Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5752 Staff AnalysisNovember 16, 1993 ITEM NO.: 10 FILE NO.: Z-5752 NAME: DAWSON -- SHORT -FORM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATION: At the north-east corner of West Markham Street and North Palm Street, at 4620 West Markham St. DEVELOPER: DONNA AND CURT DAWSON 2 Amarillo Cir. Little Rock, AR 72205 661-0920 AREA: 0,16 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 ZONING: O-3 PLANNING DISTRICT: 4 CENSUS TRACT: 15 VARIANCES REQUESTED: STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: PROPOSED USES: None FT. NEW STREET: 0 Floral and gift shop The applicant proposes to remodel an existing residential structure for use as a floral and gift shop. The existing residential facade facing Palm Street is proposed to retain the residential "look". The facade facing Markham Street is proposed to be remodeled for access for the retail business. The required parking, landscaping, and buffer fencing are proposed. A. PROPOSALIRROUEST: Review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of Directors is requested for the establishment of a Planned Commercial Development District for a floral and gift shop. The applicant proposes a business use which has minimal customer traffic, since the majority of their sales, they state, are transacted by phone. Their clients, they report, are the employees and staff of the hospitals in the vicinity, or are residents of the area. The applicant requests convertibility to the uses by right as specified in the 0-3 zoning district and for an antique shop. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: There is currently a single-family residence situated on the property, with a property address of 101 North Palm Street. Off-street parking has been provided to the rear of the November,16, 1993 ITEM NO_: 10 (Continued) FILE NO.: Z-575.2 property by way of the north -south alley off Markham Street. There is a single-family home on the lot immediately to the north, although the lot is zoned 0-3. There are business uses to the east and west, and a public use to the south across Markham Street. C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS: Engineering reports that additional right-of-way may be required on Markham Street. Water Works and Wastewater reported no comments. Arkansas Power & Light Co. approved the submittal without comment. ARKLA Gas approved the submittal without comment. Southwestern Bell approved the submittal without comment. The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment. Site Plan review reports that a 6 foot high opaque "good neighbor" fence should be installed along the north property line. D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: The Planning Division relates that the site is in the Heights/Hillcrest District and is shown as part of an office corridor along Markham. It is important that the City protect the neighborhood to the north from a commercial strip along Markham. The recommended use pattern, Planning relates, should be supportive to the hospitals and be low traffic generating. The uses outlined for the proposed PCD are in character with uses by right in the 0-3 zone. E. ANALYSIS• The current zoning district is 0-3, which allows uses such as banks, clinics, duplication shop, library, art gallery, photography studio, dance studio, as well as general and professional offices. The proposed use is in keeping with the character of these types of uses. There are no outstanding issues to be resolved. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the application. 2 November 16, 1993 ITEM NO.: 10 Continued FILE NO_: Z-5752 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (October 28, 1993) The applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Dawson, were present. Staff presented the request. There was a brief discussion with the applicants on the character of the proposed uses and the convertibility to other uses which they were requesting. The Committee clarified with the applicants the comments contained in the discussion outline, then referred the item to the Commission for the hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (November 16, 1993) Staff reported that a letter had been received from the applicant asking that the item be withdrawn from consideration. The item was included on the consent agenda for withdrawal and was approved with the vote of 8 ayes, no nays, 2 absent, no abstentions, and 1 open position. 3