Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5019-A Staff AnalysisA •quesgp v pup saou 0 's9AP L 3O agora p Aq panoaddp SPM Teaaa99p pagsenbaa aqq 'ppuabV quasuo0 aqq 3o gaed sV •buTgaaM T66T 'OT aaqutagdaS aqg TTgun Tpaa939p p bUTgsanba.z sem queOTTdde aqq '33p4s buTaaauTbua aqq utoa3 UOTgppuaujmoOaa aqq 3o asnpoaq geqq pageqs 33p4S •quasa.ad saagOaCgO OU aaaM aaagy •aOuppuaggp UT you spM qupOTTddp aqy (T66T '0£ A'Inr) %NOIZO'd NnISSINNOD ONINRvgd •90UTd xooq UOTssnOsTP IVUOT41ppe ON •uOTssTutuzo0 TTn3 aqq Aq panoaddp aq TTTM 4Tma9d asn TeuoTgTpuOO papueuiv aqq gpgg upauz ATTP0T4euro4np you S90P Teaa939p aqq geqq Pagegs uagg ueuzaTpgo aql •gaaut T66T 'OT aaquzagdaS aqg TTgun Tpaaa39p aqq gsenbaa og abequenpe ,sguPDTTddp agg og aq pTnOM gT 'gaaagS ggS9 ao3 goa[oad agq uO spTq buTxpq aq TTTM AgTO aqq aOUTs 'aanamo$ •4Tuia9d asn TPUOTgTpuOO TETgTUT aqq ao3 PanTaOaa uaaq qou ppq 993 naTT uT aqg geqq pageqs qu9uzgapd9G buTaeauTbua aqq 3o aeupap0 Aaaar • T66T 'OT aaquzagdag TTgun Tpaaag9P p buTgsanbea qupOTTddp aqq uioa3 panTaOaa uaaq peq a9449T p geqq pageqs 33pgs •aauppuaggp UT aaaM squp0TTdde ag► (T66T '8T 7,`Inr) %Slxaw oD SaZZIL1rnId0 NOISIAIOSA.S •squeumoo buTaaauTbua aqq aad gTmaad asn TeUOTgTPUOD papuauV aqg 30 Tenoaddp spueulmoOaa 33e4S uOT4ppuaala5-0aU 33p49 •peap buTnTT paTOOO/pagpaq se paqunoo aq oq paap goo3 aapnbs papupdxa aqq 3o apTsgno sT gaodapo aql •goaod aqq ggTm g9a3 aapnbs 081. -/+ ATagpuixoaddp OPTnoad TTTM uoTsuedxa Mau aql •gaa3 aapnbs 0-91.0'T ao3 panoadde sem gTuzaad asn TpuOTgTPuOO TpuTbTao agq '886T aunt ui •49a3 6"9Z Aq gaa3 ZT uoTgTppp mooapaq p pup gea3 OT Aq gaa3 OT qE gOaod e (8) 149a3 6'9Z Aq 4993 5 3o uoTsuedxa uiooa bUTnTT p (Z) '4a93 0V Aq 4999 LT 3o gaodapO p (T) 3O gsTsuoa TTTM UOTsuedxe agy •paap agq 3o aagOpapgO agq ebuegO qou pTnogs atuoq paangoQJnupux TeuoTgOasTgTnm aqg 3O UOTsuedxa pasodoad aql sT ,nTIjUV •sgTutaad buTPTTnq 3o aoupnssT oq aOTad paaTnbaa ST gsanbaa aaTTapa aqg uagg 'puno3 aq upo paooaa OU 3I 'P9TT3 aana SPM 9a3 naTT-uT agg aaggagm pauTuzaagap uaaq .L ic, panuT-4uOO 8 % "nN InINII NOISInICMIS T66T '0C ATrIf July 30, 1991 G i1 ;Ozw� NAME: Smith - Amended Conditional Use Permit (Z -5019-A) LOCATION: The south side of West 65th Street approximately 200 feet east of Duffy Lane (6823 1,2 West 65th Street) OWNERIAPPLICANT: Edward D. Smith/Carroll Smith PROPOSAL: To amend a previously approved Conditional Use Permit by expanding an existing multisectional manufactured home a total of 1,237.3 square feet. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. site Location This property abuts West 65th Street which is currently shown as a minor arterial, but is in the process of being reduced to collector standards. 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The expansion places the structure approximately 300 feet from West 65th Street on a parcel of land that is 636.5 feet in depth. The site is surrounded on three sides by vacant land and by single family to the north. The use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin Access to the site is taken from a 20 foot (width) drive located on West 65th Street. 4. Screening and Buffers The applicant has stated that he has no intention of increasing the screening and buffer that already exist. Vacant land and woods surround the site on three sides. Single family residential uses are to the north. 5. City Engineer Comments The earlier approved Conditional Use Permit required the applicant to submit an in -lieu fee for the construction project for 65th Street. As of this writing, it has not 1 September 10, 1991 ITEM NO.• B NAME* LOCATION• OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Smith - Amended Conditional Use Permit (Z -5019-A) The south side of West 65th Street approximately 200 feet east of Duffy Lane (6823 1/2 West 65th Street) Edward D. Smith/Carroll Smith To amend a previously approved Conditional Use Permit by expanding an existing multisectional manufactured home a total of 1,237.3 square feet. This property abuts West 65th Street which is currently shown as a minor arterial, but is in the process of being reduced to collector standards. 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The expansion places the structure approximately 300 feet from West 65th Street on a parcel of land that is 636.5 feet in depth. The site is surrounded on three sides by vacant land and by single family to the north. The use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parking Access to the site is taken from a 20 foot (width) drive located on West 65th Street. 4. Screening and Buffers The applicant has stated that he has no intention of increasing the screening and buffer that already exist. Vacant land and woods surround the site on three sides. Single family residential uses are to the north. 