Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5100 Staff AnalysisNovember 15, 1988 SUBDIVISIONS tem N o . 12 Name• Location: Owner /App_I_i_c_a_n t .r Buchanan Drive duplex Conditional Use Permit (Z-5100) The southwest corner of "F" Street and Buchanan Drive. Jack 0. and Ethelyne T. Williams Proposal: To relocate an existing 1,718 square feet duplex to this site and construct three paved parking spaces on 0.18 plus or minus acres of land that is zoned "R-3." Ordinance na,nce _Des.i..gn „Standards: 1. Site Location Adjacent to two residential streets, "F" Street and Buchanan Street. 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The site is abutted by single family to the north, south and east and vacant land located to the west. The site is situated above the grade of the intersection. The Staff perceives no adverse impact on the surrounding area due to the proposed land use. 3- On -Site Drive .and Parking The proposal contains one access drive onto "F" Street and three paved parking spaces. 4. Screen_ing..._and _Buffers The applicant is proposing to use the existing trees and shrubbery as landscaping. November 15, 1988 SUBDIVISIONS temNo . 12-- (.!Zgpt i n.u_ed_}.... ---- _.._. _.�...._ 5. Ana.l.ys.is The Staff feels that the proposed land use will be compatible with the surrounding area. The only concern that the Staff has is with the proposed parking layout. The applicant needs to re -design the parking area to include an area large enough to accommodate backing movements so that automobiles have the necessary room to back out of their spaces and head onto "F" Street. 6. Ci ty_ Eng.i..neer Comments None 7- St.a.f.f...- Reco_mmendat-i.on Approval, subject to the applicant submitting a revised site plan as described in the analysis section. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with Staff's recommendations. PLANNING COMM-ISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The Staff stated that they had received the revised site plan and recommended approval of the project. Staff also stated that they had received a couple of calls as well as letters from Mr. John R. Talburt and Mrs. William L. Overton objecting to the proposal. In addition, Staff stated that they had received questions about the ownership of the subject property and had reviewed, along with the City Attorney, a Warranty Deed and Title Insurance which satisfied any ownership questions. Mrs. Celeste Weedman was present and spoke against the proposal due to the potential traffic problems it might create. The Commission then voted 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent to approve the application as recommended by the Staff. Name: Location: Own e r/ A.p,p__I i c a n, t Propos,a_I Buchanan Drive duplex Conditional Use Permit {Z-5100} The southwest corner of "F" Street and Buchanan Drive. Jack O. and Ethelyne T_ Williams To relocate an existing 1,718 square feet duplex to this site and construct three paved parking spaces on 0.18 plus or minus acres of land that is zoned "R-3." Ordinance Design Standards: 1. Site Location Adjacent to two residential streets, "F" Street and Buchanan Street. Z. ComQatibi._I ity__wit� Neighborhood The site is abutted by single family to the north, south and east and vacant land located to the west. The site is situated above the grade of the intersection. The Staff perceives no adverse impact on the surrounding area due to the proposed land use. 3. On -Site Drive and Parkins The proposal contains one access drive onto "F" Street and three paved parking spaces. 4. Screeni.ng_and Buffers The applicant is proposing to use the existing trees and shrubbery as landscaping. Cont,.Jnued_) 5. Ana l_rsis The Staff feels that the proposed land use will be compatible with the surrounding area. The only concern that the Staff has is with the proposed parking layout. The applicant needs to re -design the parking area to include an area large enough to accommodate backing movements so that automobiles have the necessary room to back out of their spaces and head onto "F" Street. 6. Cites Engineer Comments None 7. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to the applicant submitting a revised site plan as described in the analysis section. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with Staff's recommendations. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The Staff stated that they had received the revised site plan and recommended approval of the project. Staff also stated that they had received a couple of calls as well as letters from Mr. John R. Talburt and Mrs. William L. Overton objecting to the proposal. In addition, Staff stated that they had received questions about the ownership of the subject property and had reviewed, along with the City Attorney, a Warranty Deed and Title Insurance which satisfied any ownership questions. Mrs. Celeste Weedman was present and spoke against the proposal due to the potential traffic problems it might create. The Commission then voted 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent to approve the application as recommended by the Staff.