HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6120 Staff AnalysisNAME:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
SOURCE:
STAFF REPORT•
Amendment to the City Land Use
Plan - Ellis Mountain District
West of Cooper Orbi, south of
Pride valley Road
Single Family to Low Density
Multifamily
Staff - Z-6120
As part of the staff review for a rezoning request, the City Land
Use Plan in the area was reviewed. The Plan recommends Single
Family for the area. The proposal is for some lower density
multifamily at the intersection, with single family surrounding
the area.
The developer is proposing to realign Cooper Orbit and extend a
new arterial to the west, through the proposed residential
development. At the intersection of the collector and minor
arterial, an area of MF -12 zoning is requested. Staff is willing
to consider a higher density of residential use near the
intersection. With the topography, MF -12 would allow for a
development to be built with the existing site. This development
will urbanize 190 acres with only about 30 acres not single
family. The request for Low Density Multifamily is appropriate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Amend Plan to Low Density Multifamily.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY LAND USE PLAN
(16,222) IN THE ELLIS MOUNTAIN DISTRICT, WEST
OF COOPER ORBIT, NORTH OF SPRING VALLEY
ESTATES FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO LOW DENSITY
MULTIFAMILY AND FOR OTHER MATTERS.
WHEREAS, the Planning Staff believes it appropriate to allow
a slightly higher density of residential use near the arterial,
collector intersection; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after discussion of the
issue at a public hearing recommends that the Plan be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. An area west of Cooper Orbit Road and north of
Spring Valley Estates is changed from Single Family to Low
Density Multifamily.
SECTION 2. The Plan Map is amended as shown on the attached
Sketch Map.
PASSED:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED:
Mayor
April 25, 1996
ITEM NO.: 25 Z-6120
owner: John L. Burnett, Trustee
Applicant: James Hathaway, Jr.
Location: East side of Cooper Orbit
Road; north of Spring Valley
Manor Subdivision
Request: Rezone from R-2 to MF -12
Purpose: Future apartment development
Size: 33.8± acres
Existing Use: Vacant, wooded
SpRROIINDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North - Vacant, wooded;
zoned R-2
South - Vacant, wooded;
East - Vacant, wooded;
West - Vacant, wooded;
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
zoned R-2 and Oasis Retreat;
zoned R-2
zoned R-2
zoned R-2
See additional comments in S-1100 File; Capitol Lakes
Estates. Dedicate right-of-way for Cooper Orbit Road and
unnamed minor arterial per Master Street Plan.
LAND USER ELEMENT
The site is located in the Ellis Mountain District. The
adopted Land Use Plan recommends Single Family. The
proposal is to realign Cooper Orbit Road and extend a new
arterial to the west through a residential subdivision. At
the intersection of the collector and minor arterial an area
of MF -12 zoning is requested. Staff is willing to consider
a higher density of residential use at the intersection.
with the topography MF -12 would allow for a development to
be built with the existing site. The request is low density
for Multifamily and staff believes appropriate. A change to
Low Density Multifamily is proposed.
'April 25, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 25 Z-6120 Cont.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The request before the Commission is to rezone a 33.8± acre
tract from "R-2" Single Family to "MF -12" Multifamily. The
33.8± acres are within a 190+ acre development which is item
No. 5 on this agenda (Capitol Lakes Estates -- Preliminary
Plat; S-1100). The property proposed for multifamily zoning
is located at the northern edge of the Capitol Lakes Estates
development, at the intersection of the realigned Cooper
Orbit Road and an as yet unnamed minor arterial street. The
minor arterial street bisects the multifamily property into
two parcels, the smaller parcel being on the north side of
the street and the larger being on the south.
The property is now vacant and heavily wooded. No immediate
development is proposed for the multifamily sites. The
surrounding properties are for the most part all zoned R-2
and are themselves vacant and heavily wooded. The Spring
Valley Manor Residential Subdivision is located south of the
190+ acre Capitol Lakes development; well separated from the
proposed multifamily. The Oasis retreat is adjacent to the
north of the smaller tract proposed for multifamily.
The Ellis Mountain District Land Use Plan currently
recommends Single Family for the site. The multifamily
property is to be located at the intersection of a realigned
collector (Cooper Orbit Road) and a new minor arterial
street. Staff believes the relatively low density proposed,
MF -12, is appropriate for the site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested MF -12 zoning and of
an amendment to the Ellis Mountain District Land Use Plan to
reflect Low Density Multifamily for the site.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(APRIL 25, 1996)
The applicant, Jim Hathaway, was present. There were
objectors present. Dana Carney, of the Planning Staff,
presented the item and discussed staff's review of the
District Land Use Plan. He stated that staff felt this low
density MF -12 zoning request was reasonable for the
property. He recommended approval of the requested zoning
and of an amendment to the District Land Use Plan.
Mr. Hathaway addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He gave a brief history of the proposal and
made reference to a previous MF -18 zoning request for
2
'April 25, 1996
SpHDIVT ;ION
ITEM NO.: 25 Z-6120 Cont.
property farther south, adjacent to Spring Valley Manor
Subdivision. Mr. Hathaway stated that the 33.8± acres of
multifamily was within a proposed 192 acre development. He
stated that this was the way that the Planning Commission
should review items, look at the large picture. Mr.
Hathaway stated that proposed buyers would know how the
property in the area is going to be used.
Mr. Hathaway discussed the relationship of the multifamily
zoning to the Spring Valley Manor neighborhood and the Oasis
Retreat. He stated that he had attempted to meet with
persons at the Oasis but had been unable to do so.
