HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5100 Staff AnalysisNovember 15, 1988
SUBDIVISIONS
tem N o . 12
Name•
Location:
Owner /App_I_i_c_a_n t
.r
Buchanan Drive duplex
Conditional Use Permit (Z-5100)
The southwest corner of
"F" Street and Buchanan Drive.
Jack 0. and Ethelyne T.
Williams
Proposal:
To relocate an existing 1,718 square feet duplex to this
site and construct three paved parking spaces on 0.18 plus
or minus acres of land that is zoned "R-3."
Ordinance na,nce _Des.i..gn „Standards:
1. Site Location
Adjacent to two residential streets, "F" Street and
Buchanan Street.
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
The site is abutted by single family to the north,
south and east and vacant land located to the west.
The site is situated above the grade of the
intersection. The Staff perceives no adverse impact on
the surrounding area due to the proposed land use.
3- On -Site Drive .and Parking
The proposal contains one access drive onto "F" Street
and three paved parking spaces.
4. Screen_ing..._and _Buffers
The applicant is proposing to use the existing trees
and shrubbery as landscaping.
November 15, 1988
SUBDIVISIONS
temNo . 12-- (.!Zgpt i n.u_ed_}.... ---- _.._. _.�...._
5. Ana.l.ys.is
The Staff feels that the proposed land use will be
compatible with the surrounding area. The only concern
that the Staff has is with the proposed parking layout.
The applicant needs to re -design the parking area to
include an area large enough to accommodate backing
movements so that automobiles have the necessary room
to back out of their spaces and head onto "F" Street.
6. Ci ty_ Eng.i..neer Comments
None
7- St.a.f.f...- Reco_mmendat-i.on
Approval, subject to the applicant submitting a revised
site plan as described in the analysis section.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and agreed to comply with Staff's
recommendations.
PLANNING COMM-ISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. The Staff stated that they had
received the revised site plan and recommended approval of
the project. Staff also stated that they had received a
couple of calls as well as letters from Mr. John R. Talburt
and Mrs. William L. Overton objecting to the proposal. In
addition, Staff stated that they had received questions
about the ownership of the subject property and had
reviewed, along with the City Attorney, a Warranty Deed and
Title Insurance which satisfied any ownership questions.
Mrs. Celeste Weedman was present and spoke against the
proposal due to the potential traffic problems it might
create. The Commission then voted 10 ayes, 0 noes and
1 absent to approve the application as recommended by the
Staff.
Name:
Location:
Own e r/ A.p,p__I i c a n, t
Propos,a_I
Buchanan Drive duplex
Conditional Use Permit {Z-5100}
The southwest corner of
"F" Street and Buchanan Drive.
Jack O. and Ethelyne T_
Williams
To relocate an existing 1,718 square feet duplex to this
site and construct three paved parking spaces on 0.18 plus
or minus acres of land that is zoned "R-3."
Ordinance Design Standards:
1. Site Location
Adjacent to two residential streets, "F" Street and
Buchanan Street.
Z. ComQatibi._I ity__wit� Neighborhood
The site is abutted by single family to the north,
south and east and vacant land located to the west.
The site is situated above the grade of the
intersection. The Staff perceives no adverse impact on
the surrounding area due to the proposed land use.
3. On -Site Drive and Parkins
The proposal contains one access drive onto "F" Street
and three paved parking spaces.
4. Screeni.ng_and Buffers
The applicant is proposing to use the existing trees
and shrubbery as landscaping.
Cont,.Jnued_)
5. Ana l_rsis
The Staff feels that the proposed land use will be
compatible with the surrounding area. The only concern
that the Staff has is with the proposed parking layout.
The applicant needs to re -design the parking area to
include an area large enough to accommodate backing
movements so that automobiles have the necessary room
to back out of their spaces and head onto "F" Street.
6. Cites Engineer Comments
None
7. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to the applicant submitting a revised
site plan as described in the analysis section.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and agreed to comply with Staff's
recommendations.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. The Staff stated that they had
received the revised site plan and recommended approval of
the project. Staff also stated that they had received a
couple of calls as well as letters from Mr. John R. Talburt
and Mrs. William L. Overton objecting to the proposal. In
addition, Staff stated that they had received questions
about the ownership of the subject property and had
reviewed, along with the City Attorney, a Warranty Deed and
Title Insurance which satisfied any ownership questions.
Mrs. Celeste Weedman was present and spoke against the
proposal due to the potential traffic problems it might
create. The Commission then voted 10 ayes, 0 noes and
1 absent to approve the application as recommended by the
Staff.