HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4933-D Staff AnalysisNom: ONE SOURCE HOME CENTER -- AMENDED LONG -FORM PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
zoC&TION: At the southeast corner of Chenal Parkway and Kornis
Rd.
Eugene M. Pfeifer
C/o Olan J. Asbury Joe White
THE HATHAWAY GROUP WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
100 Morgan Keegan Dr., Suite 120 401 S. Victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72202 Little Rock, AR 72201
663-5400 374-1666
AREA: 8.85 ACRES NMMER F LOT : 2 FT. NEW TREET:
ZONING: PCD PR P ED E Continuation of the hardware
store and lumber yard uses
previously approved, plus all
permitted and conditional uses
listed in the C-3 zoning
district regulations.
PLANNING DI TRICT: 18
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCESV&RIANCES REQUETBD: None
BACKGRQT�N .
The site was zoned PCD on December 26, 1990, by Ordinance No.
15,990. This action established the "Mechanics Lumber Company
Long -Forza PCD (Z -4933-B). The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the action at its November 20, 1990 public hearing.
The approved PCD permitted the development of a 17,500 square
foot hardware store, a 32,320 square foot lumber yard facility,
and the creation of two out -parcels which require amendment to
the PCD in order to develop. (No uses or building areas were
established.) Development plans for the out -parcel at the corner
of Chenal Parkway and Kanis Rd., to the west to the hardware
store -lumber yard facility, was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on November 29, 1994, with Board of Directors approval
of an amended PCD district titled "Worthen Bank Branch, Chenal
Parkway --Amended Short -Form PCD" (Z -4933-C), following on
December 20, 1994, established by Ordinance No. 16,811.
In the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 29,
1994, the Commission recommended denial of a requested waiver of
the requirement to construct a sidewalk along the Kanis Rd.
boundary of the out -parcel. In its action on December 20, 1994,
the Board of Directors approved the waiver in Ordinance No.
16,812.
The applicant proposes to amend the original PCD to: 1)
eliminate the eastern out -parcel, and combine it with the
existing Lot 1; and, 2) add 15,000 square feet of retail lease
space to the east end of the existing building, including an
addition to the parking area, new access points from the east,
and construction of a portion of the future eastern boundary
minor arterial street. The applicant specifically requests
approval for the continued use of the property for the hardware
store and lumber yard facility, plus requests approval of all C-3
uses as listed in the permitted and conditional uses in the C-3
zoning district regulations.
The applicant proposes to work with Public Works in negotiating
an agreement for sharing the cost of construction for the new
north -south minor arterial street which is to lie along the east
boundary of the tract; however, waivers of some requirements may
be requested by the applicant when Public Works requirements are
established.
A. PRQPQSAI,/REQUEST:
Planning Commission review and Board of Directors approval
of an amended PCD is requested.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is the current location of the Builders Home Center
and Supply facility, plus the vacant out -parcel which lies
to the east of this development. There are some trees on
the undeveloped portion of the site, but, for the most part,
the site is cleared.
The site is zoned PCD. Property immediately to the east is
zoned R-2, but is the location of the Kinco contractors
offices and materials yard. Across Kanis Rd. to the south
and west is all R-2 zoned property. To the north, across
Chenal Parkway, is an R-2 zoned tract to the northeast which
is the location of the Highland Valley United Methodist
Church and, directly to the north, an undeveloped 0-3 tract.
A C-2 tract lies to the northeast across Chenal Parkway.
C. ENGINEER INGIUTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments:
Right-of-way dedication for a right -turn lane on Chenal
Parkway is required.
K
Construct 36 feet of pavement for the east minor
arterial to a grade that will be consistent with the
preliminary plan for its inter -section with Chenal
Parkway. Contribute in -lieu for the right turn lane
and one-half of the minor arterial costs. (The manor
arterial on the east side will include right turn lanes
at the north and south ends.) A credit towards the in -
lieu will be allowed for the 36 foot pavement and
grading work.
Contribute $20,000 toward the cost of the intersection
construction. This represents one-half the Chenal
Commercial Subdivision commitment, or one-fourth of the
estimated costs.
Improve the Ranis Rd. to collector standards, including
providing a sidewalk, along the Ranis Rd. boundary of
the site.
The north driveway on the future minor arterial is
located too close to the planned intersection, and must
be relocated or eliminated.
Provide the required stormwater detention analysis.
Additional parking may be required.
