Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4924 Staff AnalysisNAME: Zion Terrace "Short -Form PRD" (Z-4924) LOCATION: 38th and Zion DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Greval Dev. Co., Inc. Barry Ferguson 721 Beech Street 318 Depot NLR, AR 72114 Lonoke, AR 72086 Phone: 375-6177 Phone: 676-3305 AREA: 1.69 acres NO. OF LOTS: 16 FT. NEW STREET: 600 ZONING: "R-4" PROPOSED USE: Detached Single Family A. Develo mental Concept This submittal represents an attempt to utilize an undeveloped tract of land lying within the boundaries of the City by in filling it with quality low cost homes. The developers wish to address the needs of what they consider to be a "neglected" moderate income market in this older part of town. The City has in the past eliminated sewer and drainage problems in the area. B. Proposal/Request (1) The construction of 16 small lot single family homes and 600' of new street on 1.69 acres. (2) Concrete pads for parking on each lot. (3) Private park to be managed by the resident property owners association. Park to be surrounded by bicycle/jogging trail and will contain a small central spa with common hot tub facilities. An outside recreation area for kids will also be included. - Continued B. Issues/Legal/Technical/Design (1) Indicate number of people and employees involved. (2) Show north arrow and location map. C. Engineering Comments Show landscaping strip adjacent to 10' alley. D. Staff Recommendation Deferral until issues addressed. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant's architect explained that there would be live-in employees, bedroom space for eight, and room for four more with the "future" addition. The issue was identified as parking, since only 11 spaces were shown. It was determined that there was no ordinance standard, but if the patients usually drove to the site, then it would be based on one space per room. The applicant agreed to research the parking issue. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Applicant was present. There were no objectors. A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent. Name: Location: Developer En ineer: Rist: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: bion Terrace "Short -Form" PRD (Z-4924)' 38th and Zion Greval Dev. Co./Barry Ferguson PRD approval for the development of affordable homes. Approval, subject to working out the street improvement issue with engineering. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Applicant submitted revised plans. No one was present in objection. There was a question of proper notice; the City Attorney determined that the item could be heard. A motion for approval was made and passed, subject to: (1) filing the notices within 24 hours; (2) submission of the Bill of Assurance; and (3) filing of the alley closure petition. The vote was: 10 ayes, O noes, and 1 absent. NAME: Zion Terrace "Short -Form PRD" (Z-4924) LOCATION: 38th and Zion DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Greval Dev. Co., Inc. Barry Ferguson 721 Beech Street 318 Depot NLR, AR 72114 Lonoke, AR 72086 Phone: 375-6177 Phone: 676-3305 AREA: 1.69 acres N0. OF LOTS: 16 FT. NEW STREET: 600 ZONING: "R-4" PROPOSED USE: Detached Single Family A. Developmental Conce t This submittal represents an attempt to utilize an undeveloped tract of land lying within the boundaries of the City by in filling it with quality low cost homes. The developers wish to address the needs of what they consider to be a "neglected" moderate income market in this older part of town. The City has in the past eliminated sewer and drainage problems in the area. B. Proposal/Rest (1) The homesoandr600'oofonew6small street ont1.69gfamily acres (2) Concrete pads for parking on each lot. (3) Private park to be managed by the resident property owners association. Park to be surrounded by bicycle/jogging trail and will contain a small central spa with common hot tub facilities. An outside recreation area for kids will also be included. C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design (1) Improvement of streets. (2) Submit sketch grading plan because clearing will be more than 25 percent on an acre. (3) Abandon alley right-of-way if legally bisects property. May need improvements. (4) Submit survey. (5) Submit typicals, profile on units, and additional information as required by site plan submission requirements., (6) Give more detail on park and its necessity, and maintenance and Bill of Assurance. (7) Lots 13, 14, and 16 need front yard landscaping. Submit landscaping plan with minimum requirements for each lot. (8) Hatched area needs to be indicated as maximum buildable area. D. Engineering Comments (1) Fifty foot right-of-way instead of 40'. (2) Radius on the corner. (3) Eighteen foot pavement and curb/gutter on developer's side of street (27', 18' from back of curb). E. Staff Recommendation Reserved until further information is received. Staff was prohibited in its review of the proposal due to inadequate information. Engineering's input is crucial due to the number and status of the rights-of-way abutting the property. Decisions need to be made regarding whether or not all of them should be extended and developed. Staff is very supportive of the concept of infill development with moderate income homes.in this area. F. Subdivision Committee Review The applicant asked to defer this item to the December meeting. G. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (11-3-87): A motion for deferral as requested by the applicant was made and passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent. H. Subdivision Committee Review Staff's recommendation on the revised plan: (1) Submit Bill of Assurance with indication for maintenance of park; (2) explain phasing; (3) extend lots in the park area in case future maintenance ceases - do this in Bill of Assurance. The main issue was identified as street improvements. The applicant requested a waiver of street improvements or construction to rural standards. He explained that phase I would include 4 through 10, 14 through 16, and Phase II would include Lots 1 through 3, 11 through 13, and the proposed park. He was asked to: (1) close the whole alley and indicate an easement; (2) properly note plat name; (3) provide 10' separation between driveways to lessen concrete; (4) show utility and access easement; (5) work out street with Engineering; (6) submit floor plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Applicant was present. There were no objectors. There was discussion on whether or not to hear the item since the Applicant had not submitted his notice receipts. The City Attorney decided that the item could be heard, provided the Applicant submitted proof of notice in 24 hours. The main issue was identified as street improvement, since the Applicant had agreed to comply with the other comments. It was agreed that 38th Street would be improved with 18 feet of pavement/curb and gutter; 37th Street would be improved with the normal improvements and 1/2 of the 27' pavement; and Cobb and Zion Street would be improved with normal improvements and 1/2 of the 27' pavement. A motion for approval of the Project was made and passed subject to: (1) filing of notices in 24 hours; (2) submission of the Bill of Assurance, and (3) filing of the alley closure petition. The vote - 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent. Item No. --A NAME: LOCATION: DEVELOPER: Greval Dev. Co., Inc. 721 Beech Street NLR, AR 72114 Phone: 375-6177 Zion Terrace "Short -Form PRD" (Z-4924) 38th and Zion ENGINEER: Barry Ferguson 318 Depot Lonoke, AR 72086 Phone: 676-3305 AREA: 1.69 acres N0. OF LOTS: 16 FT. NEW STREET: 600 ZONING: "R-4`° PROPOSED USE: Detached Single Family A. Develo mental Conce t This submittal represents anatte Phitotutilize an he boundaries undeveloped tract of land lying of the City by in filling it with quality low cost homes. The developers wish to address themodneedsrateiof what they consider to be a "neglected" market in this vldeepand drainage problemscity inathen the past eliminated sewr area. B. Proposal/Re uq est (1) The construction of fsli 16 small lotsngle family homes and 600 of new (2) Concrete pads for parking on each lot. (3) Private park to be managed by the resident property owners association. Park to be surrounded by bicycle/jogging trail and will contain a small central spa with common hot tub facilities. An outside recreation area for kids will also be included. Item No. A - Continued C. Issues/Discussion/Le al/Technical/Desi n (1) Improvement of streets. (2) Submit sketch grading plan because clearing will be more than 25 percent on an acre. (3) Abandon alley right-of-way if legally bisects property. May need improvements. (4) Submit survey. (5) Submit typicals, profile on units, and additional information as required by site plan submission requirements. (6) Give more detail on park and its necessity, and maintenance and Bill of Assurance. (7) Lots 13, 14, and 16 need front yard landscaping. Submit landscaping plan with minimum requirements for each lot. (8) Hatched area needs to be indicated as maximum buildable area. D. Engineering Comments (1) Fifty foot right-of-way instead of 401. (2) Radius on the corner. (3) Eighteen foot pavement and curb/gutter on developer's side of street (271, 18' from back of curb). E. Staff Recommendation Reserved until further information is received. Staff was prohibited in its review of the proposal due to inadequate information. Engineering's input is crucial due to the number and status of the rights-of-way abutting the property. Decisions need to be made regarding whether or not all of them should be extended and developed. Staff is very supportive of the concept of infill development with moderate income homes in this area. Item No. A - Continued F. Subdivision Committee Review The applicant asked to defer this item to the December meeting. G. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION (11-3-87): A motion for deferral as requested by the applicant was made and passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent. Item'No. A-- Continued H. Subdivision Committee Review Staff's recommendation on the revised plan: (1) Submit Bill of Assurance with indication for maintenance of park; (2) explain phasing; (3) extend lots in the park area in case future maintenance ceases - do this in Bill of Assurance. The main issue was identified as street improvements. The applicant requested a waiver of street improvements or construction to rural standards. He explained that Phase I would include through through 16, 3, a nd Phase II w 3, 11 through w 13, and the proposed park. He was asked to: (1) close the whole alley and indicate an easement; (2) properly note plat name; (3) provide 10' separation between driveways to lessen concrete; (4) show utility and access easement; work out street with Engineering; (6) submit floor plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There