HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5106 Staff AnalysisJanuary 3, 1989
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. D
NAME: Highway 10 Daycare Conditional
Use Permit (Z-5106)
LOCATION: The south side of Highway 10
just east of Ives Street
OWNER/APPLICANT: Rose N. Bicker"staff/Laurnetta
R. Bickerstaff
PROPOSAL:
To reconstruct and convert an existing 2800 square feet
building to a daycare center (45 child capacity) and to pave
a drop-off and parking area (13 spaces) on 0.30 + acres of
land that is zoned "R-2."
Ordinance Design Standards:
1. Site Location
Adjacent to an arterial street (Highway 10).
2. Co_mp_at.ibi._I._ity with Neigh4.grho_o_d.
This site is abutted by single family uses located on
the north, east and west. The property located to the
south is vacant. The proposed use, property sized
(capacity), located on an arterial street should be
compatible with the surrounding area.
3. On -Site Drives and _Parking
The applicant has proposed 13 parking spaces with
access to be taken from Highway 10.
4. Screening andByffers
__ .
The applicant is proposing a privacy fence to be
constructed along the sides of the building and along
the rear property line to enclose the playground area.
January 3, 1989
SUBDIVISIONS
I tem Nom WD (Cont i_nued )_
5. Analysis
The Staff feels that a daycare use is potentially
compatible with the surrounding area. The Staff does
feel that the proposed capacity is excessive. The
applicant needs to submit a revised site plan which -is
shown on the survey drawing and includes a proper
parking layout and drop-off area. The properly drawn
parking and drop-off area will dictate the proper
capacity for the daycare center. The revised drawing
should also show the location of the proposed screening
fence.
6. City Engineer_Comments
None
7. Staff Recommendation
The Staff reserves its recommendation pending the
submittal of a revised site plan as outlined in the
analysis section.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was not present. The Staff stated that they
had received a letter requesting deferral of the item until
the January 3, 1989 Planning Commission meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (November 15, 1988)
The applicant was not present. The Commission voted
11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent to defer the application as
requested by the applicant until the January 3, 1989
Planning Commission meeting.
SUBDI,VISION_COMMITTEE.REVIEW:
The applicant was not present. The Staff stated that the
applicant had submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of
the item. The item was not discussed.
January 3, 1989
SUBDIVISIONS
Item.. No. D
(Continued)
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
PLANNING ........... ...... .. ..... ........ . ... ... . COMMISSION . . ...... .. I ACTION:
... .-
The applicant was not present. There were no objectors.
The Commission voted 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent—to accept
withdrawal of the item as requested by the applicant.
I