Water works comments that, in addition to normal connection
charges, an acreage charge of $300 per acre applies.
Additional on-site fire protection may be required. An
existing water line easement across this property is not
shown, and must be added to the plat.
Wastewater comments that sewer service is available.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. did not respond.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. did not respond.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. approved the submittal.
The Fire Department noted that additional on-site fire
hydrants may be needed.
The Neighborhoods and Planning Site Plan Review Specialist
comments that the areas set aside for buffers and
landscaping meet ordinance requirements. A portion of the
eastern buffer adjacent to the future minor arterial street
drops below the full requirement of 21 feet, but meets the
ordinance requirements when averaged out.
3
Sec. 36-502 sets the requirements for commercial (retail)
and industrial (storage and lumber yard) uses. For general
retail sales uses, one space is required for each 300 square
feet of gross floor area up to 10,000 square feet; then, for
floor areas of 10,001 to 20,000 square feet, 95% of this
number is required; then, for floor areas of 20,001 to
30,000 square feet, 30% is required; then, for areas of
30,001 to 40,000 square feet, 85% is required. The existing
general retail floor area is 17,500 square feet; the
addition will be 15,000 square feet, or, 32,500 square feet
total. This amount of general retail space will require,
according to the Ordinance, 124 spaces. The material
storage and lumber storage totals 34,080, and requires 22
spaces. The total required, then, should be 146 parking
spaces; 136 is proposed to be provided.
Sec. 31-201 requires that, "whenever a proposed
(development) abuts a partially ... constructed...street, the
developer shall provide the minimum of one-half of the
required improvements and right-of-way. Ranis Rd., along
the south boundary of the tract, does not meet Master street
Plan standards, and half street improvements and a sidewalk
are required. Improvements to Kanis Rd., however, were not
a requirement of the developer when the original PCD was
approved; they are, however, a requirement for construction
of the bank facility on the west out -parcel. (The sidewalk
requirement was waived by the Board of Directors, contrary
to the Planning Commission recommendation, for the out -
parcel.)
E. ANALYSIS•
The Planning staff reports that the development is in the
Ellis Mountain Planning District. The area is designated on
the adopted Land Use Plan for commercial uses. The
requested C-3 uses, then, are in conformance with the Plan.
The 22 parking spaces allotted to the material storage and
lumber storage uses are based, presumably, on a separate
"free-standing" storage use not associated with a principal
use. There may be some room for compromise on this number;
thus, the 136 spaces may be appropriate. The applicant,
however, needs to be the one who addresses this matter and
requests approval of the number of parking spaces he
proposes to provide.
4
Staff recommends approval of the amended PCD.
Staff recommends that all Public Works improvements
requirements be required to be provided as part of the
amended PCD.
SnBDZVjSjQN CQKKIITEE (AUGUST 31, 1995)
Mr. Gene Pfeifer, the applicant, and Mr. Joe White, with White-'
Daters & Associates, were present. Staff outlined to the
Committee members the proposed development. The Committee
reviewed the discussion outline with Mr. Pfeifer and Mr. White.
David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, presented the Public
Works comments, and explained to Mr. Pfeifer the Public Works
rationale for the comments and their implications for his
development. Mr. Pfeifer indicated that he would have to
consider these comments. Mr. white said that the additional
information would be provided, and that required changes would be
discussed with Public Works. The Committee forwarded the item to
the full Commission for the public hearing.
PLj&NNING—COMM1ZON A TION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 1995)
Mr. Olan Asbury, representing the developer, was present.
Staff outlined the request involved in the amended PCD.
Mr. Asbury recounted the history of the approval of the original
PCD in 1990, and of the agreements concerning the rights-of-way
and street improvements which were associated with that approval.
He stated the elements of the amendment to the PCD which the
applicant was seeking. He asked for a concession to permit the
northern -most eastern drive onto the future north -south minor
arterial to remain as shown on the plan. He said that, since the
proposed building addition is an extension of the existing
building, and the parking lot is being extended eastward, the
location of the drive approach from the street is established by
the existing construction. He said that, until the north -south
minor arterial is constructed, to delete this drive approach
would cause a real hardship for customer access to the property,
since the only other viable access point is off Chenal Parkway.
He said that, when the north -south minor arterial is constructed
at some time in the future, the northern -most access point could
become a right -turn out only. The southern -most east access
point, he said, is proposed to be increased to the maximum
allowable width, and, upon construction of the north -south minor
arterial, would become the main entry to the commercial center.
