Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Z-5097-K Application 1
rezon.doc 3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING CONMUSSION ON AN APPLICATION TO REZONE PROPERTY To all owners of land lying within 200 feet of the boundary of property at: LOCATION: W4.-gt of ChenamzegTi... Wnrtllof AhnrdPAn Tlrive OWNEDBY: Deltic Timber Cornornt . 09/22/05 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application has been filed for rezoning of the above property requesting a change of zone classification from: MF -12 & R-2 District which permits use of the property as: to: 0-3 MF -12 • Open Space District which permits use of the property as: If approved, the rezoning will occur only upon the property described above. It will not change the zoning or permitted uses on neighboring roerties. The purpose of this request is to: (1) build; (�) develop; (1) sell after rezoning. EXPLANATION: The residential zoning adjacent to thip Chennncewi Park and Aberdeen will be changed to Open Space. The multi—family zoning will be shifted to match the open space boundary. The balance of the tract will he zoned Office,_ A public hearing on said application will be held by the Little Rock Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, 2nd Floor, City Hall, 500 W. Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas, on: Jan. 17 2008 at 4: 00 p.m. All parties in interest may appear and be heard at said time and place or may notify the Planning Commission of their views on this matter by letter. All persons interested in this request are invited to call or visit the Department of Planning and Development, 723 West Markham, 371-4790, and to review the application and discuss same with the Planning staff. ++ AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that I a -f e�-S. Print or type name acting as agent/owner, have provided notice to affected parties in 2ccord#nc ith the requirements of the Planning Commission Bylaws and that the no ' "nformation p t is to the best of my knowledge true and factual. Name) (Date) Beach Abstract & Guaranty Company, Inc. 100 Center Street - P.O. Box 2580 Little Rock, AR 72203 (501) 376-5652 Facsimile (501) 376-5625 December 18, 2007 Wbite-Daters & Associates, Inc Attn: Tamara 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock AR 72223 Beach #S07-12016 Dear Tamara: We have examined the records of Pulaski County, Arkansas, up to November 18, 2007 at 7:00 A.M. as to the property lying within 200 feet to the property described, to wit: PART OF S1/2 OF SES 14 ANG F'AFM OF THE NY174 OF SZ00 23. T- 2 -n, R -14 -'AL pjAM ComTY ARUNSAS 1, ORE PAF€{fCW,+ RLY DESCRISF.D A& 0EGJ N4KQ AT THE WWHU9 CCPR OF LOT 1, kOCK 20. ICFIE►i. L 3rd, Al AOWr b!t TO Pit CITY OF IQ£ 1RCCXt l ANW. THD" iR#MEil.Y ,41.OW THE M UNE O:F LOTS 1.y 7WOUGH it, SQU OLOC i RO THE FOLIDWING WMR"- AIND WAN'"W*w. 1.zoA', N12130'30'W, 212,7r; NDT23'11'Ws 141:JW, N 3 S'40' 14'k„E S :S7'; NI S37'42t 1W,94", NNW451, W,U'; rvc f ;x;71 K. 225.71' AND *W51'30w, 190,42' iii A PW ON THE SOM UNE OF E SWI/4 SWV4< SAW 5MIGN 14. TW- CE SW25WE ALOW: SMD 5l3M UNC, 2.71' TO T14E WK AST CCS OF SXD SW 1/4 ".W /k THEME SQS" OV301r, ALMD TKE NOM 4jNE OF THE SEI/4'$W/4, &W SCMN 14,. 131$.74' " Im NOMEW C ER mmct- T�ff;N E %7,W0911 40HO vA N - op 1hr X1/4 Sej./4: skj� SE"Off 1 4, .6ZJ7' TO A POW >WM Rr.W—Or--WAS' UNt C? CrV0NMU OLM 0"(1 SMKRL<' 1LOW SW WM R047 -Of -WAY r.€%4 OM `4't� ARS V A 9MV Svr04'57'V, 31S.90'z 1KNCE W3`V4n Md COPO4i1E O XDNGs Sa113 WEV 3?WT'.'(F,..1k�1` Y UW- 6-00% THWE M1V07"55'W MO Si]if" hWF5TMLV AND CONT4litu NG Al~ SA a KSE WSW -W -WAY '€4tl£. RUN THE ARC * A SW.Igjl 11ADL-,S t URYE TO 1?1E FKHT. A CHORD 0%"0, AND DISTMWE, OF 554"fK'V W' 1375.41'; THEME 309.45 'niEWM Vi i' AND CGkh- iNUNG" JUNG SANG 'ilW i)F-Wi1Y UMF, WW, T44E ARC 06" A 458.&Y C IUS CUW3 M 1WE UP', A CHOW SE&t4G ANQ ViS AXCE t1F ffi 755'28"W, +47.15' TO THE S0VniEW CCRNER OF W C31U*KCDV PAW '{QAC"#; TKNCE A€ `tom..y� PARK tt7Rl�y�f 'f/W N�Fy,:#cl.I��Gg.}DEA�Rpf3+'OS MO E?W'J4NCU. +p��{�{/,y}}.��sy'� 711 15?l T'eb 7kFxltr�Y�fyi�'i�1 �,[R�x 3L1�{.A:i�F Y� ro7p4f 4i'r'¢t} , TO A K10T AN TM'SW kiT S Qt W-ky 6F V 1HCNWCW 1 LW' ARC or A g",9.3 n RSM CuM 70 s!HE LSF'T; A CHWO AFAM9 A 13WANCE cjF S4r.31'V-W, 212,70 FT., THNCC WeSML7 itO COW44uKa ALLOW SAO WW RIOW-ipp-ftAw MIF, WKG T ARC IV A 25.00 FT. KWUS cuRvE TD THE NICK, A CH= UUMNC 1;6' MCE or SW20's2 W, W.66 fT. TO A !'aW ON 711E NORM RMIT- 3F -WAY UNE OF A300EV OMT,* THENCE N41T&3'28"W A100 SAID tQRTH: I4or; -oF-WAY UNF, 15 25 FT-- T3iEl~k." 1: NQMiNEMLY WD COONUNG ASG SNO tKWIR RIGS'--CF-WAy #INE. %N,10 'THL Aft OF A 524 ,26 It. L S .. T� iA M 19 ARWO 1N� DW E ATF' We do not certify as to the validity of title and our liability is limited to the amount paid for this service. Addresses of owners cannot be guaranteed accurate. If we can be of further service to you, please call us. A erely, Donna Davis Special Service Department 501-376-5652 Tamara Page 3 Owners: Larry and Evelyn Williams 97 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72212 William and Nancy Kimpel 95 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72212 Aberdeen Court Property Owners Assoc Inc P.O. Box 241992 Little Rock AR 72223 The Buchmann Family Trust 5 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 Stephen and Sandra Stelling 7 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 John and Angela Heifner 9 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 Bernard and Beverly Wait 144 Pebble Beach Little Rock AR Terry and Sandra Kuykendall 15 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 Trudy Ogata James and Claude James 17 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 William and Anna Roehrenbeck 19 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 Legal Descriptions_ Lot 1, Block 18, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 94-66588 Lot 2, Block 18, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2007-56218 Tracts A & C, Block 18, Chenal Valley Addition and Part of the NW Section 23 T -2-N, R -14-W Instrument # 2005-054318 Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2005-95446 Lot 2, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 96-66197 Lot 3, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2000-026455 Lot 4, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2005-93904 Lot 5, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2007-49356 Lot 6, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 97-30512 Lot 7, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2003-59127 Tamara Page 4 Owners: Legal I]escrintions: Thomas and Tarena Word Lot 8, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 64 Broadmoor Drive Instrument # 98-49329 Little Rock AR 72204 Roy and Earline Melton Lot 9, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 23 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 93-83067 Little Rock AR 72223 John and Margaret Heuston Lot 10, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 25 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 95-60371 Little Rock AR 72223 Mary Ryan and Marie Ryan Lot 11, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 27 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2007-17785 Little Rock AR 72223 Randy and Debra Montgomery Lot 12, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 29 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 95-41786 Little Rock AR 72223 Glenyce Feeney Revocable Trust Lot 13, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 31 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2000-44209 Little Rock AR 72223 Gregory and Kristina Klein Lot 14, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 33 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 94-81275 Little Rock AR 72223 E. F. Lamb Jr and Retha Lamb Lot 15, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 35 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2004-32774 Little Rock AR 72223 Gardner Family Revocable Trust Lot 16, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 37 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2005-98147 Little Rock AR 72223 Delane Labat and Betty Magee Lot 17, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 39 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2001-46234 Little Rock AR 72223 Tamara Page 5 Owners: Leal Descriptions: Brent Moore Lot 18, Block 20, Chenal Valley Addition 41 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2000-16492 Little Rock AR 72223 Wilbur Rauch Revocable Trust Lot 1, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 14 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2001-002212 Little Rock AR 72223 John and Heather Barnett Lot 13, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 36 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2004-87059 Little Rock AR 72223 Christopher and Deborah Caywood Lot 14, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 30 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2006-89067 Little Rock AR 72223 Wilma Graham Lot 15, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 28 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2006-43004 Little Rock AR 72223 James Batcheller Lot 16, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 26 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2002-147703 Little Rock AR 72223 Clara and Charles Cromer Lot 17, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 24 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2004-16257 Little Rock AR 72223 Nancy Hornaday Lot 18, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 22 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2007-25294 Little Rock AR 72223 Cummins Lue and Mei Ling Tseng Lot 19, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 20 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 96-59177 Little Rock AR 72223 L. Randolph and Georgia Mano Lot 20, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition 18 Aberdeen Drive Instrument # 2004-104883 Little Rock AR 72223 Tamara Page 6 Owners: Gregory and Janet Floyd 16 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 Paul and Sharon Hernandez 88 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 John and Margaret Morris 2 Rosaires Way Little Rock AR 72211 Mary Nash Ross Betts Revocable Trust 2 Grayan Court Little Rock AR 72223 Timothy and Rhonda Mason 4 Grayan Court Little Rock AR 72223 Gregory and Cecilia Luther 6 Grayan Court Little Rock AR 72211 Dale and Holly Schimmel 8 Grayan Court Little Rock AR 72211 Matthew and Teresa Williams 10 Grayan Court Little Rock AR 72223 SMV, Inc 12 Grayan Court Little Rock AR 72223 Lowell and Sheila Jumper 40 Carmel Drive Little Rock AR 72212 Legal Descriptions: Lot 21, Block 21, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 98-10840 Lot 1, Block 22, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2004-56097 Lot 35, Block 22, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2006-25782 Lot 1, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2006-49165 Lot 2, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2001-007208 Lot 3, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 94-85107 Lot 4, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 98-57438 Lot 5, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2000-39660 Lot 6, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 99-81417 Lot 7, Block 25, Chenal Valley Addition Instrument # 2005-007158 Tamara Page 7 Owners: Legal Descriptio Scott and Tanja Wallace Lot 1, Block 26, Chenal Valley Addition 2 Gelan Court Instrument # 2006-34888 Little Rock AR 72223 Richard and Wendy Phelan Lot 2, Block 26, Chenal Valley Addition 4 Gelan Court Instrument # 2002-156596 Little Rock AR 72223 Michael Gray Sr and Carolyn Gray Lot 3, Block 26, Chenal Valley Addition 6 Gelan Court Instrument # 2002-180210 Little Rock AR 72223 Steven and Caryn Smith Lot 4, Block 26, Chenal Valley Addition 8 Gelan Court Instrument # 2007-91127 to correct Little Rock AR 72223 Instrument # 2005-78906 Karen Flake etal Lot 1, Chenonceau Commercial Subdivision P.O. Box 990 Instrument # 2000-002626 & 002627 Little Rock AR 72203 Lot 2, Chenonceau Commercial Subdivision Instrument # 2003-128298 Deltic Farm & Timber Co Part of the S1/2SW, W992.7 feet SW SE P.O. Box 7200 of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W And E1Dorado AR 71731-7200 Tract A, Block 25 & Tract B, Block 26 Chenal Valley Addition Book: 1211 Page: 71 Carl and Renea Harrod Part of the NE SW of Section 14 18001 Hwy 10 T -2-N, R -14-W Little Rock AR 72212 Instrument # 87-10064 John and Mildred Harrod Part of the NE SW of Section 14 5901 Star B Lane - Unit B T -2-N, R -14-W Little Rock AR 72212 Book: 1200 Page: 287 James and Eleanor Karam Part of the SW NW SE of Section 14 17815 Cantrell Road T -2-N, R -14-W Little Rock AR 72223 Book: 917 Page: 471 Tamara Page 8 ❑wners: Thomas Brown 6001 Becknell Lane Little Rock AR 72212 Clyde and Dorothy Linsley Living Trust 6002 Becknell Lane Little Rock AR 72223 Paul and Mary DeBusk 17 Norton Road Little Rock AR 72212 William and Ruth Eldridge 14 Norton Road Little Rock AR 72212 Legal Descriptions: Part of the NE SW of Section 14 T -2-N, R -14-W Book: 1026 Page: 115 Part of the NE SW of Section 14 T -2-N, R -14-W Instrument # 99-99024 Part of the NW SW of Section 14 T -2-N, R -14-W Book: 1348 Page: 645 Part of the NW SW of Section 14 T -2-N, R -14-W Book: 1284 Page: 530 APR -3-2008 12:17P FROM:OGLESBY LAW FIP,M 501-664-1012 Physica; Address: I M Morgan Keegan, Suite 100 I title Rock. Arkancac 72202 Via Fax 399-3435 EDWARD T. OGLESBY ATTORNEY AT LAW OGLESBY LAW FIRM, P.A. POST OFFICE .Box 7488 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72217-7488 Email: edivard.'- ! xb taH•.cn t Telephone (501) 664-1000 Facsimile (501) 664-1012 April 2, 2008 Mr. Tony BozynsU, Director Little Rock Planning! Cuntmission RE. Deltic Timber Request to Rezone TO:3993435 P.1/1 • Also Admitted In Louisiana Rezoning Plan for Tracts 132 and 133 Chenal Valley/ Chenoceau Blvd. Dear Mr, Bozynski: On behalf of the Aberdeea PmPert}' Owners Association, I write 1a advise 1hrt thi Association agr&-s with the landowner's request for rezoning as the same encompasses a 200 feat wide open space on the far western edge of the pFOP osed rezoning along %vitn a 100 feet: uedisturbed buffer immediately to the cast of that 240 feet open space. Please allow this correspondence to acme as the Aberdeen Property Owners Association withdrawal of objection to the proposed rezoning as revised by the applicant. Sincerely, Edward T. Oglesby ETO/ep ec: Bill Spivey, Wright Lindsey & Jennings Wendy Wood, President Abzrdecrt POA Chenal Valley Property Owners Association Inc. 7 Chenal Club Boulevard Little Rock, AR 72223 (501)821-5757 April 9, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski Director of Neighborhoods & Planning City of Little Rock 723 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Tract 132, Chenal Valley Master Development Plan, Chenonceau Blvd, Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Mr. Bozynski: On behalf of Chenal Valley Property Owners Association, we wish to confirm that pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions of Chenal Valley and the architectural guidelines for development of properties in Chenal Valley, any future development of the above identified tract will be held to the same high development standards as any other property to be developed in Chenal Valley. These standards would include review and approval of all construction plans by the Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee. Roof pitches, exterior building materials, color schemes, site and grading plans, landscaping, signage and exterior lighting are typical items that are reviewed as part of this process. Should you require any further information concerning standards for development of the above identified property, we invite you to contact the undersigned at your first convenience. Cordially, CHENAL VALLEY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 752884-v1 Revised sketches and additional letters regarding Item C (Z -5097-K) — West side of Chenonceau Boulevard, South of Highway 10. p PCD Q o ❑ 0 CD 1��100' UNDISTURBED BUFFER C1 Vicinity Map A6f f / W11"d �,'IC.e 01 COQ 03 { 1 2 03 MF12V9::/.3' A 8 A 21.61 AC/ C3 w C3 MF12 to SOS, 0.93"AC�V BLVDILI C3 02 6k Odom CI Area, 1�OH111" Case: Z -5097-K N Location: West Side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1000' South of Hwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W 14 0 187.5 375 Feet I LBOSNODE Q a o 0 100' UNDISTURBED BUFFER Vicinity Map R2'�, .t os 41j NC A MF12 1A,n i PK/OS flz'�' J CO S o � 0 a� MF12 to &PA MF 21.61 AC C /MF12f �t C lb3 9.38 AC n Land Use Case: Z -5097-K N Location: West Side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1000' South of Hwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W 14 0 187.5 375 Feet APR -3-2008 12:17P FROM:OGLESBY LAW FIRM 501-664-1012 TO:3993435 Physical Address: 100 Morgan Keegan, Suite 100 Little Rock. A rkansass 72202 EDWARD T. OGLESBY ATTORNEY AT LAw OGLESBY LAw FIRM, P.A. POST OFFICE BOX 7488 LITTLE RoCK, AR 72217-7488 Email: cd%tiarrl,'h oCleshvlN�ti.�rsm Telephone (501) 661-1000 Facsimile (501) 664-1012 April 2, 2008 Via Fax 399-3435 Mr. Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Planning Commission P. 1/1 • Also Admitted In Louisiana RE: Deltic Timber Request to Rezone Rezoning Plan for Tracts 132 and 133 Chenal Valley/ Chenoceau Blvd. Dear Mr. Bozynski: On behalf of the Aberdeen Property Owners Association, I write to adviSr. Ihrt the Assaeiation agrees with the landowner's request for rezoning as the same encompasses a 200 feet %Afide open space on the far western edge of the proposed rezoning along with a 1 o0 feet undisturbed buffer immediately to the east of that 20o feet open space. Please allow this correspondence to serve as the Aberdeen PropertycOwners Association withdrawal of objection to the proposed rezoning as revised by the app Sincerely, Edward T. Oglesby ETO/cp cc: Bitl Spivey, wrlgbt Lindsey & Jennings Wendy Wood, President Aberdeen POA Mr. Ray C. Dillon April 7, 2008 President President and Chief Executive Officer Chenal Properties, Inc. Deltic Timber Corporation 7 ChenalClub Boulevard 210 East Elm Street Little Rock, AR 72223 El Dorado, AR 71730 Re: Limited Multi -Family Zoning of Land West of Chenonceau Boulevard and Highway 10, Chenal Valley, Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Correspondents: This letter is submitted for the purpose of documenting the position of the Bayonne Property Owners Association with respect to the above -referenced matter. As you know, a substantial number of the residents of our subdivision, Bayonne Place, appeared at the Little Rock Planning Commission meeting held on February 28, 2008, to support our own interests and the interests of the residents of the nearby Aberdeen subdivision re zoning changes you are currently requesting as to land contiguous to the Aberdeen subdivision. We were very surprised to learn, as one Commissioner stated several times, the large tract of undeveloped land across from the Bayonne Place entrance and extending then on its eastern border north down Chenonceau Boulevard to Highway 10 is now, and as Mr. Spivey stated, has been since 1993, zoned Multi -Family 12 [referred to below as "MF 12" or "MF 6"]. Our problem with this is that such a zoning classification is dramatically different from the direct, written and widely distributed representations which came directly from Deltic Timber Corporation' and on which we have all relied in the substantial investments we have made in our homes. Whether we, or our builders, bought lots directly from Deltic Timber Corporation, or whether we bought our homes from prior owners, we were all provided with the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan," and, because of this, we believed — as was expressly and explicitly 'No attempt is made here to define at this point the exact corporate identity of the exact entity which is responsible for these (mis)-representations. It would be either Deltic Timber Corporation or a subsidiary charged with the development of Chenal Valley. Deltic Timber Corporation Chenal Properties, Inc. April 7, 2008 Page Two represented by Deltic Timber Corporation in writing — nearby land, and specifically the above - referenced land, was to be used for "Limited Multi -Family" development described to us as high- end condominiums, patio homes, and, specifically, "Multi -Family 6" development. We, of course, have many copies of the written "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan" which remove from debate what was represented to us. We understand, and we believe we can ultimately prove, that "Land Development Plan" was distributed generally and routinely until approximately six months ago. We understand, and believe we can ultimately prove, Deltic agents were told to describe "Limited Multi -Family development" as condominiums, patio homes, and, specifically, "Multi -Family 6" development. Our representatives attended another meeting with representatives of Deltic Timber Corporation on April 2nd, 2008. We were told there would be no negotiation as to the MF 12 zoning classification. However, a representative of Deltic Timber Corporation acknowledged the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan" represented what is asserted here, that a developer can always implement a land -use program with lesser density than the approved zoning classification, and there is no zoning classification "Limited Multi -Family." Because we view an MF 12 zoning directly across from our entrance [and this also is misrepresented on the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan," for the reason that across the street from this entrance point is shown as a city park on the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan"], and covering the substantial acreage described above, as truly ruinous of the investments we have made, we are currently seeking to retain an attorney to pursue our claims, and we are, consequently, unsure at this point as to whether further consideration by the Little Rock Planning Commission will be requested or whether we should directly seek judicial remedies. We do, however, document at this point what we have now learned of the plans of Deltic Timber Corporation and will respond to protect our rights within a reasonable time. Sincerely, Bayonne Place Property Owners Association By. InS. Anthony, President Deltic Timber Corporation Chenal Properties, Inc. April 7, 2008 Page 3 cc: Members, Little Rock Planning Commission Members, Little Rock City Board of Directors, Mayor, City Manager Dana Carney and Tony Bozynski, Little Rock Planning Commission John William Spivey, 111, Attorney, Deltic Timber Corp. Tim Daters, White Daters & Associates All Residents, Bayonne Place Subdivision Board Members & Edward Oglesby, Attorney, Aberdeen Subdisivion 6916 Westridge Road Roland, AR 72135 April 8, 2008 Planning Commission Members c/o Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am writing to you on behalf of the Coalition of West Little Rock Neighborhoods with regard to Item No. C on the April 10, 2008, agenda (Z -5097-K). The Coalition of West Little Rock Neighborhoods is an organization of Neighborhood and Property Owner Associations adjacent to the Highway 10 corridor that represents over 1000 households and, to date, 9 POAs/NAs. Among the aims of our organization are to ensure Smart Growth of West Little Rock and prevent further re -zoning of Highway 10 property that increases the density of development along this scenic by -way and its surrounding neighborhoods. Several of our member communities, particularly the Aberdeen POA and the Bayonne POA, are deeply concerned with regard to the said agenda item and the request by White- Daters and Associates on behalf of Deltic Timber Corporation to rezone the 40 -acre property to the west of Chenonceau Blvd. Although we are not opposed to development of this property per se, we are opposed to rezoning requests that entail an increase in zoning density that could potentially impact home values and quality of life. The resulting changes would have major effects on the surrounding neighborhoods, with the end result of expanded commercial enterprises and high density apartments exposing the nearby homes and community areas to increased traffic problems, possible theft, security risks, and vandalism. Parents and families with children certainly deserve the security of a safe, single family, residential neighborhood environment as was understood in the original land use designation. We would like our objections to this rezoning request to be so noted. Sincerely, Mary K. Dornhoffer, ELS President Coalition of West Little Rock Neighborhoods Page 1 of 1 Carney, Dana From: lynnreynolds@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:59 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Chennonceau Blvd. re -zoning issue Mr. Carney, I would like to go on record as being oppossed to the re -zoning of the area on Chennonceau Blvd. which Deltic Timber is requesting to be re -zoned. I feel that Deltic Timber and Chenal Properties have misrepresented the future use of this property for years. I was personally told in 1997 by Cindy Cole, who was at that time a sales person with Chenal Properties, that this area was a limited multi -family MF -6 area and would be developed in a manner like The Oaks; she assured me that it would never be developed with apartments as a MF -6 would not allow that. Now we are told that this property has been MF -12 since 1993. This property was misrepresented for years, until the last few months, as limited multi -family (now it appears that there is no such zoning designation). I feel that the owners of property in the neighborhoods close to this area were mislead by Deltic and their representatives. Lynn Reynolds 24 Durance Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 501-868-4983 4/9/2008 a AMY/ 1// C/ Y�0� Mr. Ray C. Dillon President and Chief Executive Officer Deltic Timber Corporation April 7, 2008 President Chenal Properties, Inc. 7 ChenalClub Boulevard 210 East Elm Street Little Rock, AR 72223 El Dorado, AR 71730 Re: Limited Multi -Family Zoning of Land West of Chenonceau Boulevard and Highway 10, Chenal Valley, Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Correspondents: This letter is submitted for the purpose of documenting the position of the Bayonne Property Owners Association with respect to the above -referenced matter. As you know, a substantial number of the residents of our subdivision, Bayonne Place, appeared at the Little Rock Planning Commission meeting held on February 28, 2008, to support our own interests and the interests of the residents of the nearby Aberdeen subdivision re zoning changes you are currently requesting as to land contiguous to the Aberdeen subdivision. We were very surprised to learn, as one Commissioner stated several times, the large tract of undeveloped land across from the Bayonne Place entrance and extending then on its eastern border north down Chenonceau Boulevard to Highway 10 is now, and as Mr. Spivey stated, has been since 1993, zoned Multi -Family 12 [referred to below as "MF 12" or "MF 6"]. Our problem with this is that such a zoning classification is dramatically different from the direct, written and widely distributed representations which came directly from Deltic Timber Corporation' and on which we have all relied in the substantial investments we have made in our homes. Whether we, or our builders, bought lots directly from Deltic Timber Corporation, or whether we bought our homes from prior owners, we were all provided with the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan," and, because of this, we believed — as was expressly and explicitly 'No attempt is made here to define at this point the exact corporate identity of the exact entity which is responsible for these (mis)-representations. It would be either Deltic Timber Corporation or a subsidiary charged with the development of Chenal Valley. Deltic Timber Corporation Chenal Properties, Inc. April 7, 2008 Page Two represented by Deltic Timber Corporation in writing — nearby land, and specifically the above - referenced land, was to be used for "Limited Multi -Family" development described to us as high- end condominiums, patio homes, and, specifically, "Multi -Family 6" development. We, of course, have many copies of the written "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan" which remove from debate what was represented to us. We understand, and we believe we can ultimately prove, that "Land Development Plan" was distributed generally and routinely until approximately six months ago. We understand, and believe we can ultimately prove, Deltic agents were told to describe "Limited Multi -Family development" as condominiums, patio homes, and, specifically, "Multi -Family 6" development. Our representatives attended another meeting with representatives of Deltic Timber Corporation on April 2", 2008. We were told there would be no negotiation as to the MF 12 zoning classification. However, a representative of Deltic Timber Corporation acknowledged the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan" represented what is asserted here, that a developer can always implement a land -use program with lesser density than the approved zoning classification, and there is no zoning classification "Limited Multi -Family." Because we view an MF 12 zoning directly across from our entrance [and this also is misrepresented on the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan," for the reason that across the street from this entrance point is shown as a city park on the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan"], and covering the substantial acreage described above, as truly ruinous of the investments we have made, we are currently seeking to retain an attorney to pursue our claims, and we are, consequently, unsure at this point as to whether fizrther consideration by the Little Rock Planning Commission will be requested or whether we should directly seek judicial remedies. We do, however, document at this point what we have now learned of the plans of Deltic Timber Corporation and will respond to protect our rights within a reasonable time. Sincerely, Bayonne Place Property Owners Association By: . ItS. Anthony, President Deltic Timber Corporation Chenal Properties, Inc. April 7, 2008 Page 3 cc: Members, Little Rock Planning Commission Members, Little Rock City Board of Directors, Mayor, City Manager Dana Carney and Tony Bozynski, Little Rock Planning Commission John William Spivey, III, Attorney, Deltic'Timber Corp. Tim Daters, White Daters & Associates All Residents, Bayonne Place Subdivision Board Members & Edward Oglesby, Attorney, Aberdeen Subdisivion Sufi Mr. Ray C. Dillon President and Chief Executive Officer Deltic Timber Corporation 210 East Elm Street El Dorado, AR 71730 April 7, 2008 President Chenal Properties, Inc. 7 ChenalClub Boulevard Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Limited Multi -Family Zoning of Land West of Chenonceau Boulevard and Highway 10, Chenal Valley, Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Correspondents: This letter is submitted for the purpose of documenting the position of the Bayonne Property Owners Association with respect to the above -referenced matter. As you know, a substantial number of the residents of our subdivision, Bayonne Place, appeared at the Little Rock Planning Commission meeting held on February 28, 2008, to support our own interests and the interests of the residents of the nearby Aberdeen subdivision re zoning changes you are currently requesting as to land contiguous to the Aberdeen subdivision. We were very surprised to learn, as one Commissioner stated several times, the large tract of undeveloped land across from the Bayonne Place entrance and extending then on its eastern border north down Chenonceau Boulevard to Highway 10 is now, and as Mr. Spivey stated, has been since 1993, zoned Multi -Family 12 [referred to below as "MF 12" or "MF 6"]. Our problem with this is that such a zoning classification is dramatically different from the direct, written and widely distributed representations which came directly from Deltic Timber Corporation' and on which we have all relied in the substantial investments we have made in our homes. Whether we, or our builders, bought lots directly from Deltic Timber Corporation, or whether we bought our homes from prior owners, we were all provided with the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan," and, because of this, we believed — as was expressly and explicitly 'No attempt is made here to define at this point the exact corporate identity of the exact entity which is responsible for these (mis)-representations. It would be either Deltic Timber Corporation or a subsidiary charged with the development of Chenal Valley. Deltic Timber Corporation Chenal Properties, Inc. April 7, 2008 Page Two represented by Deltic Timber Corporation in writin — nearby land, and specifically the above - referenced land, was to be used for "Limited Multi -Family" development described to us as high- end condominiums, patio homes, and, specifically, "Multi -Family 6" development. We, of course, have many copies of the written "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan" which remove from debate what was represented to us. We understand, and we believe we can ultimately prove, that "Land Development Plan" was distributed generally and routinely until approximately six months ago. We understand, and believe we can ultimately prove, Deltic agents were told to describe "Limited Multi -Family development" as condominiums, patio homes, and, specifically, "Multi -Family 6" development. Our representatives attended another meeting with representatives of Deltic Timber Corporation on April 2', 2008. We were told there would be no negotiation as to the MF 12 zoning classification. However, a representative of Deltic Timber Corporation acknowledged the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan" represented what is asserted here, that a developer can always implement a land -use program with lesser density than the approved zoning classification, and there is no zoning classification "Limited Multi -Family." Because we view an MF 12 zoning directly across from our entrance [and this also is misrepresented on the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan," for the reason that across the street from this entrance point is shown as a city park on the "Chenal Valley Land Development Plan"], and covering the substantial acreage described above, as truly ruinous of the investments we have made, we are currently seeking to retain an attorney to pursue our claims, and we are, consequently, unsure at this point as to whether further consideration by the Little Rock Planning Commission will be requested or whether we should directly seek judicial remedies. We do, however, document at this point what we have now learned of the plans of Deltic Timber Corporation and will respond to protect our rights within a reasonable time. Sincerely, Bayonne Place Property Owners Association r By; LL � r 'd— J n S. Anthony, President Deltic Timber Corporation Chenal Properties, Inc. April 7, 2008 Page 3 cc: Members, Little Rock Planning Commission Members, Little Rock City Board of Directors, Mayor, City Manager Dana Carney and Tony Bozynski, Little Rock Planning Commission John William Spivey, III, Attorney, Deltic Timber Corp. Tim Daters, White Daters & Associates All Residents, Bayonne Place Subdivision Board Members & Edward Oglesby, Attorney, Aberdeen Subdisivion Attached are letters received regarding Item C (Z --5097-K) — West side of Chenonceau Boulevard, South of Highway 10. February 3, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 RE: Opposition of Deltic Timber's proposed rezoning north of Chenonceau Boulevard Dear Mr. Bozynski, As residents of Aberdeen Court we are writing to express our concern about the proposed rezoning of property owned by Deltic Timber. We oppose the rezoning which would allow multi -family construction. If this zoning change is allowed, it will have a negative impact on the adjoining neighborhood. As proposed the rezoning would bring increased population density and traffic. This is undesired and problematic. The rezoning would also negatively impact the current properties as the proposed open space between the property under consideration for rezoning and the Aberdeen Court is inadequate. As proposed, the open space would be diminutive. Thus it would not provide an adequate barrier or transition between distinct zones. We respectfully request that the Department of Planning and Development decline the request by Deltic Timber to rezone its property. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter and consider our concerns. Sin er Iy, c. Mark S. & Lura . Tyler 20 Chatel Dri Little Rock, AR 72223 (501) 868-4748 01/25/08 08:02 FAX 501 905 7455 January 14, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski, Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Sent via fax 501-399-3435 and 501-371-6863 Case number Z -5097-K Dear Mr. Bozynski, I write to contest the potential rezoning of Chenonceau Boulevard from residential to mulit-family zoning. My family and I are residents of Aberdeen Court subdivision in Chenal Valley. We oppose Deltic Timber's rezoning request because it will most definitely devalue the property of our home and those of our neighbors_ Those Aberdeen residents whose properties abut this contested area will loose privacy, sound and sight buffers. Traffic will Increase on Chenonceau Boulevard making it less safe for drivers and pedestrians; our neighborhood children walk to the park and pool Please do not approve the rezoning of Chenonceau Boulevard. Thank you for your time and consideration, Denise D. Ullem 6 Berney Way Court Little Rock, AR 72223 IM 001/001 01/16/2008 WED 17:05 FAX 501 364 1516 Pediatric Surgery Rebekah Little 78 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 501-868-5757 January 16, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Dear Mr. Bozynski, I am writing regarding the rezoning of the land neighboring Aberdeen Court, just north of Chenonceau Boulevard in west Little Rock. My husband, four children, and I moved to Aberdeen Court this past summer. Though it is inconvenient for my husband to drive into central Little Rock for work each day, we chose Aberdeen because we felt it would provide a safe, secluded environment in which to rear our children. I fear Deltic Timber's rezoning goals threaten some of the reasons we selected Aberdeen for our home. Our park is a nice place for neighborhood children to play together. I enjoy meeting other families there, and value the added security of a neighborhood park rather than a city park. Rezoning will also increase traffic, thus decreasing safety as we walk to and from the park. We pay significant neighborhood dues for the upkeep of Chenonceau Park, and I worry large multi -family housing units nearby will compromise some of the privacy and security my children enjoy there. Though my home does not border the residential and open space Deltic Timber is seeking to rezone, I am sympathetic to neighbors whose property value will be decreased by a narrow buffer between the multi -housing units and our neighborhood. When purchasing a home, new residents should be able to feel secure that zoning designations will be honored. Such designations are "good faith" promises that a home is safe from objectionable building. Allowing the rezoning which Deltic Timber proposes violates the trust homeowners have placed in the Department of Planning and Development. Aberdeen Court is known as a neighborhood for families. The time selected for the rezoning hearing is right as many of us have children getting home from school. For this reason many moms like me probably will not be in attendance at the hearing, but I hope our opinions will be valued. I hope that when officials at the Department of Planning and Development consider Deltic Timber's rezoning request that they will not be swayed by "big business," but rather will be mindful of the many families who already live here. Sincerely, I�Uk,k Z/�� Rebekah Little Ja002/002 01/16/2008 WED 14:46 FAX 501 364 1516 Pediatric Surgery January 16, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski Dept of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 399-34351371-6863 Mr Tony Bozynski: RE: Deltic Timber's re -zoning request I am writing today to voice opposition to Deltic Timber's request to re -zone property located north of Chenonceau Boulevard and just east of the Chenonceau pool. My wife and I were informed of this petition one week ago. We understand that a hearing will be held on January 17th at 4pm. As a new resident of Arkansas, my wife and I choose our house in Aberdeen for several reasons including the serenity of the neighborhood and the pride that homeowners exhibited. We enjoyed the quiet streets and picturesque views. Having now lived in Little Rock for six months, we realize that the Aberdeen family is a unique neighborhood. There are 198 homes in our neighborhood. These homes represent a significant investment for many young families. In light of the current zoning regulations along Chenonceau, I do not oppose multifamily units being built near our neighborhood. Many current Aberdeen residents probably lived in apartments during their early adult years. The issue at hand is a possible move of multifamily units closer to the Aberdeen greenspace, and inparticular, quite close to sixteen current families. Under the current zoning regulations, these homes were purchased with the expectation that only R2 of OS zones would border our neighborhood eastern extent. Will property values be decreased with re -zoning? This is a difficult question. Property values are primary determined by the condition of the particular property for sale and other broader, more complex forces such as overall area development and prosperity. I suspect that apartment reinvestment will never equal the reinvestment of homeowners, especially when properties are paid off. Furthermore, will increased traffic not result in a lower residential property value? 2001/002 01/16/2008 WED 14:46 FAX 501 364 1516 Pediatric Surgery Issues: 1) The burden to prove that property values will not be adversely affected should be squarely on the shoulders of Deltic Timber? 2) Do the local public schools, including JT Robinson, have the capacity to handle a significant influx of students? 3) What types of multifamily units are being proposed? 4) What security would Deltic Timber provide towards the current recreation area of the Chenonceau pool? These facilities are funded by the Chenal Valley residents and thus should be solely used by these homeowners. 5) Is there data indicating that a large multifamily unit is needed in the west Little Rock region? I appreciate your time to review my concerns. Sincerely, Danny Little, MD 10002/002 SFN-16-2008 ^-2:24P FROM:0GLESBY LFW FIRM 501-664-1012 Physical Add: c,; 100 Morvon Kerg::c, Suite 100 Urge Rock, Arkansas 72202 Via Fax 399-3435 Et)wARD T. OGLESBY ATTORNEY AT LAW OrzEsBy LAW FIRM, P.A. Possr OFFICE Box 7488 LITTLF. Rom, AR 72217-7488 Emailc cdwar-l[a�u�4erpvinw_" Telephone (50 1) 564-1000 Facsimile (501.) 664-1012 January 16, 2008 Mr. 'Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Planning Commission RE: Defoe Timber Request to Rgone Cheaeceau Blv(L Dear Mr. Bozynsldi 0:3993435 P.1/1 a AW) AdmMed Jr) Louisiana per your stmt member's call of. t6 .lanuM 08, [understand the above-refere;tced :scatter has I have been deferred, er inaKlicant, Until rlac 8 at a notified theBnd ofLectarsfot1oAbrden'POA m1d Nusted ThaiMa he sevi 4 era" to all members. Sincerely, Edward T. Oglesby FTO/cp cc. Aberdeen POP. Board of Directors via email JAN. 16. 2008 1; 28PM AMCO N0. 5601 P. 1 Johnna'Thomas 7 Berney Way Drive Little Rock, .PSR 72223 501.868.7108 January 16, 2008 Mr, Tony Bozynski Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Dear Mr, Bozynski; Via FAX 501.399.3435 501.371.6863 I am writing you to express my opposition to Deltic Timber's request to re -zone the residential area (112) east of Aberdeen to a mufti -family (MF). I am respectfully requesting that the area remain unchanged. Unfortunately, i am unable to attend Thursday's hearing because of a previously scheduled appointment with my son. My absence in no way should be interpreted as a lack of interest. In fact, as a nine year resident of the Aberdeen sub -division, I am extremely committed toofe neighborhood and the surrounding areas. I purchased our home in hopes of having environment to raise my son away from commercial development and apartment buildings where residents are typically transient, Over the last few years, I have witnessed a vast amount of changes to the area by Deltic Timber. Some of these changes have not been viewed as beneficial. This request by Deltio Timber is a prime example of a proposed change which would greatly impact our neighborhood and family atmosphere in a negative manner. Once again, please accept my opposition to this request for re -zoning. There is not a need for additional multi -family housing in the area, EDWARD T. OGLESBY ATTORNEY AT LAW OGLESBY LAW FIRM, P.A. Physical Address: 100 Morgan Keegan, Suite 100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Mr. Tony Bozynski, Director and Planning Commission City of Little Rock POST OFFICE BOX 7488 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72217-7488 Email: edward0oglesbylaw.com Telephone (501) 664-1000 Facsimile (501) 664-1012 January 9, 2008 Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock AR 72201-1334 RE: Deltic Timber Rezoning Request Chenonceau Blvd. Dear Mr. Bozynski and Members of the Commission: * Also Admitted In Louisiana As a resident of Aberdeen Court I write to object to the above -referenced proposed rezoning insofar as the same, on its western boundary, changes the R2 property to MF12. My neighbors whose homes abut that property are quite concerned given the narrowness of the open space strip and their reliance upon the previous zoning of this property and the representations by Deltic Timber that the property would be residential in nature. I intend on appearing and speaking at the forthcoming Planning Commission meeting to voice these objections but did want the same of written record. Sincerel Edward T. Oglesby ETO/cp JAN --14-2008 MON 03:32 PM GAB FAX NO. 5012240258 P. 01 W. Tony Rozynski Director of the Depm Rtnent of Planning and Development Dept. of Plann ing and Development 723 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Ali 72201-1334 Via Fax; 501-399-3435 Re: Chenoneeau rB-zoaing issue Dear Mr. Sozyt!ski .My wife, Kelly, along with our two children, Tyler & Natalie, live in the Aberdeep nsighborhood. Ciur address is S Gravelle Drive, w4 megtly ]eatneai about the rezoning prop..)aai submitted by De1410 Timber that is under consideration for the Chenonceau property which bordem our neigh.".". ood, along the cast side. It i� aur undera"tanding that lite proposal will be hmA and voted on in this vveoks macti ng, Thursday January 1',t'. Untortunately. my wife and t will not be able to attend the meeting. HowdVer, we are writing to vxpreso our opposition to this proposal, in its endrr.ty. Qurre:ightaurltnad auioys a setting drat is buffered from mom developrtient. Wlioh makes it a desirable ]ncetion, brans orhor reasons. Whip;, we undersEand that duvcloprr►ent hrippaps and shag stopping it is often times challenging, Delrc needs to remember what made their Chenal Mvrioprrrent su great. One of the moss appeal in& attribws to Chcoal, is the separation of the neiOiborhaats : r' rm comtne.oial development. It is truly a resivfential [+ sly fel. Vire want to keep Abectlteri as it is and oppose avy zoning change: from ,sing)c family to Multi family. At a minimuin, if Da:tfes raxoning proposal is successful, Lbe bt'Mr zone grWenbelt becwwn the Aberdeen homeowners at, d. the now property should be a rninimunt of 3W' tvide', wc: Strongly urge your depatttrtint. to consider these sug,mslions, whiA not Only helps the Aberdeen nelghbeAlond, but alsa all of Chenal and Little Rock. 441int>?aining t]'te appeal of these varioui neighborhoods (any neighborhood) is ser asset to the city of Little Rosh that should rake priority in tl=ese ty-pe�; of proceedings. "Ill, ted, .lou Ke ly Ca,na}aan B Gravelle Drive Little Rock, 72223 01!14/4JaG 15:49 531663H5' SAFE FOODS CORP PAGE 01'01 January. 14, 2008 Terry A. Elliott 7 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 `v'i.a Fax to 399-3435 W Tony Boaynski Dept, of Planning and Development 723 West Markbaln Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Dear Mr. BozS nski: I would like to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning to the north of Chenonceau Boulevard The main reasons for my opposition are: i. The building of.'apartments this close to an established neighborhood of high value homes will result in a significant decline in the market value of the hones; especially in the Aberdeen Court neighborhood, but also to surrounding neigbborhoods. 2. Before we purchased our home in 1998 we asked our realtor if the greenbelt behind the homes on our side of the street would remain and we were assured that this was the case. The requested &wge will virtually eliminate the greenbelt for the bulk of the homes on that side of Aberdeen, Drive. 3. There is thready too much ttaffic on Chenonceau Boulevard and the addition of apamnents will only make the tra_t is problem. worse. (Examples: The traM- n lanes at the fight at Cantrell Road are not designed properly, in that cars coming front the Ranch side cannot detertuine which cars taming toward thein are going to turn right on Cantrell or go straight across Cantrell. As a resWt, I bave seen a number of near misses' when the cars coming out of the Ranch pulled out in front of cars legally ?tying to cross Cantrell. Similarly, the lack of a light at the C.hcrtal end of Chenonceau causes a major back up of traffic at numerous tames ever' day,) Siuc�Iy, Terry A. Elliott 01;1412008 02:09 5015652385 Dear Mr. Tony Bozynaki, PAGE 01 Monday, January 14, 2408 This is a very disturbing situation. Deltic Timber seems to be going back on their word. This was not in the original plans. We bought this property in 1993. We built our home and moved in 1995. There were lots of restrictions as home owners that had. Will these residents have to pay 2 POA agreements? Will they use the pools? We hope you will carefully consider what we are try to relay to you and the board. Ray and Ann Wagner 77 Aberdeen Little Rock, AR 72223-9100 January 13.. 2008 Mr, Todd lozynski Department of Planning and Dcvclopment 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Mr. Bozvnski, We are writing this letter to express our opposition to the proposed rezoning request by Deltic Timber to rezone the property located north of Clxxioneeau Boulevard and just east of the Chenonceau Pool from a residential area (R2) to multi -f nilly (MFF). Some reasons for our opposition: 1 An apartment complex in that location will negatively effect our property value and the property value of our neighbors. 2. This proposal is contrary m what we wars told by Delde Timber when we. purchased the property and decided to build in Aberdeen Court in ChensL We were promised that there Mould always be a "green belts' busier zone behind our property. We were also told wid it was Yuen included in their sale brochure that if anything w:.m ever built on the property in question that it would be an elementary school, This is a total betrayal of trust for them now to want to build multi -family units. 3. A multi -family unit would only compound the alread;✓ trafilo congested areas of Chenal Parkway, Chenonceau Boulevard and Cantrell Road (.Highway 10). 4, A multi -family unit compound would adversely e£#ect our }privacy and the privacy of our neighbors as a two to three leve; comple-x would allow those residents to view nght into our backywds. We respectfully request that you vote for the interests of the residents of Aberdeen Court and implore you to reject the request of Deltic Timber and vote against the rezoning from R2 to MF. Thank you vey much for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Debbie and Randy Montgomery 29 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock,AR 72223-9100 501-868-8282 TH-d i49S 899 TOS h.IJ3WO9INOW 3tua3Q'A."aNH'J Wd bT=ZT 800Z-bt--NCf JAN -14-2008 12:25 FROWN NFS 501-202-2035 T-909 P.001/001 F-393 GLENYCE G. FEENEY, M.S., RD/LD, DHCFA, FADA 31 ABERDEEN DRIVE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72223 W. Tony Bozynski Dept. Of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Dear Mr. Bozynski: As a single, senior citizen, I'm very distressed to learn about a proposal to rezone the property behind my home at 31 Aberdeen Drive. The proposal could not possibly afford me any privacy from the area to be zoned high density MF12. As the original owner, I chose my lot land because the original drawings showed a proposed elementary school. I was told there was a wide greenbelt between my property and the proposed school. Based on that information, I designed a home featuring numerous glass windows and doors facing out over the wooded area. Because I considered this my retirement home, I also designed a single level home with many elements that contain handicap accessible features. I'm concerned not only for the anticipated lack of privacy from a multiple level structure, but also the Possible devaluation of my home if this proposal should go through. An MF12 designated property would bring individuals not vested in the Chen al area and increase our need for security of our homes and subdivision. I'm particularly appalled about the discrepancy between the width of the proposed open space behind the majority of the homes on Aberdeen Drive adversely effected by this proposal. Homes nearest to the entrance to the subdivision will enjoy a much wider open space behind their homes. Their space appears to be approximately 4 times the width afforded to the hornes located further away from the entrance. It i s.with those concerns I strongly support the Aberdeen Court POA's objection to the planned rezoning from R2 to MF12. Further, I feel the proposed open space is drastically insufficient. It does not provide equity to all effected Aberdeen homeowners. I also support the Aberdeen Court POA in their request for a buffer of no less than 300 feet wide. This support includes the request to plant trees to increase the density of the buffer. Sincerely, Glenyce G. Feeney 91/14!2333 a8: 17 15312961123 UAMS L=ERARY ADMIN PAGE 3i/03 Date: January 10, 2008 Frwn: Mary & Marie Ryan�a�7 27 Abertiten Drive `3 ti %� . J Little Rack AR 72223-9'00 To: Tony Bozynski Dept. of Planning and Development 723 W. Markham. Street Little Rock AR 72201-1334 Subject: Proposed Rezoning on Chenonceau We purchased the bouse at 27 Aiperd to Drive ten rr<cnths ago. Since the woods beUnd a were the main re&ion we ehose this house, we specifically asked our real estate amt if the woods could he &Naloped at acty time mid site said. no. Had we known there was even the possibUity tate was could be developed, we probably would not have chosen u: purchase the h"e.. and wt certainly would not have paid as nturb for it. We oppose the proposed rezoning of the property on Cheoonceau for the following reasons: 1) The impact on the property value of our hottse - We have looked at comps for the nei0borhood and c,;ttmatc that ft loss of the %,00ds will cost.. us S30.000 0.000 compared to the value of the othc.T houses in our neighborhood (Ws is based on the comps used for the appraisal bone when we pnmbased the howm). 2) The impact on our quality oflifv-- We will not be happy Uving in the !rouse if an aparttnnt complex is built behind it, especially since we speci#i: ally !nought the house bmause of the woods. The a,ddiiional noise, loss of privacy and pollution caused by more inhabitants will impact our qualhy of life tremendously, as will the loss ofvdldlife, including the deer, rabbits zmd birds which we currently enjoy so much. 3) The impact on our ability to resale the bouso in the future — Since other houses will surely be for sale in and near our neighborhood at the same time and which do .not have an aparuoeut complex. br+W &rm, we will have difficuhy selling our house. The NO ,hat the proposed green space ;tamvvs s i mdy 'before it reaches our house mrill decrease the value of our property even more compared to the other houses on our street. The property behind our housa is curreMly zoned R:2. We would much rather have a house right behind out house titan an apactatent cumpiex 100 ket away, and eve are sure potential buyers in the futurt will feel the :sante u•ay -- they will not want to buy a house behind an Watment complex. 01 14/ 2 3C91 ]d: 17 15012361433 IJAMS I_IDRAP" ;L9.9ZH PAGE 02/03 4)'fite iMpact on the envimnmeat -- Many trees will be destroyed close to our house if the land is mm -ed and apartment buildings built there. and wildlife habitat will be destroyed. We c mot imagine why- Deltic Timber or tate Planning Corn.mission would ever think it wu-Id be ok to choose to change the toning when it would have such a detrimental impact on the adjacent property owners. We do not think that rezoning should be done unless that: aro very oornpellizig reasons to do so. A corporation's requmi to r zxw, in order to snake a hirer profit on its prop"tp, or to sell it more easily, is not a cor p llixtg mason to take awa�y the riots of tht property owners who purcltaned their ptvp tcty based on current zoning or or- the faise information they were given by their real estate agents. We and severAl of our rteighbora were told by real estate agents that the property behind us could not be developed, and we Weved then (out teal estate agent has been a friend of ours for mn years, and vm thought she -evuld surely lwow someftRg this importwO- It seems to trs tisat suroeO&Z as important as zoning infcamation should be included its disclosure information before a house is sold so that the buyers will not be at the mercy of ku-informed res estate agarrts or corporations who change their minds about Allat they want to do with their property. we hope that you will forward'tits recomrnewlaticm to include inning irtfvrrustjon in the disclosure ptorednre be*ra someone buys a hou-se to the Stale Real Estate Commisslon or whomever can implement it. in suno an, we thing t eat corporations should not be. able to have zoning vbauged at the ea-pmse of the adjacent property owners, otherwise why would we even hatie zoning if it is not used to protect propeM o►smers. Pieria think of the permanent damage rezoning svovld do to the resi lent3 in Abmdeen Court, and to the environment, rather than the osxe time temporary profit of u corporation. Thank you. 01_'' 4/2,13 :.1 08: 17 15 12351423 LIAM-q LIBRARV A-7',MlH PAGE 03-'D1 Area Vicinity Map Case: Z- 5097-K. N Loaition: West Side of Cheno-liceau B)vd., I COO' S,'Nouth of Rwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 o igs -oO Peet (-'T- 42.11 :R: T2-NrU,.INVj4 JAM -12-2008 10:33 AM LAMBAS,INC. 870 368 SSSS U,, LAMB, JR, — Provident 609 EAST MAIN STREET WIHAWYATT LAMB--VIwPfesidsnt BODE 35 M5LWURNE, AH 72556 Fax Transmittal P.01 PHONE 604*4.36.1 FAX 670.386-5665 Date: Y - —No To: r ds n ` 1= a %1, 96-3 From: , �� �, k a ►. , 19 i ce.. - ..._.. P.O." ALB,_ TO:Tony Bozynski COMPANY: Dept of Planning FAX; 399-3435 DATE: t-11-08 RE: proposed re -coning on Chenonceau PAGES INCLUDING COVER- 1 FROM: Caroline Beauchamp Jones LR PHONE: 501-868650 LR FAX: 501-468-49% I object to the proposed rezoning on Chenonceau. Being a long time resident of Aberdeen Court, I object to the narrow buffer space being proposed between the houses in Aberdeen Court and proposed vew structures (whether multi- famil_viapartments or single fam']Vi`houses). This narrow buf'f'er wll3 not only affect the re -sale price of those houses backing up to the open space but also all the houses in Aberdeen Court. A buffer of at least 300 feet would allow residents whose houses back up to this area to continue to have the open area promised to them prior to purehasing their houses. I am enjoy the Chenal poul on Chenonceau in fact, one of the reasons I purchased my house. }laving a buffer around it is a must. Having apartments around it would fie terrible. How wouid ,You like to be lying ant by your neighborhood pool relaxing, and looking at apartments — hearing apartments. Are apartments residents going to try to use our pool? What kind of problems will that bring? Mult¢ faanitylapartmeuts many tunes attract people who are transient and are different than those who have ownership and purchase houses. Not only maintenance and appearance of the area but also NOISE and SECURITY ISSSU S are grave concerns. Thank you for your consideration. Caroline Beauchamp T•d 9664 -B98 -TCS savor dweyoneag auiTojeo dO4:10 80 IT uer 01-11-'08 10:31 FROM-tos 5012187302 T-697 P01101 U-661 January 11, 2008 Mr. Tony Boynski, I am a resident of Aberdeen subdivision and just leaded of Deltic Timber's request to -rozone parr . of.Chenonceau Boulevard to..multi-family : - I -am -adamantly apposed -to such a rezoning. I purchased my home in Aberdeen to avoid such an environment and do not want to see the upscale neighborhood tarnished with apartments. These apartments will un-doubtably lower my property values. The already heavy traffic in the mornings in afternoons will dramatically increase the traffic in this area. This area is no place for an apartment building and should NOT be allowed under any circumstances. Please do not allow this to tarnish a beautiful neighborhood that hundreds of people have invested so much of their money and time into. As a steward of our community, please do not allow this corporation to spoil such a nice area. I will be out of town during the time this meeting is to be held, so 1 can not be there in person, Otherwise I would be in attendance to support my POA board in voicing our objection to this rezoning. Sincerely, s James Calva 61 Berney '11V'ay Drive Aberdeen Subdivision L. RANDOLPH MANO January 11, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski City of Little Rock Dept. of Planning and Development 723 W. Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Re: Chenonceau Rezoning Application Dear Mr. Bozynski: I am writing regarding the proposed rezoning of the property on Chenonceau Boulevard adjacent to Aberdeen Court. When I first head of the proposal, I was disappointed in the change but encouraged by the reference to designating several acres of Open Space along the boundary with Aberdeen Court. Later, I was distressed to see that the open space was a negligible amount for 11 of the 16 houses that are the most directly impacted by the requested rezoning. These houses on Aberdeen Drive will have NO privacy with a major apartment complex looming over their backyards. When these residents bought their homes, they were clearly at least 500 feet from any planned multi -family property — Now that margin is being cut to a sliver of 100 feet! The developer and the homeowners both knew this subject property was zoned R2 residential. Now the rules are being changed after the fact, to allow the developer to make more money — at great expense to the small homeowners! For most people, their homes are their most valuable financial investments. The city should recognize that we homeowners depend on it when we make these major financial decisions. We depend on our city government to enforce its rules and regulations fairly, but, in instances like this, we become more convinced that our trust was grossly misplaced. Maybe we should NOT depend on our city government if its word has no meaning. What a sad state we are destined for when the residents of a city no longer trust its leaders. Is this where we are headed? Does untrustworthy leadership attract newcomers to our city? If it is essential to the city's growth that modifications are needed, I would merely ask that the city honor the spirit of the ori ' al zoning plan and provide for a dedicated open space of no less than 300 feet from the property lines of the residents on Aberdeen Drive. Thank you for considering this request. 18 Aberdeen Drive + Little Rock, AR 72223 + (501) 868-7258 January 13, 2008 To: Tony Bozynski From: Trudy and Roger James Mr. Bozynski, my wife and I have lived at 17 Aberdeen Drive since the house was built. Aberdeen Court is an ideal neighborhood in our eyes. We want to preserve the quality of life here that makes us feel the way we do about it. Deltic would like to rezone the area adjacent to our street. We oppose it for a number of reasons: 1. Much of the area in question is directly behind our house. When we purchased we were told that the ravine that contains two streams would remain an open space.. That was a contributing factor in our decision to purchase. 2. The ravine in question would not be suitable as a building site unless great quantities of fill are brought in. That would distroy the natural drainage of the area. 3. The multi -family housing that is proposed for this area in question will change the character of our neighborhood. It is well known that traffic and crime rates increase when apartments come in. This will have a detrimental effect on property values. This will cost my wife and I money when we sell our home. Mr. Bozynski, we are very happy here in Aberdeen Court. Please help us to preserve a community that we and our neighbors love. Thanks for your consideration. C. Roger James l7 Aberdeen Drive #le Rock, Arkansas 72223 23 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 January 13, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski Dept of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock AR 72201-1334 Dear Mr. Bozynski: My name is Dr. Roy W. Melton. My wife, Earline, and I bought our property at 23 Aberdeen Drive on the first day lots were offered in Aberdeen Court. I am writing to explain why I object to the recent proposal by Deltic Timber to rezone the property north of Chenonceau Boulevard and just east of Chenonceau pool and change it to MF12. Our property at 23 Aberdeen backs directly up to this property. (1) A very narrow buffer zone is proposed, less than 100 feet in some cases I understand. Our yards are very shallow. We would have people in the multi -story buildings looking down on our activities at a very close range. (2) The noise of dense apartments so close would disturb a quiet neighborhood that has been that way for thirteen and one half years. (3) The traffic increase would endanger our grandchildren who visit and often go to the pool on Chenonceau. (4) Apartments in our area would change the very appearance of the neighborhood. (5) For the above reasons, the value of our property would no doubt be lowered. (6) I have a document, "Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions of Chenal Valley," which was given to us when we purchased our property. It is actually prepared and executed by Deltic Farm and Timber Company, Inc., owners and developers of Chenal Valley at the time. Paragraph two and three of this document state three times the desire of the developer to preserve the value of our property. This is a twelve -page document which reinforces these principles. I am enclosing a copy of this document. As you can see, it is signed by both the president and secretary of Deltic Timber. When we moved here, we were told by Mr. McCray and Mr. Eberle that the property behind us was dedicated for an elementary school, that only the playground would abut our property, and that playground would have a considerable buffer area. I don't know when this changed to a single family dwelling area. I am enclosing a map showing the area as dedicated for an elementary school. So, I submit that the rezoning of the stated property is not only very undesirable, but possibly illegal. Sincerely, Roy W. Melton Enclosures 0 DECLARATION O n9 -61706 + f4tzss'' This Declaration, by DELTIC FARM & "Declarant"). F COVENANTS AND RESTRICTI6tE D OF CHENAL VALLEY made this 1714�day TIMBER CO., INC., W I T N E S S E T H: 89 NOU 22 PNI 2: 59 of !r9. ("Developer" or the LZO -w- A Z_ I Z A—EN � Z WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of the real property described on Exhibit "A" attached to this Declaration (hereafter "The Property") and desires to create a community with permanent parks, playgrounds, open spaces, landscaped entrances and other common facilities for the benefit of the community, which shall be known as "Chenal Valley." WHEREAS, Developer desires to provide for the preservation of the values and amenities in Chenal Valley and for the maintenance off the parks, playgrounds, open spaces, landscaped entrances and other common facilities; and to this end, desires to subject the Property to these covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens, each of which is for the benefit of the Property and each Owner, and. WHEREAS, Developer has deemed it desirable, for the efficient mreservation of the values and amenities in Chenal valley, to create an association which shall be assigned the powers of main- taining, administering and enforcing these covenants and restric- tions and doing all other things necessary to preserve the values and amenities of this community; WHEREAS, Developer has caused to be incorporated under the laws of the State of Arkansas, as a nonprofit corporation, Chenal valley Property Owners Association, Inc., for the purpose of exercising these functions; NOW THEREFORE, the Developer declares that the Property is ate. z1far1l be held, transferred, sold, conveyed .and occupied sub- jec:t ta: th- covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens (Sgttimes referred to as "Covenants and Restrictions") se forth ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Declaration or any supplemental Declaration (unless the context shall indicate a contrary intention) shall have the following meanings: —Z— (a) "Association" shall mean and refer to Chenal Valley Property Owners Association, Inc., its successors and assigns. (b) "The Property" shall mean and refer to that property described on Exhibit "A" which is subject to these Covenants or any Supplemental Covenants under the provisions of Article II. (c) "Common Area" shall mean all real property owned by the Association for the common use and enjoyment of all Owners. The common area shall be deeded to the Association. (d) "site" shall mean and refer to any platted lot within the Property which may be purchased;by any person or owned by the Developer or any 1/3 acre of unplatted property owned by the Developer within the Property. (e) "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of a fee simple title to any Site which is a part of the Property, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. (f) "Member"' shall mean and refer to any Owner who by virtue of holding fee simple title to any Site is a Member of the Association. If any Owner holds title to more than one site then the Owner shall hold memberships equal to the number of sites owned. (g) "Architectural Control Committee" shall mean the commit- tee appointed pursuant to Section 1 of Article VI hereof. (h) "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Association. (i) "Declarant" or "Developer" shall mean Deltic Farm & Timber Co., Inc., it successors and assigns. ARTICLE II PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION: SECTION 1: Existinq Property. The real property, which is, and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied sub- ject to this Declaration is located in the County of Pulaski, State of Arkansas, and is more particularly described on Exhibit "A," all of which property shall be referred to as "The Property." The Property consists of both platted and unplatted properties and the unplatted portions may be subsequently platted by Developer, as it deems appropriate. SECTION 2. •Additions to Existina Property. Additional lands of the Developer may become subject to these Covenants and Restrictions in the following manner: The Developer shall have the right but not the obligation to bring within the plan of this ' -2- Declaration additional properties, regardless of whether or not said properties are presently owned by the Developer, in future stages of the development, provided that such additions are in accord with the general plan of development (the "General Plan") which has been prepared prior to the date of these Covenants and Restrictions and prior to the sale of any Site and is maintained in the office of the Declarant, and provided such proposed addi- tions, if made, will become subject to assessments of the Association for their share of -expenses. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES shall these Covenants and Restrictions or any'supplement or the General Plan bind the Developer to make the proposed additions or to adhere to the Plan in any subsequent development of land shown on the General Plan. Nor shall the Developer be precluded from conveying lands in the General Plan not subject to these Covenants and Restrictions or any supplement free and clear of these Covenants and Restrictions or any supplement. (B) The additions authorized shall be made by filing of record a Supplemental Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions with respect to the additional property which shall extend the plan of the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration to the additional property, and the Owners, including the Developer of Sites in those additions shall immediately be entitled to all rights and privileges provided in this Declaration. (C) The Supplemental Declaration may contain those compli- mentary additions and modifications of the Covenants and Restrictions contained in this Declaration necessary to reflect the different character, if any, of the added properties as are not inconsistent with the Plan of this Declaration. In no event, however, shall such supplement revoke, modify and add to the covenants established by this Declaration within the Property. SECTION 3. AdditionsLimited to Developer. No one other than the Developer shall have the right to subject additional lands to this Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, unless the Developer shall indicate in writing to the Association that such additional lands may be included. ARTICLE III THE ASSOCIATION Every person, persons or entity who owns any Site, including a builder or. contractor, shall be a. Member of the Association, and shall abide by its Articles of Incorporation -and By -Laws. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of any Site. The Association shall be governed by its Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. -3- ARTICLE IV PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE COMMON PROPERTIES SECTION 1. Members' Easements of F-n!oVment. Every Member shall have a right and easement of enjoyment in and to the Common Properties. This easement of enjoyment shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Site, subject to the Articles of Incorporation and the By -Laws of the Association. SECTION 2. Title to Common Areas. The Developer agrees to convey title to the common areas to the Association free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except for applicable impro- vement district assessments within five (5) years after their designation as such on a recorded plat filed in the office of the Circuit Clerk of Pulaski County, Arkansas. ARTICLE V COVENANT FOR MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS SECTION 1. Creation of Lien and Personal Oblication of Assessments and Special Assessments. Declarant for each Site owned within the Property shall ne deemed to covenant and agree, and each Owner of any Site by acceptance of a deed shall be deemed to covenant and agree, to pay to the Association annual assessments or charges and special assessments, together with interest and costs of collection, if any, which amounts shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the Site. Each assessment, together with interest, cost of collec- tion and reasonable attorneys' fees, if any, shall also be the personal obligation of the Owner of the Site at the time when the assessment or special assessment fell due. The personal obliga- tion for delinquent assessment or special assessment shall not pass to an Owner's successors in title unless expressly assumed by them. The lien for assessments and special assessments shall be subject to and subordinate to the lien of any recorded first mortgage or Deed of Trust. Assessments shall be fixed by the Association in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws of the Association. SECTION 2. Exempt Proper. Common Areas as defined in Article I, all Common Areas subsequently added to the Property and any areas which are designated for the common use of a par- ticular subdivision, and all portions of the Property owned or otherwise dedicated to any political subdivision shall be exempt from the assessments and liens of the Association. -4- ARTICLE VI ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE SECTION 1. Designation of Committee. The Association shall have an Architectural Control Committee, consisting of at least three (3) and not more than five (5) members who shall be natural persons. As long as Developer shall own twenty percent (20%) or more of the areas designated as residential on the General Plan (as defined in the Covenants and Restrictions) or twenty percent (20%) or more of the areas designated as commercial on the General Plan, the Members of the Architectural Control Committee, and all vacancies, shall be appointed by Developer. when Developer no longer owns twenty percent (20%) of both of these areas, the Members of the Architectural Control Committee, and all vacancies, shall be appointed by the Board of Directors. SECTION 2. Function of Architectural Control Committee. No Improvement shall be constructed or maintained upon any Site and no alteration or repainting to the exterior of a structure shall be made and no landscaping performed unless complete plans, spe- cifications, and site plans showing the exterior design, height, building material and color scheme, the location of the structure plotted horizontally and vertically, the location and size of driveways, the general plan of landscaping, fencing walls and windbreaks, and the grading plan shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Architectural Control Committee. A copy of the plans, specification, and lot plans as finally approved shall be deposited with the Architectural Control Committee. No trees shall be removed without prior written aaoroval of the Architectural Control Committee. The Architectural Control Committee shall have the power to employ professional consultants to assist it in discharging its duties. The decisions of the Architectural Control Committee shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon the applicant. SECTION 3. Content of Plans and specifications. The plans and specifications to be submitted and approved shall include the following: (a) A topographical plot showing existing contour grades and showing the location, of all improvements, structures, walks, driveways, fences and walls. Existing and finished grades shall be shown at lot corners and at corners of proposed improvements. Lot drainage provisions shall be indicated as well as cut and fill details if any applicable change -in the lot contours is contemplated. (b) Exterior elevations. (c) Exterior materials, colors., textures and shapes. (d) Structural design. -5- wa (e) Landscaping plan, including mailboxes, systems, ve, afences s and walls, elevation changes, watering y g tation and ground cover. (f) Parking area and driveway plan. (g) Screening, including site, location and method. (h) Utility connections. (i) Exterior illumination, including location and method. kj ) File pzotection system. (k) Signs, including size, shape, color, location and materials. SECTION 4. Definition of "Imurovement". Improvement shall mean and include all residences, buildings, and roofed struc- tures, parking areas, fences, walls, hedges, mass plantings, poles, driveways, lakes, swimming pools, tennis courts, signs, changes in any exterior color or shape, glazing or reglazing of exterior windows with mirrored or reflective glass, and any other r_ew exterior construction or exterior improvement which materially alters the appearance ❑f the property and which may not be included in any of the foregoing. The definition does not include garden shrub or tree replacements or any other replace- ment or repair of any magnitude which does not materially change exterior colors or exterior appearances. SECTIONS. The Basis of Anoroval. Approval of plans and specifications shall be }cased on, among other things, adequacy of site dimensions, structural design, conformity and harmony of external design and of location with neighboring structures and sites, relation of finished grades and elevations to neighboring sites, and conformity to both the specific and general intent of the .protective covenants. The Architectural Control Committee shall establish certain architectural guidelines, which shall be approved by the Board (the "Architectural Guidelines"), and all plans and specifications must comply with Architectural Guidelines then in force and effect. However, the Architectural Control Committee may approve exceptions to the Architectural Guidelines by a unanimous vote. The current Architectural Guidelines shall be available at the office of the Association or the office of the Declarant. SECTION 6. Majority Vote. A majority vote of the Architectural Control Committee is required for approval or disapproval of proposed improvements. SECTION 7. Failure of Committee to Act. If the Architec- tural Control Committee fails to approve, disapprove, or reject as inadequate proposed plans and specifications within thirty (30) days after submittal, they shall be deemed approved. if -6- plans and specifications are not sufficiently compiete or are otherwise inadequate, the Architectural Control Committee may reject them entirely, partially or conditionally approve. SECTION B. Limitation of Liability. Neither the Declarant, the Association, the Architectural Control Committee nor any of anyone its members shall be liable, in damages or otherwise, to a submitting plans and specifications for approval or to any owner of land affected by this Declaration by reason of mistake of judgment, negligence or nonfeasance arising out of or in connec- tion with the approval or disapproval or failure to approve or disapprove any plans and specifications. SECTION.9. Reasonable Fee. The Architectural Control Committee may charge any owner ced reasonable laps and specificationsrvices in reviewing that owner's prop p ARTICLE VII MAINTENANCE SECTION 1. Duty of Maintenance. Owners and occupants (including lessees) o= any part of the the Property shall jointly and severally have the duty and responsibility, at their sole cost and expense, to keep that part of the Property so owned or occupied, including buildings, improvements and grounds in a well-maintained, safe, clean and attractive condition at all times. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) Prompt removal of all litter, trash, refuse, and waste. (b) Lawn mowing. (c) Tree and shrub pruning. (d) watering. (e) Keeping exterior lighting and mechanical facilities in working order. (f) Keeping lawn and garden areas alive, free of weeds, and attractive. (g) Keeping parking areas, driveways, and roads in good repair. (h) Complying with all governmental health and police requirements. (i) Repainting of improvements. (j) Repair of exterior damages to improvements. -7- r - - SECTION 2. Enforcement. If, in the opinion or the Association any Owner or occupant has failed in any of the foreoging duties or responsibilities, then the Association may provide written notice of that failure, giving the Owner or occu- pant ten (10) days from receipt to perform the care and main- tenance required. Should any person fail to fulfill this duty and responsibility within the ten-day period, then the Association through its authorized agent or agents shall have the right and power to enter onto the premises and perform needed care and maintenance without any liability for damages for wrong- ful entry, trespass or otherwise to any person. The Owners and occupants (including lessees) of any part of the Property on which work is performed shall jointly and severally be liable for the cost of the work and shall promptly reimburse the Association for all costs. If the Association has not been reimbursed within thirty (30) days after invoicing, the indebtedness shall be a debt of all of the Owners and occupants jointly and severally, and shall constitute a lien against that portion of the Property on which work was performed. This lien shall have the same attributes as the lien for assessments and special assessments set forth in Article V, and the Association shall have identical powers and rights in all respects, including but not limited to the right of foreclosure. ARTICLE VIII COMMON SCHEME RESTRICTIONS The following restrictions are imposed as a common scheme upon all Sites and Common Areas for the benefit of each other Site and Common Areas and may be enforced by any Owner or the Association through any remedy available at law or in equity. 1. No garbage, refuse, rubbish, tree limbs, pine straw, leaves or cuttings shall be deposited on any street, road, or Common Areas nor on any Site unless placed in a container suitable for garbage pickup. 2. No building material of any kind or character shall be placed upon any Site except in connection with construction approved by the Architectural Control Committee. Construction shall be promptly commenced and diligently prosecuted. 3. No clothes lines, drying yards, service yards, wood piles or storage areas shall be so located as to be visible from a street, road, Chenal Country Club, golf course, or Common Area. 4. Any exterior lighting installed on any Site shall either be indirect or of such controlled focus and intensity as not to disturb the residents or the adjacent property. 5. No animals or poultry shall be kept on any Site or Common Area except a reasonable number of ordinary household pets belonging to the household. -8- 6. No signs, plaques or communication or any oescription shall be placed on the exterior of any Site or Common Area by an Owner unless approved by the Architectural Control Committee. 7. No nuisances shall be allowed in Chenal Valley nor shall any use or practice be allowed which is a source of annoyance to its residents or which interferes with their right of quiet enjoyment. 8. No immoral, improper, offensive or unlawful use shall be made of Chenal valley or any part thereof, and all valid laws, zoning, by-laws and regulations of all governmental bodies having jurisdiction shall be observed. 9. No portion of a Site (other than the entire Site) may be rented, and no transient may be accommodated therein unless by consent of the Owner. lo. All areas designated on the General Plan as jogging trails shall be used solely for pedestrian and golf cart traffic and no other motor vehicles, of any type, shall be allowed on the jogging trails. 11. No used or previously erected or temporary house, struc- ture, house trailer or non -permanent outbuilding shall ever be placed, erected or allowed to remain on any Site or Common Area. 12. No junk vehicle, commercial vehicle, trailer, truck, camper, camp truck, house trailer, boat or other machinery or equipment (except as may be reasonable and customary in connec- tion with the use and maintenance of any improvements located upon the Property and except for such equipment and/or machinery as the Association may require in connection with the maintenance and operation of the Common Areas) shall be kept upon the Property, nor (except for bona fide emergencies) shall the repair or extraordinary maintenance -of automobiles or other vehicles be performed. This restriction shall not apply to vehicles, trailers, boats, machinery, equipment or the like stored and kept within an enclosed storage room or garage. The Association may, in the discretion of its Board of Directors, provide and maintain a suitable area designated for the parking of such vehicles. 13. All buildings built on any Site shall comply with the setback restrictions imposed upon the Site on either a recorded plat in the Circuit Clerk's office of Pulaski County, Arkansas or in the deed to each purchaser of a Site. Setback restrictions are covenants running with the land. - 14. Access easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage of facilities and for pedestrian and golf cart traffic are reserved in rights of way of drives and roads or on the side or rear of each Site as shown on the recorded plat. 15. An Owner hereby grants a right of access to his Site to the Association, any managing agent of the Association, and/or any otner person auznorized by tris Hoard or the managing agent for the purpose of making inspections or for the purpose of correcting any conditions originating in his Site and threatening another Site or any Common Area, or for the purpose of performing installations, alterations, or repairs to the parts of the Site over which said persons have control and/or responsibility for maintenance. Requests for such access must be made in advance and entry must be at a time reasonably convenient to the Owner. In case of an emergency, this right of entry shall be immediate whether the Owner is present or not. hLM'.C.L"Z LA COMMON PROPERTIES SECTION 1. Easements of Enjoyment. sun3ect to the provi- sions of Section 3 of this Article IX, every Member of the Association shall have the right and easement of enjoyment in and to the Common Area. SECTION 2. Title to Common Properties. Declarant shall con- vey ownership of the Common Area to the Association, which shall be responsible for its operation and maintenance, within five (5) years after their designation as a Common Area on a recorded plat filed in the office of the Circuit Clerk of Pulaski County, Arkansas. _ SECTION 3. Extent of Easements. The rights and easements of enjoyment created shall be subject to the following: (a) The right of the Association to prescribe rules and regulations for the use, enjoyment, .and maintenance of the Common Area; fib) The right of the Association_ to borrow money for the purpose of improving all or any part of the Common Area, and to mortgage all or any part of the Common Area; (c) The right of the Association to take reasonably necessary steps to protect all or any part of the Common Area against foreclosure; and (d) The right of the Association to suspend the easements of enjoyment of any Member of the Association during the time any assessment levied under Articles V or VII remains unpaid, and for any period not to exceed thirty (30) days for any infraction of its published rules and regulations. -10- A2t'1'1"Z X GENERAL PROVISIONS br;(_;T1UlV 1. uuration. Tne Covenants ana restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land, shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Association, or the Owner of any land subject to this Declaration, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns for a term of forty (40) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time the Covenants and Restrictions shall be automa- tically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless an instrument terminating these Covenants and Restrictions signed by the then Owners of sixty-five percent (65%) of the Sites has been recorded prior to the commencement of any ten-year period. SECTION 2. Amendments. These Covenants and Restrictions may be amended during the first twenty years (20) from the date of the Declaration, by an instrument signed by the Owners of not less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the Sites and thereafter by an instrument signed by the Owners of not less than seventy percent (70%) of the Sites. Any amendment must be properly recorded. SECTION 3. Notices. Any notice required to be sent to any Member or Owner under the provisions of this Declaration shall be deemed to have been properly sent when mailed, postpaid, to the last known address of the person who appears as Member or Owner on the records of the Association at the time of mailing. Each purchaser of a Site shall forward a copy of his recorded warranty deed to the Association or its officers. SECTION 4. Enforcement. Enforcement of these Covenants and Restrictions shali be by any proceeding at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any Covenant or Restriction, either to restrain violation or to recover damages, and against the land to enforce any lien created by these Covenants and Restrictions. Failure by the Association or any Owner to enforce any Covenant or Restriction shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. SECTIONS. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these Covenants or Restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. Attorney Fee. In any legal or equitable pro- ceeding for the enforcement or to restrain the violation of this instrument or any provision thereof, by reference or otherwise, the' prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to attorney fees in such amount as the court finds reasonable. All remedies provided for herein, or at law or equity, shall be cumulative and not exclusive. -11- SECTION 7. Dissolution. The Association may De aissolvea with consent given in writing and signed by not less than three- fourths of each class of Members as defined in the By -Laws of the Association. Upon dissolution of the Association other than incident to a merger or consolidation, the assets of the Association shall be conveyed and granted and assigned to any nonprofit corporation, association trust, or other organization to be devoted to same or similar purposes. Dh;L'1'1C: r'AKM 6c '1'1Ml:Sr+tt l:U . , live.. ATTEST: By: . W. Butler, Jr. President Jam s E. Baine Se retary Hl�l\iV V W Lr;LVP1r,LV 1' 6TATZ ue litCilHIVJKj j SS. COUNTY OF UNION j On this day before me, a Notary Public, duly commissionea, qualified and acting within and for said county and state, appeared the within named C. W. Butler, Jr. and James E. Baine, being the President and Secretary, respectively, of DELTIC FARM & TIMBER CO., INC., and who had been designated by said DELTIC FAIUM & TIMBER CO., INC. to execute the above instrument; to me per- sonally well known, who stated they were the. President and Secretary of said DELTIC F_A.RM & TIMBER CO., INC. and were duly authorized in their respective capacities to execute the foregoing instrument, and further stated and acknowledged that they had so signed, executed, and delivered said foregoing instrument for the consideration, uses and purposes therein men- tioned and set forth. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this I— day of MeN, , 1989. My commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC -12- Area Map /9q3 y Ca7pIL ' LMF --rr- - -- - - - - ' • Nard15 A6,Ke,.n Ca u! • � , , Choral She • _ - 01. r Flat N. L • site special ' . Public Use `Lee Cue . L't SkVo Fan* Seo Dan Mountain' ,T --- -------- - - -- -- - - - r � f Singe Fandly u' s'd' 1 � -Pa. - - . PrNeta Use Oparl Space -Spnztal i � r —my �' jy + � -C!--,I ch' •� � I?ommal9y ' Sir* F. �- - - - - - - - - - - - t. Camn r' OP - p • • Palk r Detached ' r Shoo Franey °• LMF . /\ s rrGaff Church She Lodge Passive• • r Ir LMF r Ovadook ' • . _ _ _ tMF 1 f Inn } " • Park r Sbgle Raley. Detached LMF r r Sktpls FwNly 3brpla F-rey Detached F . •_ ! . ' A �hsd ,;i L'ailDmh;Place,i" Space a ell Reserve thoverefty SkVW Fa * ; Y Park Shrills Femlly .� �� r ' ad I - - ' ' pucet � r n • _ _ r Schoen, BenpN Famey a M . . r t Chaod DetachedCarI' M,d� Sir" Fiiiiel' r CarderI Detached Few Aft 0". 'ae4� 'w `l•PndeWorW C. Omom Tncla % QoWt ChuN• Cham % r Se CwKar vlm Out , C IIIA r t ' r , , _ .r' . Pucel \ • Commercial r r HomphY Cwmerttpy ! --� atn Feb 28 2008 14:00 HP LASERJET FAX p.2 Lw Lk �•. r1 Il t. 1. ��a �, ���� G•L��,J'l k.