HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5936-H Staff Analysisc0
2007
:' NNO.: 12
D 4- S -7
FILE NO.: Z
NAME: Chenal Condo's Short -form PD -R
LOCATION: Located on the Northwest comer of Rahling Road and Chenal Parkway
DEVELOPER:
First Delta Development Group
C/o William Dean
18 Corporate Hill Drive
Little Rock, AR 72205
ENGINEER:
White-Daters and Associates
24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 4.7 acres
CURRENT ZONING:
ALLOWED USES:
PROPOSED ZONING
PROPOSED USE:
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
MF -18
Multi -family 18 units per acre
-M
Multi -family — 15.3 units per acre
VARIANCESIWAiVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF
The property contains 4.7 acres located at the northwest corner of Chenal
Parkway
and Rahling Road just north of the Bank of the Ozark property � proposing
development with a new corporate office. First er overlooking Development
No nGroup
g ee ksof Chenal
a "high-end' condominium development ❑ g
Country Club. The project will consist of six buildings three -stories undin he ght with al
total of 72 units. All units will have one parkingspace
87 spaces will be constructed above ground for guest parking.
The development will be gated and take access from the sharedwbe
hich
connects to Chenal Parkway and Rahling Road. A swimming pool with cabana will
April 12, 2007
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z -5936-H
centrally located near the entrance. A community mailbox will also be provided with a
pick-up lane.
The development will have access to the Chenal Golf Course with a cart trail tying
directly into the cart path on Hole #6. The lower level of Building A will have cart
storage for individuals who wish to own a Chenal golf cart.
B. EXISTING CONDIT)ONS:
Ordinance No. 19,501 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on March 21,
2006, revoked a previously approved PCD restoring this site to the previously held
MF -18 Zoning District.
The site is a sparsely wooded site located adjacent to the Chenal Golf Course to the
north. South of the site a large area has been cleared for construction of an office
building and further south a shopping center. Rahling Road has been extended to the
west of Chenal Parkway but the connection to Chenal Parkway has not been
completed. To the west of the site is an area zoned OS, Open Space and further west
is vacant R-2, Single-family residentially zoned property. Across Chenal Parkway is a
large tract of 0-2, Office and Institutional District zoned property which is presently
tree covered.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received a number of informational phone calls from area
residents. All property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, all residents located
within 300 -feet of the site, who could be identified, along with the DuQuesne Place
Property Owners Association, the Aberdeen Place Property Owners Association and
the Margequx Place Property Owners Association were notified of the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS -
1. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required
prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and
drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of
construction.
2. Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Section 29-186 (e).
3. Show improvements and curb cuts for the Bank of the Ozarks site to better
determine location of proposed entrance.
4. The right turn lane on Chenal Parkway must be constructed with 250 feet of
stacking distance and a 150 foot taper.
2
E
ON
NO.: 12 Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5936-H
5. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of
work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from
Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner).
6. If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction.
7. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed
location for storm water detention facilities on the plan.
8. Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Traffic Engineering
must approve completed plans prior to construction.
9. Turn around must be provided for a WB -30 vehicle attempting to enter
development. A stacking distance of 30 feet from pavement must also be
provided.
UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required, with easements. Capacity Contribution
Fee will be charged for this project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-
1414 for additional information.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Ener : Approved as submitted.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the
time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on
the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal
charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered
connections off the private fire system. Please submit four copies of the plans for the
fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Contact Central Arkansas
Water regarding procedures for installation of fire service. Approval of plans by the
Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department
is required. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze
shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a
reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. This development will
have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities
will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection.
Fire Department: Install and place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire
Department for additional information.
County Planning: No comment.
3
April 12, 2007
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12(Cont.)FILE NO.: Z -5936-H
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: This request is located in the Chenal Planning District. The Land
Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a short
form PD -R Planned Development Residential to allow the development of the site with
three buildings containing 72 units of owner occupied condominium housing.
The application is closer to the Land Use Plan than the current zoning of MF -18. The
request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. If this site does develop as
proposed, staff will include it as clean-up when there is a review of the Plan in this
area.
Master Street Pian: Chenal Parkway is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master
Street Plan. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street
improvements. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic
and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas.
Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and
pedestrians on Chenal since it is a Principal Arterial.
Bicycle Plan: A Class I bike route is shown along Chenal Parkway and Rahling Road.
A Class I bikeway is built separate from or alongside a road. Additional paving and
right of way may be required.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located
in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan.
Landscape,
1. Compliance with the City's landscape and buffer ordinance is required.
2. The zoning street buffer ordinance requires an average twenty-two foot wide (22')
street buffer along Chenal Parkway.
3. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a land use buffer along the western perimeter
of the site of twenty-two foot. Seventy percent (70%) of this area is to remain
undisturbed. Currently, a driveway is proposed in this location. Please relocate
this drive out of this minimal land use buffer. Easements cannot count toward
fulfilling this requirement.
4. The zoning street buffer ordinance requires an average thirty-three foot wide (33')
street buffer along the shared private drive.
51
is►
c0
W
1 f=
2007
,;-g 1VISION
STEM NO.: 12 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -5936-H
5. The zoning buffer ordinance requires a land use buffer along the northern
perimeter of the site next to the golf course area. This buffer should be thirty-three
foot in width of which, seventy percent (70%) is to be undisturbed. Easements
cannot count toward fulfilling this requirement.
