HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5030 Staff Analysis1. Meeting Date: July 19, 1988
2. Case No.: Z-5030
3. Request: Rezone from R-2 to 0-3 and OS
4. Location: North of Labette Manor Dr. (South of Kanis Rd. and
west of John Barrow Rd.)
5. Owner/Applicant: Bishop Estate/John P. McKay, Jr.
6. Existing Status: Vacant
7. Proposed Use: Office development
8. Staff Recommendation: Approval of 0-3 with a 50 ft. OS area
along the west side and a portion of the south property line.
9. Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval of 03 with a 50 ft.
strip along the western boundary and a 50 ft. OS area adjacent to
a portion of the south property line. The southern OS area will
extend from the southwest corner of the site to the east
right-of-way line of Labette Manor Dr.
10. Recommendation Forwarded with: 6 ayes, 0 noes, 4 absent and 1 abstention
11. Objectors: None
June 28 , 19B'8
Item No. 5 - Z-5030
Owner: Bishop Estate
Applicant: McKay Properties, Inc.
By: John P. McKay, Jr.
Location: North of Labette Manor Drive
Request: Rezone from "R-2" to "0-3"
Purpose: Office
Size: 10.0 acres
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "C-3"
South - Vacant and Multifamily, Zoned "MF -12"
East - Multifamily, Zoned "R-5"
West - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The request is to rezone a ten acre site located to the
southwest of the Barrow/Kanis intersection from "R-2"
to "0-3" for future development. The property is
situated directly north of Labette Manor Drive and
adjacent to the Twin Lake Subdivision, approximately
600 feet west of Barrow Road and 700 feet south of
Kanis Road. If the "0-3" request is granted, the
applicant has indicated that the 10 acres will probably
be platted into lots and be an extension of the "C-3"
area to the north. A preliminary plat for a
commercial/office subdivision has been approved for the
"C-3" land which has two streets serving the "C-3" lots
one from Kanis and the other from Barrow. To provide
access to the ten acres under consideration, the plan
is to extend the proposed north/south street from Kanis
into this site. On the east, west, and south sides,
the property abuts residential zoning, "R-2," "MF -12,"
and "R-5." Other zoning in the general area includes
"MF -18," "0-3," and "C-4." Land use is a mix of single
family, multifamily, and nonresidential uses with some
of the land still undeveloped.
2. The site is vacant and heavily wooded.
3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues. Dedication of any streets will be provided
by the plat.
3u'ne 2=8, 1988
Item No. 5 - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5_ There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented history or neighborhood position
on the property.
7. The site is located in the Boyle Park District Plan
area, and the Land Use Plan suggests a low density
residential pattern for the property. The current lana
use designation was part of a larger plan amendment
which occurred several years ago and involved a number
of sites in the vicinity of the Kanis/Barrow
intersection. The plan change increased the amount of
land recommended for both residential and
nonresidential uses throughout the area. It appears
that the emerging trend is a mix of residential and
nonresidential development with a major concentration
of office and medical related uses because of. the
Baptist Hospital Campus. In the area, a high
percentage of the land is still vacant, both
residential and nonresidential, so it seems that any
type of reclassification would be adding to existing
surplus of properties available for development. While
reviewing the request, staff debated at length the
merits of adding to the office land and decided that an
"0-3" rezoning is a reasonable option for the property.
The primary reason for this position is the proposal to
combine the ten acres under consideration with the
"C-3" area to the north and develop a quality office
subdivision. Also an office classification provides a
good transition from the "C-3" development to the
north and the residential areas located to the south
and west. To reduce any potential impacts on the
existing residential areas, staff recommends that the
west and south 50 feet be rezoned to "OS" for a buffer
and to prohibit access into the ten acres from Cerelle
and Labette Manor Drives.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the "0-3" rezoning with a
50 -foot "OS" strip on the west and south sides.
June 28, 1988
Item No. 5 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: June 28, 1988
The applicant, John McKay, was present. There were no
objectors in attendance. Mr. McKay started to address the
Commission but had to stop because of quorum problems. (The
item was brought back up at 2:35 p.m. and the discussion
continued.) Mr. McKay told the Commission that he had some
problems with the recommended open space area on the south
side because of the topography and the existing multifamily
zoning to the south. He said the 50 foot OS strip on the
west side was reasonable and then proceeded to describe the
proposed layout/development of the site. Mr. McKay went on
to elaborate on his concerns with the open space along the
south property line. He said that there was no need to
buffer a multifamily area and there would be problems with
the drainage and water retention requirements if a 50 foot
open space area was required. There was a long discussion
about the open space area and staff indicated that the
primary concern was access from the residential areas.
Mr. McKay informed the Commission that he had complete
support of the surrounding property owners and submitted a
petition to that effect. Additional comments were made
about access to the south and the open space area. A motion
was made to recommend approval of 0-3 with a 50 foot OS area
on the west side and with the condition that the northern 20
feet of Labette Manor Drive be closed. After some
discussion about the motion, an amended motion was then
offered which recommended approval of 110-3" with a 50 foot
"OS" strip on the west side and a 50 foot "OS" area along
the south property line from the southwest corner of the
site extending to the east right-of-way line of Labette
Manor Drive. The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes,
4 absent and 1 abstention (Walter Riddick III).