HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5936-B Staff AnalysisJune 22, 2000
ITEM NO.: 1.1.
FILE NO.: Z -5936-B
NAME: Chenal Valley (Tract 5A) - Zoning Site Plan Review
LOCATION: Northwest corner of-Chenal Parkway and LaGrande Drive
nRVELnPER
Cousins
2500 Windy Ridge Pky.
Suite 1600
Atlanta, GA 30339
ENGINEER:
White-Daters and Associates
401 S. Victory Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 38 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: C-2 ALLOWED USES: Commercial
PROPOSED USE: Commercial
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:
1.
Variance
for reduced building
setbacks (Lots 2, 3 and 4).
2.
Variance
for driveway setbacks
from property lines.
3.
Variance
to allow a median cut
on Chenal Parkway.
BACKGROUND:
This property was recently rezoned from PCD to C-2. The C-2
zoning district requires a site plan review by the Planning
Commission for any development.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant is proposing a four (4) lot site plan for the
38 acre property for the development of a shopping center.
The applicant is proposing the following development:
Lot 1 - building area: 215,153 square feet
(3 single -story buildings)
parking: 1,114 spaces
June 22, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1.1. (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5936-B
Lot 2 - building area: 119,888 square feet
(1 two-story building) with 20,000 square
foot future building addition.
parking: 530 spaces
Lot 3 - building area: 6,500 square feet
(1 single -story building)
parking: 69 spaces
Lot 4 - building area: 8,250 square feet
(1 single -story building)
parking: 69 spaces
The applicant is proposing a main entrance from Chenal
Parkway with a new median cut in Chenal Parkway. A
variance for this median cut has been requested. One other
driveway is shown on the Chenal frontage (Lot 2), with two
drives from LaGrande Dr. and three driveways from Rahling
Road. The applicant is requesting a variance for the
minimum setback for the two westernmost drives (one on
LaGrande Dr. and one on Rahling Road). The minimum
ordinance setback from property lines is 125 feet. The
proposed drives are approximately 30 to 40 feet from the
property lines.
As part of the development, the applicant proposes to fund
new traffic signals at the intersection of Chenal Parkway
and Rahling Road and the intersection of Chenal Parkway and
the project's main entrance (new median cut). The
applicant has also noted that LaGrande Dr. and Rahling Road
will be constructed to their intersection, just west of
this property.
The applicant is requesting a variance for a reduced
building setback for the proposed building on Lot 2. The
south building setback is approximately 30 feet. The
applicant is also requesting variances for reduced building
setbacks for Lots 3 and 4. The south setback for the
building on Lot 3 is approximately 37 feet and the south
and west setbacks for the building on Lot 4 are
approximately 10 to 18 feet. The ordinance requires a
minimum setback of 40 feet from all property lines in C-2
zoning.
The applicant is also proposing two (2) ground -mounted
signs (one on each side of the main entry drive from Chenal
Parkway), with a maximum height of eight (8) feet. The
applicant is also proposing a six (6) foot sidewalk along
Chenal Parkway within the property's front landscaped area.
V
June 22, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1.1. (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z -5936 -
The applicant has also submitted a detailed "tenant sign
criteria" (dated June 7, 2000) for this proposed
development. A copy is included in the agenda report for
Planning Commission review.
The proposed buildings, parking areas, drives, landscaped
areas and other proposed improvements are noted on the
attached site plan. The applicant has noted that the
project will be developed in one (1) phase.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The property is undeveloped and wooded, with varying
degrees of slope. The Arkansas Systems and Village at
Rahling Road developments are located across Chenal Parkway
to the east. The GMAC office complex is located across
LaGrande Dr. to the south. The property immediately north
and west is undeveloped and part of a PCD development which
was approved previously.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received no public comment
regarding this item. There was no established neighborhood
association in the area to notify.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1.All comments from Subdivision Plat S-867-GGGG apply to
this item.
2.Add left turn bays on West Loop Road, Chenal Parkway and
LaGrande Drive (dual left turns for WB lane with
additional lane added on LaGrande). (44 feet wide)
3.Show and construct sidewalk on all street frontages.
4.Show future curb cuts on remaining acreage bounded by
LaGrande Drive and West Loop.
5. Show existing driveways on GMAC property and line-up
proposed driveway with existing driveways.
6. Continue third lane to Chenal Parkway to LaGrande Drive.
7.Show cross access easements between lots one, three, and
four.
8. Traffic signal at Chenal and Rahling Road will be
required to handle projected site traffic.
3
June 22, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1.1. (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5936-B
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements
to serve property.
AP&L: No Comment received.
Arkla: Arkla approves as long as existing easement is not
affected.
Southwestern Bell: No Comment received.
Water: An acreage charge of $300/acre will apply in
addition to the normal connection charges. A water main
extension will be required to serve Lot 4, looped lines
with on site fire protection will be required to serve
Lot 1, and on site fire protection may be required for
the other lots.