-FILE t1o, Z -4933-D (Cont
Mr. Asbury, speaking of the requested waivers, indicated that the
developer would not commit to making improvements along the Kanis
Rd. frontage of the site, saying that, when the PCD was approved
in 1990, the improvements issues regarding Kanis Rd. were
addressed at that time; that the current PCD issue does not abut
xanis Rd.; and, that it is inappropriate to raise these
requirements after they had been established and settled
previously.
Mr. Asbury reiterated the agreements with the City regarding
construction of the north -south manor arterial, saying that it is
the developer's commitment to paying one-half the cost of these
improvements, with the stipulation that the developer pay one-
half the cost of the north -south minor arterial as it was aligned
in 1990, not as it the alignment has been changed. He explained
that recently the alignment had been changed to curve to the east
to intersect Kanis Rd., instead of intersecting Kanis Rd. at a
nearly right-angle, and the developer would not be interested in
paying one-half the cost of this expanded project. He said that
the developer would agree to constructing the full width of the
north one -halt of the project, according to the original
alignment.
Mr. Asbury stated that the developer cannot commit to paying for
improvements on Chenal Parkway or for paying for re -construction
of Chenal Parkway or the north -south minor arterial to
accommodate the grade changes which will be necessary for the
extension of the north -south minor arterial across Chenal
Parkway. He said that there is already an agreement. from 1990,
which defines the developers responsibilities for boundary street
improvements costs. He said that the developer is unwilling to
dedicate additional right-of-way along Chenal Parkway for a right
turn lane, saying that it is his understanding that there is
adequate right-of-way width in which the right turn lane can be
built.
Mr. Asbury requested that the Commission approve the amendment to
the PCD to permit the building expansion of the commercial
center; that the allowable uses of the center be C-3 uses; that
the northern -most east drive approach be permitted on a temporary
basis until such time that the north -south minor arterial is
constructed, at which time this drive would become a right -turn
only exit; and, that the southern -most drive onto the north -south
minor arterial be increased in width to the maximum allowable
width for an approach. The committed to working with Public
Works to define the waivers and variances which will be sought at
the Board of Directors level.
Commissioner Daniel recalled that there is a Chenal Taskforce
which is studying Chenal Parkway issues, and that this taskforce
will be making recommendations concerning access issues for
Chenal Parkway.
6
Chairperson Walker re -stated the issues of the amended PCD, as
described by Mr. Asbury. He explained that no position was being
taken by the Commission on any waivers and that the report and
conclusions of the Chenal Taskforce should be taken into account
as requests for waivers are developed and as the developer and
Public Works come to agreements on the waivers to be pursued on
this application. Chairperson Walker asked for approval of the
amended PCD, and the issue was approved with the vote of 8 ayes,
0 nays, 2 absent, 0 abstentions, and 1 open position.
7
NAME: ONE SOURCE HOME CENTER -- AMENDED LONG -FORM PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION_: At the southeast corner of Chenal Parkway and Kanis
Rd.
Eugene M. Pfeifer
C/o Olan J. Asbury Joe White
THE HATHAWAY GROUP WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
100 Morgan Keegan Dr., Suite 120 401 S. victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72202 Little Rock, AR 72201
663-5400 374-1666
AREA• 8.85 ACRES IER OF LOTa: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: PCD PRQPED Continuation of the hardware
store and lumber yard uses
previously approved, plus all
permitted and conditional uses
listed in the C-3 zoning
district regulations.
p F-APIN I NG D I S TR ICT : 18
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES RE E TED: None
BACKGROUND_
The site was zoned PCD on December 26, 1990, by Ordinance No.
15,990. This action established the --Mechanics Lumber Company
Long -Form PCD (z -4933-B)• The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the action at its November 20, 1990 public hearing.
The approved PCD per-mitted the development of a 17,500 square
foot hardware store, a 32,320 square foot lumber yard facility,
and the creation of two out -parcels which require amendment to
the PCD in order to develop. (No uses or building areas were
established.) Development plans for the out -parcel at the corner
of Chenal Parkway and Kanis Rd., to the west to the hardware
store -lumber yard facility, was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on November 29, 1994, with Board of Directors approval
of an a -mended PCD district titled "Worthen Bank Branch, Chenal
Parkway --Amended Short -Form PCD" (Z -4933-C), following on
December 20, 1994, established by Ordinance No. 16,811.
