Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4855-B Staff AnalysisApril 25, 1996 ITEM A FILE N Z--48 -B NAME: TRAMMELL 5323 BASELINE RD. -- SHORT -FORM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: On the south side of Baseline Rd., approximately 0.25 mile west of Stanton Rd., -at 5323 Baseline Rd. ' DEVELOPER: Allen W. Trammell TRAMMELL & CO. 7009 Geyer Springs Rd. Little Rock, AR 72209 568-5652 AREA: 0.71 ACRES ERZ EER: Troy D. Laha ENGINEERS, INC. P. O. Box 190251 Little Rock, AR 72219-0251 565-7384 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW TREET: 0 ZONING: I-2 & R-2 'PROPOSEDUSES: Mini -Warehouse and Office PLANNING DISTRICT: Geyer Springs West (15) CENSOS TRACT: 41.08 VARTANQES RE E TED: None BACKGROUND The item was on the January 30, 1996 Planning Commission agenda as a rezoning request. The proposal, at that time, was for a rezoning of the C-3 and R-2 site to C-4. Staff recommended denial of the C-4 rezoning, but there was agreement among Commissioners and staff that a deferral would be appropriate to permit the applicant to amend his request to seek approval of a planned development in lieu of the C-4 rezoning. STATEMENT QF PROPOSAL: Proposed is a planned development of a 0.71 acre tract to include construction of a mini -warehouse facility and the conversion of the existing residential structure on the tract to an office use. The applicant proposes to construct approximately 10,000 square feet of mini -warehouse buildings, with a total of 68 rental units. The existing residential structure is proposed to be "totally remodeled" to bring it into conformance with applicable codes and to provide the amenities needed to make it attractive office space for general and professional offices. The mini - warehouse facility is proposed to be accessible only during specified hours, typically until 9:00 at night, and not on a 24- April 25, 1996 SDIVI I ITEM A(Cont.)FILE r7-4 -B Little Rock Municipal Water Works comments that on-site fire protection may be required. A water main extension would be needed to provide additional fire protection, if the fire hydrant is required. Little Rock Wastewater utility comments that the existing structure has sewer available, but that, if sewer service is required for the mini -storage units, a main extension will be retried to provide service. Arkansas Power and Light Co. commented that a 25 foot right- of-way will be required along the north side of the property bordering Baseline Rd. for possible future construction of a single or 3 phase circuit. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company approved the submittal. The Fire Department commented that there is a fire hydrant location within 500 feet of the proposed buildings. The drives should be a minimum of 20 feet in width, and should be able to support fire apparatus. D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICALZDESIGN: The Neighborhoods and Planning staff comments include: The applicant has indicated that he proposes to use the existing house for general and professional office space, or for the office and residence for the mini -warehouse manager. If a broader use choice is desired, the applicant needs to specify the types of uses he desires to include in the approval; e.g., "by right" uses as listed in the 0-3 zoning district. The term "office" will not permit use of the building for other types of uses which are normally permitted in the office zoning districts (beauty shops, sit-down restaurants, etc.). The existing house has 1086 square feet; the carport, 240 square feet, for a total of 1,326 square feet. Sec. 36-502 requires, for general business and retail sales, one parking space for each 300 feet of gross floor area; therefore, for this building, 5 spaces are required. The site plan shows a concrete area for parking, but does not show how vehicles will be accommodated in the area. The 34 foot long by 26.7 foot wide area will not accommodate 5 vehicles, with maneuvering area. 3 April 25, 1996 ITEM A n FILE 7-4 -B Commercial) uses for the area. Although the rear 92 (±) feet extends into the"MR" (Mixed Residential) area to the south, because the tract is a single tract, not taking access to the area to the south, and because land use district lines are not "fixed" lines, no conflict with the Land Use plan is seen. The proposed development, then, is in conformance with the adopted Land Use Plan. F. STAFF RE MME ATI Staff recommends approval of the planned development, subject to the applicant complying with Public Works and landscaping requirements. BDIVI ION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 22, 1996) Mac. Alan Trammell, the applicant, was present. The Neighborhoods and Planning staff presented the request and the proposed site plan. The Public Works staff person, David Scherer, presented the Public works comments, noting the need to eliminate one of the drives and to provide adequate vehicle parking and maneuvering space. The Neighborhoods and Planing staff presented the discussion outline comments, and discussed the issues of landscaping and buffering, parking requirements, and maintenance of the perimeter of the property between the mini -warehouse buildings and the property lines. Mr. Trammell indicated that the 2 foot space