5. City Engineer Comments The earlier approved Conditional Use Permit required the applicant to submit an in -lieu fee for the construction project for 65th Street. As of this writing, it has not 1 September 10, 1991 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B Continued been determined whether the in -lieu fee was ever filed. If no record can be found, then the earlier request is required prior to issuance of building permits. 6. Analysis The proposed expansion of the multisectional manufactured home should not change the character of the area. The expansion will consist of (1) a carport of 17 feet by 40 feet, (2) a living room expansion of 5 feet by 26.9 feet, (3) a porch at 10 feet by 10 feet and a bedroom addition 12 feet by 26.9 feet. In June 1988, the original Conditional Use Permit was approved for 1,076.0 square feet. The new expansion will provide approximately +/- 780 square feet with the porch. The carport is outside of the expanded square foot area to be counted as heated/cooled living area. 7. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Amended Conditional Use Permit per the engineering comments. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (JULY 18, 1991) The applicants were in attendance. Staff stated that a letter had been received from the applicant requesting a deferral until September 10, 1991. Jerry Gardner of the Engineering Department stated that the in lieu fee had not been received for the initial Conditional Use Permit. However, since the City will be taking bids on the project for 65th Street, it would be to the applicants' advantage to request the deferral until the September 10, 1991 meet. The chairman then stated that the deferral does not automatically mean that the Amended Conditional Use Permit will be approved by the full Commission. No additional discussion took place. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 30, 1991) The applicant was not in attendance. There were no objectors present. Staff stated that because of the recommendation from the Engineering staff, the applicant was requesting a deferral until the September 10, 1991 meeting. As part of the Consent Agenda, the requested deferral was approved by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes and 4 absent. 2 September 10, 1991 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B Continued STAFF AMENDED RECOMMENDATION: (AUGUST 27, 1991) As a result of further review by the engineering staff, there is no requirement for the applicant to submit an in -lieu fee for the construction project for 65th Street. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 10, 1991) The applicant was in attendance. Bill Hoofman represented the applicant. There was one person present to speak in opposition, Daphna Bickerstaff. Mrs. Bickerstaff stated that she did not understand why this mobile home was allowed because a few years ago her request was denied. She further stated the owners of the mobile home do not keep their property properly cleaned. There have been several instances of an old junked car, lumber, and trash on the site. Also, she informed the Commission that the mobile home was placed on the site before the Conditional Use Permit was obtained. Ervin Tester of the Enforcement staff stated that he had no knowledge of the mobile home being on the site before the Conditional Use Permit was obtained. The reason why the case is before the Commission is due to the enforcement action pending against the new construction. During the enforcement officer's inspection of the site, he did not notice anything unsightly. Mr. Hoofman then addressed the Commission. He stated that his client was expecting a new baby and the new additions were needed to make room for the baby. He understood Mrs. Beckerstaff's concerns and hoped the city would inspect the site. He agreed that if his clients were in violation, then the City should pursue action. Additional discussion continued regarding the number and types of additions to be made. Mr. Hoofman stated one bedroom, enlarging the living room, replacing a porch and expanding the carport. Mrs. Beckerstaff then asked how would the owners be allowed to use an easement to access their property. Staff stated that the easement was the common drive because the site is one lot fronting West 65th Street. The other two lots fronting West 65th Street have their own drives. Mrs. Beckerstaff stated that the issue was now clear. 3 September 10, 1991 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: B (Continued A motion was then made to approve the Conditional Use Permit as filed. Staff was also instructed to send an enforcement officer to check into Mrs. Beckerstaff's complaints. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position. 4