6. A six (6) foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed
outward, a wall, or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern and
western perimeters of the site. Credit towards fulfilling this requirement can be
given for existing trees and undergrowth that satisfies this year -around
requirement.
7. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to provide an
approved landscape plan stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape
Architect.
9. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as
feasible on this tree covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (March 22, 2007)
Mr. Joe White was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of
the proposed development indicating there were additional items necessary to
complete the review process. Staff stated the development was proposed at a density
less than currently allowed per the existing MF -18 zoning. Staff also questioned the
dashed line around the perimeter of the site. Staff stated the indicated turn -around
was not adequate to provide turning movements for large vehicles. Staff stated the
entrance should be redesigned to allow proper turning movements.
Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated an additional lane would be
required along Chenal Parkway. Staff also requested the applicant provide the
driveway locations for the proposed bank to ensure the drives were aligned.
Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated the indicated buffers did not
appear to meet the typical minimum requirements. Staff also stated a landscape plan
would be required at the time of development.
Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies
suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and
clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then
forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action.
G�
April 12, 2007
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 Cont.
mom.
FILE NO.: 2-5936-H
H. ANAL:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues
raised at the March 22, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant
redesigned the entrance to allow adequate maneuvering for vehicles entering and
exiting the site. The drive located on the adjoining property has also been indicated
and there is no conflict in turning movements.
The applicant is proposing the development of this 4.7 acres located just north of the
Bank of the Ozark property as a "high-end' condominium development overlooking the
No. 6 Green of Chenal Country Club. The project will consist of six (6) buildings three
floors of residential housing with twelve (12) units per building for a total of 72 units.
All units will have one parking space underground An additional 87 spaces will be
constructed above ground for guest parking.
The development will be gated and take access from the shared private drive which
connects to Chenal Parkway and Rahling Road. A swimming pool with Cabana will be
centrally located near the entrance along with the community mailbox which will allow
a pick-up lane at the mail location. The development is proposed with access to the
Chenal Golf Course with a cart trail tying directly into the cart path on Hole #6. The
lower level of northern most buildings will have cart storage for individuals who wish to
own a Chenal golf cart.
The buildings are proposed four stories in the rear. The maximum building height
proposed is 42 -feet. The lower level of each building is proposed for parking with
three levels of residential housing above. Each building is proposed with a total of
twelve units. The property is presently zoned MF -18. The typical maximum building
height for MF -18 zone property is 35 -feet. Staff is supportive of the increased building
height. The applicant has indicated structures with parking located under the building
to limit the amount of surface parking.
The buildings are proposed with shingled roofs, stucco' and stone veneer.
Architectural elements include metal gable vents, iron railings, French doors and
transoms and shuttered awnings are proposed. The developers have indicated these
architectural elements to add design and character to the buildings as well as break
the massing of the structures.
The site pian indicates the placement of 159 parking spaces. Typically a multi -family
development with 72 units would require the placement 108 parking spaces. The
indicated parking is more than adequate to meet the typical minimum parking demand.
The site plan indicates the placement of interior landscaping and adequate buffering
around the perimeters of the site to satisfy the typical minimum ordinance
requirements. The site plan indicates a 40 -foot building setback and a minimum
6
iw f
_ ,2007
VISION
O.: 12 [Cont.
LE NO.: Z -5936-H
22 -foot average street buffer along Chenal Parkway. The site plan also includes the
placement of a 25 -foot landscape buffer along the western perimeter and the
placement of dense evergreen plantings within the buffer area. Fencing is not
proposed along the western perimeter. Along the northern perimeter a 30 -foot average
buffer is proposed with the placement of dense evergreen plantings in this area as
well. No fencing is proposed along the northern perimeter either. The area is zoned
residentially but is developed as the 6th hole of the Chenal Golf Course. The
developers have indicated a desire to capture the views of the golf course and request
the typically required screening not be required. The property to the west is zoned
OS, Open Space. Staff is supportive of the allowance of the plantings and buffers as
indicated.
Fencing is proposed along the Chenal Parkway and the southern perimeters of the
site. The fencing is proposed as a combination of brick, wrought iron and wood or a
wood simulation. The maximum height of the fence proposed is eight (8) feet with the
columns extending two (2) feet above the finished fence height. Staff is supportive of
the fencing as proposed.
The applicant has indicated development signage on the proposed site plan. The
signage will be consistent with signage allowed per the Chenal Design Overlay District
or a maximum of eight (8) feet in height and one hundred square feet in area. A sign
will be located along Chenal Parkway with a second sign located at the entrance to the
development. Staff is supportive of the signage as proposed.
Staff is supportive of the request. The development is proposed with a density similar -
to the density allowed per the current zoning. The development is proposed with
15.3 units per acre. To staff s knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated
with the request. Staff feels the development of the project as proposed will not
significantly impact the area and should provide an alternative housing type for the
area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments
and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the above agenda staff
report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 12, 2007)
The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the
item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the
comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs, D, E and F of the above agenda staff
report.
7
April 12, 2007
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 12 {Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-59
There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion for placement of
the item on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes
and 1 absent.
E