HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6063-A ApplicationCity of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Plaf�ding
L9 723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
February 26, 1996
Mr. Kenny Goodwin
301 E. Roosevelt Rd.
Little Rock, AR 72206
RE: GOODWIN 301 E. ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -FORM PCD (Z -6063-A)
Dear Mr. Goodwin:
Enclosed is a copy of the Ordinance which was passed on Tuesday, February 20, 1996, which
establishes your requested PCD. Also, I have included a copy of the staff report/minute record
from the Planning Commission's hearing on the PCD request. The "Planned Development"
ordinance requires a development to be implemented as approved by the Planning Commission,
and very little variation is permitted from the approved site plan. You are urged to keep the
minute record available for future reference and to use it as a guide as you implement business
programs. Any variation from the approved planned development will require a formal
amendment to the PCD ordinance.
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
Any required changes in the site plan or submittal information must be incorporated into the
document(s), and at least three (3) copies of the changed plat must be submitted to me before the
file can be processed for approval. If you want a copy of the "signed -off' plan for your records,
please provide an extra copy or copies beyond the three copies I need for the file.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call me at 371-6814.
Sincerely,
xb�,� '.,6z�-
Bobby . Sims
Subdivision Administrator
cc: Mr. Sam Nwaneri
P. O. Box 2516
Little Rock, AR 72203
ORDINANCE NO. 17,128
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
AND ESTABLISHING A PLANNED COMN1ERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TITLED GOODWIN 301 E.
ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -FORM PCD(Z-6063-A),
LOCATED AT 301 E. ROOSEVELT RD., IN THE CITY
OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 36
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That the -zone classification of the
following described property be changed from C-3 to PCD.
A parcel of land in Section 14, T -1-N, R -12-W, and
located at 301 E. Roosevelt Rd., Little Rock, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Pettefer's Addition
SECTION 2. That the preliminary site development
plan/plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock
Planing Commission.
SECTION 3. That the change in zoning classification
contemplated for GOODWIN 301 E. ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -FORM PCD
(Z -6063-A) is conditioned upon obtaining final plan approval
within the time specified by Chapter 36-454(d) of the Code of
Ordinances.
SECTION 4. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas,
and designated district map be and it is hereby amended to
the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and
designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof.
SECTION 5. That this ORDINANCE shall take effect
and be in full force upon final approval of the plan.
PASSED: February 20, 1996
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Robbie Hancock Jim Dailey
City Clerk Mayor
Item
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION
FEBRUARY 20,1996 AGENDA
Subject
Establish GOODWIN 301 E.
ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -
FORM PCD
SYNOPSIS
FISCAL IMPACT
RECOMIMENDATION
Action Required
4Ordinance
Resolution
Approval
Information Report
Submitted By
Charles Nickerson
Establish GOODWIN 301 E. ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -FORM PCD
(Z -6063-A), located on the south side of E. Roosevelt Rd., at 301 E.
Roosevelt Rd.
None
Staff initially recommended denial of the PCD, because the request
included approval of an "open display" use for a used car business, a C-4
type use. Such a C-4 use is inconsistent with the character of uses
allowed by the adopted Land Use Plan for the area. When the applicant
refined his request, explaining that he needed the used car designation to
meet state licensing requirements for a use car brokerage business, and
limited both the number of used cars to be displayed and the signage on
the site, the character of the use became much less intense and could be
approved as being in character with the Land Use Plan. Staff
subsequently has revised the recommendation to one of approval, with
reservations.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the PCD with the
vote of 8 ayes, 1 no, 2 absent, and 0 abstentions.
The Commission voiced the analysis that the use of the site, as explained
by the applicant and limited by the Commission, is, basically, in keeping
with those uses allowed in the C-3 zoning district, that the "open
display" use is so restricted that it does not impact the character of the
use.
CITIZEN On October 12, 1995, the required notification sign was posted on the
PARTICIPATION property.
On October 20, 1995, the required notice was sent to both the
Meadowbrook Neighborhood Association and to the East of Broadway
Neighborhood Association, advising them of the nature of the request
and the date of the public hearing.
On October 27, 1995, the required notice forms, indicating the nature
of the request and the date and time of the meeting, were mailed by
certified mail, to all record property owners within 200 feet of the tract.
