HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5769-A Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z -5769-A
NAME: R. D. SNELL -- SHORT -FORM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - OFFICE
LOCATION: At the southwest corner of Kanis Road and White Road
DEVELOPER•
ROBERT D. SNELL
1200 White Rd.
Little Rock, AR
224-2832
AREA• 0.45 ACRES
ZONING: R-2
ATTORNEY•
KENNETH JONES
9923 W. Markham St.
72211 Little Rock, AR 72205
223-9700
PLANNING DISTRICT: 18
CENSUS TRACT: 42.07
NUMBER OF LOTS• 1
PROPOSED USES•
FT. NEW STREET• 0
Contracting Office
VARIANCES REQUESTED: Approval of a waiver of required
improvements on Kanis Rd. and White Rd.
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes the use of an existing two-story building
on property which he owns as an office for his electrical
contracting business. The site is a 0.45 acre tract of land
which is to be subdivided from a larger tract which contains not
only the subject building, but also the applicant's home. The
applicant proposes to divide the property so that the tract
containing the office use is 120 feet deep (along the white Rd.
frontage of the site), with the full 165 feet of frontage along
Kanis Rd. The applicant proposes to provide the required
landscape buffer along the new property line between the two
uses; proposes to relocate the existing driveway to the site from
the side street, White Rd., to the Kanis Rd. frontage, at the
west side of the building, removing the existing driveway and re-
establishing the lawn and landscaping in the area; and proposes
to pave the new drive and the parking area. No outside storage
of construction materials or equipment is proposed. No
improvement's to Kanis Rd. or white Rd. are to be made.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Review by'"the Planning Commission and a recommendation for
approval of the PD -Office to the Board of Directors is
requested. A waiver of a requirement to make Master Street
Plan improvements along Kanis Rd. is requested.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is developed. There is a two-story building on the
property which was previously used by the applicant for,
FILE NO.: Z -5769-A .(Cont.)
initially, a place for him to restore and maintain antique
automobiles in the pursuit of his antique automobile
collecting hobby, then, later, as an office for his
electrical contracting business. (The electrical
contracting business was relocated to properly zoned
property when zoning Enforcement noted that a non-
residential use was taking place on residentially zoned
property.)
The site is part of a 1.88 acre tract which has 165 feet of
frontage on Kanis Rd. and 498 feet of frontage on White Rd.
The applicant's home is located on the tract of land which
will remain after the PD -0 site is divided from it. (The
remaining tract on which the home will sit will have 378
feet of frontage on White Rd., with 165 feet of depth.
The site is zoned R-2. All properties surrounding the site
are zoned R-2.
C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works Comments that:
1) Kanis Rd. is classified as a Minor Arterial street and
requires dedication of additional right-of-way to
provide one-half of a 90 foot right-of-way. According
to the survey provided, an additional 15 feet of right-
of-way must be dedicated. The applicant must make a
$750.00 "in -lieu contribution" for improvement costs
for Kanis Rd. (No Master Street Plan improvements will
be required for Kanis Rd. due to there being no
construction associated with the proposal.) Since the
existing drive access off White Road is proposed to be
relocated to Kanis Rd., and no access is to be taken
from White Rd. for the PD -0 site, no additional right-
of-way or Master Street Plan improvements to White Rd.
are required.
2) A stormwater detention analysis will be required to be
provided.
3) • Provide a hard surface for the parking and drive. A
concrete apron is required from the right-of-way line
to the edge of the street.
A
Water Works has no comments on this item.
Wastewater comments that for service to the PD site, a sewer
main extension, with easements, will be required.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. has not provided comments.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. approved the submittal without
comment.
2
FILE NO.: Z -5769-A -(Cont.)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. approved the submittal
without comment.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
D. IS ES LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN:
The application involves approval of a "lot split" in order
to divide the 1.88 acre tract into two lots, one for the
proposed office use and the other for the applicant's home.
Sec. 31-143 of the Code provides that "the Planning
Commission hereby delegates to and designates the Planning
Director the authority for approving lot splits, where a
single lot ... is being split into two (2) lots. The minimum
lot size shall be governed by the lot size specified by the
zoning ordinance classification of the subject property."