Fire Department: Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 regarding
placement of fire hydrants.
County Planning: No Comments received.
CATA: No effect; Site is not on a dedicated bus route.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
No Comment.
Landscape Issues:
Area set aside for buffers and landscaping meet with
ordinance requirements.
The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many
existing trees as is feasible on this tree covered site.
Extra credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six inch
caliper or larger.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JUNE 1, 2000)
Tim Daters, Bill Bassett and Joe Keaton were present,
representing the application. Mr. Bassett briefly
described the site plan. He noted that the project would
be developed as a single phase.
4
June 22, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1.1. (Cont.)
H.
FILE NO.: Z -5936-B
It was noted that a variance would be needed for the median
cut in Chenal Parkway. Bob Turner, of Public Works,
discussed the Public Works requirements, and noted that he
would support the variance for the median cut based on the
fact that the entrance to the project was estimated to
generate traffic equal to a collector street.
Mr. Bassett gave a brief description of the proposed
signage. Staff noted that a document explaining the
proposed signage had been submitted. Mr. Bassett also
explained the proposed interior pedestrian sidewalks.
After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the site plan
to the full Commission for final action.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan and additional
information to staff on June 71 2000. The revised site
plan addresses the issues as raised by staff and the
Subdivision Committee. Dumpster areas and ground -mounted
sign locations have been shown on the revised plan.
The following is the minimum number of required parking
spaces and the proposed parking for each individual lot of
this development:
The number of parking spaces for each lot exceeds the
minimum ordinance standards and staff is comfortable with
the parking plan as proposed.
As noted in paragraph A., the applicant is requesting a
variance for minimum building setbacks for Lots 2, 3 and 4.
Staff supports the variance as requested.
The applicant is also requesting a variance for reduced
driveway setbacks from property lines and a variance to
allow a median cut in Chenal Parkway. Public Works has
indicated approval of the driveway setback variance.
Public Works has indicated support of the variance for a
median cut in Chenal Parkway based on the projected amount
of traffic that this development will generate.
5
Required (minimum)
Proposed
Lot
1 -
956
1,114
Lot
2 -
387
530
Lot
3 -
21
69
Lot
4 -
27
69
The number of parking spaces for each lot exceeds the
minimum ordinance standards and staff is comfortable with
the parking plan as proposed.
As noted in paragraph A., the applicant is requesting a
variance for minimum building setbacks for Lots 2, 3 and 4.
Staff supports the variance as requested.
The applicant is also requesting a variance for reduced
driveway setbacks from property lines and a variance to
allow a median cut in Chenal Parkway. Public Works has
indicated approval of the driveway setback variance.
Public Works has indicated support of the variance for a
median cut in Chenal Parkway based on the projected amount
of traffic that this development will generate.
5
June 22, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1.1. (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z -5936-B
The proposed site is located within the Chenal/Financial
Center Design Overlay District and must comply with the
following requirements for signage, site lighting and
utilities:
I. Ground -mounted signs must be monument - type with a
maximum height of 8 feet and a maximum area of 100
square feet.
2. Site lighting must be directed to the parking areas and
not reflected to adjacent parcels.
3. All lighting and utilities located between the rear
lines of the buildings and Chenal Parkway right-of-way
shall be underground. No overhead utilities shall be
constructed within 100 feet of the Chenal Parkway
right-of-way.
As noted in paragraph A., the applicant has submitted a
document titled "Tenant Sign Criteria" (dated June 7,
2000), which provides restrictions for wall -mounted and
projecting signs throughout this development. Staff feels
that the proposed sign criteria is extremely close to the
City's sign ordinance requirements and recommends approved
of this document as a component of the proposed site plan.
A copy of the document has been attached for Planning
Commission review.
Otherwise, to staff's knowledge, there are no outstanding
issues associated with the proposed site plan. Staff feels
that the proposed site plan will have no adverse effect on
the general area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed site plan subject
to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs
D, E and F of this report.
2. Staff recommends approval of the requested variance for
reduced building setbacks (Lots 2, 3 and 4).
3. Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow a
median cut in Chenal Parkway at the main development
entry.
4. Staff recommends approval of the variance for reduced
driveway setbacks for the two westernmost drives.
6
June 22, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1.1. (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z -5936-B
5. Ground -mounted signage, site lighting and utilities shall
conform to the Chenal/Financial Center Design Overlay
District Standards.
6. The dumpster areas must be screened on three (3) sides
with an 8 foot opaque fence or wall.
7.Staff recommends approval of the "Tenant Sign Criteria"
(dated June 7, 2000) as a component of this site plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(JUNE 22, 2000)
The staff presented a positive recommendation on this
application, as there were no further issues for resolution.
There were no objectors to this matter.
The Chairperson placed the item before the Commission for
inclusion within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended
by staff. A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed
by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent.
7