.
Notification:
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300
feet who could be identified and the John Barrow and SWLRUP Neighborhood
Associations were notified of this issue.
WCF History:
Prior to January 1998, cellular towers were permitted by -right in Open Space and
Industrial Districts with a maximum height of 75 feet. Variances for towers
exceeding 75 feet in height in the Open Space and Industrial Districts were
approved by the Board of Adjustment. Cellular towers proposed for placement in
other zoning districts required approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission.
On January 20, 1998, the Little Rock Board of Directors passed Ordinance No.
17,664 which added a new article to the Zoning Ordinance entitled "Wireless
Communications Facilities" and which established standards and development
criteria for the various types of WCF's to be erected within the City and its
July 11, 2002
ITEM NO.: 11 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -6125-B
jurisdiction. Under that Ordinance, new WCF were to be landscaped in
accordance with Chapter 15, the Landscape Ordinance. This resulted in few
WCF sites being landscaped since the landscape requirements of Chapter 15
are tied to parking lots and WCF sites typically have no parking or driveways.
In early 1999, it was brought to the attention of the Board of Directors that
numerous WCF sites lacked landscaping and screening. These sites were
typically located such that abutting zoning or use didn't require screening or
landscaping. It was clear that the landscaping and screening requirements
within the City Code at that time were insufficient to specifically address the
issue of WCF lease sites. Staff was directed to develop new language for
WCF's that addressed the specifics of WCF sites but incorporated some of the
minimum tree spacing, shrub placement and opaque screening employed on
commercial sites.
On October 14, 1999, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to
recommend approval of an Ordinance establishing landscaping and screening
requirements for all new or amended WCF with support structures (towers).
While recognizing the impossibility of screening a 75 foot — 150 foot tower, it was
felt that it would be appropriate to screen the base of a tower site including
equipment facilities and cabinets. The basic landscaping and screening
requirements proposed by the Planning Commission for all new or amended
WCF were as follow:
a. All WCF subject to this section shall contain a permanent six (6) foot
landscape strip parallel with all sides of the primary use area and outside
of the opaque fence, except for a space for ingress and egress to the
primary use area.
b. An eight (8) foot opaque fence shall be constructed, finished side facing
outward, around the primary use area to provide screening and a
background for required landscaping within the six (6) foot landscape
strip.
c. The opaque fence shall also satisfy the security fence requirement of
section 36-593(f).
d. The landscape strip on each side of the primary use area shall be planted
with two (2) trees of a 2" caliper which will grow to a minimum twenty (20)
feet in height at maturity. The space between trees shall be planted with
evergreen shrubs of thirty (30) inch height on 30 inch centers at planting,
sufficient to cover at maturity the entire ground area within the landscape
strip.
6
July 11, 2002
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -6125-B
On December 20, 1999, the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 18,173
which incorporated the landscape and screening requirements proposed by the
Commission for new or amended WCF's but, which also added a 2 year
amortization period for those WCF in existence on January 20, 2000 to be
brought into compliance with the new standards. The Board retained sole
authority to grant waivers or deferrals of the landscape and screening
requirements for those WCF sites covered by the amortization schedule. All new
or amended WCF's still went to the Planning Commission. Subsequent to
January 2000, numerous applications for deferral or conditional waiver of the
standards have been approved by the Board. There are only a few remaining
WCF sites that have not been dealt with during the past two years either through
a collocation amendment or as a deferral/waiver by the Board.
On May 21, 2002, Ordinance No. 18,682 was passed by the Board of Directors
which amended the landscape standards for WCF by requiring that the 6 foot
landscape strip be located within the WCF lease area and by changing the
spacing of trees and shrubs in each landscape strip to a minimum of 15 feet for
the trees and a maximum of 48 inches for the shrubs.
Also on May 21, 2002, the Board passed Ordinance No. 18,683 which passed to
the Planning Commission the authority to grant a deferral of the landscaping and
screening requirements for those WCF that were in existence prior to
January 20, 2000 and which also extended the amortization period an additional
30 days. Rather than going directly to the Board of Directors, deferrals for those
pre-existing WCF are now to be handled through the Tower Use Permit process.
The new language in the Code now reads as follows:
Existing WCF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance
with this section within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this
ordinance unless compliance is deferred by the Planning
Commission through the TUP process because the WCF is not
currently located within 100 feet of any occupiable structure.
