HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4708 Staff AnalysisOctober 28, 1986
Item No. B - Z-4708
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
John D. Crockett
Same
Chicot Road at the MOPAC Railroad
Tracks
Rezone from "R-2" to "I-2"
Auto Sales Lot
1.0 Acres
Existing Use: Auto Sales Lot
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "I-2"
South - Commercial and Railroad Tracks, Zoned "R-2"
and "I-2"
East --- Railroad Tracks, Zoned "R-2"
West -- Vacant, -Zoned "I-2"
STAFF ANALYSIS
The request is to rezone the site to "I-2" for an auto sales
lot. The lot is currently in operation and the use is
nonconforming. The property is located on the east side of
Chicot Road between I-30 and Baseline Road in an area that
is heavily zoned for industrial uses, especially north of
the MOPAC tracks. To the south, there is a mix of "R-2,"
"0-3" and "C-3" with a well established single family
neighborhood directly south of the railroad tracks. The
area on the north side is primarily zoned "I-2" with several
"R-2" tracts, but there are no residential uses on those
11R-2" parcels: The property in question abuts "I-2" on the
north and south with the railroad tracks on the east side.
Across Chicot Road to the west, there is also 11I-2" zoning.
Because of the existing zoning pattern, the proposed
rezoning will not impact any of the surrounding property.
There is a potential Master Street Plan issue and that is
the future extension of University Avenue to the south,
adjacent to the railroad tracks. The plan shows the
proposed roadway to be extended and connect with Chicot Road
at some point between the creek and tracks.
October 28, 1986
Item No. B - Continued
Engineering recommends that the property should not be
rezoned from its "R-2" status. This particular piece of
property will be purchased by the City of Little Rock for
the Chicot Road interchange connection. The Engineering
staff has contacted persons with knowledge of this site in
the past and have tentatively entered into talks to purchase
the property at various times.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff will present a recommendation at the public hearing
after reviewing the Master Street Plan issue with
Engineering.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (8-26-86)
The applicant, John D. Crockett, was present. There were no
objectors. Staff recommended that the "I-2"' request be
denied. Mr. Crockett spoke and said that he had purchased
the property to be leased out for an auto sales lot. He
went on to say that he knew some street plans existed, but
he didn't think that those plans would impact his property.
There was a long discussion about the master street plan
issue and the acquisition question. After some additional
comments,- a motion was to defer the item for 60 days and to
stop any further enforcement action during that time period.
Mr. Crockett agreed to the deferral. The motion was
approved by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. (This
action was taken to give the City adequate time to pursue
the acquisition of the property.)
PLANNING _COMMISSION ACTION: (10-28-86)
The applicant was pres_ent.___Th-ere were no objectors. A
motion was made to recommend approval of the "I-2" request
as filed. The motion passed by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes
and 0 absent. (Staff informed the Commission that the
rezoning would not be forwarded to the Board of Directors
until the City's purchase of the property had been
finalized).