Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4676-A Staff AnalysisSeptember 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 10 NAME: Baseline Square Site Plan 15. t9cu S Review (Z -4676 - LOCATION: ZThe southeast corner Of�Hilaro ings Road and Baseline Road OWNER APPLICANT: nn T.a.,ra AD—t- vkx- PROPOSAL: To construct a total of 113,564 square feet (three buildings) of commercial space and 446 parking spaces on 9.35 acres of land that is zoned "C-2." ANALYSIS: The staff has reservations about the site plan for this project. It is deficient in many ways. The site plan needs to be revised to show a 40 feet front yard landscaped area (no parking allowed,Hilaro Springs Road). In addition, the site plan should indicate landscape and screening on the south and east to protect the adjacent single family areas. The applicant should construct a berm with intermittent cuts for drainage, a 6 feet opaque screening fence, and plant trees on 40 feet centers adjacent to the single family areas located on the south and the east. Finally, a number of additional site plan revisions will be required in accordance with the City Engineering Comments as listed below. CITY ENGINEERING COMMENTS: (1) Too many driveways - post signage on one entrance on each street indicating service vehicles only; (2) dedicate a right-of-way which totals 45 feet from the centerline on both Baseline Road and Hilaro Springs Road and construct improvements to both roads* (3) stormwater detention required; (4) redesign all driveways to be at 900 intersections and get the approval of the City Traffic Engineer; (5) relocate or redesign the southeast corner of the building L.L. 2 so that truck traffic can make the September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 10 - Continued turn; (6) stacking space and pick-up window location needed; and (7) extend the curb return from Baseline Road to the south building wall of Building R2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff reserves its recommendation until the applicant has submitted a revised site plan as outlined in its analysis and City Engineering Comments numbered 1-7. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The Committee felt that this application should be deferred 30 days due to the deficiencies in the site plan. The applicant was given until September 2, at 5 p.m., to submit a revised site plan that met staff recommendations and Ordinance requirements or be deferred until the October 14, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There were no objectors. The staff stated that the applicant had submitted a revised site plan which corrected its earlier deficiencies except for a 40' landscape buffer (no parking allowed) on Hilaro Springs Road that was not shown. The staff stated that their interpretation of the Ordinance wa that a 40' landscape buffer was required on both Hilaro Springs and Baseline Road. The staff also dropped its request for a berm on the south and east property lines. Finally, the staff stated that they supported the site plan if 40' landscape buffers were shown on both Hilaro Springs and Baseline Roads and explained that the applicant could file with the Board of Adjustment for a hardship on the Hilaro Springs Road buffer. The Commission voted 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent to approve the application as recommended by the staff. September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 10 NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT; Baseline Square Site Plan Review (Z -4676-A) The southeast corner of Hilaro Springs Road and Baseline Road Professional Land/Bob Moore PROPOSAL: To construct a total of 113,564 square feet (three buildings) of commercial space and 446 parking spaces on 9. 35 acres of land that is zoned "C-2. to ANALYSIS: The staff has reservations about the site plan for this project. It is deficient in many ways. The site plan needs to be revised to show a 40 feet front yard landscaped area (no parking allowed/Hilaro Springs Road). In addition, the site plan should indicate landscape and screening on the south and east to protect the adjacent single family areas. The applicant should construct a berm with intermittent cuts for drainage, a 6 feet opaque screening fence, and plant trees on 40 feet center's adjacent to the single family areas located on the south and the east. Finally, a number of additional site plan revisions will be required in accordance with the City Engineering Comments as listed below. CITY ENGINEERING COMMENTS: (1) Too many driveways - post signage on one entrance on each street indicating service vehicles only; right-of-way which totals 45 feet from the centerline lonte a both Baseline Road and Hilaro Springs Road and construct improvements to both roads; (3) stormwater detention required; (4) redesign all driveways to be at 900 intersections and get the approval of the City Traffic Engineer; (5) relocate or redesign the southeast corner of the building L.L. 2 so that truck traffic can make the September 9, 1966 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 10 -- Continued turn; (6) stacking space and1ck-u windw and (7) extend the curb return frompBasellinelRoadlto theded; south building wall of Building R2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff reserves its recommendation until the applicant has submitted a revised site plan as outlined in its analysis and City Engineering Comments numbered 1-7. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The Committee felt that this application should be deferred 30 days due to the deficiencies in the site plan. The applicant was given until September 2, at 5 p.m., to submit a revised site plan that met staff recommendations and Ordinance requirements or be deferred until the October 14, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There were no objectors. staff stated that the applicant had submitted a revisedhSite plan which corrected its earlier deficiencies except for a 40' landscape buffer (no parking allowed) on Hilaro Springs Road that was not shown. The staff stated that their interpretation of the Ordinance wa tho-t a 40' landscape buffer was required on both Hilaro Springs and Baseline Road. The staff also dropped its request for a berm on the south and east property lines. Finally, the staff state that they supported the site plan if 40' landscape buffers were shown on both Hilaro Springs and Baseline Roads and explained that the applicant could file with Adjustment for a hardship on the Hilaro the Board of Springs Road buffer. The Commission voted 8 ayes, 0 approve the application as recommended by°the astaffabsent to