�l ���111: `"� ` L� �i��:���5 tl���'L L•�/..r`-"��-i �- Feb 28 2008 14:01 HP LASERJET FAX P•3 n iw uk - liulA. Moore, Monte From: Carney, Dana Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 7:43 AM To: Moore, Monte Subject: FW: rezoning on Chenonceau Blvd - 0/ Page 1 of 1 -----Original Message ----- From: MARY TURNER [mailto:eandmt@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:30 PM To: Carney, Dana; tjferstl@comcast.net; Ihargraves@Iittlerockchamber.com; obray@aol.com; jerry@jerrymeyeragency.com; chauncey.taylor@centerpointenergy.com; williams4850@sbcglobal.net; jyates@irwinpartners.com; vera; a turner Subject: rezoning on Chenonceau Blvd Mr. Carney and Planning Commission, Thank you for your willingness to serve our community. We realize it is a difficult job, with few rewards. Mary and I live in the Bayonne subdivision on Chenonceau Blvd. Twelve years ago, before purchasing our lot, we researched our area carefully. Deltic Timber's maps, plans, and published materials were clear that no apartment complexes were to built along Chenonceau. With this assurance we bought our lot and built our home. For several years members of our subdivision have been assured by Deltic that no apartments, instead only condos, were planned for the area on the west side of Chenonceau. Now we are facing a rezoning effort and the possibility of MF -12 apartments in our neighborhood. We are concerned for the traffic, fire, and saftey issues such a development would introduce. Further, we think the idea of approving such a zoning proposal to be archaic. We think most communities in LR are developed with approval for Planned Urban Developments, in which the complete picture of the development is given to the regulatory agencies. To grant such a request as is being made in this rezoning proposal is more like giving the developers "carte blanche" than like supervising the development. We ask that you reject the rezoning request, and that you move to a Planned Urban Development model for approval. With this model we can have confidence that the Planning Commission is looking not only to the interests of the developers but also to the nature of the communities in which the development exists. Please consider our request favorably. Thank you, Emil and Mary Turner 7 Iviers Drive, Little Rock, AR 72223 2/27/2008 ) 7.,.l ICC �- DAVID M. HARGIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 807 WEST THIRD STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 (501)371-0900 FAX: (501) 371-0903 February 25, 2008 Mr. Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivisions City of Little Rock Planning and Development Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Re -zoning Request: Chenonceau Blvd. Dear Mr. Carney: It is my understanding the re -zoning proposal referenced above is from R-2 Single Family to MF -12 Multifamily. This letter will serve as my strongest opposition to those changes currently before the commission. Notwithstanding the fact property owners in the area, myself included, were led to believe the developer would maintain the areas as originally designated, it would seem the explosion of higher density multi -family apartments in this area of the city could tax existing services. I urge the members of the Planning Commission to refrain from a rubber-stamp approval for the developers in the area, and explore alternative solutions that might include MF -6 designation. Specific site plans and details are also requested. Your assistance and attention are most appreciated. 6Sincor , Linda . Hargis Paralegal LHH/s cc: Little Rock Planning Commission Members Little Rock City Directors Kathy & Mike Bauer I Gelan Ct. Little Rock,,A-R 72223 February 24, 2008 Michael Keck Little Rock City Director Ward 4"', #26 Hanna Lane Little Rock, AR 72227 Dear Mr. Keck - We are writing to ask for your support in helping the residents of Bayonne Place Sub - Division protect our neighborhood from the proposed rezoning of the vacant land along elle west side or'C'etionceau Blvd. When we purchased our home in this area we were I h I! ,oil In 1 -1 the raising our family in a safe neighborhood environment of single family hordes. We werc 0 -Fly 0.11 -fl 1.1hol CC as well as ]in-,itc-.'_'I i-1-1-11fit :1 E111Eiv dw(] ,U V f 0 1 1 1 1; E We are naturally aboiji allox.s of"imil-1), co-Ocen-le'd ahnill RIC: C"IffIv (if (:ffl' 1 ArQQL that c1ii](Ircn cross to act to the pool and wolild Ndd iwi jir5t iooiv ti-alflicdicy wok(ld decrease the privacy of our neigbborhood and reduce the security of our raillific". airld 11ollics VY- to support Clic residents of Bayonne Court in V i) ,Iflhoihood. Wc.liavcnotrustinDeltic Timber's word, We must be able to trust in our city offic.ia.N' supporl, Sincerely. -, C- 1114 �r� Kathy & Mike Bauer Cc: Bruce T. Moore, Valerie Dawson Pruitt, Dana Carney, Stacey Hurst a/Y Michael ec_k #26 naane Li Rock, AR 72227 February 22, 2008 The Officers of the Bayonne Place Property Owners Association (Bayonne POA) have met with representatives of the developer of our neighborhood, Deltic Timber Company, to discuss the proposal to rezone property between the Aberdeen Sub -Division east to Chenonceau Blvd. and across the street from the Bayonne Place Sub -Division. As we understand the rezoning proposal a large section next to Aberdeen would be rezoned from R-2 Single Family to MF -12 Multifamily and part of the current area on the North end of Chenonceau currently zoned MF -12 would be expanded into the current 0-3 area. On behalf of the 187 homeowners who comprise the Bayonne Place Subdivision, we strongly urge you not to approve the rezoning change for the following reasons: • According to the City's Zoning Definitions MF -12 is reserved for apartments "as a transition zone between lower and higher density residential developments." This is not a transitional area. All of the homes in Deltic's developments in this area are single family low density homes. ■ Homeowners' concern for consistency in property values would be undermined. Those who have previously purchased property did so after research on the zoning of the adjacent land, which was originally listed as elementary school and limited multi -family ■ The increase in traffic resulting from expanded commercial enterprises and high density apartments will expose the nearby homes and the current neighborhood park and swimming pool to increased traffic problems, possible theft, security risks, and vandalism. Parents and families with children certainly deserve the security of a safe, single family, residential neighborhood environment as was understood in the original land use designation. • It would seem that the MF -6 Multifamily definition would more appropriately apply to this area. It reads in part, "This district is used predominately in the west and southwest portions of the City generally for upper income and condominium type development." The residents of Bayonne Place Subdivision rely upon the Planning Commission to protect the original intended use of this land. Making the zoning change proposed by Deltic will have an adverse effect upon our property values and neighborhoods, and is clearly against the understanding of the residents of our area. Please help us protect the integrity of our neighborhoods and our property values. Thank you. Sincerely, 452 rank Pohlkamp, President Bayonne Property Owners Association Cc: CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Mark Stodola, Mayor Stacey Hurst, Vice -Mayor, Ward 3 Doris Wright, Ward 6 Brad Cazort, Ward 4 B.J. Wyrick, Ward 7 Erma Hendrix, Ward 1 Dean Kumpuris, At -Large, Position 8 Ken Richardson, Ward 2 Gene Fortson, At -Large, Position 9 Joan Adcock, At -Large, Position 10 LITTLE K PLANNING COMMISSION: ana Carney Pam Adcock Valerie Dawson Pruitt J.T. Ferstl William F. Rector, Jr. Lucas Hargraves Chauncey Nick Taylor Troy Laha Darrin L. Williams Obray Nunnley Jeff Yates Jerry Meyer B.J. Wyrick (Ex -Officio) CITY MANAGER: Bruce T. Moore OFFICERS, BAYONNE PLACE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION President: Frank Pohlkamp 60 Iviers 868-5630 Vice President: John S. Anthony 8 Noyal 868-8098 Vice President: Dennis Gilliam 58 Iviers 680-1483 Treasurer: Phyllis Pohlkamp 60 Iviers 868-5630 Secretary: Janice Peters 3 Bayonne Ct. 868-1303 23 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 March 31, 2008 Mr. Monte Moore City of Little Rock Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Little Rock AR 72201-1334 Re: Rezoning Agenda Item C (Z -5097-K) Dear Mr. Moore: ©`i -7- ��- r�,aT) We wish to address the above rezoning application. Yes, we are one of the ones who camped out for our lot. Yes, we are one of the ones who assumed that a school would be built behind us. What we want to refer to specifically is the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS. We are enclosing a copy of the first and last pages. This covenant was made by DELTIC TIMBER and signed by their president, C. W. Butler, Jr. In paragraphs two and three, DELTIC TIMBER states that they desire to provide for the preservationQf the values in Chenal Valley. We do not see how MF -12 zoning for high rise anything in our back yard can preserve the value of our property. We think the rezoning of the property would give DELTIC TIMBER a greater asset, and it would bring more money into their company. We realize that the objective of large companies is increase profits. But must that be at the expense of property owners who accepted their covenant as honest and dependable? Will you allow DELTIC TIMBER to renege on their covenant? Is a covenant by DELTIC TIMBER not worth the paper it is written on? 23 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock AR 72223 March 31, 2008 We ask you to consider these thoughts as you make your decision on the rezoning. Thank you very much. 6Aalt, Ro7 and Earline Melton 23 Aberdeen Drive DECLARATION O ,99-61`,_70(3 F""s" This Declaration, �. by DELTIC FARM & "Declarant"). F COVENANTS AND RESTRICTI6kE= J Cr E. ZC O OF CHENAL VALLEY made this 171*1day TIMBER CO., INC., W I T N E S S E T H: E,9 NM1121222..Pik 2: 59 ley of ("Developer" or the WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of the real property described on Exhibit "A" attached to this Declaration (hereafter "The Property") and desires to create a community with permanent parks, playgrounds, open spaces, landscaped entrances and other common facilities for the benefit of the community, which shall be known as "Chenal Valley." WHEREAS, Developer desires to orovide for t preservation +he values and ties in e a Va y and for the maintenance o:f_- the parks, playgrounds, open spaces, landscaped entrances and other common facilities; and to this end, desires to subject the Property to these covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens, each of which is for the benefit of the Property and each Owner, and_ WHEREAS, Developer has deemed it desirable, for the efficient Dresery tion ues and amenities in Chenal valley, to create an association which shall be assigned the powers of main- taining, administering and enforcing these covenants and restric- tions and doing all other things necessary to preserve the values and amenities of this community; WHEREAS, Developer has caused to be incorporated under the laws of the State of Arkansas, as a nonprofit corporation, Chenal Valley Property Owners Association, Inc., for the purpose of exercising these functions; NOW T11EREFORE, the Developer declares that the Property is aid- z1gall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied sub- Jeat to; the coven,-mts, restrictions, easements, charges and liens fsvrnet.:Lmesi referred to as "Covenants and Restrictions") ze `- forth ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Declaration or any supplemental Declaration (unless the context shall indicate a contrary intention) shall have the following meanings: -1- SECTION 7. Dissolution. The Association may be dissolved with consent given in writing and signed by not less than three- fourths of each class of Members as defined in the By -Laws of the Association. Upon dissolution of the Association other than incident to a merger or consolidation, the assets of the Association shall be conveyed and granted and assigned to any nonprofit corporation, association trust, or other organization to be devoted to same or similar purposes. DELTIC FARM & TIMBER CO., INC. ATTEST: By: W. But er, Jr. President Jams E. Baine Se retary ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF ARKANSAS ) ss. COUNTY OF UNION ) On this day before me, a Notary Public, duly commissioned, qualified and acting within and for said county and state, appeared the within named C. W. Butler, Jr. and ,lames E. Baine, being the President and Secretary, respectively, of DELTIC FARM & TIMBER CO., INC., and who had been designated by said DELTIC FARM & TIMBER CO., INC. to execute the above instrument; to me per- sonally well known, who stated they were the. President and Secretary of said DELTIC FARM & TIMBER CO., INC. and were duly authorized in their respective capacities to execute the foregoing instrument, and further stated and acknowledged that they had so signed, executed, and delivered said foregoing instrument for the consideration, uses and purposes therein men- tioned and set forth. INSTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1- day of L/04, , 1989. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 01-11-'03 10:30 r ROM-tos 5012187302 T-696 F01/01 TJ -550 January 11, 2009 IU Tony Boynski, 1 am a resident of Aberdeen subdivision and just leaned of Deltic Tinmbet's request to --�--------rezone pard of C.f-tenonceau•Boulavard to multi -family. 4 am adamantly apposed to such a rezoning, I purchased ray horne in Aberdeen to avoid such an environment and do not wtuit to see the upscale neighborhood tarnished with apartrrents, These apartments will un-doubtably lower my property values. The already hearty traffic in the mornings in afternoons will dramatically increase the traffic in this area. This area is no place for an apartment building and should NOT be allo%'ed under any circumstances. please do not allow this to tarnish a beautiful neighborhood that hundreds of people have invested w much of their money and time into. As a steward of our community, please do not allow this corporation to spoil such a nice area 1 will be out of town during the tune this meeting is to be held. so I can not be there in person. Otherwise l Mould be in attendance to support my POA board in voicing our objection to this rezoning. Sincerely. James Calva 61 Berney Way Driva Aberdeen SubdiviAo: D�6'r I, � '_' L_Z'114ZF�s TAN- 12-20Ft8 10:31 NSA LAMB^S, INC. 870 S68 ..+535 509 EAST MAIN STREET PHONE ®71193.438" Ir tAPAt3, JP - P19dtlYr0 FgXBi4�if�e-555,'. ASmA WYATS LAMB - Wlnn-PrMdur ocx 95 McLBOURNE, AH 72555 Fax Transmittal JAN -14-2009 12:22 FR]NrSh PS 30i-202-2035 7-908 F 001!071 F-382 , s GL.ENYGF G. FEENEY, M.S., RD/LD, DHCFA, FAD,A 31 ABERDEEN DFUVI LITTLE ROCK, AiiKANSAS 72223 ivfr. Tony Bozynski Crept. Of PlL7n.ing and Development 723 Nest Markhwn Strect Little Erode, AR 12201-1331 Dear'NL-. Bozyns1d: As a sicgla, seuiur cirizen, I'm very distressed to learn about a proposal to rezone the property behind my home at 31 Aberdeen Drive. The proposal could not possritly ,-fferd me arty privacy from the area to be zoned bigh density MP'12. As The origutal owner, I chose my lot land because the origirrtti drawings showed a proposed elementary scl3.001, i wm told there was a wide greenbelt between my proper areal IIIc proposed school. Based on thwt information, I designed a .'•some featuring numerous glass windows and doors facing oul over the w•ooded..rea, Because I considered this my redremxat horns, I also designed a &glr level home with many elements that contait handicap accessible fearLL-". I'm concerned not only for the aatiaipgted lark of privacy from a muhiple level structure, belt also the possible devHlu"Ou of my home if this proposal should go Through. An M+1:2 dens gnated property ► ouW briug individuals not vested in the Cbenal area and increase our need for security of our homes and subdivision. I'm paztioularly appalled aboat the discrepancy between the wideh orthe proposed open space behind the majority of the homes on Aberdeen Drive adversely effcoted by this proposal. Homes nearest TQ the cmaanre To the enbdivision'Aill enjoy a much wider open sparse behind thzirlkomes, Their spa: a appears to be app*mcimstely 4 tints the width afforded to the homes located further away from the entrance, Itis -with those concerns I strongly support tine Aberdeen Court POA's o4-jecdon to the planned rezoning from R2 to Ml~ 12, Fur or. I feel the prop osri.I open space. is dx-astieaily ,-tsufficieni. It does not pra■^_-de equity to a;l ¢ffected Aberdeen homeowners. 1 also suppvrt the Ab"een Court POA itt their requeA fOr s buffer of no less than 300 feet wide. This support includes the request to plant trees to increase the rlexhsiry of the buffer. Sir cerely, Glenylce G. Feeney DI/16/2008 WED 14:44 FAX 501 354 1515 Pediatric Surgery QC0 /002 January 16, 2005 Mr. Tony Bozynski Dept of Planning and Development 723 West Markharn Street Little Rock, AR 72201 399-3435/371-6863 Mr Tony Bozynski: RE: Deltic; Timber's re -zoning request 1 am writing today to voice opposition to Deltic Timber's request to re -zone properh/ located north of Chenonceau Boulevard and Just east of the Chenonceau pool. My wife and I were informed of this pe?ition one week ago. We understand that a hearing wlil be held on January 17th at 4pm. As a new resident of Arkansas, my wife and I choose our house in Aberdeen for several reasons including the serenity of the neighborhood and the pride that homeowners exhibited. We enjoyed the quiet streets and picturesque views. Having now lived in tittle Rock for six months, we realize that the Aberdeen family is a unique neighborhood. There are 198 homes in our neighborhood. These homes represent a significant investment for many young families. In light of the current zoning regulations along Chenonceau, I do not oppose multifamily units being built near our neighborhood. Many current Aberdeen residents probably lived in apartments dur;ng their early adult years. The issue at hand is a possible move of multifamily units closer to the Aberdeen greenspace, and inparticular, quite close to sixteen current families. Under the current zoning regulations, these homes were purchased with the expectation that only R2 of OS zones would border our neighborhood eastern extent. Will property values be decreased with re -zoning? This is a difficult question. Property values are primary determined by the condition of the particular property for sale and other broader, more complex forces such as overall area development and prosperity. i suspect that apartment reinvestment will never equal the reinvestment of homeowners, especially when properties are paid off. Furthermore, will increased traffic not result in a lower residential property value? OL%16/2008 WED 14:45 FAX 501 364 1516 Pediatric Surgery 4002/002 Issues: 1) The burden to prove that property values will not be adversely affected should be squarely on the shoulders of Deltic Timber? 2) Do the local public schools, including JT Robinson, have the capacity to handle a significant influx of students? 3) What types of multifamily units are being proposed? 4) What security would Deltic Timber provide towards the current recreation area of the Chenonceau pool? These facilities are funded by the Chenal Valley residents and thus should be solely used by these homeowners. 5) is there data indicating, that a Wage multifamily unit is needed in the west Little Rock region? I appreciate your time to review my concerns. Sincerely, Darting Little, MO : .t i Ohl, 16 '('flip l;.