HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5906 Staff AnalysisFebruary 21, 1995
ITEM NO.: C FILE NO_: Z-5905
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
Alltel Cellular Tower - Southedge
Drive Site Conditional Use Permit
1100 Southedge Drive
Alltel Mobile Communications of
Arkansas by Tracy Gill
A conditional use permit is
requested to allow for the
construction of a 100 foot tall,
monopole cellular tower on this
MF -24 zoned property. Associated
with the tower is an unmanned 28
foot by 17 foot equipment shelter.
The property is located on the north side of Southedge
Drive, one block north of Rodney Parham Road and directly
west of the Spring Meadows Apartment Complex.
2. Compatibility with_Neicrhborhood
The proposed tower site is in an area of mixed zoning and
uses located along the north side of Rodney Parham Road.
The properties fronting onto Rodney Parham are primarily
zoned C-3 and contain a variety of commercial uses.
Behind these, and separating them from the single-family
residential neighborhood to the north, is an area of
multifamily zoning containing several apartment complexes.
The proposed tower site is shielded from the residential
neighborhood to the north by an apartment complex.
The Treasure Hill neighborhood, to the south, is separated
from the tower site by the commercial development on Rodney
Parham. The proposed 100 foot tower should not have a
negative impact on the adjacent neighborhoods.
3. on -Site Drives and Parkin
The site will be reached by a 15 foot access easement off of
Southedge Drive. Parking is provided at the tower site for
the service technician who will occasionally visit the site
for maintenance purposes. No other on-site parking is
required.
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: C Cont_) _ FILE NO.: Z-5906
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
screening and Buffers
The base of the tower site will be enclosed by an 8 foot
tall, wood privacy fence. Where adjacent to the apartment
complex, the tower site and parking space will be further
screened by planting 5 foot tall, evergreen shrubs.
City Engineer Comments
Access to the site must be taken through Lot 10, which is
occupied by the apartment complex. No new driveway will be
allowed onto Southedge Drive at this point.
utility Comments
Little Rock Wastewater Utility reports a sewer main
extension with easements will be required if sewer service
is necessary. The Fire Department requires the driveway to
be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The site only has a 15 foot
access easement to Southedge Drive.
Analysis
The applicant requests a conditional use permit to allow for
the construction of a 100 foot tall, monopole tower on this
MF -24 zoned site. The proposed tower site is shielded
somewhat from the nearest single-family neighborhoods by a
two-story apartment complex and by commercial development
along Rodney Parham Road.
Staff feels that the proposed 100 foot tower is a reasonable
use for this site and is supportive of the request, however
one important issue must be resolved prior to the Planning
Commission acting on this matter.
During the initial review of this application, it became
apparent that the small piece of property on which the tower
lease area is located was illegally subdivided from the
larger property on which the apartment complex is located.
This was later confirmed by the applicant.
In light of this development,
appropriate to defer action on
subdivision issue is resolved.
Staff Recommendation
staff feels that it would be
the proposed tower until the
Staff recommends deferral of this item until the property is
properly subdivided.
2
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: C (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z--5906
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(NOVEMBER 10, 1994)
The applicant was not present. Staff presented the item and
informed the Committee that the applicant had requested a
deferral to the January 10, 1995 commission meeting. A
subdivision application will be filed for that same meeting. The
Committee determined there were no other outstanding issues and
forwarded the item to the full Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(NOVEMBER 29, 1994)
The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present.
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested a
deferral to the January 10, 1995 commission meeting in order to
address the subdivision issue.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved for
deferral to the January 10, 1995 Planning Commission meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JANUARY 10, 1995)
The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present.
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested a
second deferral, this time to the February 21, 1995 commission
meeting. The applicant is continuing work to resolve the
subdivision issue.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved for
deferral to the February 21, 1995 Planning Commission meeting.
The vote was 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 2, 1995)
Randal Frazier was present representing Alltel. Staff informed
the Committee that the Board of Directors will consider a waiver
of the Subdivision regulations to permit approval of a final plat
of this lot at their February 7, 1995 meeting. Assuming the
Board approves the waiver, this would resolve the subdivision
issue and staff's recommendation will, be approval, subject to the
base of the tower site being screened from the adjacent multi-
family property.
After a discussion of the surrounding zoning and uses, Mr. Frazier
was urged to bring photographs or drawings depicting the design of
the proposed tower. The Committee then forwarded the item to the
full Commission.
3
February 21, 1995
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: C [Cont.] FILE NO.: Z-5905
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 21, 1995)
Randal Frazier was present representing Alltel. Several
individuals were present in opposition and many letters opposed
to the tower had been received by the Planning Staff. Staff
advised the Commission that the applicant desired to withdraw the
application. Mr. Frazier concurred. The item was placed on the
Consent Agenda and approved for withdrawal by a vote of 8 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent and 1 abstaining (Ball).
N
1. Meeting Date: February 7, 1995
2. Case No.: Z-5906
3. Rist: For ALLTEL CELLULAR TOWER, SOUTHEDGE DRIVE SITE --
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, approval of a WAIVER of the
Subdivision Regulations to permit approval of a final plat
of the single lot without dividing it from the tract from
which it was deeded.
4. Location: 1100 Southedge Dr.
5. Owner/ADDlicant: United Way of Pulaski County, owner;
Alltel Mobile Communications of Arkansas, by Tracy Gill,
applicant.