Provided, however, the WCF shall be landscaped and screened in
accordance with this article within ninety (90) days of final
inspection for any occupiable structure subsequently constructed
within 100 feet of the WCF.
a. In such cases where the Planning Commission has granted a deferral
of the landscape and/or screening requirements of this article, the
Planning Commission may modify the deferral or impose the
landscape and screening requirements if, in the future, a major change
in circumstances occurs.
3
July 11, 2002
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -6125-B
b. For purposes of this section, a "major change in circumstance" means
that:
(1) the area within 200 feet of the boundaries of the WCF tower site
has developed to the point that there is a virtually unobstructed
view of the tower site from any adjoining occupiable residential
structure or from public property or right of way, and
(2) the City has received a complaint from the owner of an
occupiable structure located within 200 feet of the tower site that
the site has insufficient landscaping or screening in place; and
(3) the City has requested that the parties resolve the issue by
agreeing to certain screening or landscaping requirements
consistent with LRC § 36-593 which can be granted
administratively by the Director of Planning and Development, but
no agreement has been reached, or sufficient additional space
around the site has been acquired to meet the landscaping,
setback and screening requirements of LRC § 36-593.
Staff Report.-
The
eport:
The Sprint Spectrum WCF located on the 1-1 zoned property at 4300 South
Shackleford (10700 Colonel Glenn Road) consists of a 180 foot tall monopole
tower and an equipment cabinet within a 70 foot by 70 foot lease area. The
lease area is within a heavily wooded 5 acre tract. Access is from a gated, 1,000
foot, gravel driveway off of Shackleford Road. The actual primary use area of
the WCF lease area (that area containing the tower and equipment) is 35 feet by
35 feet and is enclosed by a 6 foot tall, chain-link fence topped with barbed wire.
There are numerous trees within the remainder of the overall lease area,
between the fence enclosing the primary use area and the overall lease area
boundary. The properties to the north, west and east are undeveloped and
heavily wooded. Some 140± feet of the wooded, 5 acre parent tract extend to
the south of the WCF site. Further south, fronting onto Colonel Glenn Road, are
two large office -warehouse buildings and the large tract occupied by Clear
Channel Corporation (the former Sam's Club building). The nearest single family
residence is located 660± feet northeast of the WCF, through an area of dense
woods. On April 29, 1996, the Board of Adjustment granted a height variance
which allowed this facility, including a 140 foot tall tower. On September 30,
1996, the Board approved an increase in the tower height from 140 feet to 180
feet.
4
July 11, 2002
ITEM NO.: 1
FILE NO.: Z -6125-B
Since the WCF is located within a heavily wooded tract surrounded by other
heavily wooded or industrially developed tracts, the applicant is requesting
approval of a deferral of the landscaping requirements on all four perimeters of
the site. Spring Spectrum will replace the chain-link fence with the required 8
foot tall solid wood fence.
Staff is supportive of the request. Due to the nature and location of the WCF
site, it is reasonable not to require additional landscaping. If the 35 foot by 35
foot primary use area is ever expanded, staff suggests that it be limited so that
the required 6 foot wide perimeter landscape strip is retained within the 70 foot
by 70 foot lease area.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JUNE 13, 2002)
Tracy Gill was present, representing the application. Staff briefly described the
proposed tower use permit. The four (4) Sprint Spectrum T.U.P.'s (Items 10, 11,
12 and 13 on this agenda) were discussed simultaneously.
There was a general discussion relating to the basic requirements for screening
and landscaping tower sites. The intent of and reasons for these specific
ordinance requirements were discussed. Commissioner Berry asked that staff
provide the Commission with this information. There was additional discussion
pertaining to the number of Sprint towers in Little Rock. Mr. Gill provided the
Committee with this information.
Mr. Gill explained the reasons for deferral of the landscape requirements for this
specific site. He noted that there was wooded property surrounding the site. He
also noted that the site was located in industrial zoning.
After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the tower use permit to the full
Commission for final action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested deferral of the landscape
requirement on all four perimeters of the WCF site subject to compliance with the
following conditions:
1. The deferral is until such time as a "major change in circumstance" as
defined in Section 36-593(c)(6) of the Code.
5
July 11, 2002
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -6125-B
2. A 6 foot wide perimeter landscape strip is to be retained within the 70 foot
by 70 foot lease area.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 11, 2002)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented
the item and a recommendation of approval subject to compliance with the
conditions outlined in the "Staff Recommendation" above. There was no further
discussion.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff. The vote was 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position.
C: