HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5600-B Staff AnalysisDecember 7, 2000
ITEM NO.: 14
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
FILE NO.: Z -5600-B
Chenal Parkway Mini -Storage - Revised
Conditional Use Permit
24300 Chenal Parkway
Guardsmart Storage Centers / Pat McGetrick
PROPOSAL: To amend an existing conditional use permit
by revising the layout of the additional
mini -storage buildings and adding truck
rental to the use on property zoned C-3,
General Commercial.
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. SITE LOCATION:
The existing site is located on the east side of Chenal
Parkway approximately 350 feet north of the intersection
with Highway 10.
2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD:
A phased construction of the mini -storage complex was .
approved in May 1997. Several buildings have been in place
since 1997 and Staff is not aware of any compatibility
problems. The site is zoned C-3, General Commercial. The
zoning to the northwest is 0-3, General Office, Planned
Commercial District across Chenal Parkway to the west and
R-2, Single Family Residential to the north, east, and most
of the south. The site is surrounded by tree covered land
to the north and east. There is an Entergy substation
directly to the south and two single family residences
immediately to the southeast. Across Chenal Parkway there
is a quick lube and a gas station.
Staff believes the amended site should continue to not have
an adverse impact on most of the surrounding properties,
and minimal effect on the R-2 zoned properties.
The Aberdeen Neighborhood Association, all property owners
within 200 feet, and all residents within 300 feet that
could be identified;= were notified of the public hearing.
December 7, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM
NO.:
14
(Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5600-B
3.
ON
SITE
DRIVES AND PARKING:
There is one existing 36 foot wide driveway into the
complex with a controlled access gate into the storage
area. Just before the gate is the office. In front of the
office are four parking spaces. Those spaces would satisfy
the required parking for the 1200 foot office with the
manager's apartment above the office. Adequate parking is
shown around the storage buildings. In addition an area for
boats and recreational vehicles has been set aside, as well
as eight spaces to park rental trucks. Parking and
driveways should be adequate.
4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS:
A 6 -foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence or dense
evergreen plantings, is required where adjacent to residential
properties to the north, east and south.
An irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be
required.
A registered landscape architect will be required to
prepare the landscape plan prior to a building permit being
issued.
5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS:
a. Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps
brought up to the current ADA standards.
b. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that
is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to
occupancy.
c. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for
approval prior to start of work.
d. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
e. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
f. Easements shown for proposed storm drainage are
required.
g. Show direction of flow for water courses leaving the
property.
h. A grading permit will be required on this new
development. -
2
December 7, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5600-B
1. An ADEQ permit for NPDES discharge compliance is
required.
j. Turning radii and aisle widths must be approved by the
Fire Department.
k. This property must comply with new land alteration
ordinance, buffers, and tree removal.
6. UTILITY AND FIRE DEPT. COMMENTS:
7.
Water: An acreage charge of $300 per acre applies in
addition to normal charges. On site fire protection will
be required in the area being added.
Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected.
Southwestern Bell: No comments received.
ASA: Approved as submitted.
Entergy: Approved as submitted.
Fire Department: Contact Dennis Free, 371-3752, at the
fire department concerning turning radii.
CATA: No comments requested. Outside CATA service area.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The applicant has requested to amend an existing
conditional use permit by revising the layout of the
additional mini -storage buildings and adding truck rental
to the use.
A phased construction of the mini -storage complex was
approved in May 1997. The full site consists of about 4.2
acres. This application is for the second of the two
phases. It includes a revised layout for an additional six
storage buildings, plus adds truck rental to the use.
Parking for eight rental trucks is shown on the proposed
site plan. The exterior of the additional one-story
buildings would match the existing ones, including a brick
face on the new building closest to Chenal. The proposed
plan meets or exceeds setback requirements and other site
layout requirements. This site is not within the Chenal
Parkway or Highway 10 Overlay Districts.