Mr. Hathaway then described the proposed realignment of
Cooper Orbit Road and the construction of the new east/west
arterial street. He stated that the 33.8± acres of
multifamily would actually be closer to 30 acres once the
required right-of-way was dedicated. Mr. Hathaway stated
that the total density of the 192 acre development would be
3.4 units per acre, even including the multifamily. He
noted staff's recommendation of approval of a Land Use Plan
Amendment and of the proposed rezoning.
There was then a discussion of the proposed Capital Lakes
Estates preliminary plat, which includes the proposed MF -12
property. It was noted that the Plat had been deferred to
the June 6, 1996 Commission meeting.
Commissioner Adcock asked if there was a buffer proposed
where Capitol Lakes Estates is adjacent to Spring Valley
Manor. Mr. Hathaway responded that no buffer was necessary
since the plat proposed single family where adjacent to
Spring Valley Manor.
In response to a question from Commissioner Adcock, Mr.
Hathaway stated that the development was pursuing all issues
related to the site including annexation, platting, zoning
and utilities. He stated that all of those issues would be
resolved or the land would not be developed.
There was then a brief discussion of the site's topography.
J. Mark Davis, spokesperson for the Oasis Renewal Center,
addressed the Commission in opposition to the rezoning. He
described the Center's operations and handed out information
on the Oasis. He stated that Oasis was mindful of a
property owner's right to develop his property but was also
concerned about the relationship of the proposed multifamily
to the Oasis site. He stated that the multifamily property
would negatively impact the Oasis. Mr. David asked that the
zoning be denied.
April 25, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 25 Z-6120 (Cont.
In response to a question from Chairman Woods, Mr. Davis
stated that Oasis was opposed to the multifamily zoning on
both the north and south sides of the proposed arterial
street.
In response to a question from Commissioner Lichty, Mr.
Davis stated that most of the Oasis operations are located
in the north west quadrant of the Oasis property, on the
north side of lake. Commissioner Lichty asked how the Oasis
could be opposed to the multifamily on the south side of the
proposed arterial street when it would be so greatly
separated from the Oasis operation.
David Scherer, of the Public Works Department, discussed the
Master Street Plan and the proposed streets. Dana Carney
noted that the right-of-way for the proposed arterial -and
realigned Cooper Orbit Road would be dedicated through the
rezoning.
Commissioner Hawn stated that he could not understand how
the Oasis could object to the MF -12 density. He suggested
that the Oasis should have purchased additional property if
they wanted more solitude.
In response to a question from Commissioner Adcock, Mr.
Davis stated that the Oasis was not opposed to the earlier
rezoning request which proposed MF -18 zoning adjacent to the
Spring Valley Manor Subdivision.
Chairman Woods commented that it appeared that the Oasis did
not work with the developer where the residents of Spring
Valley Manor did.
Commissioner Lichty asked if the developer would consider a
lower density for the approximately 8 acres on the north
side of the proposed arterial street. Mr. Hathaway
responded that he would consider a modification but that he
had been told that the Oasis Board was unwilling to
negotiate.
Commissioner Ball asked if it was imperative that the 8
acres north of the arterial be zoned multifamily. Mr.
Hathaway responded by asking where multifamily would be more
appropriate than where he had proposed.
Mr. Hathaway stated that he was willing to offer a condition
that the multifamily would not be developed unless the plat
was approved, the streets built, the property annexed and
sewer service brought to the site. He stated that the
developer needed to know if the multifamily was feasible.
There was a discussion of dropping the 8 acres north of the
proposed arterial street from the rezoning request.
4
_April 25, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 25 z-6120 Cont.
Commissioner Putnam stated that the problem seemed to be how
to secure the Oasis.
In response to a question from Mr. Hathaway, Rusty Sparks,
President of the Spring Valley Manor Property Owners
Association, confirmed that the applicant had worked with
the neighborhood to resolve several issues.
Commissioner Ball asked if the rezoning request could be
deferred to coincide with the Commission's review of the
plat. Mr. Hathaway asked what issue there was about the
plat that affected the rezoning. He noted that the right-
of-way for the arterial street and Cooper Orbit Road would
be established through the rezoning_
Mr. Hathaway offered to attach the condition that the zoning
would become null and void if the plat was not approved.
Staff noted that the Rezoning Ordinance could be written so
that it becomes effective when the plat is approved.
Rusty Sparks addressed the Commission in support of the
application.
Bill Worthen addressed the Commission. He stated that he
represented persons who own property north of the western
end of the proposed Capitol Lake Estates. He did not voice
an opinion about the rezoning.
Joe Gillespie, President of the Oasis Board, addressed the
Commission in opposition to the rezoning request. He stated,
that he had advised Mr. Davis to voice the Oasis Board's
opposition to rezoning.
Commissioner Brandon asked Mr. Gillespie if he had stated
that he would not negotiate with the applicant. Mr.
Gillespie responded by stating "never say never."
Commissioner Ball stated that the Commission was being put
in the position of voting yes or no and that there did not
appear to be any negotiation.
Mr. Gillespie stated that he did not believe the Oasis would
survive with multifamily development adjacent to it.
Commissioner Ball asked Mr. Hathaway if he wanted a vote on
the application. Mr. Hathaway responded that he would like
a vote and that he would work with the Oasis people. Mr.
Hathaway again offered the condition that the zoning would
only go into effect upon approval of the Capitol Lakes
Estates Preliminary Plat.
5
April. 25, 1996
SL73DI ION
ITEM NO.: 25 2-612D Cant. __
A motion was made to approve the Land Use Plan Amendment.
The vote was 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 abstaining
(Putnam).
A motion was then made to approve the MF -12 zoning with the
condition as offered by Mr. Hathaway. The vote was 6 ayes,
0 noes, 1 absent and 4 abstaining (Putnam, Hawn, Adcock and
McCarthy).
0