�i�i� by v I1C.561)(, F. Joanna Thorn.as 7 Berney Way L' Citi e Little Rock, .AR 72223 501.868.711108 January 13, 2.008 N,-, Tony Bczunski Department of Planning and Development 723 4Vaost Markham Street Little Reck, AR 72201-1334 Dear Mr, Bozynski: Via F.AX 501.399.3436 501371,6663 I am writing you to exp'ess my c.ocsitior, to ora tic limber's recuest to re -zone the residen:!al area (R2,' east of Aberdsen to a multb-tamdy (Mr]. I am respectfully requesting that the area remain unchanged, �UnfoAtrnately, ' a. -n ur:ab',e to attend Tfnj days hearing W,ausa n' a pfev:ausiy ach0 'Jad appointment with my so, Yy absence in ria way should be interpreted as a lack of interest. In fa . as a Bina year resdant :.f rhe Abe, een sr;iv�iirisicn, ? am ext r^nely cmn311ted `o our ne,10bcrh000 ar)d the ; ur•canding areas. i pur based o rr home it hope$ of haying s safe e nv!ron ment 'o rai$a my son a:vay trom cor,-c+zrcla. development aid apartment huildings where residents are typ'ually irarteiert, over the last tee+ years. I have rvivessed a vast amount of Cr�311�g8 t[7 tfl3 el'?3 l y "�?IIiG �:R't;er. Sanyo Ai tfla3E rages h3va not: Nan vlev ed as bit. e101al. T,is wvest by N6. Timbe, is a prima exar^,pla. of a aroroa3d change wh& w utt greatly mpact our let" rhood and famtiy atinesphsra !n a ngat!ve manner. ,%rice again, plafl:2 acml rrly opposition to this request for re -zoning, There is not a Head for additional multl-termly horsing in the ares. 01!13/2009 WRD 15:57 PAX 501 354 1516 Pediatric Surgery Ctll/OC1 Rebekah Little 78 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock. AR 72223 501-868-5757 January 16, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynski Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little (tock, AR 72201-1-134 Dear Mr. Bozynski, I am writing regarding the rezoning of the land neighboring Aberdeen Court; just north of Chenonceau Boulevard in west Little Rock. My husband. four children, and I moved to Aberdeer. Court this past summer. Though it is inconvenient for my husband to drive into central Little Rock for work each day, we chose Aberdeen because we felt it would provide a safe, secluded environment in which to rear our children. 1 fear Deltic Timber's rezoning goals thveaten some of the reasons we selected Aberdeen for our home. Our park is a rice place for neighborhood children to play together, I enjoy meeting other families there, and value the added security of a neighborhood park rather than a city park. Rezoning will also increase traffic, thus decreasing safety as we walk to and ,.om the park. We pay significant neighborhood dues for the upkeep of Cheuonceau Park, and I worry large multi -family housing units nearby will compromise some of the privacy and security my children enjoy there. Though any home does not border the residential and open space Deltic Timber is seeking to rezone, I am sympathetic to neighbors whose property value will be decreased by a narrow buffer between the multi -housing units aid our neighborhood. When purchasing a home, new residents should be able to feel secure that zoning designations will be honored. Such designations are "good faith" promises that a home is safe frorn objectionable building. Allowing the rezoning which Deltic Timber proposes violates the trust homeowners have placed in the Department of Planning and Development.. Aberdeen Court is known as a neighborhood for families. The time selected for the rezoning hem ing is right as many of us have children getting home from school. For this reason many moms like me probably will not be in attendance at the hearing, but I hope our opinions will be valued. I hope that when officials at the Department of Plamning and Development consider Deltic Timber's rezoning request that they will not be swayed by "big business,"but rather will be mindful of the many families who already live here. Sincerely, Rebekah Little U1/moo/US 05:01 FAX_ 501 905 7455 January 14, 2008 Mr. Tony Bozynshi, l3j�-panmeni of Planning and Development 723 Wast ruler kham Sire at Little Frock, AIR 72201-1334 Sent via fax 501-399-3435 and 505-371.6863 Case number Z -6097-•K Dear Mr, Sozynski, I write to contest the potertial retuning o- Chenonceau Bonii!ev- rd from !esider;tial to rnulit�.family zoning. My -family and I are residents of Aberdeen Court subdivision in Chenal Valley. We oppose Os lit Timbrws roxoning request because it Mill most definitely dovalua tra property of our home and tf:ose of our neighbors. Those Abe Me an Iesidents whose propert! as abutth!s contested area will lom privacy, sound and sight buffers. Tram will increase on Chenonceau Boulevard malting it less safe for drivers and pedestrians: our neighborhood children walk to the park and pool. Please do not approve the rezoning of Chenonceau Boulevard. Thank you for your time and consideration, U vise D. Ullem 6 Berney Way Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Feb 28 2008 14:04 HP LASERJET FAX LITTLE ROCK CANCER CLINK, P.A. 500 S. Unh,ersity Avenue, Suite 811, Little Rock, Alt 72205 501-661-1822 Fax Sol -666-0266 Fern:ndip Padilla, M -D. FA.GP. Stella M. Kamanda, M.D., Ph.D. James F. Beek,1VLD. FACSIMILE COVER LETTER C0NFO3Ej\7L4LLjTY NOTICE This transmissions is inteaded only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and nzy contain information that•is privileged and/or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the untended recipient, yo -U are hereby notified that any disclosure, distributiou or copying of this infomatio n is strictly prohibited by law. If you have received this transinissiou in error, please notify us iromediatciy at the number lasted above and return the origkai documents to us at the address shown above via the United States Postal Service. Attention: FAX NUMM: FROM: DATE: PAGES: CODOMMS: P.1 f Feb 28 2008 14:04 HP LASERJET FAX r p.2 46 �J (k 'Now i" IC, id-Lo, kr aA Ir . I 4� - D7 1 t obi---� ar)k N#Aim �Frj� 4�-L t, Feb 28 2008 14:04 HP LASERJET FAX r p.3 k. Feb 28 2008 14:00 HP LASERJET FAX p.1 LITTLE ROCK CANCER CLINM P.A. Soo S. Univenity Avenue, Suite 87.1, Little Rodd, AR 72205 501-W-1822 Fax SGI-666-0266 Fernando Padilla, KD. F.A.C.P. Stella M Kamanda, M.D., Pb.D. James F. Beck, M.D. FACSIMILE COVER LETTER CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE Tris is ¢-.ended only for thr use oftho indiv:daa.l or t1dity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and/or coELfida=i l- I ft reader of this mess ga is not the intended recipient, you a.,e hereby Aod5ed that any .3isabme, dim tioa c copyi3g a this information is Strict -,y prohdHted Oy law. If You have received this -ran ,;sSion in. error, p3,=e noti y us imm--d'tely et the mv...her above and ret= the or4ine documents to us at the address shown above via tx United States Postal Service. Attention; TAXNUMBER:' FROM• j DATE:1t� I PAGES: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: West side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1,000+ feet South of Hijzhway 10 OWNED BY: Deltic Timber Co THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: To rezone 9.38 Acres from "MF -12" Multifamfl District to "0-3" General Office District, 6.37 Acres from "R-2" Single Family District to "MF -12" 6.08 Acres from "R-2" to "OS" Open Space District and 0.93 Acre from "MF -12" to "OS". Z -5097-K NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Rezoning of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on January 17, 2008 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ALL RESIDENTS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY AT: GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: Wcst side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1,000+ feet South of Highway 10 OWNED BY: Deltic Timber CoM. THE FOLLOWING REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE: To rezone 9.38 Acres from "MF -12" Multifamil District to "0-3" General Office District 6.37 Acres from "R-2" Sin le Family District to "MF -12" 6.08 Acres from "R-2" to "OS" Open Space District and 0.93 Acre from "MF -12" to "OS". Z -5497-K NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Rezoning of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L. R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on January 17, 2008 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that area residents are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. ADDRESS UNIT ZIPCITY STATE ZIP ZNUMBER 1 BAYONNE DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 10 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 11 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 12 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 14 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 14 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 14 NORTON RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 15 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 16 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 17 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 17 NORTON RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 17901 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 18 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 18001 CANTRELL RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 19 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 2 GELAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 2 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 2 ROSAIRES WAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 20 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 21 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 22 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 23 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 24 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 25 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 26 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 27 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 28 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 29 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 30 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 31 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 31 ROSAIRES WAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 33 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 35 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 36 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 37 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 39 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 4 GELAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 4 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 4 ROSAIRES WAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 41 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 43 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 5 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 5300 CHENONCEAU BLVD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 5424 CHENONCEAU BLVD LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 5901 STAR LN LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 6 GELAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 6 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 6000 BECKNELL LN LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 6001 BECKNELL LN LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 6002 BECKNELL LN LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 7 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 7 ROSAIRES WAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 8 GELAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 8 GRAYAN CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 84 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K ADDRESS UNIT ZIPCITY STATE ZIP ZNUMBER 86 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 88 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 9 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 93 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 95 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 97 ABERDEEN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72223 Z -5097-K 2008036524 Received: 5/28/2009 10:42:23 AM Recorded: 05128/2008 10:44:26 AM Filed & Recorded in Official Records of PAT O'BRIEN PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT/COUNTY CLERK Fees $ 45.00 ORDINANCE NO, 19,970 AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the zone classification of the following property be and is hereby changed as indicated: Z -5097-K — Described as part of South '/2 of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Commencing at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearing and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N1290'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO1°23'11" West, 141.82 feet; N15°48'14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57" West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW '/4 SW '/4, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/4 SW '/; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE'/ SW '/4, said Section 14, 1,148.54 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S88°05'30" East continuing along said North line, 170.20 feet to the NW corner of the SW '/4 SE V4, said Section 14; thence S87°42'09" East along the North line of said SW'/4 SE'/4, 149.28 feet; thence S00°46'26" West, 271.14 feet; thence S89°13'34" East, 450.05 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Chenonceau Blvd; thence Southerly along said Westerly right-of-way line being the arc of a 904.93 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of S24°31' 10" West 51.55 feet; thence S63°51'43" East continuing along said Westerly right-of-way line, 5.00 feet; thence S26°07'55" West continuing along said Westerly right-of-way line, 237.94 feet; thence Southerly continuing along said Westerly right-of-way line being the arc of a 909.93 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of S40°37'20" West, 456.79 feet; thence N47'51'1 I" West, 502.36 feet; thence NO2°17'51"d , East, 557.76 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 9.38 acres mor less: From "MF -12" Multifamily District to "0-3" General Office _ d ti� 1 4 District. AND 0111-m y Part of South %Z of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Commencing at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearings and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N12°30'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO 1 °23' 11" West, 141.82 feet; N15'48'14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57 West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW %4 SW'/4, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/4 SW 1/4; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE 1/4 SW '/4, said Section 14, 344.10 feet; thence S06°27'46" West, 851.90 feet; thence S45°14'34" East, 42.59 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence N87'42'1 6" East, 158.18 feet; thence S51101'1 I" East, 396.60 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Chenonceau Blvd.; thence S83°36'51" West along said Northerly right-of-way line, 65.81 feet; thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly right-of-way line being the arc of a 968.85 foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of S82°55'28" West, 41.16 feet; thence N59°25'28" West, 157.21 feet; thence N51 °01' 11" West, 128.57 feet; thence S87°42' 16" West, 27.44 feet; thence N45°14'34" West, 136.62 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.93 acres more or less: From "MF -12" Multifamily District to "OS" Open Space District. AND Part of South'/2 of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Commencing at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearings and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N12°30'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO '23'l 1 " West, 141.82 feet; N15°48' 14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57" West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW 1/4 SW 1/4, said Section 14; thence S88125'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/4 S W '/4; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE 1/4 SW '/4, said Section 14, 48.44 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S88005'30" East continuing along said North line, 295.66 feet; thence S06°27'46" West, 851.90 feet; thence S45°14'34" East, 42.59 feet; thence S87'42'1 6" West, 259.62 feet; thence NO '23'l 1 " East, 105.87 feet; thence N15°48' 14" East, 138.47 feet; thence N13°37'42" East, 183.31 feet; thence N08°08'45" East 111.63 feet; thence NO3°53'05" West, 313.65 feet; thence N40°51'27" West, 74.10 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 2 4.36 acres more or less: From "R-2" Single Family District to "MF -12" Multifamily District. AND Part of South '/z of Section 14 and part of the NW '/4 of Section 23, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Beginning at the SE comer of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearings and distances: N24059'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N12°30'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO1°23' 11" West, 141.82 feet; N15048'14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3052'57" West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW 1/4 SW '/4, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW 1/4 SW 1/4; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE '/4 SW '/4, said Section 14, 48.44 feet; thence S40°51'27" East, 74.10 feet; thence S03°53'05" East, 313.65 feet; thence S08°08'45" West, 111.63 feet; thence S13°37'42" West, 183.31 feet; thence S15°48'14" West, 138.47 feet; thence S01 °23' l 1" West, 105.87 feet; thence N87°42'16" East, 259.62 feet; thence S45°14'34" East, 136.62 feet; thence S87'42'16" West, 210.13 feet; thence S14°53'30" West, 194.45 feet; thence S29'08'1 6" East, 167.81 feet to a point in the North right-of- way line of Chenonceau Blvd.; thence Southwesterly along said North right-of-way being the are of a 999.93 foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of S47°31'27" West, 212.70 feet; thence Westerly continuing along said North right-of-way line being the arc of a 25.00 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of S86°20'32" West, 36.66 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Aberdeen Drive; thence N46°35'28" West along said Northerly right-of-way line, 154.25 feet; thence Northwesterly continuing along said Northerly right- of-way line being the arc of a 528.96 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of N45°03'03" West, 29.95 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 8.10 acres more or less: From "R-2" Single Family District to "OS" Open Space District. (West side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Highway 10) SECTION 2. That the zoning of the above described property is subject to the following conditions which were proposed by the applicant for the property described in Section 1 of this ordinance and which shall be covenants running with the land to bind subsequent grantees of the property: + The West 100 feet of the above described MF -12 zoning shall be maintained as an undisturbed buffer area. SECTION 3. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock and designated district map be and is hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and designate the change provided for in Sectioos and 2 hereof. SECTION 4. That the Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force 30 days after the date of its passage and approval. SECTION 5. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. SECTION 6. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED: �idQ� GRWp ATTEST: Cite of Little ifock Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney APPROVED: Lee— Mayor 4 r D. C•1 Vicinity Map Case: Z -5097-K N Location: West Side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1000' South of Hwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 0 187.5 375 Feet CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R 14W 14 MF12 to Os �.93AC EAU e1 -"o c::5 d 02 Ar Vicinity Map Ward: 5 PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W14 X Vicinity Map Case: Z -5097-K N Location: West Side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1000' South of Hwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 0 187.5 375 Feet CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W14 a � t� 100' UNDISTURBED BUFFER L�J V'• C1 Vicinity Map oto; MF11 01 MF/ 03 C3 C3 MF12 938 AC/ C3 21.61 AC // Area. L�Ulllll Case: Z -5097-K N Location: West Side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1000' South of Hwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 0 187.5 375 Feet CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W 14 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION MAY 20, 2008 AGENDA Subject Ordinance rezoning property located along the west side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Highway 10 from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12 (with conditions), 0-3 and OS. (Z -5097-K) Submitted by: Planning & Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT RECOMMENDATION CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Action Required I Approved By gOrdinance Resolution Approval Information Report Bruce Moore The owner of approximately 23 acres of property located along the west side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1,000 feet — plus south of Highway 10 is requesting that the zoning be reclassified from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12 (with conditions), 0-3 and OS. I None Approval of the Ordinance. The Planning Commission reviewed this issue at its April 10, 2008 meeting. There were objectors present. All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300 feet who could be identified, and the Aberdeen Court, Maywood Manor, Bayonne Place and Chevaux Court Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. CITIZEN The Commission voted to recommend approval of the PARTICIPATION rezoning, as revised by the applicant. The applicant had CONTINUED revised the application to increase the proposed OS zoning along the east of Aberdeen Neighborhood to 8.09 acres, with a minimum width of 200 feet, and reduce the proposed MF -12 zoning to 4.36 acres, with the west 100 feet of the proposed MF -12 zoning being an undisturbed buffer area. The vote was 11 ayes and 0 noes. BACKGROUND Deltic Timber Corporation, owner of the 23.12 Acres located on the west side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1,000 feet - plus south of Highway 10, is requesting to rezone the property from "R-2" Single Family District and "MF -12" Multifamily District to "MF -12" Multifamily District, "0-3" General Office District and "OS" Open Space District. The rezoning represents a reorganization of zoning lines with an area over 40 acres in size east of the Aberdeen Court neighborhood. Following is a description of the proposed rezoning, as revised by the applicant: 1. MF -12 to 0-3 (9.38 Acres) — to enlarge an existing 0-3 zoned tract. 2. MF -12 to OS (0.93 Acre) — east side of Chenonceau - Park. 3. R-2 to OS (8.09 Acres) — north and west sides of Chenonceau Park and along east boundary of Aberdeen Court Neighborhood. 4. R-2 to MF -12 (4.36 Acres) — west of existing MF -12 zoned tract. The west 100 feet of which will be an undisturbed buffer area. The property is currently undeveloped and mostly wooded, with varying degrees of slope. The Aberdeen Court single family development is located to the west, with the Bayonne neighborhood to the south across Chenonceau Blvd. Single family residences on larger lots are located to the north, with various nonresidential uses and zoning along Highway 10. Undeveloped 0-2 and C-3 zoned property is located across Chenonceau Blvd. to the east. 2 BACKGROUND CONTINUED The City's Future Land Use Plan designates the property as Single Family, Multifamily and Office. The requested rezoning does not require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan based on the fact that it is a reconfiguration of zoning lines within an existing plan area. Staff is supportive of the requested rezoning. Staff views the request as an appropriate revision of zoning lines within an area of existing R-2, MF -12 and 0-3 zoning. The proposed plan will create an OS buffer along the east side of the Aberdeen Court Neighborhood, which currently does not exist. The OS strip is 200 feet wide at its narrowest point, widening to several hundred feet wide along the west side of Chenonceau Park. The proposed rezoning will enlarge the existing 0-3 zoning by 9.38 acres and have a net decrease of approximately six (6) acres in the MF -12 zoning. Staff believes the reconfiguration of zoning lines within this area along Chenonceau Blvd. will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the zone classification of the following property be and is hereby changed as indicated: Z -5097-K — Described as part of South 1/2 of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Commencing at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearing and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N1290'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO1°23'11" West, 141.82 feet; N15°48'14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57" West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW '/a SW '/, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/ SW '/; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE '/ SW '/, said Section 14, 1,148.54 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S88°05'30" East continuing along said North line, 170.20 feet to the NW corner of the SW '/ SE '/, said Section 14; thence S87°42'09" East along the North line of said SW '/ SE %, 149.28 feet; thence S00046'26" West, 271.14 feet; thence S89°13'34" East, 450.05 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Chenonceau Blvd; thence Southerly along said Westerly right-of-way line being the arc of a 904.93 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of S24°31' 10" West 51.55 feet; thence S63°51'43" East continuing along said Westerly right-of-way line, 5.00 feet; thence S26°07'55" West continuing along said Westerly right-of-way line, 237.94 feet; thence Southerly continuing along said Westerly right-of-way line being the arc of a 909.93 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of S40°37'20" West, 456.79 feet; thence N47'51'1 I" West, 502.36 feet; thence NO2°17'51" East, 557.76 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 9.38 acres more or less: From "MF -12" Multifamily District to "0-3" General Office District. AND Part of South %Z of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Commencing at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearings and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N12°30'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO '23'11 " West, 141.82 feet; N15°48' 14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57 West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW '/ SW 1/, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/ SW '/; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE'/ SW'/, said Section 14, 344.10 feet; thence S06°27'46" West, 851.90 feet; thence S45°14'34" East, 42.59 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence N87'42'1 6" East, 158.18 feet; thence S51'01'1 I" East, 396.60 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Chenonceau Blvd.; thence S83°36'51" West along said Northerly right-of-way line, 65.81 feet; thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly right-of-way line being the arc of a 968.85 foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of S82°55'28" West, 41.16 feet; thence N59°25'28" West, 157.21 feet; thence N51'01'1 1" West, 128.57 feet; thence S87'42'16" West, 27.44 feet; thence N45°14'34" West, 136.62 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.93 acres more or less: From "MF -12" Multifamily District to "OS" Open Space District. AND Part of South % of Section 14, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Commencing at the SE comer of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearings and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N12°30'38" West, 212.77 feet; NO1 °23' 11" West, 141.82 feet; N15'48'14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57" West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW '/ SW 1/, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW % SW '/; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE Y SW %, said Section 14, 48.44 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S88°05'30" East continuing along said North line, 295.66 feet; thence S06°27'46" West, 851.90 feet; thence S45°14'34" East, 42.59 feet; thence S87°42'16" West, 259.62 feet; thence NO1 °23' 11" East, 105.87 feet; thence N15°48' 14" East, 138.47 feet; thence N139T42" East, 183.31 feet; thence N08°08'45" East 111.63 feet; thence NO3°53'05" West, 313.65 feet; thence N40°51'27" West, 74.10 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 2 4.36 acres more or less: From "R-2" Single Family District to "MF -12" Multifamily District. AND Part of South '/z of Section 14 and part of the NW '/ of Section 23, T -2-N, R -14-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas more particularly described as: Beginning at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 20, Chenal Valley, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence Northerly along the East line of Lots 1 through 16, said Block 20 the following bearings and distances: N24°59'36" East, 150.01 feet; N34°44'03" West, 120.00 feet; N12°30'38" West, 212.77 feet; N01°23'11" West, 141.82 feet; N15'48'14" East, 159.97 feet; N13°37'42" East, 169.94 feet; N08°08'45" East, 80.98 feet; NO3°52'57" West, 225.71 feet and N40°51'30" West, 190.42 feet to a point on the South line of the SW '/ SW 1/, said Section 14; thence S88°25'58" East along said South line, 222.77 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/a SW '/; thence S88°05'30" East along the North line of the SE '/ SW 1/, said Section 14, 48.44 feet; thence S40°51'27" East, 74.10 feet; thence S03°53'05" East, 313.65 feet; thence S08°08'45" West, 111.63 feet; thence S13°37'42" West, 183.31 feet; thence S15°48'14" West, 138.47 feet; thence S01'23'1 I" West, 105.87 feet; thence N87'42'16" East, 259.62 feet; thence S45°14'34" East, 136.62 feet; thence S87°42'16" West, 210.13 feet; thence S14°53'30" West, 194.45 feet; thence S29'08'1 6" East, 167.81 feet to a point in the North right-of- way line of Chenonceau Blvd.; thence Southwesterly along said North right-of-way being the arc of a 999.93 foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of S47°31'27" West, 212.70 feet; thence Westerly continuing along said North right-of-way line being the arc of a 25.00 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of S86°20'32" West, 36.66 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Aberdeen Drive; thence N46°35'28" West along said Northerly right-of-way line, 154.25 feet; thence Northwesterly continuing along said Northerly right- of-way line being the arc of a 528.96 foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and distance of N45°03'03" West, 29.95 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 8.10 acres more or less: From "R-2" Single Family District to "OS" Open Space District. (West side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Highway 10) SECTION 2. That the zoning of the above described property is subject to the following conditions which were proposed by the applicant for the property described in Section 1 of this ordinance and which shall be covenants running with the land to bind subsequent grantees of the property: • The West 100 feet of the above described MF -12 zoning shall be maintained as an undisturbed buffer area. SECTION 3. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock and designated district map be and is hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and designate the change provided for in Sections I and 2 hereof. SECTION 4. That the Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force 30 days after the date of its passage and approval. SECTION 5. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. SECTION 6. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED: ATTEST: APPROVED: City of Little Rock Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney M MF12 to MH2 21.61 AC NI f1, 03 C3 C3 02 C3 Area. Vicinity Map 7 • Ward: 5 PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W 14 MA �n- LD I • /MF12 i C33 9�38'A C C NC Vicinity Map Case: Z -5097-K N Location: West Side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1000' South of Hwy. 10 Ward: 5 PD: 19 CT: 42.11 TRS: T2N R14W14 0 187.5 375 Feet 1 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 White-Daters and Associates Tim Daters 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Date: April 21, 2008 Dear Mr. Daters: Re: Case No. Z -5097 - Location: West side of Chenonceau Blvd. 1.000 ft. south of HM. 10 This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a change in zoning from R-2 and MF -12 District to MF -12, 0-3 and OS District, the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on April 10, 2008. (a) X (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Recommended approval as revised. Denied your request as submitted. Deferred to Recommended approval of Denied Other: as amended. Meeting. as amended. An ordinance affecting this rezoning will be submitted to the Board of Directors for its consideration at its meeting May 20, 2008 (6:00 p.m.). If you have any questions, please call me at 371-4792. Sincerely, Monte Moore, Zoning and Code Enforcement Administrator Department of Planning and Development MM:aa City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 April 21, 2008 Frank Pohlkamp 60 Ivers Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the April 10, 2008 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item "C", (Z -5097-K) Rezoning from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12, 0-3 and OS, located along Chenonceau Blvd. was approved as revised by applicant. The application will be on the Board of Directors' May 20, 2008 Agenda (6:00 P.M.). For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY B ZYN Secretary to Little Rack Planning Commission TB:aa City of Little Rock $ Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 April 21, 2008 Kris Klein 33 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the April 10, 2008 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item "C", (Z -5097-K) Rezoning from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12, 0-3 and OS, located along Chenonceau Blvd. was approved as revised by applicant. The application will be on the Board of Directors' May 20, 2008 Agenda (6:00 P.M.). For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY B YN Secretary to Little Roc Planning Commission TB:aa City of Little Rock ' Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 3, 2008 White-Daters and Associates Tim Daters 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 RE: Rezoning from R-2 and MF -24 to MF -12, 0-3 and OS (Z -5097-K) — West side of Chenonceau Blvd., 1,000 feet south of Highway 10 Dear Mr. Daters: Enclosed please find a copy of the Ordinance passed by the Board of Directors on May 20, 2008, which rezoned the above referenced property as approved by the Planning Commission at their April 10, 2008 Public Hearing. If you have any questions concerning this Ordinance, please call me at 371-4792. Sincerely, Monte Moore Zoning and Code Enforcement Administrator MM:aa City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 White-Daters and Associates Tim Daters 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Date: March 3s 2008 Dear Mr. Daters: Re: Case No. Z -5097-K Location: West side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Hwv. 10 This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a change in zoning from R-2 and MF -12 District to MF -12, 0-3 and OS District, the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on February 28, 2008. (a) (b) (c) X (d) (e) (f) Recommended approval as applied for. Denied your request as submitted. Deferred to April 10, 2008 Meeting. (4:00 p.m.) Recommended approval of Denied Other: as amended. If you have any questions, please call me at 371-4792. Sincerely, Monte Moore, Zoning and Code Enforcement Administrator Department of Planning and Development MM:aa as amended. Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 White-Daters and Associates Tim Daters 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Date: Januga 22, 2008 Dear Mr. Daters: Planning Zoning and Subdivision Re: Case No. Z -5097-K Location: West side of Chenonceau Blvd. south of Hwv. 10 This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a change in zoning from R-2 and MF -12 District to MF -12, 0-3 and OS District, the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on January 17, 2008. Recommended approval as applied for. Denied your request as submitted. Deferred to February 28, 2008 Meeting. (4:00 p.m.) Recommended approval of Denied Other: as amended. If you have any questions, please call me at 371-4792. Sincerely, MoiTti Moore, Zoning and Code Enforcement Administrator Department of Planning and Development MM:aa as amended. City of Little (Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 March 3, 2008 Kris Klein 33 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the February 28, 2008 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item "C", (Z -5497-K) — Rezoning from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12, 0-3 and OS located along the west side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Highway 10 was deferred to the April 10, 2008 Agenda (4:00 P.M.). For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY B ZYN Secretary ❑ Little Ro k Planning Commission TB:aa City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 March 3, 2008 Wilma Graham 28 Aberdeen Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the February 28, 2008 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item "C", (Z -5097-K) — Rezoning from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12, 0-3 and OS located along the west side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Highway 10 was deferred to the April 10, 2008 Agenda (4:00 P.M.). For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, NYaBO YN Secret yt L k Planning Commission TB:aa EtCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 March 3, 2008 Lawrence Bengal 11 Rosaires Way Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the February 28, 2008 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Agenda item "C", (Z -5097-K) —Rezoning from R-2 and MF -12 to MF -12,0-3 and OS located along the west side of Chenonceau Blvd., south of Highway 10 was deferred to the April 10, 2008 Agenda (4:00 P.M.). For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY B Z Secretary to kLittleck Planning Commission TB:aa