HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4850 Staff AnalysisNAME: Metrailer Medical Clinic "Short -form" PCD
(Z-4850)
LOCATION: 1200 & 1204 N. Harrison
NW Corner of Harrison & Evergreen
E E ER AR TE T: James A. Metrailer/Greg Peckham -
Allison, Moses, Redden
REQUEST: "R-2" Single Family to PRD
PROPOSED E: Medical Clinic
STAFF EC END Denial, due to possibility of
adverse effects to the area and departure from the land
use plan.
j2LANNING COMMIFBION N: Approval, subject to:
1.) Access restricted to Harrison Street.
2.) A limit of 3 doctors with 50 patients total per
day.
3.) Hours of operation to be from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
4.) Provision of 18 parking spaces, including two (2)
employee spaces behind the building adjacent to
the alley if necessary.
5.) A 6 -foot opaque wood fence along the alley
property line to restrict access.
6.) No access to be taken from the alley.
Reasons for Planning Commission Actio _;_
1) With the conditions, the proposed
use would not adversely affect the
area.
2) Lower intensity ogfic-e use would be
better than possible multi -family use
of the property.
3) The lot has been vacant for about 30
years, and it is not reasonable to
expect a single-family residence to be
built there.
4) The portion of that block which faces
the rear of commercial uses has been
severely affected, and office uses
might provide a good transition to
single-family uses to the west.
Staff maintained its position of opposition based on the
potential harm to the neighborhood and the conflict with the
Heights -Hillcrest Plan.
VOTE: 8 ayes, 1 no, 1 absent and 1 open
NAME:
Metrailer Medical Clinic
Short Form PCD - Z-4850
LOCATION: 1200 and 1204 N. Harrison
(NW Corner of Harrison and
Evergreen)
DEVELOPER:
James A. Metrailer
#3 Biscayne Court
Little Rock, AR 72207
Phone: 225-4195
664-1540
Greg Peckham
Allison, Moses, Redden
225 East Markham - Suite 400
Heritage East
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 375-0378
AREA: .32 acres NO. OF LOTS: 2
ZONING: 11R-2"
vunnngRr) USE: Medical Clinic
FT. NEW STREET: 0
A. Developmental Concept
(1) To provide easy access to medical care and benefit
the neighborhood, since most of the applicant's
patients are elderly and live in the area.
(2) To provide design which will incorporate
traditionally residential forms and scales in an
effort to maintain compatibility with adjacent
single family structures.
B. Existing Conditions
Single family to north and west, apartments across
street to the east, and commercial to the northeast of
this site abutting the apartments.
C. Proposal
(1) To construct a doctorl,p office of 3,200 square
feet on a vacant parcel of .32 acres.
Z-4850 - Continued
(2 ) Provision of 18 parking spaces which amount to six
per physician.
(3 ) Use of the abutting alley on the west for
secondary access.
D. Issues/Legal/Technical/Design
(1) Inappropriate land use.
(2) Noncompliance with land use plan.
E. Engineering Comments
(1) Alley improved to property line.
(2) Show handicapped parking.
F. Staff Recommendation
Denial.
Staff fears that proposed use will have deleterious
affect on single family area that may lead to
destabilization in the area. The land use plan
indicates single family for the site.
G. Subdivision Committee Review
The primary consideration was identified as the
appropriateness of the proposed use on this site in
what is generally a residential area. Staff stated a
preference for orientation of the building to the east,
if it is any use beside residentially approved. The
applicant was informed that a 60 -foot right-of-way
was needed on Evergreen, and this would interfere with
spacing for parking. He was asked to visit with his
neighbors regarding the plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: '(6-30-87)
The applicant was not present. The staff reported that a
letter requesting deferral until August 11 had been properly
filed. The Commission placed this item on the consent
agenda for deferral. The motion on the consent agenda
passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.
Z-4850 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: (7-23-87)
There was no discussion of this matter inasmuch as no one
was present to represent the proposal. Staff reported that
there had been no contact with the applicant and no further
changes recommended.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (8-11-87)
The Planning staff restated its recommendation of denial and
added that the staff position was based upon the
Heights/Hillcrest Plan that did not support nonresidential
uses off Kavanaugh Boulevard. Plus, it was felt that this
could be the forerunner of other business activity or
intrusion along Harrison Street or Evergreen. The staff
felt this was especially so inasmuch as some owners in the
Harrison block have expressed an interest in commercial
zoning.