In the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 29,
1994, the Commission recommended denial of a requested waiver of
the requirement to construct a sidewalk along the Kanis Rd.
1*4W4K,WFEREEFUROMMM-
boundary of the out -parcel. In
the Board of Directors approved
16,812.
STATEMENT GF PROPOS L :
its action on December 20, 1994,
the waiver in Ordinance No.
The applicant proposes to amend the original PCD to: 1)
eliminate the eastern out -parcel, and combine it with the
existing Lot 1; and, 2) add 15,000 square feet of retail lease
space to the east end of the existing building, including an
addition to the parking area, new access points from the east,
and construction of a portion of the future eastern boundary
minor arterial street. The applicant specifically requests
approval for the continued use of the property for the hardware
store and lumber yard facility, plus requests approval of all C-3
uses as listed in the permitted and conditional uses in the C-3
zoning district regulations.
The applicant proposes to work with Public Works in negotiating
an agreement for sharing the cost of construction for the new
north -south minor arterial street which is to lie along the east
boundary of the tract; however, waivers of some requirements may
be requested by the applicant when Public Works requirements are
established.
A. PR P AL/RE QE T•
Planning Commission review and Board of Directors approval
of an amended PCD is requested.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is the current location of the Builders Home Center
and Supply facility, plus the vacant out -parcel which lies
to the east of this development. There are some trees on
the undeveloped portion of the site, but, for the most part,
the site is cleared.
The site is zoned PCD. Property immediately to the east is
zoned R-2, but is the location of the Kinco contractors
offices and materials yard. Across Kanis Rd. to the south
and west is all R-2 zoned property. To the north, across
Chenal Parkway, is an R-2 zoned tract to the northeast which
is the location of the Highland Valley United Methodist
Church and, directly to the north, an undeveloped 0-3 tract.
A C-2 tract lies to the northeast across Chenal Parkway.
C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments:
Right-of-way dedication for a right -turn lane on Chenal
Parkway is required.
2
Construct 36 feet of pavement for the east minor
arterial to a grade that will be consistent with the
preliminary plan for its inter -section with Chenal
Parkway. Contribute in -lieu for the right turn lane
and one-half of the minor arterial costs. (The minor
arterial on the east side will include right turn lanes
at the north and south ends.) A credit towards the in -
lieu will be allowed for the 36 foot pavement and
grading work.
Contribute $20,000 toward the cost of the intersection
construction. This represents one-half the Chenal
Commercial Subdivision commitment, or one-fourth of the
estimated costs.
Improve the Kanis Rd. to collector standards, including
providing a sidewalk, along the Kanis Rd. boundary of
the site.
The north driveway on the future minor arterial is
located too close to the planned intersection, and must
be relocated or eliminated.
Provide the required stormwater detention analysis.
Additional parking may be required.
Water Works comments that, in addition to normal connection
charges, an acreage charge of $300 per acre applies.
Additional on-site fire protection may be required. An
existing water line easement across this property is not
shown, and must be added to the plat.
Wastewater comments that sewer service is available.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. did not respond.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. did not respond.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. approved the submittal.
The Fire Department noted that additional on-site fire
hydrants may be needed.
The Neighborhoods and Planning Site Plan Review Specialist
comments that the areas set aside for buffers and
landscaping meet ordinance requirements. A portion of the
eastern buffer adjacent to the future minor arterial street
drops below the full requirement of 21 feet, but meets the
ordinance requirements when averaged out.
3
Sec. 36-502 sets the requirements for commercial (retail)
and industrial (storage and lumber yard) uses. For general
retail sales uses, one space is required for each 300 square
feet of gross floor area up to 10,000 square feet; then, for
floor areas of 10,001 to 20,000 square feet, 95% of this
number is required; then, for floor areas of 20,001 to
30,000 square feet, 90% is required; then, for areas of
30,001 to 40,000 square feet, 85% is required. The existing
general retail floor area is 17,500 square feet; the
addition will be 15,000 square feet, or, 32,500 square feet
total. This amount of general retail space will require,
according to the Ordinance, 124 spaces. The material
storage and lumber storage totals 34,080, and requires 22
spaces. The total required, then, should be 146 parking
spaces; 136 is proposed to be provided.
