HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-5019-A Staff AnalysisA
•quesgp v pup saou 0
's9AP L 3O agora p Aq panoaddp SPM Teaaa99p pagsenbaa aqq 'ppuabV
quasuo0 aqq 3o gaed sV •buTgaaM T66T 'OT aaqutagdaS aqg TTgun
Tpaa939p p bUTgsanba.z sem queOTTdde aqq '33p4s buTaaauTbua aqq
utoa3 UOTgppuaujmoOaa aqq 3o asnpoaq geqq pageqs 33p4S •quasa.ad
saagOaCgO OU aaaM aaagy •aOuppuaggp UT you spM qupOTTddp aqy
(T66T '0£ A'Inr)
%NOIZO'd NnISSINNOD ONINRvgd
•90UTd xooq UOTssnOsTP IVUOT41ppe ON •uOTssTutuzo0 TTn3 aqq
Aq panoaddp aq TTTM 4Tma9d asn TeuoTgTpuOO papueuiv aqq gpgg upauz
ATTP0T4euro4np you S90P Teaa939p aqq geqq Pagegs uagg ueuzaTpgo aql
•gaaut T66T 'OT aaquzagdaS aqg TTgun Tpaaa39p aqq gsenbaa og
abequenpe ,sguPDTTddp agg og aq pTnOM gT 'gaaagS ggS9 ao3 goa[oad
agq uO spTq buTxpq aq TTTM AgTO aqq aOUTs 'aanamo$ •4Tuia9d asn
TPUOTgTpuOO TETgTUT aqq ao3 PanTaOaa uaaq qou ppq 993 naTT uT
aqg geqq pageqs qu9uzgapd9G buTaeauTbua aqq 3o aeupap0 Aaaar
• T66T 'OT aaquzagdag
TTgun Tpaaag9P p buTgsanbea qupOTTddp aqq uioa3 panTaOaa uaaq peq
a9449T p geqq pageqs 33pgs •aauppuaggp UT aaaM squp0TTdde ag►
(T66T '8T 7,`Inr) %Slxaw oD SaZZIL1rnId0 NOISIAIOSA.S
•squeumoo buTaaauTbua aqq aad gTmaad
asn TeUOTgTPUOD papuauV aqg 30 Tenoaddp spueulmoOaa 33e4S
uOT4ppuaala5-0aU 33p49
•peap buTnTT paTOOO/pagpaq se paqunoo aq
oq paap goo3 aapnbs papupdxa aqq 3o apTsgno sT gaodapo aql
•goaod aqq ggTm g9a3 aapnbs 081. -/+ ATagpuixoaddp OPTnoad
TTTM uoTsuedxa Mau aql •gaa3 aapnbs 0-91.0'T ao3 panoadde
sem gTuzaad asn TpuOTgTPuOO TpuTbTao agq '886T aunt ui
•49a3 6"9Z Aq gaa3 ZT
uoTgTppp mooapaq p pup gea3 OT Aq gaa3 OT qE gOaod e (8)
149a3 6'9Z Aq 4993 5 3o uoTsuedxa uiooa bUTnTT p (Z) '4a93 0V
Aq 4999 LT 3o gaodapO p (T) 3O gsTsuoa TTTM UOTsuedxe
agy •paap agq 3o aagOpapgO agq ebuegO qou pTnogs atuoq
paangoQJnupux TeuoTgOasTgTnm aqg 3O UOTsuedxa pasodoad aql
sT ,nTIjUV
•sgTutaad buTPTTnq 3o aoupnssT oq aOTad
paaTnbaa ST gsanbaa aaTTapa aqg uagg 'puno3 aq upo paooaa OU
3I 'P9TT3 aana SPM 9a3 naTT-uT agg aaggagm pauTuzaagap uaaq
.L
ic,
panuT-4uOO 8 % "nN InINII
NOISInICMIS
T66T '0C ATrIf
July 30, 1991
G i1 ;Ozw�
NAME:
Smith - Amended Conditional Use
Permit (Z -5019-A)
LOCATION:
The south side of West 65th Street
approximately 200 feet east of
Duffy Lane (6823 1,2 West 65th
Street)
OWNERIAPPLICANT:
Edward D. Smith/Carroll Smith
PROPOSAL:
To amend a previously approved
Conditional Use Permit by expanding
an existing multisectional
manufactured home a total of
1,237.3 square feet.
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. site Location
This property abuts West 65th Street which is currently
shown as a minor arterial, but is in the process of being
reduced to collector standards.
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
The expansion places the structure approximately 300 feet
from West 65th Street on a parcel of land that is 636.5 feet
in depth. The site is surrounded on three sides by vacant
land and by single family to the north. The use is
compatible with the surrounding area.
3. On -Site Drives and Parkin
Access to the site is taken from a 20 foot (width) drive
located on West 65th Street.
4. Screening and Buffers
The applicant has stated that he has no intention of
increasing the screening and buffer that already exist.
Vacant land and woods surround the site on three sides.
Single family residential uses are to the north.
