Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6046-A Staff Analysis601 March 30, 1998 Item No.. 2 File No.• Owner: Address- Description: Zoned: Variance Requested: Justification: Present Use of Prope_ rty: Proposed Use of Property: Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: No issues. B. Staff Analysis: Z -6046-A William and Ellen Reif 819 North Pine Street Lot 3 and part of Lot 2, Whillock's Replat R-3 Variances are requested from the area regulations of Section 36-255 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12. Applicant's Statement: The variance is requested from Section 36-255 of the Little Rock City Code to allow the construction of an attached garage and a front porch. The existing house is located at the top of a hill sloping to the North and East. The proposed site of the garage is level and immediately adjacent to the residence. Construction of the garage in any other location would require a significant amount of fill to level the site. The area to the South of the proposed addition (Lot 2) is a vacant lot. A front set back variance is currently in place. Single Family Single Family The R-3 zoned property at 819 N. Pine Street is occupied by a two-story single-family residence. The residence was built in late 1980 - early 1981. Due to a surveying error, the residence was constructed with a 9.7 foot front yard March 30, 1998 Item No.: 2(Cont.) setback. Subsequently, the applicant acquired a 12 foot wide portion of the lot adjacent to the south. A replat of the lots to legitimize that transaction is pending at staff level, awaiting the Board's action on this issue. on September 25, 1995, the Board_ approved a variance to allow for construction of a garage addition on the south side of the house. The addition was to maintain the existing 9.7 foot front yard setback and was to have a side yard setback of 3.6 feet. If an application is approved by the Board, all permits necessary for the initiation of work must be obtained within two years from the date of approval or the approval shall be considered void. The permits were never obtained and that 1995 Board action is considered void. The applicant is now requesting that the Board reapprove the variance to allow for construction of a garage addition onto the south side of the house. All issues are the same as at the time of the 1995 action and staff supports the variances for the garage. The 3.6 foot side yard setback should have no effect on the adjacent property. The adjacent lot is vacant and it is from the owner of this adjacent lot that the applicant acquired the 12 foot wide strip which is to be added to his lot. The garage addition will maintain the same front yard setback as the existing house. Even with the reduced front yard setback, the garage will have a setback from the curb of N. Pine Street of 34± feet. There should be no impact on traffic or sight distance. There is a second issue before the Board and that is a proposal by the applicant to construct a new porch addition onto the front of the house. The porch will extend out from the house 8 feet and will run the entire width of the house. Staff cannot support this request. The house now only has a front yard setback of 9.7 feet, created by an error at the time the house was built. The R-3 district requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet. If approved, the porch would have a front yard setback of only 1.7 feet. This is too great a setback variance for a principal structure in a residential zone. The porch will extend out beyond the proposed new garage and could create a sight distance hazard. Such a reduced front yard is out of character with existing development in the area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the setback variances to allow for construction of the proposed garage addition onto the south side of the house subject to the condition that no building permit is to be issued until the replat issue concerning this lot and the lot to the south is resolved. Staff does not recommend approval of the requested variance to allow for construction -of a porch addition onto the front of the house. 2 March 30, 1998 Item No.: 2 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (MARCH 30, 1998) The applicant, William Reif, was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and recommended approval of the variances to allow for construction of the proposed garage addition onto the south side of the house subject to the condition that no building permit be issued until the replat issue is resolved. Staff recommended denial of the variance to allow for construction of the porch addition onto the front of the house. Mr. Reif addressed the Board in support of his application. He presented copies of a survey of his property and noted that the porch addition would have a setback of 34 feet from the edge of the street. Mr. Reif stated that his property was elevated several feet above the street and, as such, the porch addition should not create a sight -distance hazard. He also noted that Pine Street was a one-way street with traffic moving north to south which would further reduce any possible sight distance problem. In response to a question from Brandon Rogers, Dana Carney of the Planning Staff, stated that he was not aware of any plans for the widening of the street. Mr. Carney also noted that the street was constructed in the western half of the right-of-way, not in the center of the right-of-way, which was why there was so much undeveloped right-of-way between Mr. Reif's property and the pavement of the street. Richard Wood, of the Planning Staff, gave a brief history on the development of the site. He stated that the lot was mistakenly measured from the center of the street rather than the center of the right-of-way, resulting in the house being located too close to the front property line. In response to a question from Mr. Rogers, Mr. Wood stated that any proposed widening of Pine Street would probably result in an additional 4-8 feet of pavement on the applicant's side of the street. A motion was made to approve all requested variances subject to a replat. The motion was approved by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. 3