K3
December 7, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z -5600-B
During the on site review, Staff found that the owners had
not met one of the original conditional use permit
conditions. The primary area of concern is Conditioned
Storage. Conditioned or climate controlled storage was
specifically agreed to not be used. However, at least one
major building contains conditioned storage.
Staff is reluctant to recommend approval of the requested
expansions to the conditional use permit when a violation
of the original C.U.P. exists. The issue of conditioned
storage must be addressed by the Commission. Staff's
original position was that conditioned storage was more
like warehousing, which is not allowed in C-3 zoning even
as a C.U.P. That would require Planned Commercial
Development zoning.
8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is reluctant to recommend approval of the requested
expansions to the conditional use permit when a violation
of the original C.U.P. exists.
If that violation can be resolved or specifically addressed
by the Commission, then Staff could recommend approval of
the conditional use permit subject to compliance with the
following conditions:
a. Comply with the City's Landscape and Buffer Ordinances.
b. Comply with Public Works Comments.
c. Comply with Fire Department Comment.
d. All exterior lighting must be low intensity and directed
downward and inward to the property and not towards any
residential zoned area.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (NOVEMBER 16, 2000)
Pat McGetrick was present representing the application. Staff
gave a brief description of the proposal, briefly reviewing the
comments provided to the applicant.
Specific items covered were: designating the boat and --RV parking
with driveways on either side; correcting the legal description
to include lot 2; facing the buildings along Chenal viith
4
December 7, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z -5600-B
brick/masonry; proper screening; and, labeling utility
easements.
There being no further issues, the Committee accepted the
proposal and forwarded the item to the full Commission for final
action.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(DECEMBER 7, 2000)
Pat McGetrick and Chris Thornton were present representing the
application. There were no registered objectors present. Staff
presented the item noting that one of the conditions in the
original conditional use permit had not been adhered to. That
condition specifically excluded the use of "conditioned or
environmentally controlled storage spaces." Staff stated they
were reluctant to recommend approval without the Commission
dealing with this non-conformance. If that issue could be
addressed and resolved by the Commission, then Staff could
recommend approval of the application subject to compliance with
the conditions listed under "Staff Recommendation," paragraph 8
above, plus the added condition that the exterior facing of the
buildings along Chenal be brick/masonry.
Staff commented that the storage buildings existing and proposed
were divided into small units, not large open areas, and that
configuration could be "environmentally controlled" and still
meet the criteria for an allowable use through a conditional use
permit in C-3 zoning. Large open areas within buildings or
entire buildings that were environmentally controlled would be
considered warehouses, not mini -storage, and would not be
allowed in C-3 zoning.
Chris Thornton, the developer of this complex, explained the
background as he understood it that brought this application to
this point with its two violations of truck rental and
environmentally controlled storage space. His justification was
based on a misunderstanding of the terminology and what was
required to permit what he wanted to do. He stated it was not
done to knowingly avoid the requirements or proper procedures.
Madam Chair Adcock suggested to Mr. Thornton that he check with
the Planning and Development Department before he does any more
future development on this site to see if it would be allowed.
5
December 7, 2000
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 14 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -5600-B
Commissioner Nunnley asked the applicant to confirm that he
would maintain the configuration of his buildings as mini -
storage units, not buildings with large open bays or have entire
buildings used for bulk storage. Mr. Thornton said he would
maintain the mini -storage configuration, and in fact that the
building construction wouldn't allow anything else. Commissioner
Nunnley also asked the applicant if this current revised plan
was the final plan. Mr. Thornton replied that as far as he knew
it was, and that it would be quite some time before all the
buildings on this plan would be completed. Mini -storage with
some environmentally controlled units and limited truck rental
as shown was all that he planned at this time.
Commissioner Faust mentioned that in light of the current
violations, one question of the Commission was the credibility
of the applicant. She stated that based on the discussion that
she felt his credibility was fine with her.
A motion was made to approve the application as submitted to
include staff comments and recommendations. The motion passed by
a vote of 7 ayes, 0 nays, 3 absent and abstention by
Commissioner Downing.
0