HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5115 Staff AnalysisDecember 13, 1988
Item No. 5 -Z-5115 .... .
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Ed CuIin
Ed CuIin
11209 1-30
Rezone from 11R-2" to 111-2"
Paint and body shop
1.46 acres
Paint and body shop (nonconforming)
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Interstate right-of-way, zoned "R-2"
South - Single family, zoned "R-2"
East - Industrial, zoned "R-2"
West - Commercial, zoned "R-2"
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The current use, a paint and body shop, is nonconforming and
the request is to reclassify the property from "R-2" to
111-2." The rezoning action will do away with the site's
nonconforming status and allow for future expansion or a
more intensive industrial use. There are several structures
on the land at this time, one large metal building and two
smaller ones, that are being utilized for the current use.
Land use in the area is a mix of residential, commercial and
industrial with the property abutting an industrial use on
the east. The properties with frontage along the interstate
are all nonresidential and the single family area is located
to the south on Meadow Lane. Some of the commercial and
industrial uses are nonconforming. There are some vacant
tracts to the east and across 1-30. Zoning in the immediate
vicinity is either "R-2" or 111-2" with "11-2" surrounding the
site.
The property is within the Otter Creek District Plan area
and the adopted land use plan identifies the location for an
industrial use. The 111-2" reclassification conforms to the
plan's direction and the rezoning should not have any impact
on other properties in the general area.
t
December 13, 1988
Item No. 5 - Z-51 1 5__,(_Cont i nu.ed )
ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
None reported as of this writing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the 111-21' rezoning request as
filed.
PLANNING_ COMMISSION ACTION: (December 13, 1988)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors and the
item was placed on the consent agenda. A motion was made to
recommend approval of the 111-2" request as filed. The
motion was approved by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and
1 absent.