Sec. 31-201 requires that, "whenever a proposed
(development) abuts a partially... constructed... street, the
developer shall provide the minimum of one-half of the
required improvements and right-of-way. Kanis Rd., along
the south boundary of the tract, does not meet Master Street
Plan standards, and half street improvements and a sidewalk
are required. Improvements to Kanis Rd., however, were not
a requirement of the developer when the original PCD was
approved; they are, however, a requirement for construction
of the bank facility on the west out -parcel. (The sidewalk
requirement was waived by the Board of Directors, contrary
to the Planning Commission recommendation, for the out -
parcel.)
E. ANALYSE
The Planning staff reports that the development is in the
Ellis Mountain Planning District. The area is designated on
the adopted Land Use Plan for commercial uses. The
requested C-3 uses, then, are in conformance with the Plan.
The 22 parking spaces allotted to the material storage and
lumber storage uses are based, presumably, on a separate
"free-standing" storage use not associated with a principal
use. There may be some room for compromise on this number;
thus, the 136 spaces may be appropriate. The applicant,
however, needs to be the one who addresses this matter and
requests approval of the number of parking spaces he
proposes to provide.
4
— • t 1' �� is �
Staff recommends approval of the amended PCD.
Staff recommends that all Public Works improvements
requirements be required to be provided as part of the
amended PCD.
�U]�DIVISJgN COMMIT2ZE(AUGUST 31, 1995)
Mr. Gene Pfeifer, the applicant, and Mr. Joe White, with White-
Daters & Associates, were present. Staff outlined to the
Committee members the proposed development. The Committee
reviewed the discussion outline with Mr. Pfeifer and Mr. White.
David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, presented the Public
Works comments, and explained to Mr. Pfeifer the Public Works
rationale for the comments and their implications for his
development. Mr. Pfeifer indicated that he would have to
consider these comments. Mr. White said that the additional
information would be provided, and that required changes would be
discussed with Public Works. The Committee forwarded the item to
the full Commission for the public hearing.
PLkNNING COMMI SIGN ACTIO : (SEPTEMBER 19, 1995)
Mr. Olan Asbury, representing the developer, was present.
Staff outlined the request involved in the amended PCD.
Mr. Asbury recounted the history of the approval of the original
PCD in 1990, and of the agreements concerning the rights-of-way
and street improvements which were associated with that approval.
He stated the elements of the amendment to the PCD which the
applicant was seeking. He asked for a concession to permit the
northern -most eastern drive onto the future north -south minor
arterial to remain as shown on the plan. He said that, since the
proposed building addition is an extension of the existing
building, and the parking lot is being extended eastward, the
location of the drive approach from the street is established by
the existing construction. He said that, until the north -south
minor arterial is constructed, to delete this drive approach
would cause a real hardship for customer access to the property,
since the only other viable access point is off Chenal Parkway.
He said that, when the north -south minor arterial is constructed
at some time in the future, the northern -most access point could
become a right -turn out only. The southern -most east access
point, he said, is proposed to be increased to the maximum
allowable width, and, upon construction of the north -south minor
arterial, would become the main entry to the commercial center.
5
FILE o.:_ Z -4933-D C nt Z
Mr. Asbury, speaking of the requested waivers, indicated that the
developer would not commit to making improvements along the Kanis
Rd. frontage of the site, saying that, when the PCD was approved
in 1990, the improvements issues regarding Kanis Rd. were
addressed at that time; that the current PCD issue does not abut
Kanis Rd.; and, that it is inappropriate to raise these
requirements after they had been established and settled
previously.
Mr. Asbury reiterated the agreements with the City regarding
construction of the north -south minor arterial, saying that it is
the developer's commitment to paying one-half the cost of these
improvements, with the stipulation that the developer pay one-
half the cost of the north -south minor arterial as it was aligned
in 1990, not as it the alignment has been changed. He explained
that recently the alignment had been changed to curve to the east
to intersect Kanis Rd., instead of intersecting Kanis Rd. at a
nearly right-angle, and the developer would not be interested in
paying one-half the cost of this expanded project. He said that
the developer would agree to constructing the full width of the
north one-half of the project, according to the original
alignment.
Mr. Asbury stated that the developer cannot commit to paying for
improvements on Chenal Parkway or for paying for re -construction
of Chenal Parkway or the north -south minor arterial to
accommodate the grade changes which will be necessary for the
extension of the north -south minor arterial across Chenal
Parkway. He said that there is already an agreement, from 1990,
which defines the developers responsibilities for boundary street
improvements costs. He said that the developer is unwilling to
dedicate additional right-of-way along Chenal Parkway for a right
turn lane, saying that it is his understanding that there is
adequate right-of-way width in which the right turn lane can be
built.
