HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5724 Staff AnalysisSeptember 7, 1993
T 4 Z-5724
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Marvin T. Griffin
Marvin T. Griffin
11324 Kanis Road
Rezone from R-2 to 0-3
Office
0.61 acres
Office (Nonconforming)
North - Vacant, zoned R-2
South - Vacant, zoned C-2 and OS
East - Single -Family, zoned R-2
West - Single -Family, zoned R-2
11324 KaniS Road is zoned R-2, and has a nonconforming use
on it. The owner would like to expand the use by making a
20 foot by 40 foot addition to the principal structure. The
zoning ordinance prohibits any expansions of nonconforming
uses, so the property must first be rezoned before the
proposed construction can be initated. in addition to the
main building, there are several accessory structures to the
rear of the site. The property has a width of approximately
100 feet along Kanis Road and a depth of 315 feet.
zoning in the area includes MF -18, 0-3, C-2, C-3, OS and
PCD. The adjacent zoning is R-2. Land use is made up of
single family residences, a church, office, a day care
center, a hospital and light industrial. The Koger Office
Development is located to the southeast of the property in
question. There are undeveloped tracts throughout the area
and several vacant buildings.
The north side of Kanis Road, including 11324, is identified
for office development on the adopted plan. Therefore, the
proposed 0-3 request conforms to the recommended land use
plan and is the appropriate classification for the site.
There are no outstanding land use or zoning issues
associated with this request.
September 7, 1993
TEM 4 Z-5724 n
The adopted plan in the I-430 District recommends office for
the site - no issue.
Kanis Road is classified as a minor arterial and the
existing right-of-way is deficient. The right-of-way for a
minor arterial is 45 feet from the centerline.
STAFF REQQMMENDATIP
Staff recommends approval of the 0-3 rezoning as requested.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTI: (SEPTEMBER 7, 1993)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors, and the
item was placed on the Consent Agenda. The Planning
Commission voted 9 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent to recommend
approval of the 0-3 request.
F%