The applicant, Dr. Metrailer, was present and offered
comments on his history in the area, plus his patients
living nearby. He addressed the staff recommendation
relative to redesign to front the building on Harrison
Street. He offered that his current operation was a
10:30 a.m. to 4 or 5 p.m. activity with 10 to 15 patients
per day.
The staff then made record notice of some 11 cards in
support of the Planned Unit Development and three cards and
one letter opposed. A brief discussion followed wherein
strip zoning was assessed as to potential follow-up on this
action. The Commission position disagreed with staff on the
possibility. Henk Koornstra then stated that additional
right-of-way for Evergreen was a requirement of the Master
Street Plan as a collector. The right-of-way needed
approximately two and a half tc five feet with at least 30
feet as measured from the centerline of the existing
right -:of -way. A discussion of the -office hours and the
number -of doctors that would operate from this facility
resulted in commitments by Dr-. Metrailer to three doctors
with 50 patients.
Z-4850 - Continued
The staff maintained its position of opposition citing the
potential deleterious impact on the neighborhood, the
conflict with the Heights -Hillcrest Plan and potential for
expansion of nonresidential use along both Evergreen and
North Harrison Street.
A lengthy discussion followed which resulted in a motion to
approve the Planned Commercial District with the following
conditions:
1. Access restricted to Harrison Street.
2. A limit of three doctors with 50 patients total per
day.
3. Hours of operation to be from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
4. Provision of 18 parking spaces, including two employee
spaces behind the building adjacent to the alley.
5. A six-foot opaque wood fence along the alley property
line.
6. No access to be taken from the alley.
The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 1 no, 1 absent,
1 open position.
0
June 30, 1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 10____________.
NAME:
Metrailer Medical Clinic
Short Form PCD - Z-4850
LOCATION• 1200 and 1204 N. Harrison
(NW Corner of Harrison and
Evergreen)
rWX7W.T.nPF.R . ARCHITECT:
James A. Metrailer Greg Peckham
#3 Biscayne Court Allison, Moses, Redden
Little Rock, AR 72207 225 East Markham - Suite 400
Phone: 225-4195 Hertage East
664-1540 Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 375-0378
AREA: .32 acres NO. OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: "R-2"
PROPOSED USE: Medical Clinic
A. Developmental Concept
(1) To provide easy access to medical care and benefit
the neighborhood, since most of the applicant's
patients are elderly and live in the area.
(2) To provide design which will incorporate
traditionally residential forms and scales in an
effort to maintain compatibility with adjacent
single family structures.
B. Existinq Conditions
Single family to north and west, apartments across
street to the east, and commercial to the northeast of
this site abutting the apartments.
C. Proposal
(1) To construct a doctor's office of 3,200 square
feet on a vacant parcel of .32 acres.
June 30, 1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 10- Continued-�___�___��_�Y
(2) Provision of 18 parking spaces which amount to six
per physician.
(3) Use of the abutting alley on the west for
secondary access.
D. Issues/Legal/Technical/Design
(1) Inappropriate land use.
(2) Noncompliance with land use plan.
E. Engineering Comments
(1) Alley improved to property line.
(2) Show handicapped parking.
F. Staff Recommendation
Denial.
Staff fears that proposed use will have deleterious
affect on single family area that may lead to
destabilization in the area. The land use plan
indicates single family for the site.
G. Subdivision Committee Review
The primary consideration was identified as the
appropriateness of the proposed use on this site in
what is generally a residential area. Staff stated a
preference for orientation of the building to the east,
if it is any use beside residentially approved. The
applicant was informed that a 60 -foot right-of-way
was needed on Evergreen, and this would interfere with
spacing for parking. He was asked to visit with his
neighbors regarding the plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (6-30-87)
The applicant was not present. The staff reported that a
letter requesting deferral until August 11 had been properly
filed. The Commission placed this item on the consent
agenda for deferral. The motion on the consent agenda
passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.