between the buildings and the property line would provide sufficient space for maintenance of the grounds. He explained that, at the existing residential structure, the carport would be included in the office building, and that required parking would be provided on-site. He said that the site plan would be revised, as needed. Following the discussion, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for the public hearing. STAFFUPDATE: The applicant submitted a revised site plan which addresses all Planning and Public Works staff concerns. The second drive approach off Baseline was removed; the internal driveways were re -designed to provide required off-street parking; adequate parking, to meet Ordinance requirements was provided; the landscaping requirements were provided for; land use buffers were provided; etc. Staff recommends approval of the PCD. pLANNINg COMMISSION A TI N: (APRIL 25, 1996) Staff reported that all issues had been resolved. The use issues have been clarified; the site plan has been revised to conform to 5 April 25, 1996 ITEM NO. A FILE NO.: Z-4855 NAME: TRAMMELL 5323 BASELINE RD. -- SHORT --FORM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: On the south side of Baseline Rd., approximately 0.25 mile west of Stanton Rd., at 5323 Baseline Rd. DEVELOPER: Allen W. Trammell TRAMMELL & CO. 7009 Geyer Springs Rd. Little Rock, AR 72209 568-5652 AREA: 0.71 ACRES ZONING• I-2 & R-2 PLANNING DISTRICT: CENSUS TRACT: 41.08 VARIANCES RE ESTER: BACKGROUND: ENGINEER: Troy D. Laha ENGINEERS, INC. P. O. Box 190251 Little Rock, AR 72219-0251 565-7384 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT NEW STREET: 0 PR POSED SES: Mini -Warehouse and Office Geyer Springs West (15) None The item was on the January 30, 1996 Planning Commission agenda as a rezoning request. The proposal, at that time, was for a rezoning of the C-3 and R-2 site to C-4. Staff recommended denial of the C-4 rezoning, but there was agreement among Commissioners and staff that a deferral would be appropriate to permit the applicant to amend his request to seek approval of a planned development in lieu of the C-4 rezoning. STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: Proposed is a planned development of a 0.71 acre tract to include construction of a mini -warehouse facility and the conversion of the existing residential structure on the tract to an office use. The applicant proposes to construct approximately 10,000 square feet of mini -warehouse buildings, with a total of 68 rental units. The existing residential structure is proposed to be "totally remodeled" to bring it into conformance with applicable codes and to provide the amenities needed to make it attractive office space for general and professional offices. The mini - warehouse facility is proposed to be accessible only during specified hours, typically until 9:00 at night, and not on a 24 - Aprli 25,1996 S BDIVISION ITEM NO -: A AcontFII%? N❑. Z-4855-8 hour per day basis. A security fence is to be installed:_at. the -- perimeter of the mini -warehouse area, and a security gate will be provided to control access. No on-site manager or dwelling is proposed initially, but use of the existing dwelling for these purposes may be instituted at a later date. Site lighting is to be located and designed to limit "bleed -over" onto abutting properties, and will provide security lighting on the site. Construction of the facility is proposed to be accomplished in phases, as financing permits. A. PROPOSALRE UF -ST: Planning Commission review and a recommendation of approval to the Board of Directors is requested for a planned development. B, ECISTING CONDITIONS: The site currently has a 1,086 square foot residential structure located approximately 34 feet off the Baseline Rd. right-of-way. The remainder of the tract is vacant. The existing zoning of the tract includes C-3 property (the front/north 200 feet) and R-2 property (the rear/south 91-96 feet). The C-3 portion of the tact abuts 1-2 property to the west and a PCD to the east. The rear R-2 property abuts R-2 property on the east, south and west. Across Baseline rd. to the north is C-4 and R-2 property. C. ENGINEERING IITILITY COMMENTS: The Public works comments include: A site grading plan must be submitted and an excavation permit form the City must be obtained prior to beginning any work on the site. The Traffic Engineer requests a revised site plan showing 24 foot drives and a layout with improved maneuvering space. The two access drives must be combined into one drive, preferably on the west side of the property. Drives must be asphalt, not gravel. The existing apron off Baseline Rd. must be removed and the curb and sidewalk must be reconstructed. An AHTD permit for the driveway is required. Right-of-way must be dedicated along Baseline Rd. to provide a minimum of 45 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Baseline Rd. 2 ,�april 25, 1996 SU8DIVIIaION ITEM A Can FILE NO.: Z-4$ -B Little Rock Municipal Water Works comments that on-site fire protection may be required. A water main extension would be needed to provide additional fire protection, if the fire hydrant is required. Little Rock Wastewater Utility comments that the existing structure has sewer available, but that, if sewer service is required for the mini -storage units, a main extension will be retried to provide service. Arkansas Power and Light Co. commented that a 25 foot right- of-way will be required along the north side of the property bordering Baseline Rd. -for possible future construction of a single or 3 phase circuit. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company approved the submittal. The Fire Department commented that there is a fire hydrant location within 500 feet of the proposed buildings. The drives should be a minimum of 20 feet in width, and should be able to support fire apparatus. D. I E5 LEGAL TECH I AL DE IG : The Neighborhoods and Planning staff comments include: The applicant has indicated that he proposes to use the existing house for general and professional office space, or for the office and residence for the mini -warehouse manager. If a broader use choice is desired, the applicant needs to specify the types of uses he desires to include in the approval; e.g., "by right" uses as listed in the 0-3 zoning district. The term "office" will not permit use of the building for other types of uses which are normally permitted in the office zoning districts (beauty shops, sit-down restaurants, etc.). The existing house has 1086 square feet; the carport, 240 square feet, for a total of 1,326 square feet. Sec. 36-502 requires, for general business and retail sales, one parking space for each 300 feet of gross floor area; therefore, for this building, 5 spaces are required. The site plan shows a concrete area for parking, but does not show how vehicles will be accommodated in the area. The 34 foot long by 26.7 foot wide area will not accommodate 5 vehicles, with maneuvering area. April 25; 1996 SUBDIVISION ITEM No.: A(Cont.FILE NO.: Z -4855-B The code requires, for warehouse and-storage:_uses, 5 parking spaces, plus 1 space per 2000 square fee of gross floor area, up to 50,000 SF. The storage use has 10,486 SF of area. Therefore, 10 spaces are required. Historically, in mini -storage uses, it is viewed that each storage space has its own parking area in the driveway, and this requirement is not applied strictly. As long as there are spaces provided for the office use (for those renting spaces and paying rents), parking is deemed sufficient. The Ordinance requires that the applicant submit a general schematic landscape plan. This must be prepared prior to a building permit being issued. At this time, the notation of areas to receive landscaping is sufficient. Fencing, or other approved means, is required to buffer commercial uses from residentially zoned or use areas. The blank face of a building can be an approved means of doing this. In the part of the site abutting residential zoned land, the blank wall of the building serves as the screening device. Any change in the configuration of the buildings to accommodate staff's recommendation also needs to take the need for the land use buffer requirement into consideration. The Pians Review Specialist notes: The proposed structure encroaches 12 1/2 feet into the required 14 1/2 foot wide land use buffer along the southern perimeter, and 3 feet into that portion of the eastern perimeter adjacent to the residentially zoned property. Trees and shrubs will be required within these buffer areas. Curb and gutter, or other approved landscape border, will be required to protect landscaped areas from vehicular traffic. It will be necessary to bring this development into compliance with the Landscape Ordinance. E. ANALYSIS: The Planning staff comments that the proposed development is in the Geyer Springs West zoning district, and that the adopted Land Use Plan recommends "MOC" (Mixed Office and \4 P:pri,l 25, 1996 SUDIV18IQN IT M NO.: A Cont. FILE NQ.: Z -4855-B Commercial) uses for the area. Although the rear 92 (t) feet extends into the "MR" (Mixed Residential) area to the south, because the tract is a single tract, not taking access to the area to the south, and because land use district lines are not "fixed" lines, no conflict with the Land Use plan is seen. The proposed development, then, is in conformance with the adopted Land Use Plan. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the planned development, subject to the applicant complying with Public Works and landscaping requirements. SUBDIVISION CQ MMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 22, 1996) Mr. Alan Trammell, the applicant, was present. The Neighborhoods and Planning staff presented the request and the proposed site plan. The Public Works staff person, David Scherer, presented the Public Works comments, noting the need to eliminate one of the drives and to provide adequate vehicle parking and maneuvering space. The Neighborhoods and Planing staff presented the discussion outline comments, and discussed the issues of landscaping and buffering, parking requirements, and maintenance of the perimeter of the property between the mini -warehouse buildings and the property lines. Mr. Trammell indicated that the 2 foot space between the buildings and the property line would provide sufficient space for maintenance of the grounds. He explained that, at the existing residential structure, the carport would be included in the office building, and that required parking