On November 14, 1995, a public hearing on the applicant's proposal to
rezone the property from C-3 to C-4 was held, but, as a result of the
discussion regarding the character of the proposed use, the application
was amended to a PCD request and was deferred to permit the applicant
to file the needed site plan and PCD documentation.
On December 12, 1995, the public hearing was conducted on a revised
application for a PCD request. Due to the applicant not having
completed his site plan to incorporate the required information and
revisions noted by the Subdivision Committee, the public hearing on the
issue was again deferred.
On January 30, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted another
public hearing on the request. No one spoke in opposition to the
request, and staff heard from no one who expressed opposition to the
request.
BACKGROUND The applicant proposes a mixed use planned development to include the
continued use of the north (E. Roosevelt Rd.) -facing level (the upper
level of a two-story building) as a grocery store; the future use of the
south -facing (lower) level as a restaurant; and, the use of the five
designated parking spaces at the north-west corner of the property as a
lot to store used cars which he will have for sale. The applicant plans to
operate a used car brokerage business, and needs a properly zoned site in
order to qualify for a used car dealer's license from the State. He does
not, however, plan to operate a typical used car lot and sell cars from
the lot. He plans, though, to buy and sell cars at auctions and from and
to individuals, and to inventory up to five cars on the property. Of the
five cars, one would be permitted to have advertisement in or on it
indicating that it was for sale; other cars would not. No pole sign would
be allowed to advertise cars for sale; only a building sign would be
permitted to advertise the applicant's used car brokerage business.
BACKGROUND With these restrictions, the Planning Commission considered the use to
(CONTINUED) be no more intense than any other C-3 permitted use, and
recommended approval of the PCD.
No Land Use Plan amendment is required; the proposed use, as
amended and limited, conforms to the adopted Land Use Plan.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
AND ESTABLISHING A PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TITLED GOODWIN 301 E.
ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -FORM PCD(Z-6063-A),
LOCATED AT 301 E. ROOSEVELT RD., IN THE CITY
OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 36
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That the zone classification of the
following described property be changed from C-3 to PCD.
A parcel of land in Section 14, T -1-N, R -12-W, and
located at 301 E. Roosevelt Rd., Little Rock, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Pettefer's Addition
SECTION 2. That the preliminary site development
plan/plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock
Planing Commission.
SECTION 3. That the change in zoning classification
contemplated for GOODWIN 301 E. ROOSEVELT -- SHORT -FORM PCD
(Z -6063-A) is conditioned upon obtaining final plan approval
within the time specified by Chapter 36-454(d) of the Code of
Ordinances.
SECTION 4. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas,
and designated district map be and it is hereby amended to
the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and
designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof.
SECTION 5. That this ORDINANCE shall take effect
and be in full force upon final approval of the plan.
PASSED:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor
r � �
it f a R� . 1 r 1�-■-.f �
w � a ■ f��
■ -! r. ■ -MEN�
i 1
ME
IN
7 INS i R� ■
� � � i 1 i' 1 •��
� s i ■■7 �
9
N
0
Area Land Use Plan
Z-6063
301 Roosevelt Rd
C3 to C4
si
-T w TRS TIN R12W 14 A
eb.`.
PD
� S
Vicinity Map Item No.
i
RY i i Ra r
t�
r
7 INS i R� ■
� � � i 1 i' 1 •��
� s i ■■7 �
9
N
0
Area Land Use Plan
Z-6063
301 Roosevelt Rd
C3 to C4
si
-T w TRS TIN R12W 14 A
eb.`.
PD
� S
Vicinity Map Item No.
ROOSEVELT ROAD
141, D 0t
1
PROPOSED PARKING
2 &TN STREET
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
Z -6063-A ITEM NO.
GOODWIN
301 E.ROOSEVELT ROAD
U)%
WF:4 �.
` U U
w
EX15TINC
can
`D
BUIL DING
F -i Ln
ww
1
PROPOSED PARKING
2 &TN STREET
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
Z -6063-A ITEM NO.
GOODWIN
301 E.ROOSEVELT ROAD
ROOSEVELT ROAD
EXISTING
BUIL. DIN&
v .
PROPOSED PARKING
2&T9 STREET
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
ITEM TEM NO.
