Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5884-A Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-58 4-A NAME: TYRRELL LEASING -- PHASE II SHORT -FORM PCD LOCATION: 12200 Block of Chenal Parkway DEVELOPER: TLC DAILY RENTAL Brent Tyrrell 12300 Chenal Parkway P. O. Box 23717 954-7368 ENGINEER: WHITE-DATERS & ASSOC., INC. 401 Victory St. Little Rock, AR 72201 374-1666 AREA: .55 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: None ZONING: C-3 PROPOSED USES: Expansion of current auto leasing auto sales at 12300 Chenal Parkway plus, C-3 uses. PLANNING DISTRICT: CENSUS TRACT: 42.06 VARIANCES RE VESTED: BACKGROUND Chenal (19) None This lot was platted as a commercial lot for C-3 development as part of a larger commercial subdivision. The TLC Auto Leasing use adjacent on the west required additional land for the growing business. STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: To approve the PCD application for a mixed use project with the initial or first phase being TLC Rental and Leasing. That use would occupy the front building element facing Chenal Parkway. The balance of the building or Phase II would be open to occupancy by C-3 type uses. The second phase would be approximately 7,800 square feet of office or retail in two or four tenants. The building would be one story steel frame and brick much like the current TLC building. The proposed second phase building would be attached to the first or separated by at least ten feet. A. PROPOSAL RE HEST: To approved a mixed use project and change the zoning from C-3 to PCD, the primary reason being to allow a C-4 use, TLC Rental, in the same fashion as permitted on the lot adjacent. FILE NO.: Z -5884-A Cont. E. ANALYSIS• Planning Comment The site is in the Ellis Mountain District. The adopted Plan recommends commercial. There is no land use issue. The proposal is in keeping with the development in the area. The intensity, the resolution of the staff issues identified will, we feel, make a good application and good project. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Approval subject to staff comments. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MAY 16, 1996) There was a brief discussion of the project with Mr. Tyrrell offering an overview of his proposed uses and buildings. There were no issues of consequence raised. However, Mr. Tyrrell was directed to develop a use list. This list to become part of the PCD application. He was directed to give consideration as to the treatment of the overhead door on the Chenal Street side. The Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for final review. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MAY 28, 1996) The applicant submitted on May 23 required answers to the several questions posed by staff write-up. He has added the following: • Landscaping and buffers agreed to and provided. • Dumpster enclosed. • Lanes for traffic access reviewed. Are OK as is. • Phase line and phasing noted on drawing. • Fire hydrant distance • Retaining wall • Building height • Use mix PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 6, 1996) The Planning Commission determined it appropriate to place this item on the Consent Agenda for approval in as much as there were no continuing issues for resolution. There were no objectors in attendance nor in the record file. A motion to place the item on a Consent Agenda for approval was made. The motion passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 3 Z -5884 - NAME: TYRRELL LEASING - ~� PHASE II SHORT FORM PCD LOC— p'�= 12200 Block of Chenal Parkway DEVELOPER: LNGINEER. TLC DAILY RENTAL Brent Tyrrell WHITE-DATERS & ASSOC., INC. 12300 Chenal Parkway 401 Victory St, P. 0. Box 23717 Little Rock, AR 72201 954-7368 374-1666 AREA: .55 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: ZONING: C-3 None PROPOSED USES: Expansion of current auto leasing auto sales at 12300 Chenal Parkway plus, C-3 uses. PLANNING DISTRICT: Chenal (19) CENS[TS TRACT : 42.06 VARIANCES RE [TESTED: None BACKGROUND: This lot was platted as a commercial lot for C - part of a larger commercial subdivision, 3 development as use adjacent on the `,,,est required additional land forothe asLC ow business. growing STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: To approve the PCD application for a mixed use project initial or first phase being TLC Rental and Leasing. Thatwith the would OCCUPY the front building element facing Chenal Parkwus ay. The balance of the building or Phase II would be open to occupancy by C-3 type uses. The second phase would be approximately 7,804 square feet of office or retail in two or four tenants. The building would be one sto brick much like the current TLC building.�' steel frame and Phase building would be attached to thefirsteorrrseparatedcbnd least ten feet. y at `a' • PROPOSAL RE UEST : To approved a mixed uSe project and change the zoning from C-3 to PCD, the primary reason bein on as g to allow a C-4 use, TLC Rental, in the same fashi adjacent, Permitted on the lot FILE NO.: Z -5884-A (Cont. E. ANALYSIS• Planning Comment The site is in the Ellis Mountain District. The adopted Plan recommends commercial. There is no land use issue. The proposal is in keeping with the development in the area. The intensity, the resolution of the staff issues identified will, we feel, make a good application and good project. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval subject to staff comments. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MAY 16, 1996) There was a brief discussion of the project with Mr. Tyrrell offering an overview of his proposed uses and buildings. There were no issues of consequence raised. However, Mr. Tyrrell was directed to develop a use list. This list to become part of the PCD application. He was directed to give consideration as to the treatment of the overhead door on the Chenal Street side. The Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for final review. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE -COMMENT: (MAY 28, 1996) The applicant submitted on May 23 required answers to the several questions posed by staff write-up. He has added the following: • Landscaping and buffers agreed to and provided. • Dumpster enclosed. • Lanes for traffic access reviewed. Are OK as is. • Phase line and phasing noted on drawing. • Fire hydrant distance • Retaining wall • Building height • Use mix PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 6, 1996) The Planning Commission determined it appropriate to place this item on the Consent Agenda for approval in as much as there were no continuing issues for resolution. There were no objectors in attendance nor in the record file. A motion to place the item on a Consent Agenda for approval was made. The motion passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 3