would be provided on-site. He said that the site plan would be revised, as needed. Following the discussion, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for the public hearing. STAFF UPDATE• The applicant submitted a revised site plan which addresses all Planning and Public Works staff concerns. The second drive approach off Baseline was removed; the internal driveways were re -designed to provide required off-street parking; adequate parking, to meet Ordinance requirements was provided; the landscaping requirements were provided for; land use buffers were provided; etc. Staff recommends approval of the PCD. 5 March 14, 1996 ti ITEM O.: D FILE NO.: Z -4855-B NAME: TRAMMELL 5323 BASELINE RD. -- SHORT -FORM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: On the south side of Baseline Rd., approximately 0.25 mile west of Stanton Rd., at 5323 Baseline Rd. DEVELOPER: Allen W. Trammell TRAMMELL & CO. 7009 Geyer Springs Rd. Little Rock, AR 72209 568-5652 AREA: 0.71 ACRES ENGINEER: Troy D. Laha ENGINEERS, INC. P. 0. Box 190251 Little Rock, AR 72219-0251 565-7384 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: I-2 & R-2 PROPOSED USES: Mini -Warehouse and Office PLANNING DISTRICT: Geyer Springs West (15) CENSUS TRACT: 41.08 VARIANCES REQUESTED: None BACKGROUND: The item was on the January 30, 1996 Planning Commission agenda as a rezoning request. The proposal, at that time, was for a rezoning of the C-3 and R-2 site to C-4. Staff recommended denial of the C-4 rezoning, but there was agreement among Commissioners and staff that a deferral would be appropriate to permit the applicant to amend his request to seek approval of a planned development in lieu of the C-4 rezoning. STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: Proposed is a planned development of a 0.71 acre tract to include construction of a mini -warehouse facility and the conversion of the existing residential structure on the tract to an office use. The applicant proposes to construct approximately 10,000 square feet of mini -warehouse buildings, with a total of 68 rental units. The existing residential structure is proposed to be "totally remodeled" to bring it into conformance with applicable codes and to provide the amenities needed to make it attractive office space for general and professional offices. The mini - warehouse facility is proposed to be accessible only during specified hours, typically until 9:00 at night, and not on a 24- March 14, 1996 BDIVT IO L ITEM NQ.: D(COnt_ FILE Z-48 5-B hour per day basis. A security fence is to be installed at the perimeter of the mini -warehouse area, and a security gate will be provided to control access. No on-site manager or dwelling is proposed initially, but use of the existing dwelling for these purposes may be instituted at a later date. site lighting is to be located and designed to limit "bleed -over" onto abutting properties, and will provide security lighting on the site. Construction of the facility is proposed to be accomplished in phases, as financing permits. A. PROPOSAL RE ❑EST: Planning Commission review to the Board of Directors development. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: and a recommendation of approval is requested for a planned The site currently has a 1,086 square foot residential structure located approximately 34 feet off the Baseline Rd. right-of-way. The remainder of the tract is vacant. The existing zoning of the tract includes C-3 property (the front/north 200 feet) and R-2 property (the rear/south 91.96 feet). The C-3 portion of the tact abuts I-2 property to the west and a PCD to the east. The rear R-2 property abuts R-2 property on the east, south and west. Across Baseline rd. to the north is C-4 and R-2 property. C. ENGINEERING UTILITY COMMENTS: The Public Works comments include: A site grading plan must be submitted and an excavation permit form the City must be obtained prior to beginning any work on the site. The Traffic Engineer requests a revised site plan showing 24 foot drives and a layout with improved maneuvering space. The two access drives must be combined into one drive, preferably on the west side of the property. Drives must be asphalt, not gravel. The existing apron off Baseline Rd. must be removed and the curb and sidewalk must be reconstructed. An AHTD permit for the driveway is required. Right-of-way must be dedicated along Baseline Rd. to provide a minimum of 45 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Baseline Rd. 2 March 14, 1996 SQBDIVIS_I 1+ 4 ITEM O.: D Cont. FILE NO-: Z-4 5-B Little Rock Municipal Water Works comments that on -site --fire protection may be required. A water main extension would be needed to provide additional fire protection, if the fire hydrant is required. Little Rock Wastewater Utility comments that the existing structure has sewer available, but that, if sewer service is required for the mini -storage units, a main extension will be retried to provide service. Arkansas Power and Light Co. commented that a 25 foot right- of-way will be required along the north side of the property bordering Base -line Rd. for possible future construction of a single or 3 phase circuit. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company approved the submittal. The Fire Department commented that there is a fire hydrant location within 500 feet of the proposed buildings. The drives should be a minimum of 20 feet in width, and should be able to support fire apparatus. D. I6aUESLLEGALITECHNICAL/DESIGN: The Neighborhoods and Planning staff comments include: The applicant has indicated that he proposes to use the existing house for general and professional office space, or for the office and residence for the mini -warehouse manager. If a broader use choice is desired, the applicant needs to specify the types of uses he desires to include in the approval; e.g., "by right" uses as listed in the 0-3 zoning district. The term "office" will not permit use of the building for other types of uses which are normally permitted in the office zoning districts (beauty shops, sit-down restaurants, etc.). The existing house has 1086 square feet; the carport, 240 square feet, for a total of 1,326 square feet. Sec. 36-502 requires, for general business and retail sales, one parking space for each 300 feet of gross floor area; therefore, for this building, 5 spaces are required. The site plan shows a concrete area for parking, but does not show how vehicles will be accommodated in the area. The 34 foot long by 26.7 foot wide area Mill not accommodate 5 vehicles, with maneuvering area. 3 March 14, 1996 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO D(Cont. FILE "Q � The Code requires, for warehouse and storage uses, 5 parking spaces, plus 1 space per 2000 square fee of gross floor area, up to 50,000 SF. The storage use has 10,486 SF of area. Therefore, 10 spaces are required. Historically, in mini -storage uses, it is viewed that each storage space has its own parking area in the driveway, and this requirement is not applied strictly. As long as there are spaces provided for the office use (for those renting spaces and paying rents), parking is deemed sufficient. The Ordinance requires that the applicant submit a general schematic landscape plan. This must be prepared prior to a building permit being issued. At this time, the notation of areas to receive landscaping is sufficient. Fencing, or other approved means, is required to buffer commercial uses from residentially zoned or use areas. The blank face of a building can be an approved means of doing this. In the part of the site abutting residential zoned land, the blank wall of the building serves as the screening device. Any change in the configuration of the buildings to accommodate staff's recommendation also needs to take the need for the land use buffer requirement into consideration. The Plans Review Specialist notes: The proposed structure encroaches 12 1/2 feet into the required 14 1/2 foot wide land use buffer along the southern perimeter, and 3 feet into that portion of the eastern perimeter adjacent to the residentially zoned property. Trees and shrubs will be required within these buffer areas. Curb and gutter, or other approved landscape border, will be required to protect landscaped areas from vehicular traffic. It will be necessary to bring this development into compliance with the Landscape Ordinance. E_ ANALYSIS• The Planning staff comments that the proposed development is in the Geyer Springs West zoning district, and that the adopted Land Use Plan recommends "MOC" (Mixed Office and 4 March 14, 1996 k ITEM D Mont , ) FILE Z-4 -B Commercial) uses for the area. Although the rear 92 (t) feet extends into the "Mit" (Mixed Residential) area to the south, because the tract is a single tract, not taking access to the area to the south, and because land use district lines are not "fixed" lines, no conflict with the Land Use plan is seen. The proposed development, then, is in conformance with the adopted Land Use Plan. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIDN�_: Staff recommends approval of the planned development, subject to the applicant complying with Public works and landscaping requirements. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (FEBRUARY 22, 1996) Mr. Alan Trammell, the applicant, was present. The Neighborhoods and Planning staff presented the request and the proposed site plan. The Public Works staff person, David Scherer, presented the Public works comments, noting the need to eliminate one of the drives and to provide adequate vehicle parking and maneuvering space. The Neighborhoods and Planing staff presented the discussion outline comments, and discussed the issues of landscaping and buffering, parking requirements, and maintenance of the perimeter of the property between the mini -warehouse buildings and the property lines. Mr. Trammell indicated that the 2 foot space between the buildings and the property line would provide sufficient space for maintenance of the grounds. He explained that, at the existing residential structure, the carport would be included in the office building, and that required parking would be provided on-site. He said that the site plan would be revised, as needed. Following the discussion, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 14, 1996) Staff reported that the applicant had submitted a revised site plan, but that the revised plan did not address the issues discussed at the Subdivision committee meeting; e.g., that no front or side yard