GOODWIN E
301 E -ROOSEVELT ROAD
ar1
�.. Q Q
8 o C�
0 C== �. t
-
a= = occ
d oCao dCd
° a a CJC7c7 'J �---
,❑ Irla � �= d �' oda
r
A C7
d
0 cm cm m
Q 4D OHO❑ 6 Q� 7J '
cj Q Q U cla J C•
C=4 i3 d
Sc
23
°
o ElQ R41
TR, 1 n
Area Zoning
Z-5063
301 Roosevelt Rd
TR) Ttr RI:w N
PD
CT
I[em No.
a
S a 0
u
Q
oc ❑ ''C3p dR9 ROOSEVELT RD.
C)
n Q° n O
.�
C3 �� • d ' a
d� ° d aaao oGa ad"1
•z CJUC=
C3 0
aiC2 0m
Qa C1 C2
C p 4 6 Q a 1 d° c� a'-'
a aOEM �0 a
.o Cl
0 o aQo
° oCl� p a �a°❑ 0 0 Q °
s
fl-�•cl
R4, 0C3 11 11
n j
Area Zonincy
Z-6063
301 Roosevelt Rd
PCO
PRS
PD_—
C7
-- -
im
C3
f1em tio.
a
ROOSEVELT ROAD
EX/ STING
' BUIL DING
o
PROPOSED PARKING
267TH STREET
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
1-6063-A ITEM NO.
GOODWIN E
301 E4ROOSEVELT ROAD
P. O. BOX 2516
LITTLE ROCK AR 72203
PHONE (501) 568-4370
11 12 1995
Dear Sir,
Your letter of November 14 1995 was received and the course of action; your decision....
STAFF CANNOT SUPPORT A C-4 REQUEST AT THIS SITE, was noted.
I would now like to elaborate my request with a detailed site plan to enable you reconsider
this proposal and accord it a favorable processing.
efer the Engingering CoMrngnts:
A 70 feet dedicated right of way ROW ,exists for Roosevelt. Provision for Cumberland
ROW is also made on the site plan. But you may as well remember that Cumberland did
not go through from 26th street to Roosevelt. I think that the ROW for 26th street is
adequate enough.
The project would comply with any requirements to provide side walks on Roosevelt and
26th street. This would also include any street improvements.
Traffic Engineering commence
As you can see from the site plan, no provisions are made to install any parking in the
ROW of any of the surrounding streets, including Roosevelt.
All parking areas are paved and asphalt finish.
The access to Roosevelt would be reconstructed and widened from 12 to 18 feet; to lead
into the designated customer parking areas only.
This access would be closed at the end where it joins the 26th street; and a NO OUTLET
sign would be placed at the Roosevelt entrance.
,Staff Analysis.
According to the site plan, the vehicle sale would not replace the existing grocery (food
store). The proposal is: the car sale would exist along with the food store and the
restaurant.
1
At this point, I would request that you place a value on the information and
details contained in the site plan and give my request an adequate
consideration. This would help my proposal for expansion to include;
1. A RESTAURANT at the lower floor of the existing food store.
2. A DISPLAY CAR SALE LOT at the west end of the existing food
store. See site plan.
3. CUSTOMER PARKING LOTS A and B as shown on the site plan.
4. RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ACCESS TO ROOSEVELT.
My proposal to develop this property would include the improvement of the following:
a. the access road would close towards the 26th street, only leading cars
into the customer parking areas.
b. the property would be fenced (chain link) ON THE EAST, WEST
AND SOUTH EDGES.
C. concrete steps would be constructed to link the display car lot and the
customer parking -B. This would include handicap access link
d. I shall produce a composite working and detailed drawing of the
RESTAURANT, THE PARKING LOTS AND THE DISPLAY CAR
LOT to meet city codes and regulations.
e. I would comply with any applicable improvements required.
f. this proposal does not intend to make any additions or extensions to the existing building
structure.
AT THIS POINT, YOU MAY RECONSIDER THE ITEM IN QUESTION;
ITEM # 3- Z-6063
OW , ER.....................KENNY GOODWIN
APPLICANT................KENNY GOODY IN
LOCATION.................301 EAST ROOSEVELT ROAD
REQUEST ...................REZONE FROM C-3 TO C-4
PURPOSE .................. VEHICLE SALES LOT AND RESTAURANT
SIZE ..........................0.32 ACRES
EXISTING USE ............ FOOD STORE
I MUST THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR CONSIDERATIONS.
YOURS SINCERELY,
SAM NWANERI
(AGENT FOR KENNY GOODWIN).
2