HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5055-A Staff AnalysisMay 16, 1989
SUBDIVISIONS
tem No. 15
Name: Chenal Valley Golf Course Club
House and Maintenance
Facilities Conditional Use
Permit (Z -5055-A)
Location:
North of Kanis Road and west of
Chenal Parkway
Owner/Applicant: Deltic Farm and Timber Company,
.__._._.�...__......._.__.�_.m___... Inc./Joe Whit e
Proposal:
To construct a 38,000 square foot two-story clubhouse
facility, swimming pool and tennis building (3,200 square
feet), tennis courts (18 total with 8 covered for winter
use), 380 parking spaces, two putting greens, one lawn
bowling area, a health and fitness center (square footage
unknown) on 22.11 acres of land zoned "R-2",/Conditional Use
Permit and a 7,200 square feet maintenance facility on
2.4429 acres of land that is zoned "R-2."
Ordinance Design Standards:
1. Site Location
The maintenance facility fronts on a future collector
and the clubhouse facility is located at the end of a
proposed public right-of-way (110 foot right-of-way,
30 foot median, 4 lanes with 50 feet of pavement, and
sidewalks on both sides).
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
Both sites are abutted by vacant land pend a golf course
that is under construction. The propm:�:ed uses are
compatible with the surrounding area_
May 16, 1989
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 15
3. On -Site Drives and Parking
The clubhouse site contains access from an unnamed
public right-of-way and 380 parking spaces (to be
constructed in two phases) while the proposed
maintenance facility contains 30 proposed parking
spaces and a 25 foot (width) access from a future
collector street.
4. Screening and Buffers
The clubhouse facility does not show any landscaped
areas while the maintenance facility contains
landscaped areas.
5. Analysis
The Staff feels that the proposed uses will be
compatible with the surrounding area. There are,
however, a number of questions left unanswered. The
clubhouse site needs to be revised to include the
following information:
(1)
The
street name for the proposed
access street;
(2)
The
number of parking spaces in
each area;
(3)
The
landscaped areas;
(4)
The
dimensions of the clubhouse,
the tennis and
pool
building, and the interior
access drive;
(5)
The
location and dimensions of the
proposed health
and
fitness center.
The site plan for the maintenance facility needs to be
revised to include:
(1) The street name of the future collector;
(2) The delineation of the parlk:ing area;
(3) The labeling of Open Space, buffers and/or
landscaped areas.
6. City Engineer Comments
None.
7. Staff Recommendation
Approval, provided the app IicargL a&rees to submit
rev i sed s i to p l ans as out l i ned �?on ¢.Its Ana l ys i s Sec t i on .
May 16, 1969
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 15
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and stated that the health
facility would be removed from the clubhouse proposal, and
that access will be provided to the maintenance facility via
Gordon Road for some length time into the future. The
applicant agreed to comply with Staff recommendations.
There were no unresolved issues.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. Staff
stated that the applicant had notified the only adjacent
property owner of record, but that the notice was
insufficient. The applicant stated that they had notified
the applicant and that he had attended the meeting but had
left prior to the item being heard. The Staff stated that
they had called the owner of record, Mr. James E. Butler,
and had informed him of the date, time and place of the
public hearing. The Commission voted 9 ayes, 0 noes, and
2 absent to suspend the Bylaw requirements for notification.
The Commission then vote 9 ayes, 0 noes, and 2 absent to
approve the application as recommended by the Staff,
reviewed by the Subdivision Committee and agreed to by the
applicant.