The R-2 zoning district (Sec. 36-254) requires a minimum of
7,000 square feet for single-family lots, with a minimum lot
width of not less than 60 feet. The 0-3 district (Sec. 36-
281) requires a minimum of 14,000 square feet, with a
minimum lot with of not less than 100 feet.
Landscape review comments that the structural supports for
the proposed fence along the southern property line must be
on the inside/PD side of the fence. No portion of the
proposed driveway should be closer than 6 feet to the
southern property line. Landscape plantings will be
required between the vehicular use area and the proposed 8'
high fence.
The Planning Division comments that the site is in the Ellis
Mountain District.. The adopted Land Use Plan recommends
transitional zone. The proposed use, if truly -office, is
compatible with the Plan.
E. ANALYSIS•
A plat for the proposed lot split will be required to be
prepared, approved, and filed as part of the PD process.
Both resulting lots meet all requirements, and approval of
the lot split is a staff level matter.
If the use ip'confined to "office" use, and there is no
outside_sCorage of construction supplies or equipment, then
the use is compatible with the Land Use Plan.
The applicant requested a waiver of all Master Street Plan
improvements on both Kanis and White Roads. Public Works,
after review of the proposed PD, deleted the improvements
requirements and has required a $750.00 "in -lieu
contribution" for Kanis Rd. improvements only.
3
FILE NO.: Z -5769-A (Cont )
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the PD -O.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MARCH 16, 1995)
Mr. Kenneth Jones, the applicant's attorney, was present. Staff
outlined the proposal, and Mr. Jones reviewed the staff comments
contained in the discussion outline. Mr. Jones indicated that
Mr. Snell would be holding a neighborhood meeting in order to
work out any conflicts with the residents along White Rd. He
indicated that he would report to Mr. Snell on the staff comments
and concerns. The item was referred to the full Commission for
the public hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 4, 1995)
The item was included by staff on the Consent Agenda for
Approval; however, a neighbor, Mr. Phil Glasscock, indicated that
he had concerns about the proposed PD -O, and Chairperson Walker,
noting that two neighbors had completed registration cards
indicating objection to the proposal, Chairperson Walker
announced that the item would be removed form the Consent Agenda
and placed on the Regular Agenda.
Staff outlined the request, and reported that the applicant had
amended his request since the original application had been
filed. Originally, staff reported, the applicant had understood
that boundary street improvements would be required on both Kanis
Rd. and White Rd., and had, as a result, requested waivers of the
improvements. Subsequently, the applicant had excluded access
from the PD -O site to White Rd., making improvements to White Rd.
unnecessary, and Public Works had concluded that, since the PD -O
involved only a change in use, with no structural changes to the
existing building on site, a $750.00 "in -lieu" payment would be
the extent of the requirements for improvements to Kanis Rd.
Consequently, staff reported, the two originally requested
waivers were moot, and the applicant was amenable to the payment
of the $750 "in -lieu" contribution. Staff reported that, in
response'to' neighborhood concerns, the applicant had amended his
site plan to relocate the entrance drive from its location on
White Rd. to.the west side of the building with access from Kanis
Rd.; that the'4xis`ting access from White Rd. was to be abandoned
and landscapin4 in the area installed. Staff reported that all
concerns expressed by the neighborhood in correspondence directed
to staff had been addressed.
Mr. Phil Glasscock, a resident of White Rd., indicated that the
neighborhood was not in objection to the proposed use if: 1)
there was no access to White Rd. from the electrical contracting
office; 2) the site would be screened from the residential area;
3) there would be no future access to White Rd. available to the
4
FILE NO.: Z -5769-A Cont.
site; and, 4) there would be a legal division of the tract,
separating the proposed office use from the residential use to
the south.
Staff explained that each of the concerns was addressed in the
staff "wright-up": that the access point had been located off
Kanis Rd., and that no change in that access could be
accomplished without amending the PD -0, which would involve the—
applicant going thorough the same process as he was having to in
order to establish the PD -0; that a "lot split" would be required
to be provided and files with the County to divide the property;
and, landscaping would be established along White Rd. as a
buffer.
With Mr. Glasscock's concession that all concerns had been
addressed, Chairperson called the question, and a recommendation
for approval of the PD -0 was passed by the Commission with the
vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions, and 2 absent.
k,