HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4806 Staff Analysis1. Name: Davidson Properties "Short -Form" PRD (Z-4806)
2. Location: West end of McGovern Drive and Breckenridge
Addition
3. Develo er/En ineer: Davidson Properties/Manes, Castin,
Massey, and McGetrick
4. Existing Status: Undeveloped 500' of interstate
frontage
5. Proposed Use: Singel Family, 0 Lot Line
6. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the PUD, subject
to: 1 completing the plat and plan content
requirements; (2) dedicating the floodway; (3)
providing a turnaround for McGovern; (4) minimum of
20-foot drive; (5) water and fire plan on-site, and (6)
Public Works approval.
7. Planning Commission Action: Several residents of the
neighborhood were In attendance. One of their major
concerns was the paved access and utility easement on
the east of the development, the size of the lots, and
loss of buffer from the interstate.
A motion for approval was made and passed, subject to:
(1) a minimum square footage of 1700; (2) construction
of fence when streets are built; (3) the drive to end
at the northwest corner of Lot 8. The vote 10 ayes, 0
noes, 1 absent, and 1 abstention (Massie).
NAME-:
Davidson Properties Planned
Residential District
(Short Form)
LOCATION: At the west end of McGovern
Drive and Breckenridge Addition
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Davidson Properties Manes, Castin, Massie and McGetrick
P.O. Box 7347 2501 Willow Street
Little Rock, AR 72217 North Little Rock, AR
Telephone: 227-5357 Telephone: 758-1360
AREA: 3 Acres N0. OF LOTS: 10 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: "R-2" Single Family
PROPOSED USE: Residential in a Planned Unit Development
format for zero lot line
PLANNING DISTRICT: 2
CENSUS TRACT: 22.05
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
None.
A. Existing Conditions
The property consists of a wooded knoll lying at the
end of a residential street. The property rises
approximately 50' in elevation out of the Grassy Flat
Creek. The project site has over 500' of Interstate
430 frontage and an apartment complex on the north.
Z-4806 - Continued
The Natural Resources Complex, including the Game and
Fish Commission lies to the south.
B. de-, velopment_Proposal
To construct eight or nine units on a zero lot line lot
format. The proposal utilizes a private access
easement system to serve each of the several units.
The homes appear to be in the 1400 to 1600 square foot
range, including a garage attached. A significant
portion of the tract (Lot 10) will be dedicated as
£loodway. Lot 9 does not propose a specific building
site but that it be built upon if and when a design
suitable to the terrain is developed. The lot sizes
are a minimum of 4,730 square feet with a pro rata
share of the common space and drives bringing the
average to +12,400 square feet. This figure does not
include Lot -10 in the computation.
C. EnEneerin Comments
All driveway widths and locations shall be approved by
the Traffic Engineer. It is preferred to have a 20'
driveway if two-lane traffic is allowed behind the
buildings. 5tormwater detention shall be shown
on-site. Attach calculations to the drawings.
D• Analysis
The staff review has developed only minor issues for
discussion, except that the plat and plan need more
quantitative data. The area of Lot 10 will be
dedicated per City Board policy for floodway. The
staff reaction to Lot 9 is that free form siting of a
house without specifying on this plan is appropriate so
long as one building site is the limit. The Fire
Department has requested a minimum drive width of 20'
throughout, and as a follow-up to that a requirement
for a termination device on McGovern Drive. This is
especially important if this developer plans a gate or
controlled entry to the project. The only other points
for discussion are compatibility with adjacent
conventional lots at 7,000 square feet plus screening
along the south boundary line, resolving parks plan
requirement for Priority Two open space and an on-site
fire line and hydrant plan.
Z-4806 - Continued
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the Planned Unit Development subject to:
(1) completing the plat and plan content requirements,
(2) dedicate the floodway, (3) provide a turnaround for
McGovern, (4) minimum 20' drives
Plan on-site, (6) public Works a� (5) water and fire
approval.
F• Subdivision Committee Review
The applicant agreed to adhere to staff's comments with
the exception of the turnaround. He felt also that a
20' service drive to the back of the lot was not
necessary since it won't be used by fire, garbage, etc.
He requested a 16' or 18' pavement width. He felt that
the area in the rear could be serviced by a fire hose.
Utilities - Additional sewer easements required across
Lot 10. "Contact LRWU.
water main extension plus on-site protection required.
PLANNI� NGCOMMISSION ACTION:
The Applicant was present. There were several concerned
residents from the neighborhood in attendance. Some of
those present expressed concerns about the proposed
development. Mr. Steve Young,
an adjacent property owner,
objected to density and traffic
similar objections, inaddition to MS. Rita Hart xphessed
access/utility easement which would abut her property.
Mr. Dean Roberts of 17 Warwick felt that the project would
negatively impact their property values, due to a loss of
the buffer between Breckenridge and the Interstate
especially concerned about: . He was
{lj the
east side of the paved eastment on the
kept green), (2) maintenancevofothene be
privacy that
hit
minimization of tree removal. and(3))
Z-4806 - Continued
Mr. Randy Davidson, the Applicant, explained that there
would be a 6' opaque wooden fence around the perimeter of
the property with an exception of the south side; and there
would be a property -owners association for maintenance, and
that the houses would be 1,700 to 1,900 square feet and sell
for $105,000. He had no current plans to build on Lot 9
which has difficult terrain. The residents were assured
that any development other than single family on this lot
would mean renotification of property -owners. Finally, a
motion for approval of the amended application was made and
passed, subject to: (1) a minimum of 1,700 square feet
house size, (2) the construction of the fence when the
streets are built, (3) a drive ending at the northwest
corner of Lot 8, (4) Fire Department approval. The vote 10
ayes, 0 noes, and 1 abstention (Massie).