were no objectors. There were discussion on whether or not to hear the item since the Applicant had not submitted his notice receipts. vie City Attorney decided that the item could be heard, Pro he Applicant subimitted -roof of otice in 24 hours. The main issue was identified as street improvement► since the Applicant had agreed to comply with the other comments. It was agreed that 38th Street would be unproved with 18 feet of pavement/curb and gutter; 37th Street would be improved with the normal improvements and 1/2 of the 27' pavement; and Cobb and tion Street would abproved with normal improvements and 1/2 of the 27' pavement'. A motion for approval of the Project was made and passed subject to: (1) to filing of notices in 24 hours; (2) submission of the Bill of Assurance. and (3) filing of the alley close partition. The vote - 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent. Item No. 14 - Continued B. Issues/Legal/Technical/Desi (1) Indicate number of people and employees involved. (2) Show north arrow and location map. C. Encineerinq Comments Show landscaping strip adjacent to 10' alley. D. Staff Recommendation Deferral until issues addressed. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant's architect explained that there would be live-in employees, bedroom space for eight, and room for four more with the "future" addition. The issue was identified as parking, since only 11 spaces were shown. It was determined that there was no ordinance sUandard, but if the patients usually drove to the site, then it would be based on one space per room. The applicant agreed to research the parking issue. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Applicant was present. There were no objectors. A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent. December 15, 1987 SUBDIVISIONS Item No.A NAME: Zion Terrace "Short -Form PRD" (Z-4924) LOCATION: 38th and Zion DEVELOPER: ENG' Greval Dev. Co., Inc. Barry Ferg-son 721 Beech Street 318 Depot NLR, AR 72114 Lonoke, AR 72086 Phone: 375-6177 Phone: 676-3305 AREA: 1.69 acres NO. OF LOTS: 16 FT. NEW STREET: 60.0 ZONING: "R-4" PROPOSED USE: Detached Single Family A. Develo mental Conce t This submittal represents an attempt to utilize an undeveloped tract of land lying within the boundaries of the City by in filling it with quality low cost homes. The developers wish to address the needs of what they consider to be a "neglected" moderate income market in this older part of town. The City has in the past eliminated sewer and drainage problems in the area. B. Proposal/Request small (1) The homesoandr600'oofonew6street on 1.69 single 1.69acres. (2) Concrete pads for parking on each lot. (3) Private park to be managed by the resident property owners association. Park to be surrounded by bicycle/jogging trail and will contain a small central spa with common hot tub facilities. An outside recreation area for kids will also be included. December 15, 1987 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design (1) Improvement of streets. (2) Submit sketch grading plan because clearing will be more than 25 percent on an acre. (3) Abandon alley right-of-way if legally bisects property. May need improvements. (4) Submit survey. (5) Submit typicals, profile on units, and additional information as required by site plan submission requirements. (6) Give more detail on park and its necessity, and maintenance and Bill of Assurance. (7) Lots 13, 14, and 16 need front yard landscaping. Submit landscaping plan with minimum requirements for each lot. (8 ) Hatched area needs to be indicated as maximum buildable area. D. Enqineerinq Comments (1) Fifty foot right-of-way instead of 40'. (2) Radius on the corner. (3) Eighteen foot pavement and curb/gutter on developer's side of street (27', 18' from back of curb). E. Staff Recommendation Reserved -until further information is received. Staff was prohibited in its review of the proposal due to inadequate information. Engineering's input is crucial due to the number and status of the rights-of-wav abutting the property. Decisions need to be made regarding whether or not all of them should be extended and developed. Staff is very supportive of the concept of infill development with moderate income homes in this area. December 15, 1987 SUBDIVISIONS _�, - ------ - No^ A .Continued Committee Review F. Subdivision �- --�—" The -applicant asked to defer this item to the Deco`-n`�e r The a Pp meeting - PLp,N ING CCM_ I++IYSSION ACTION _� 1_1-3-87 i G. - -Ynested-by the applicant was A motion for deferral as req r ayeS, 0 noes, and 1 absent. ally passed by a vote of 1 December 15, 1987 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued H. Subdivision_Committee Review Staff's recommendation on the revised plan: (1) Submit Bill of Assurance �rii�'n ind cation maintenance of park; (Z) explain phasing; (3) extend io-.s in the park laofain case Assurance future maintenance ceases - do this in R The main issue �ajtedtferreet improvements. esidentified as ofstreetimprovements The aPPli:an - i standards. He explained that or construction to rural would include 4 through 10, 14 through lnraal Phase I ts 1 through 3, 11 through 13, Phase II would include Lo and the proposa,3 nark. He was asked to: (1) closer e who e alleyte aname; (3) indicate an easement; (2. p �' provide 10' separation between driveways to te;as) c:)nc rete; ( 4 ) show utility and access e cement;bmit ( 5 �5 work out street with Engineering►- plan.