Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4858 Staff AnalysisSeptember 8, 1987 Item No. A - Z-4858 Owner: Robert D. Richardson Applicant: Alvin L. Terry, Jr. Location: Battery and Wolfe at Roosevelt Rd. Request: Rezone from "R-4" to 11R-5" Purpose: Multifamily/Elderly Housing Size: 1.12 acres Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North - Single Family and Multifamily, Zoned "R-4" and "R-5" South - Single Family, Zoned "R-4" East - Single Family and Two Family, Zoned "R-4" West - School, Zoned 11R-4" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The request is to rezone the land, 1.1 acres, from 11R-4" to "R-5" to allow an elderly housing development. The applicant has indicated that the proposal is to construct 20 units in four or five detached structures. ("R-5" is a Multifamily District and permits up to 36 units per acre.) The area is primarily a mixed residential neighborhood that includes single family, duplexes, and multifamily units which are nonconforming. There are also some nonresidental uses such as a lodge, church, and a public school directly to the west. Zoning in the area is almost all "R-4," but there are some exceptions. Directly to the north of this property, there are two lots zoned "R-5," and at the intersection of Roosevelt and Summit, there are several lots zoned "C-3," and only one of those lots has a nonresidential building. Because of the property's location and the existing land use, the proposed use is appropriate if developed through a process that ensures more controls over design and density. 2. The site is vacant and made up of seven 50 -foot lots. The alley has a 20 -foot platted right-of-way but is unimproved. September 8, 1987 Item No. A - Z -Continued 3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street Plan issues associated with this request. 4. The applicant should submit a parking and access scheme to the Traffic Engineer for approval, and stormwater detention may be required on-site. 5. There are no legal issues. 6. There is no documented history or neighborhood position on the site. 7. The proposed use, elderly housing use, is a good use of the site, but an "R-5" classification does not restrict the property to that use or the number of units and that is the concern that staff has with this request. Because of this, staff does not support the "R-5" rezoning and suggests that the PRD process be utilized for the project. This would restrict the density and ensure a site plan that would be compatible with the neighborhood. "R-5" allows a high density, and with seven platted lots, that type of zoning could have a very adverse impact on the area. In addition to the density concern, this is a use in the "R-5" District that is sometimes viewed as being objectionable, especially if concentrated in one area. The proposed use is not the problem with this request, but rather the review process and the final reclassification. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the "R-5" rezoning as requested. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (July 28, 1987) Staff informed the Commission that the item needed to be deferred because of some deficiencies in the file. A motion was made to defer the request to the September 8, 1987, meeting. The motion was approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent, and 1 open position. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (September 8, 1987) Staff reported that the applicant had submitted a letter requesting that the item be withdrawn. A motion was made to withdraw the request without prejudice. The motion passed by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes, and 0 absent.