Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4703 Staff Analysis4 ,ugust 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS tem No. 12 NAME: LOCATION: Express Properties "Short -Form PCD" (Z-4703) John Barrow at Labet'te, west side A. Development Ob'ective To provide a postal type facility with inside loading in a location that is the closet possible location to the computer generated centroid of the roots of Federal Express. B. Proposal (1) Building ........................ 3700 square feet 2.3 acres (2) Land area ....................... 89 spaces (3) Parking (on-site)..••••••••... . .36 acres (4) Building to land ratio .......... Fee symbol (5) Title after development......... (6) Use mixed - Office area......... 5000 square feet - sort/loading area... 3200 square feet (7) Perimeter treatment - conformance to the Landscape Ordinance C. Engineerinq Comments (1) The Traffic Engineer requires that the Parkview High School access road be shown on this plat in order to determine where the locations of the access points onto Barrow Road will be required. (2) The Traffic Engineer stated that one access point only is allowed on Barrow Road. The northern driveway immediately adjacent to Labette should be deleted from the plan. D. Analysis The major issue concerns land use. The applicant has indicated that panel type trucks will serve the facility, with only one tractor trailer rig entering the property daily. Staff views the proposal as similar to an UPS facility, which is considered a light industrial use, thus is August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 12 NAME: LOCATION: A. B. C. Development Objective Express Properties "Short -Form PCD" (Z-4703) John Barrow at Labette, west side To provide a postal type facility with inside loading in a location that is the closet possible location to the computer generated centroid of the roots of Federal Express. Proposal (1) Building ........................ (2) Land area ....................... (3) Parking (on-site) ............... (4) Building to land ratio.......... (5) Title after development......... (6) Use mixed - Office area......... - sort/loading area... (7) Perimeter treatment - conformance Ordinance Engineering Comments 3700 square feet 2.3 acres 89 spaces .36 acres Fee symbol 5000 square feet 3200 square feet to the Landscape (1) The Traffic Engineer requires that the Parkview High School access road be shown on this plat in order to determine where the locations of the access points onto Barrow Road will be required. (2) The Traffic Engineer stated that one access point only is allowed on Barrow Road. The northern driveway immediately adjacent to Labette should be deleted from the plan. D. Analysis The major issue concerns land use. The applicant has indicated that panel type trucks will serve the facility, with only one tractor trailer rig entering the property daily. Staff views the proposal as similar to an UPS facility, which is considered a light industrial use, thus is August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 12 - Continued inappropriate for the area. The Boyle Park Plan indicates that the area should be developed as multifamily. The proposed use will adversely affect what is now a mixed residential area. E. Staff Recommendation Denial as filed. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The main issued was identified as the proposed use. During discussion of the site plan, it was pointed out that the wash building should not be located adjacent to the abutting property zoned for residential use. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: A motion for withdrawal was made and passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. ugu'st 12, 1986 JBDIVISIONS em No. 12 - Continued inappropriate for the area. The Boyle Park Plan indicates that the area should be developed as multifamily. The proposed use will adversely affect what is now a mixed residential area. E. Staff Recommendation Denial as filed. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The main issued was identified as the proposed use. During discussion of the site plan, it was Pointed tfithe wash building should not be located adjacent out to thetabutting property zoned for residential use. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: A motion for withdrawal was made and passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.