HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5990 Staff AnalysisFILE NO,: Z-5990
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Marian and Julian Genter and
W. F. and Kathleen McElroy
J. E. Hathaway, Jr.
900 Block Autumn Road/
West Side
Rezone from R-2 to 0-3
Offices
2.5 acres
Residential
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North - Residential, zoned R-2
South - Residential and Vacant, zoned R-2
East - Office, zoned C-3
West - Commercial, zoned POD
STAFF ANALYSIS
The subject site lies immediately south of the Chenal
Parkway and Autumn intersection, which is actively under
development for several commercial projects. Autumn Road
functions as a commercial collector paralleling Bowman Road
from Kanis Road to the Parkway. There is little potential
for the existing three or four houses to remain good
dwelling sites.
Autumn at Kanis has been redeveloped in recent years from
residential to commercial and office uses. Immediately
across Autumn from this site is the psychiatric hospital and
a site under construction for Kid Sport. These uses are
commercial and office zoned.
To the west or behind this site is an office/mini-storage
use recently constructed.
LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT
The site is located in the I-430 District Plan. The Plan
recommends Commercial and Mixed/Office Commercial for the
area. There is no plan issue.
FILE NO.: Z-5990 (Cont.)
ENGINEERING CQMMENTS
1. 60 feet of right-of-way required on Autumn Road,
30 feet from the centerline.
2. With construction:
a. Grading permit required before any construction or
excavation.
b. Widen Autumn Road to one-half of a 36 foot street
with sidewalk.
C. Stormwater detention analysis will be required.
d. One driveway cut for total frontage if development
is on both tracts.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the application subject to right-of-way
dedication.
PLANNING COMMI SI❑ ACTION: (MAY 30, 1995)
The Planning Commission received the staff's recommendation
of approval with commentary that there were no objectors in
attendance nor were there any letters of objections
received. Mr. Jim Hathaway was present as was Mr. Bill
McClard. These gentlemen were in attendance as applicants
and sale agents.
The Chairman asked Mr. Hathaway if he had comments.
Mr. Hathaway responded by stating that he did turn in a
speaking request card because there was one point of
clarification he desired. The Public Works' comment dealing
with access and a limitation of one drive way to the parcel.
His question was "Was there going to be a condition of the
rezoning?" The response from staff was that it was included
in the agenda write-up for information to advise him of this
condition. At some future point when he receives a building
permit review or site plan review, the issue will be called
by Public Works as a requirement.
Mr. Hathaway responded that he now understands the reason
for placement of this comment within the agenda. The
Chairman then stated that it was appropriate to place this
item in the Consent Agenda package for a vote. A motion to
that effect was made. A vote on the motion of 6 ayes,
0 nays and 5 absent approved the application as submitted.
2
1995
ITEM NO.: 5 Z-5990
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Marian and Julian Genter and
W. F. and Kathleen McElroy
J. E. Hathaway, Jr.
900 Block Autumn Road/
West Side
Rezone from R-2 to 0-3
Offices
2.5 acres
Residential
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North - Residential, zoned R-2
South - Residential and vacant, zoned R-2
East - Office, zoned C-3
West - Commercial, zoned POD
STAFF ANALYSIS
The subject site lies immediately south of the Chenal
Parkway and Autumn intersection, which is actively under
development for several commercial projects. Autumn Road
functions as a commercial collector paralleling Bowman Road
from Kanis Road to the Parkway. There is little potential
for the existing three or four houses to remain good
dwelling sites.
Autumn at Kanis has been redeveloped in recent years from
residential to commercial and office uses. Immediately
across Autumn from this site is the psychiatric hospital and
a site under construction for Kid Sport. These uses are
commercial and office zoned.
To the west or behind this site is an office/mini-storage
use recently constructed.
LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT
The site is located in the I-430 District Plan. The Plan
recommends Commercial and Mixed/Office Commercial for the
area. There is no plan issue.
May 30, 1995
5990 (Cont. )
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
1. 60 feet of right-of-way required on Autumn Road,
30 feet from the centerline.
2. With construction:
a. Grading permit required before any construction or
excavation.
b. Widen Autumn Road to one-half of a 36 -foot street
with sidewalk.
C. Stormwater detention analysis will be required.
d. One driveway cut for total frontage if development
is on both tracts.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the application subject to right-of-way
dedication.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 30, 1995)
The Planning Commission received the staffs recommendation
of approval with commentary that there were no objectors in
attendance nor were there any letters of objections
received. Mr. Jim Hathaway was present as was Mr. Bill
McClard. These gentlemen were in attendance as applicants
and sale agents.
The Chairman asked Mr. Hathaway if he had comments.
Mr. Hathaway responded by stating that he did turn in a
speaking request card because there was one point of
clarification he desired. The Public Works' comment dealing
with access and a limitation of one drive way to the parcel.
His question was "Was there going to be a condition of the
rezoning?" The response from staff was that it was included
in the agenda write-up for information to advise him of this
condition. At some future point when he receives a building
permit review or site plan review, the issue will be called
by Public Works as a requirement.
Mr. Hathaway responded that he now understands the reason
for placement of this comment within the agenda. The
Chairman then stated that it was appropriate to place this
item in the Consent Agenda package for a vote. A motion to
that effect was made. A vote on the motion of 6 ayes,
0 nays and 5 absent approved the application as submitted.
E