HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6042 Staff AnalysisOctober 31, 1995
ITEM 17 FIT,N z-- 42
NAME:
�—
Q-_�MRZ APPLICANT:
QRDIN."CE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. site Lo ion -
Alltel - Conditional Use Permit
10700 Colonel Glenn Road
Little Rock Water Works/Alltel
Mobile Communications, Inc. by
Drew Basham
A conditional use permit is
requested to allow for the
placement of a 130 foot tall
monopole communications tower and a
12' X 28' equipment shelter, with
reduced setback, on a lease area
located within this R-2 zoned
Little Rock Municipal water Works
property.
The proposed tower site is located near the northeast corner
of Colonel Glenn Road and I-430, just northwest of Sam's
wholesale Club and just east of the I-430 right-of-way.
2. compatibility with Neichborho d:
The proposed site is within an existing Little Rock Water
Works' water tank site. The vacant, tree -covered property
to the north is zoned 0-2. The C-3 zoned property to the
east and south is also vacant and tree -covered. Immediately
to the west of the property is I-430 right-of-way. This
proposal should not have an adverse effect on the
surrounding property.
3. On -Site Drivel and -Parking:
Access to the property will be
Road by utilizing an existing
Municipal Water Works.
Parking is no issue.
gained from Colonel Glenn
drive used by Little Rock
The face side of the proposed fence must be directed
outward.
October 31, 1995
OUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 17 on FILE NO.: Z-6042
5. City Engineer's Comments:
No issues apparent to Public Works
6. Utility CQ M9 -n S -
No Comments
7. Staff Analysis:
The applicant requests a conditional use permit to allow for
the placement of a monopole communications tower and a 12' X
28' equipment shelter on a lease area located within the R-2
zoned Little Rock Municipal Water Works property at 10700
Colonel Glenn Road. Also, height and setback variances are
requested. A maximum height of 130 feet is requested for
the tower, which exceeds the maximum height (75 feet)
allowed by ordinance. A 4 foot setback is proposed along
the west property line, which encroaches into the minimum
8 foot side yard setback as required by ordinance.
8, Etaff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the application as submitted.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (OCTOBER 12, 1995)
The applicant, Drew Basham, was present.
There was a brief discussion regarding the location of the site
and the surrounding land.
The request for height and setback variances was also discussed
briefly.
The Commission accepted the presentation and forwarded the issue
to the full Commission for final action.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(OCTOBER 31, 1995)
The Staff presented a positive recommendation on this application
as there were no further issues for resolution. There were no
objectors to this matter.
The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion
within the Consent Agenda for approval. A motion to that effect
was made. The motion was passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and
2 absent.
2