HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5099 Staff AnalysisDecember 13, 1988
Item No. E - Z-5099
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
E. M. Pfeifer, III
Joe D. White
North side of Highway 10 east of
Highway 300
Rezone from unclassified to 110-3"
and "C-3"
Office and commercial
31.23 acres
Vacant
SURROUNDING... LAND USE AND. .ZONING:
North - Vacant, unclassified
South - Vacant and single family, unclassified
East - Vacant and industrial, unclassified
West - Vacant and single family, unclassified
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The proposed rezoning involves approximately 31 acres
located on the north side of Highway 10 east of Highway 300
and the request is for 10.2 acres of 110-3" and 21.1 acres of
"C-3." The location is, outside the City limits so it is
unclassified at this time. The property is situated at what
will be the future extension of the Chenal Parkway from
Highway 10 north to Highway 300.
The general vicinity is entirely outside the City limits so
there is no zoning in place. The nearest non-residential
zoning is,approximately one-half mile to the east on the
north side of Highway 10, part of the proposed Johnson Ranch
development. Land use in the immediate area is primarily
single family with some minor commercial uses and a church
at the intersection of Highway 10 and Highway 300. Another
use is an electrical substation located to the east of the
property in question.
This request is very'similar to the proposed Deltic rezoning
which is located directly to the south. Both proposals
involve commercial reclassifications along the Highway 10
frontage with an office area to the rear. As with the
Deltic request, the land area under considerati n falls
December 13, 1988
Item No.. E - Z75099 (Continued)_
within the commercial node shown on both the Highway 10 Plan
and the Extraterritorial Plan.
Rezoning to a mix of commercial and office uses does not
appear to be the primary issue but rather what type of
districts are compatible with the future development of the
Highway 10 corridor. To be consistent with other proposed
changes and existing zoning patterns, Staff recommends a
"C-2" reclassification for the 16.4 acre tract. This will
mirror the recommended "C-2" tract at the southwest corner
of the future intersection of Highway 10 and the Chenal
Parkway. For the smaller "C-3" tract, a 40 foot landscaped
area along Highway 10 is suggested and Staff supports the
"0-3" as requested.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Because of the proposed design of the new intersection,
access to the commercial tracts will need to be reviewed.
Ninety feet of right-of-way is required for the new roadway.
In the future, additional right-of-way will be required for
Highway 10.
Zoning action does not recognize the location of the
proposed street to the northeast.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of "C-2" for the larger commercial
tract, "C-3" with a 40 foot landscaped area along Highway 10
for the 4.7 acre site, and 110-3" for 10.2 acres as
requested.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (November 1, 1988)
The applicant, Gene Pfeifer, was present and requested that
the item be deferred. A motion was made to defer the item
to the December 13, 1988 meeting. The motion was approved
by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
AMENDED STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is in the process of ironing out right-of-way details
and will report at the meeting.
December 13, 1988
I temNo. E.... - Z-50.9.9___(.C.ont i nue,d)_
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (December 13, 1988)
The applicant, Joe White, was present. There were no
objectors and the item was placed on the consent agenda (Mr.
White had earlier agreed to amending the request from "C-3"
to "C-2" for the 16.4 acre tract). A motion was made to
recommend approval of 110-3" as requested, "C-2" as amended
(16.4 acres), and "C-3" for the 4.7 acre site with a 40 foot
landscape area along Highway 10 and "OS" for the right-of-
way reservation and dedication along Highway 10. The motion
was approved by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.