Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4917 Staff AnalysisNovember 3, 1987 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 20 NAME: Howard Street Conditional Use Permit (Z-4917) LOCATION: The West Side of Howard Street 150 Feet North of West 19th Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Albert and Alice Rhodes PRnPnRAT. To convert an existing 769+ square feet frame building to a furniture upholstery shop (no refinishing, no automobiles, one man operation) on land that is zoned "C-3." ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to a residential street (Howard Street) . 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood This site is abutted by single family to the north, duplex and single family to the south, vacant land to the east, and single family to the west. The existing structure is very neat and well maintained and is proposed as a one man operation of a furniture upholstery business. The staff feels that the proposed small scale use on a well maintained "C-3" site would be compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin Access to this site is taken from Howard Street. No paved parking currently exists. November 3, 1987 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 20 - Continued 4. Screeninq and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. 5. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed small scale limited furniture upholstery use on a well maintained "C-3" zoned site will be compatible with the surrounding area. The staff does feel, however, that off-street parking should be provided. The applicant needs to submit a revised site plan that contains two paved parking spaces. The applicant also needs to be advised that they will be required to meet City landscape requirements. 6. City Engineer Comments None. 7. Staff Recommendation Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) submit a revised site plan containing two paved off-street parking spaces; and (2) meet City landscape requirements. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with staff recommendations. There were no unresolved issues. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There were no objectors. The Commission voted 10 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent to approve the application as recommended by the staff, reviewed by the Subdivision Committee, and agreed to by the applicant.