5. City Engineer Comments
The earlier approved Conditional Use Permit required the
applicant to submit an in -lieu fee for the construction
project for 65th Street. As of this writing, it has not
1
September 10, 1991
ITEM NO.• B
NAME*
LOCATION•
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
Smith - Amended Conditional Use
Permit (Z -5019-A)
The south side of West 65th Street
approximately 200 feet east of
Duffy Lane (6823 1/2 West 65th
Street)
Edward D. Smith/Carroll Smith
To amend a previously approved
Conditional Use Permit by expanding
an existing multisectional
manufactured home a total of
1,237.3 square feet.
This property abuts West 65th Street which is currently
shown as a minor arterial, but is in the process of being
reduced to collector standards.
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
The expansion places the structure approximately 300 feet
from West 65th Street on a parcel of land that is 636.5 feet
in depth. The site is surrounded on three sides by vacant
land and by single family to the north. The use is
compatible with the surrounding area.
3. On -Site Drives and Parking
Access to the site is taken from a 20 foot (width) drive
located on West 65th Street.
4. Screening and Buffers
The applicant has stated that he has no intention of
increasing the screening and buffer that already exist.
Vacant land and woods surround the site on three sides.
Single family residential uses are to the north.
5. City Engineer Comments
The earlier approved Conditional Use Permit required the
applicant to submit an in -lieu fee for the construction
project for 65th Street. As of this writing, it has not
1
September 10, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B Continued
been determined whether the in -lieu fee was ever filed. If
no record can be found, then the earlier request is required
prior to issuance of building permits.
6. Analysis
The proposed expansion of the multisectional manufactured
home should not change the character of the area. The
expansion will consist of (1) a carport of 17 feet by
40 feet, (2) a living room expansion of 5 feet by 26.9 feet,
(3) a porch at 10 feet by 10 feet and a bedroom addition
12 feet by 26.9 feet.
In June 1988, the original Conditional Use Permit was
approved for 1,076.0 square feet. The new expansion will
provide approximately +/- 780 square feet with the porch.
The carport is outside of the expanded square foot area to
be counted as heated/cooled living area.
7. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Amended Conditional Use
Permit per the engineering comments.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (JULY 18, 1991)
The applicants were in attendance. Staff stated that a letter
had been received from the applicant requesting a deferral until
September 10, 1991.
Jerry Gardner of the Engineering Department stated that the
in lieu fee had not been received for the initial Conditional
Use Permit. However, since the City will be taking bids on the
project for 65th Street, it would be to the applicants' advantage
to request the deferral until the September 10, 1991 meet.
The chairman then stated that the deferral does not automatically
mean that the Amended Conditional Use Permit will be approved by
the full Commission. No additional discussion took place.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 30, 1991)
The applicant was not in attendance. There were no objectors
present. Staff stated that because of the recommendation from
the Engineering staff, the applicant was requesting a deferral
until the September 10, 1991 meeting. As part of the Consent
Agenda, the requested deferral was approved by a vote of 7 ayes,
0 noes and 4 absent.
2
September 10, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B Continued
STAFF AMENDED RECOMMENDATION:
(AUGUST 27, 1991)
As a result of further review by the engineering staff, there is
no requirement for the applicant to submit an in -lieu fee for the
construction project for 65th Street. Therefore, staff is
recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(SEPTEMBER 10, 1991)
The applicant was in attendance. Bill Hoofman represented the
applicant. There was one person present to speak in opposition,
Daphna Bickerstaff.
Mrs. Bickerstaff stated that she did not understand why this
mobile home was allowed because a few years ago her request was
denied. She further stated the owners of the mobile home do not
keep their property properly cleaned. There have been several
instances of an old junked car, lumber, and trash on the site.
Also, she informed the Commission that the mobile home was placed
on the site before the Conditional Use Permit was obtained.
Ervin Tester of the Enforcement staff stated that he had no
knowledge of the mobile home being on the site before the
Conditional Use Permit was obtained. The reason why the case is
before the Commission is due to the enforcement action pending
against the new construction. During the enforcement officer's
inspection of the site, he did not notice anything unsightly.
Mr. Hoofman then addressed the Commission. He stated that his
client was expecting a new baby and the new additions were needed
to make room for the baby. He understood Mrs. Beckerstaff's
concerns and hoped the city would inspect the site. He agreed
that if his clients were in violation, then the City should
pursue action.
Additional discussion continued regarding the number and types of
additions to be made. Mr. Hoofman stated one bedroom, enlarging
the living room, replacing a porch and expanding the carport.
Mrs. Beckerstaff then asked how would the owners be allowed to
use an easement to access their property. Staff stated that the
easement was the common drive because the site is one lot
fronting West 65th Street. The other two lots fronting West 65th
Street have their own drives. Mrs. Beckerstaff stated that the
issue was now clear.
3
September 10, 1991
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: B (Continued
A motion was then made to approve the Conditional Use Permit as
filed. Staff was also instructed to send an enforcement officer
to check into Mrs. Beckerstaff's complaints. The motion passed
by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position.
4