Mr. Asbury requested that the Commission approve the amendment to
the PCD to permit the building expansion of the commercial
center; that the allowable uses of the center be C-3 uses; that
the northern -most east drive approach be permitted on a temporary
basis until such time that the north -south minor arterial is
constructed, at which time this drive would become a right -turn
only exit; and, that the southern -most drive onto the north -south
minor arterial be increased in width to the maximum allowable
width for an approach. The committed to working with Public
Works to define the waivers and variances which will be sought at
the Hoard of Directors level.
Commissioner Daniel recalled that there is a Chenal Taskforce
which is studying Chenal Parkway issues, and that this taskforce
will be making recommendations concerning access issues for
Chenal Parkway.
2
l
Chairperson Walker re-stated the issues of the amended PCD, as
described by Mr. Asbury. He explained that no position was being
taken by the Commission on any waivers and that the report and
conclusions of the Chenal Taskforce should be taken into account
as requests for waivers are developed and as the developer and
Public Works come to agreements on the waivers to be pursued on
this application. Chairperson Walker asked for approval of the
amended PCD, and the issue was approved with the vote of 8 ayes,
0 nays, 2 absent, 0 abstentions, and 1 open position.
7
FILE NO.: Z -4933-D
NAME: ONE SOURCE HOME CENTER -- AMENDED LONG -FORM PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: At the southeast corner of Chenal Parkway and Kanis
Rd.
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Eugene M. Pfeifer
c/o Olan J. Asbury Joe White
THE HATHAWAY GROUP WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
100 Morgan Keegan Dr., Suite 120 401 S. Victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72202 Little Rock, AR 72201
663-5400 374-1666
AREA: 8.85 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: PCD PROPOSED USES: Continuation of the hardware
store and lumber yard uses
previously approved, plus all
permitted and conditional uses
listed in the C-3 zoning
district regulations.
PLANNING DISTRICT: 18
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REO[UESTED: None
BACKGROUND:
The site was zoned PCD on December 26, 1990, by Ordinance No.
15,990. This action established the "Mechanics Lumber Company
Long -Form PCD (Z -4933-B). The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the action at its November 20, 1990 public hearing.
The approved PCD permitted the development of a 17,500 square
foot hardware store, a 32,320 square foot lumber yard facility,
and the creation of two out -parcels which require amendment to
the PCD in order to develop. (No uses or building areas were
established.) Development plans for the out -parcel at the corner
of Chenal Parkway and Kanis Rd., to the west to the hardware
store -lumber yard facility, was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on November 29, 1994, with Board of Directors approval
of an amended PCD district titled "Worthen Bank Branch, Chenal
Parkway --Amended Short -Form PCD" (Z -4933-C), following on
December 20, 1994, established by Ordinance No. 16,811.
In the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 29,
1994, the Commission recommended denial of a requested waiver of
the requirement to construct a sidewalk along the Kanis Rd.
FILE NO.: Z-4 3-D ont.
boundary of the out -parcel. In
the Board of Directors approved
16,812.
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
its action on December 20, 1994,
the waiver in Ordinance No.
The applicant proposes to amend the original PCD to: 1)
eliminate the eastern out -parcel, and combine it with the
existing Lot 1; and, 2) add 15,000 square feet of retail lease
space to the east end of the existing building, including an
addition to the parking area, new access points from the east,
and construction of a portion of the future eastern boundary
minor arterial street. The applicant specifically requests
approval for the continued use of the property for the hardware
store and lumber yard facility, plus requests approval of all C-3
uses as listed in the permitted and conditional uses in the C-3
zoning district regulations.
The applicant proposes to work with Public Works in negotiating
an agreement for sharing the cost of construction for the new
north -south minor arterial street which is to lie along the east
boundary of the tract; however, waivers of some requirements may
be requested by the applicant when Public Works requirements are
established.
A. PROPOSALIRE QEST:
Planning Commission review and Board of Directors approval
of an amended PCD is requested.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is the current location of the Builders Home Center
and Supply facility, plus the vacant out -parcel which lies
to the east of this development. There are some trees on
the undeveloped portion of the site, but, for the most part,
the site is cleared.