6. Existing Status: The site is a 0.76 acre tract which was
part of Lot 10, Paragon Place Addition, but which was deeded
by the original owner of Lot 10 to the United Way, without
properly subdividing the lot. The original owner
subsequently sold the remainder of Lot 10, which is occupied
by an apartment complex. The United Way wants to lease the
0.76 acre tract to Alltel, but approval of the Conditional
Use Permit is stalled until the tract can be properly
platted.
The proper procedure should have been for the owner of Lot
10 to divide Lot 10 into 2 lots, one lot would be occupied
by the apartment complex and the second lot would have been
given to the United Way. The current owner of the apartment
complex does not want to participated in properly
subdividing the lot, so the United Way is seeking a waiver
from the Subdivision Regulations to permit approval of a
plat on a tract without the involvement of the apartment
complex owners. (In the future, if there is,a situation
which requires the owner of the apartment complex to do
major repair work, then they will be required to properly
plat their portion of the lot, and this will require a
similar waiver which is being pursued at this time by the
United Way.)
The site is zoned MF -24
7. Pro osed Use: 100 foot tall cellular tower
8. Staff Recommendation: Approval
9. Planning Commission Recommendation: The waiver issue is not
required to be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
10. Conditions or Issues Remaining to be Resolved: None
11. Right-of-way Issues: None
12. Recommendation Forwarded With: N.A.
13. Objectors: N.A.
14. Neighborhood Contact Person/Others:
Hills Neighborhood Association
15. Neighborhood Pian: Rodney Parham (2)
Rusty Johnson, Treasure
FILE NO.: Z_b9L
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNERIAPFLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
Alltel Cellular Tower - Southedge
Drive Site Conditional Use Permit
1100 Southedge Drive
Alltel Mobile Communications of
Arkansas by Tracy Gill
A conditional use permit is
requested to allow for the
construction of a 100 foot tall,
monopole cellular tower on this
MF -24 zoned property. Associated
with the tower is an unmanned 28
foot by 17 foot equipment shelter.
The property is located on the north side of Southedge
Drive, one block north of Rodney Parham Road and directly
west of the Spring Meadows Apartment Complex.
2. Compatibility with neighborhood
The proposed tower site is in an area of mixed zoning and
uses located along the north side of Rodney Parham Road.
The properties fronting onto Rodney Parham are primarily
zoned C-3 and contain a variety of commercial uses.
Behind these, and separating them from the single-family
residential neighborhood to the north, is an area of
multifamily zoning containing several apartment complexes.
The proposed tower site is shielded from the residential
neighborhood to the north by an apartment complex.
The Treasure Hill neighborhood, to the south, is separated
from the tower site by the commercial development on Rodney
Parham. The proposed 100 foot tower should not have a
negative impact on the adjacent neighborhoods.
3. On- ite Drives and Parkin
The site will be reached by a 15 foot access easement off of
Southedge Drive. Parking is provided at the tower site for
the service technician who will occasionally visit the site
for maintenance purposes. No other on-site parking is
required.
FILE Na.: Z-5906 Cont.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Screening and Buffers
The base of the tower site will be enclosed by an 8 foot
tall, wood privacy fence. Where adjacent to the apartment
complex, the tower site and parking space will be further
screened by planting 5 foot tall, evergreen shrubs.
Cit En ineer Comments
Access to the site must be taken through Lot 10, which is
occupied by the apartment complex. No new driveway will be
allowed onto Southedge Drive at this point.
utility Comments
Little Rock Wastewater Utility reports a sewer main
extension with easements will be required if sewer service
is necessary. The Fire Department requires the driveway to
be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The site only has a 15 foot
access easement to Southedge Drive.
Analysis_
The applicant requests a conditional use permit to allow for
the construction of a 100 foot tall, monopole tower on this
MF -24 zoned site. The proposed tower site is shielded
somewhat from the nearest single-family neighborhoods by a
two-story apartment complex and by commercial development
along Rodney Parham Road.
Staff feels that the proposed 100 foot tower is a reasonable
use for this site and is supportive of the request, however
one important issue must be resolved prior to the Planning
Commission acting on this matter.
During the initial review of this application, it became
apparent that the small piece of property on which the tower
lease area is located was illegally subdivided from the
larger property on which the apartment complex is located.
This was later confirmed by the applicant.
In light of this development,
appropriate to defer action on
subdivision issue is resolved.
8. Staff Recommendation
staff feels that it would be
the proposed tower until the
Staff recommends deferral of this item until the property is
properly subdivided.
0
ILE NO.: Z-5906 (Cont.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(NOVEMBER 10, 1994)
The applicant was not present. Staff presented the item and
informed the Committee that the applicant had requested a
deferral to the January 10, 1995 commission meeting. A
subdivision application will be filed for that same meeting. The
Committee determined there were no other outstanding issues and
forwarded the item to the full Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(NOVEMBER 29, 1994)
The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present.
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested a
deferral to the January 10, 1995 commission meeting in order to
address the subdivision issue.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved for
deferral to the January 10, 1995 Planning Commission meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(JANUARY 10, 1995)
The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present.
Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested a
second deferral, this time to the February 21, 1995 commission
meeting. The applicant is continuing work to resolve the
subdivision issue.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda
deferral to the February 21, 1995 Planning
The vote was 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
3
and approved for
Commission meeting.
November 29, 1994
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 32 FILE NO.: Z --171.5-D