HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4859-A Staff AnalysisDecember 1, 1987
Item No. 3 - Z-4859-A
Owner: Valentine Balsam, Jeff Moore,
Josh McHughes, and Eugene Smith
Applicant: Harold Smith
Location: 1308, 1316, 1406, 1408, and
1500 Bowman Road
Request: Rezone from "R-2" to "MF-18"
and "C-2"
Purpose: Multifamily and Commercial
Size: 10.0 acres
Existing Use: Single Family
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Office and Commercial, Zoned "R-2," "C-3,"
and PCD
South - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
East - Single Family and Commercial, Zoned "R-2" and
" C - 3 "
West - Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: (See Item A for additional
information.)
1. The proposal before the Commission is to rezone a
ten -acre site on Bowman Road from "R-2" to "MF-18" and
"C-2." In July of this year, a commercial request for
1400, and 1404 Bowman (Item A - Z-4859) was filed for
consideration, and it has been deferred two times. The
first application covered 2.4 acres, and that area is
included in the sketch for this item for purposes of
presenting a more complete picture of the issue. During
the hearing for Z-4859, several Commissioners suggested
to the owner that he try to assemble more acreage, and
this rezoning request is a result of that effort. The
issue now is to rezone five acres to "C-2' for an
unspecified commercial development and the balance of
the property to "MF-18." (The owner of 1400 and 1404
Bowman has amended his request to "C-2.") Zoning in the
area includes "R-2," "MF-12," "MF-18," "C-3," and PCD.
On the "C-3" parcel to the north, there is a
mini -storage facility which was approved through the
conditional use process. Most of the commercial zoning
has occurred within the last several years because the
area was annexed in 1985 and they have conformed to the
December 1, 1987
Item No. 3 - Continued
adopted plan. The existing land use is a mix of single
family, office, and several types of commercial
activity. Also, there are still some nonconforming
uses on both sides of Bowman Road.
2. There are a total of eight residences on the ten acres
along with several accessory structures. All the
existing development is located adjacent to Bowman Road
with the rear of the various parcels vacant.
3. Bowman is classified as minor arterial, so dedication
of additional right-of-way will be required because the
existing right-of-way is deficient.
4. Engineering has indicated that a total right-of-way of
90 feet is needed because this section of Bowman Road
will have five lanes. Street improvements an,3
dedication of right-of-way will be required.
5. There are no legal issues associated with this request.
6. There is no documented neighborhood position on the
site. The property was annexed to the City in 1985.
7. Even with the additional acreage, staff is still
opposed to a commercial reclassification at this
location. The adopted I-430 Plan identifies the
property for multifamily development, and staff feels
that the plan needs to be maintained as much as
possible. The need for additional commercial land has
not been demonstrated with this request, and the
proposed amendments to the I-430 Plan, recently
endorsed by the Planning Commission, do not recommend
any changes for the Bowman Road and Kanis Road
intersection. As has been stated, other zoning actions
in this area have conformed to the plan and that should
be reinforced by not supporting this commercial
reclassification. Other concerns include the potential
for a strip development pattern and establishing an
undesirable precedent if this "C-2" request is
granted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the "C-2" rezoning and approval
of "MF-18" for the entire site.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (12-1-87)
(Items A and No. 3, Z-4859 and Z-4859-A, were discussed
together. See Item A, Z-4859, for complete minute record.)
December 1, 1987
Item No. 3 - Continued
The applicant, Harold Smith, was present.* There were no
objectors. Mr. Smith amended the request to "MF-18" for the
entire site, approximately 10 acres. A motion was made to
recommend approval of the request as amended. The motion
passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.