The site is zoned PCD. Property immediately to the east is
zoned R-2, but is the location of the Kinco contractors
offices and materials yard. Across Kanis Rd. to the south
and west is all R-2 zoned property. To the north, across
Chenal Parkway, is an R-2 zoned tract to the northeast which
is the location of the Highland Valley United Methodist
Church and, directly to the north, an undeveloped 0-3 tract.
A C-2 tract lies to the northeast across Chenal Parkway.
C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments:
Right-of-way dedication for a right -turn lane on Chenal
Parkway is required.
2
FILE NO.: Z-4933-D (Cont.)
Construct 36 feet of pavement for the east minor
arterial to a grade that will be consistent with the
preliminary plan for its inter -section with Chenal
Parkway. Contribute in -lieu for the right turn lane
and one-half of the minor arterial costs. (The minor
arterial on the east side will include right turn lanes
at the north and south ends.) A credit towards the in -
lieu will be allowed for the 36 foot pavement and
grading work.
Contribute $20,000 toward the cost of the intersection
construction. This represents one-half the Chenal
Commercial Subdivision commitment, or one-fourth of the
estimated costs.
Improve the Ranis Rd. to collector standards, including
providing a sidewalk, along the Ranis Rd. boundary of
the site.
The north driveway on the future minor arterial is
located too close to the planned intersection, and must
be relocated or eliminated.
Provide the required stormwater detention analysis.
Additional parking may be required.
Water Works comments that, in addition to normal connection
charges, an acreage charge of $300 per acre applies.
Additional on-site fire protection may be required. An
existing water line easement across this property is not
shown, and must be added to the plat.
Wastewater comments that sewer service is available.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. did not respond.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. did not respond.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. approved the submittal.
The Fire Department noted that additional on-site fire
hydrants may be needed.
The Neighborhoods and Planning Site Plan Review Specialist
comments that the areas set aside for buffers and
landscaping meet ordinance requirements. A portion of the
eastern buffer adjacent to the future minor arterial street
drops below the full requirement of 21 feet, but meets the
ordinance requirements when averaged out.
3
FILE Na.: 2-4933-D Cont.
D. I5 QE LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN:
Sec. 36-502 sets the requirements for commercial (retail)
and industrial (storage and lumber yard) uses. For general
retail sales uses, one space is required for each 300 square
feet of gross floor area up to 10,000 square feet; then, for
floor areas of 10,001 to 20,000 square feet, 95% of this
number is required; then, for floor areas of 20,001 to
30,000 square feet, 90% is required; then, for areas of
30,001 to 40,000 square feet, 85% is.required. The existing
general retail floor area is 17,500 square feet; the
addition will be 15,000 square feet, or, 32,500 square feet
total. This amount of general retail space will require,
according to the ordinance, 124 spaces. The material
storage and lumber storage totals 34,080, and requires 22
spaces. The total required, then, should be 146 parking
spaces; 136 is proposed to be provided.
Sec. 31-201 requires that, "whenever a proposed
(development) abuts a partially... constructed... street, the
developer shall provide the minimum of one-half of the
required improvements and right-of-way. Ranis Rd., along
the south boundary of the tract, does not meet Master Street
Plan standards, and half street improvements and a sidewalk
are required. Improvements to Ranis Rd., however, were not
a requirement of the developer when the original PCD was
approved; they are, however, a requirement for construction
of the bank facility on the west out -parcel. (The sidewalk
requirement was waived by the Board of Directors, contrary
to the Planning Commission recommendation, for the out -
parcel.)
E. ANALYSIS•
The Planning staff reports that the development is in the
Ellis Mountain Planning District. The area is designated on
the adopted Land Use Plan for commercial uses. The
requested C-3 uses, then, are in conformance with the Plan.
The 22 parking spaces allotted to the material storage and
lumber storage uses are based, presumably, on a separate
'If ree-standing" storage use not associated with a principal
use. There may be some room for compromise on this number;
thus, the 136 spaces may be appropriate. The applicant,
however, needs to be the one who addresses this matter and
requests approval of the number of parking spaces he
proposes to provide.
4
FILE NO.: Z-4 3 -D Cont_)
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the amended PCD.
Staff recommends that all Public Works improvements
requirements be required to be provided as part of the
amended PCD.
SUBDIVISTON COMMITTEE COMMENT: (AUGUST 31, 1995)
Mr. Gene Pfeifer, the applicant, and Mr. Joe White, with White-
Daters & Associates, were present. Staff outlined to the
Committee members the proposed development. The Committee
reviewed the discussion outline with Mr. Pfeifer and Mr. White.
