Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5513-C Staff AnalysisDecember 17, 1991 ITEM IVO.: A FILE NO.: Z -5513-B OWNER: John Crockett APPLICANT: Staff LOCATION: In the area of Crystal Valley and Colonel Carl Miller Roads REQUEST: Rezone from R-2 to C-4 PURPOSE: To rezone to allow continued use of property. SIZE: 19.70 acres ANALYSIS: The C-4 request along Colonel Carl Miller Road is to reflect an existing commercial use in an area shown as single family on the land use plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Z -5513-B be denied and remain R-2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 5, 1991) Applicant John Crockett was represented by Mark Riable, Attorney -at -Law. Ron Newman, Planning Manager presented the item to the Commission, giving the Staff recommendation that Z -5513-B not be rezoned and remain R-2. Mr. Riable requested that Item Z -5513-B be deferred so that he could consult with Mr. Crockett. A motion was made to defer Z -5513-B to the December 17 meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. 1 November 19, 1991 ITEM NO.: A Z-5513-A,B,C,D OWNER• Various APPLICANT• Staff LOCATION: In the area of Crystal Valley & Col. Carl Miller Roads REQUEST: Z-5513 A Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Z-5513 B Rezone from R-2 to C-4 Z-5513 C Rezone from R-2 to C-4 Z-5513 D Rezone from R-2 to C-4 PURPOSE: To rezone to uses other than R-2 SIZE: Z-5513 5.0 acres Z-5513 19.70 acres Z-5513 ? acres Z-5513 10.0 acres ANALYSIS: The request at Crystal Valley and Col. Carl Miller Road (Z -5513-A) is to rezone the entire tract to C-3. The north one-half of that tract is commercial on the land use plan, and is being used as a office/residence. The south half is vacant land, primarily in the floodway. The C-4 requests along Col. Carl Miller Road (Z -5513 -B&C) are to reflect existing commercial uses in an area shown as single family on the land use plan. The request for C-4 zoning at the point where Crystal Valley turns north (Z -5513-D), is to recognize an existing commercial/residential use in an area shown as single family on the land use plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Z -5513-A be rezoned to 0-3 on the north half and remain R-2 on the south half. Staff recommends that Z -5513-B, Z -5513-C and Z -5515-D be denied and remain R-2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (November 5, 1991) Item deferred until November 19, 1991 meeting. ITEM NO.: A Z-5513-A,B,C,D _(continue)_ PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (November 19, 1991) Ron Newman presented the Staff report. At the request of the Planning Commission, Item A was deffered to theis meeting so that Staff could further review the area. Staff reviewed the area and determined that their recommendation had not changed. Commissioner Walker questioned how far from the city limits did Z-5513 A,B,C & D exist. All the properties are within a mile of the city limits. Commissioner Nicholson asked about the Master Street plan classifications of roads in the area of Colonel Carl Miller Road. Mr. Malone responded to the question. Commissioner Oleson had a concern of the number of residential sites along Colonel Carl Miller Road. Mr. Newman assired her that a majority of the area was underdeveloped and there was a mixture of residential and commercial sites. Attorney Mark Riable, represents Clarence Bryles-Mini Storage Business, spoke on behalf of Z-5513 C. Mr. Riable state that the storage buildings had an 80% occupancy at this time and that Mr. Bryles would like to expand his business at some point. Mr. Riable requested a PCD classification. There was no action on the request. Commissioner McDaniel asked about the voting procedure for Z-5513 on items A,B,C & D. Mr. Lawson stated that would be best to divide the cases instead of one blanket vote for the whole package. Commissioner Oleson suggested that the commission hear from all of the applicants before voting. Z-5513 A: Ralph Russell (owner). Mr. Russell stated that the county had designated his property as commercial and would like for the commission to leave it that way. Commissioner McDaniel stated that if the commission did not take action Mr. Russell's property will be zoned R-2. Mr. Russell again stressed that his property had a commercial designation as per the county. Mr. Russell questioned if he could move a trailer in and out on his property with an 0-3/AF zoning. Mr. Newman stated that he could. Commissioner Putnam stated that Mr. Russell take the 0-3/AF' zoning and come back to the commission when the status of his business changes. Commissioner Putnam moved to zone A- 5513 as 0-3 on the northwest corner and AF on the southhalf. The motion passed 8 ayes, 1 abstention. Z-5513 D: Virginia Jones -requesting that the sheet metal shop on her property be zoned C-3 or PCD. Mrs. Jones lives on the property and so does her son. Mrs. Jones actually request is to have the sheet metal shop area zoned and the residential area be left R-2. This application would be a PCD because of the mixed uses on the property. Ron Newman stated that the area is not shown as commercial on the land use plan. Commissioner Nicholson asked why the area was not designated as commercial and also why is staff recommending that this property remain R-2. Newman ITEM NO.: A Z-5513-A.B.C.D (continue) explained that staff recommends commercial or other than R-2 at intersections. Commissioner Putnam asked that Mr. Newman explain what he had suggested to Mrs. Jones. Mr. Newman stated that he suggested that Mr. Jones ask for a PCD instead of commercial zoning because of the mixed nature of her property, but that staff recommendation would still be R-2 encompliance with the land use plan. Commissioner Oleson asked if the Landscape Ordinace is not enforced outside of the city limits. Commissioner Walker made a motion that Z-5513 D be recommended for a PCD provided that documentation was presented to the staff within 15 days. The motion was seconded and passed 8 ayes, 1 abstention. 5513 C: Mr. Riable asked that his client be granted a PCD and that they would provide documentation and scaled drawings within 15 days. Commissioner Nicholson moved that Z-5513 C be approved for PCD and that the appropriate documentation be provided within 15'days. The motion was seconded. Discussion: Commissioner Oleson was concerned if the commission was thinking about the general good of the area. Commissioner Walker asked if the applicant would agree to the appropriate landscaping when buildings 3 & 4 were constructed. The applicant agreed. Commissioner Nicholson amended her motion to include that at such time buildings 3 & 4 be erected that it includes the normal screening as provided in the landscape ordinance and that the applicant provide the appropriate documentation within 15 days. Motion passed 9ayes, 0 no. Z-5513 B: Mark Riable also representing Crystal Valley Auto Ranch. Mr. Riable asked that the commission grant the Auto Ranch a PCD and that the appropriate documents would be submitted within 15 days. Commissioner Oleson asked if this particular type business could survive without a commercial zoning. Commissioner Perkins stated that the business need to be screened and buffered. After further discussion, Mr. Riable asked that this item be deferred until the next meeting. Commissioner Oleson moved to defer the item Z-5513 B to the December 17, 1991 meeting. Motion seconded and passed 9 ayes, 0 no.