Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5846 Staff AnalysisJune 28, 1994 ITEM NO.: 9 FILE NO.: Z-5846 NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Canaan Missionary Baptist Church Parking Lot - Conditional Use Permit 1700 Block of South Izard and South State Streets Canaan Missionary Baptist Church by Clinton Sanders and Calvin Scribner A conditional use permit is requested to allow for parking lot expansion on R-4 zoned property for Canaan Missionary Baptist Church which is located at 1700 South State Street. The church is located at 1700 South State Street, the southwest corner of Wright Avenue Bypass and South State Street. The proposed parking lots are located directly south of the church and across State Street, to the east. 2. compatibility with Neighborhood The church has existed in this neighborhood for many years. The current facility was constructed in 1968. The majority of the adjacent neighborhood is zoned R-4 and contains primarily single family and two-family residences. Other nonresidential uses in the immediate vicinity include Dunbar School, Dunbar Community Complex, Rightsell School, two other churches and a new bank. Canaan Church has operated for many years with little or no off-street parking. This proposal will allow for the construction of approximately 100 parking spaces which will get many of the members vehicles off of the streets. With attention given to properly screening the parking lots from the adjacent residential properties, the proposed parking expansion should be compatible with the neighborhood. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin The church has a sanctuary with a capacity of approximately 200 persons, requiring 50 on -site parking spaces under the current zoning ordinance. There currently exist two small, unpaved parking areas with a total capacity of approximately 23 vehicles. June 28, 1994 ITEM NO.: 9 (Continued) FILE NO.: Z-5846 This conditional use permit would allow those two lots to be brought into compliance with city code and would allow for the construction of three other parking lots. This would give the church a total parking lot capacity of approximately 100 vehicles. 4. Screening and Buffers Compliance with the City's Landscape and Buffer Ordinances is required. A 6 foot opaque screen is required along all property lines where the parking lots abut residential property. 5. City Engineer Comments No comments 6. Utility Comments No comments 7. Analysis The applicant proposes to construct three new parking lots and to bring two substandard parking lots into compliance with city code. The church currently has only 23 on -site parking spaces and most of the members park on the streets of the adjoining neighborhood. This proposal will go a long way toward addressing that situation by creating a total of approximately 100 off-street parking spaces. Staff is supportive of the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this application subject to compliance with the City's Landscape and Buffer Ordinances. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MAY 26, 1994) The applicants were not present. Staff presented the item and noted a couple of minor concerns in the design of the parking lot on the east side of South State Street. The Committee determined that there were no other outstanding issues and forwarded the item to the full Commission for final resolution. K June 28, 1994 ITEM NO.: 9 ontinued FILE NO.: Z-5846 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (TUNE 28, 1994) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and informed the Commission that the applicant had agreed to the required change in the parking lot east of State Street in order to comply with ordinance standards. Staff also informed the Commission that late notice from Arkansas Power and Light indicated that a utility pole sits in the middle of a proposed parking lot driveway. Arkansas Power and Light had forwarded three options from which the applicant could choose in order to resolve the issue. Staff recommended making compliance with Arkansas Power and Light's requirements a condition of approval. Staff further informed the Commission that the 15 day notices were sent four days late and that the applicant was requesting a waiver of the Planning Commission bylaws. All other notice requirements were met. A motion was made to waive the bylaws. The motion passed with a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. As part of the Consent Agenda, the item was approved as recommended by staff with a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. 3