David Scherer, with the Public works staff, presented the Public
Works comments, and explained to Mr. Pfeifer the Public Works
rationale for the comments and their implications for his
development. Mr. Pfeifer indicated that he would have to
consider these comments. Mr. White said that the additional
information would be provided, and that required changes would be
discussed with Public works. The Committee forwarded the item to
the full Commission for the public hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 19, 1995)
Mr. Olan Asbury, representing the developer, was present.
Staff outlined the request involved in the amended PCD.
Mr. Asbury recounted the history of the approval of the original
PCD in 1990, and of the agreements concerning the rights-of-way
and street improvements which were associated with that approval.
He stated the elements of the amendment to the PCD which the
applicant was seeking. He asked for a concession to permit the
northern -most eastern drive onto the future north -south minor
arterial to remain as shown on the plan. He said that, since the
proposed building addition is an extension of the existing
building, and the parking lot is being extended eastward, the
location of the drive approach from the street is established by
the existing construction. He said that, until the north -south
minor arterial is constructed, to delete this drive approach
would cause a real hardship for customer access to the property,
since the only other viable access point is off Chenal Parkway.
He said that, when the north -south minor arterial is constructed
at some time in the future, the northern -most access point could
become a right -turn out only. The southern -most east access
point, he said, is proposed to be increased to the maximum
allowable width, and, upon construction of the north -south minor
arterial, would become the main entry to the commercial center.
5
FILE Na.: Z -4933-D (Cont.
Mr. Asbury, speaking of the requested waivers, indicated that the
developer would not commit to making improvements along the Kanis
Rd. frontage of the site, saying that, when the PCD was approved
in 1990, the improvements issues regarding Kanis Rd. were
addressed at that time; that the current PCD issue does not abut
Kanis Rd.; and, that it is inappropriate to raise these
requirements after they had been established and settled
previously.
Mr. Asbury reiterated the agreements with the City regarding
construction of the north -south minor arterial, saying that it is
the developer's commitment to paying one-half the cost of these
improvements, with the stipulation that the developer pay one-
half the cost of the north -south minor arterial as it was aligned
in 1990, not as it the alignment has been changed. He explained
that recently the alignment had been changed to curve to the east
to intersect Kanis Rd., instead of intersecting Kanis Rd. at a
nearly right-angle, and the developer would not be interested in
paying one-half the cost of this expanded project. He said that
the developer would agree to constructing the full width of the
north one-half of the project, according to the original
alignment.
Mr. Asbury stated that the developer cannot commit to paying for
improvements on Chenal Parkway or for paying for re -constriction
of Chenal Parkway or the north -south minor arterial to
accommodate the grade changes which will be necessary for the
extension of the north -south minor arterial across Chenal
Parkway. He said that there is already an agreement, from 1990,
which defines the developers responsibilities for boundary street
improvements costs. He said that the developer is unwilling to
dedicate additional right-of-way along Chenal Parkway for a right
turn lane, saying that it is his understanding that there is
adequate right-of-way width in which the right turn lane can be
built.
Mr. Asbury requested that the Commission approve the amendment to
the PCD to permit the building expansion of the commercial
center; that the allowable uses of the center be C-3 uses; that
the northern -most east drive approach be permitted on a temporary
basis until such time that the north -south minor arterial is
constructed, at which time this drive would become a right -turn
only exit; and, that the southern -most drive onto the north -south
minor arterial be increased in width to the maximum allowable
width for an approach. The committed to working with Public
Works to define the waivers and variances which will be sought at
the Board of Directors level.
Commissioner Daniel recalled that there is a Chenal Taskforce
which is studying Chenal Parkway issues, and that this taskforce
will be making recommendations concerning access issues for
Chenal Parkway.
FILE NO.: Z-4 -D Cont.
Chairperson Walker re -stated the issues of the amended PCD, as
described by Mr. Asbury. He explained that no position was being
taken by the Commission on any waivers and that the report and
conclusions of the Chenal Taskforce should be taken into account
as requests for waivers are developed and as the developer and
Public Works come to agreements on the waivers to be pursued on
this application. Chairperson Walker asked for approval of the
amended PCD, and the issue was approved with the vote of 8 ayes,
0 nays, 2 absent, 0 abstentions, and 1 open position.
7