landscape strips were provided; inadequate parking and vehicle maneuvering space had been provided; one of the two driveway access points from Baseline Rd. had not been eliminated; etc. Staff reported that the applicant had amended his request to seek approval of all C-3 uses by right for the existing residential structure, plus the residential use for an office manager,' and the general and professional uses originally requested. Staff reported that the Planning staff did not object to this amended use list, since the property is currently zoned C-3. Staff noted, however, that uses may be limited by available 5 March 14, 1996 W0 y I EM D n FILE Z-4855- parking. - - parking. Staff reported that there had been no communications form area property owners concerning the issue. Staff recommended approval of the planned development, subject to staff working out the Neighborhoods and Planning and the Public works concurs on the site plan. Mr. Alan Trammell, the applicant, was present. He explained that his engineer and evidently misunderstood the concerns which needed to be addressed. He said that the revised drawing had provided the required land use buffer along the rear of the property, and that the eastern -most drive had been widened, as required by Public Works. He said that, since the two drive access points had been installed by the Highway Department when the state widened Baseline Rd., he was under the impression that they could both remain. He expressed concern about the expense, safety, and rationale for requiring the access point to be removed. He said that, in the discussion regarding landscaping at the Subdivision Committee meeting, he had understood that landscaping could be dealt with at staff level at the time a building permit were requested. Staff explained that the revised plan had, in an attempt to provide the required parking, simply shown paving in the entire front yard of the residential structure, eliminating any space along the front and side yards for the required landscaping. Staff noted that, in the original site plan, the areas set aside for landscaping were provided for, and specific landscaping requirements could be worked out at the time a building permit is requested; however, since the areas were now eliminated and included in paved areas, this deficiency must be addressed. Bob Brown, Site Plan Review Specialist, cited the landscaping requirements; that along the front of the property, the Land Use Buffer ordinance requires a 14 1/2 foot landscape buffer, with a 10 foot minimum, with transfers; the Landscape ordinance would require a minimum of a 6 foot strip. At the rear of the property, the requirement would be the same as the Baseline Rd. requirement. Along the side lot lines, a 6 foot minimum landscape strip would be required, he said. David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, explained that the City ordinance permits only one access point for each 300 feet of street frontage along arterial roadways; that, with the subject site being only 105 feet wide, the second access point would be required to be removed. He explained that, when the Highway Department widened the roadway, since the property was a residential property with two existing driveways, new aprons were provided for these two existing driveways. With the change in zoning and use, -conformance with the regulation permitting only one driveway would be enforced. 6 March 14, 1996 SDBDIVISIQN L ITEM D FILE Z-485 -B Commissioner Putnam recommended that the item be deferred, and that the applicant make needed changes, present them to the Subdivision Committee at the Committee's next meeting, and be heard by the Commission on April 25th. Addressing Mr. Trammell, Mr. Putnam indicated that Mr. Trammell might want to seek approval of a waiver of the restriction on the second drive access point. Chairperson Woods, saying that there were a number of issues to be resolved, suggested that the item be deferred. Mr. Trammell reported that he would, indeed, wish to seek a wavier of the restriction on the second driveway. Directors of Neighborhoods and Planning, Jim Lawson, suggested that the PCD site plan be approved, subject to meeting the landscaping, buffer, and parking requirements, with one driveway, then, make a recommendation on the requested wavier from the restriction on the second driveway. Commissioner Daniel echoed Commissioner Putnam and Chairperson Woods suggestion that the item be deferred. Commissioner Brandon voiced her concern that the landscape areas are not shown on the plan. Commissioner Adcock said that the presented site plan did not reflect what had been explained to her as the planned development. Mr. Trammell said that he would prefer to resolve the concerns during the process of staff review in view of a building permit, but if the Commissioner required it, he would request the suggested deferral. A motion was made and seconded to defer the hearing of the item until the April 25th. Commission meeting, with the requirement that the applicant will submit revised drawings by the March 18th. filing date and be reviewed by the Subdivision Committee on April 4th. The motion carried with the vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent, 0 abstentions, and 1 open position. 7