Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4663-A Staff AnalysisAugust 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H NAME: LOCATION: DEVELOPER: Kanis Road Shopping Center "Long -Form PCD" (Z -4663-A) North Side of Kanis, 1500' West of Bowman Road ARCHITECT: Investment Dev. Concepts Bozeman, Wooldridge & Assoc. 320 Executive Court 320 Executive Ct., Suite 301 Suite 301 Little Rock, AR 72205 Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: 227-9490 Phone: 227-9490 AREA: 7.05 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW ST.: ZONING: PROPOSED USES: Shopping Center A. Developmental Concept (1) To develop a site to protect the privacy of the adjoining neighbors. (2) To develop a nicely designed center that will have a positive impact on the neighborhood, and provide the residents with needed shopping facilities. B. Development Proposal (1) The construction of a one-story front arcade commercial shopping center. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued (2) Quantitative Data Sq. Ft. Acreage Lot Size 307,098 7.05 Building Coverage - Leasable 63,657 1.46 Arcade (covered walks) 5,744 0.13 Paved Area 134,752 3.09 Landscaped Area 102,945 2.37 Total Parking Spaces - 242 C. Analysis The applicant has been asked to renotify the neighborhood, submit a grading plan, provide stormwater detention volume calculations, and an 80' right-of-way on Kanis Road. Sidewalks are required. The entrance needs to be redesigned to 18' to 20' and the landscaping plan approved for year round quality of screening. There should be low level lighting directed toward the pavement. Please provide information on the percentage of food sales - grocery or restaurant. Finally, rear building or roofing treatment may be provided by use of a Mansard roof that hangs down 3" or 4" and hides air and heating equipment. D. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to resolving issues raised and modifying the site plan to add those solutions plus location of dumpster sites, provision of notice to neighborhood and location of on-site fire service system. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: (6-26-86) The discussion on this item centered on those items raised by staff and Water Works. The applicant was instructed to review options on location of dumpsters, provide information on the hillside cut and the rear drive. This information should be prepared for presentation to the Commission on the 8th. Wastewater reports that a main extension is required. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (7-8-86) The Planning Commission was advised by staff that the applicant had mailed notices with an error in the date of hearing. The Commission recommended that deferrral until August 12, 1986, is in order. A motion to defer was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (7-31-86) There was no further review of the item. WATER WORKS - On-site fire protection is required plus a pro rata charge of $12 per feet. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant, Mr. Ralph Boseman, was present. He reported that he had submitted the requested contour and water retaining studies. He explained that they were short of the landscaping plan which would be provided before the City Board meeting. Ms. Virginia Valmar of 117 Point West Circle, spoke for the neighborhood. She stated their alarm at the prospect of residential property in the nieghborhood between Kanis and Point West being sold and rezoned in the future; even though this proposal was already zoned commercial. She submitted a petition of several names expressing this concern. The property is on the north side of Kanis and is currently for sale. Ms. Kay Kelly of 17 Woodhill Drive, also spoke. She pointed out that they could have opposed this rezoning, and did initially, until they took the time to speak with the applicant and express their concerns about buffering the area adjacent to Point West. She felt that he had been very cooperative in providing the wall and trees that they had August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued requested. She felt that -they will vehemently oppose any other` rezonings of single family or -multifamily in the area. They stated that they were very pleased with the Applicant and hoped he would continue to be a good neighbor and provide a commercial center that wouldn't reduce the quality of life for his neighbors in the adjacent community. They stated support for the shopping center only beca�ise of their belief that a unified, tastefully designed development through the PUD process would be superior -to p4tchwork development. A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H NAME: Kanis Road Shopping Center "Long -Form PCD" (Z -4663-A) LOCATION: North Side of Kanis, 1500' West of Bowman Road DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: Investment Dev. Concepts Bozeman, Wooldridge & Assoc. 320 Executive Court 320 Executive Ct., Suite 301 Suite 301 Little Rock, AR 72205 Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: 227-9490 Phone: 227-9490 AREA: 7.05 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW ST.: ZONING: PROPOSED USES: Shopping Center A. Developmental Concept (1) To develop a site to protect the privacy of the adjoining neighbors. (2) To develop a nicely designed center that will have a positive impact on the neighborhood, and provide the residents with needed shopping facilities. B. Development Proposal (1) The construction of a one-story front arcade commercial shopping center. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued (2) Quantitative Data Sq. Ft. Acreage Lot Size 307,098 7.05 Building Coverage - Leasable 63,657 1.46 Arcade (covered walks) 5,744 0.13 Paved Area 134,752 3.09 Landscaped Area 102,945 2.37 Total Parking Spaces - 242 C. Analysis The applicant has been asked to renotify the neighborhood, submit a grading plan, provide stormwater detention volume calculations, and an 80' -right-of-way, on Kanis Road. Sidewalks are required. The entrance needs to be redesigned to 18' to 20' and the landscaping plan approved for year round quality of screening. There should be low level lighting directed toward the pavement. Please provide information on the percentage -of food sales - grocery or restaurant. Finally, rear building or roofing treatment may be provided by use of a Mansard roof that hangs down 3" or 4" and hides air and heating equipment. D. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to resolving issues raised and modifying the site plan to add those solutions plus location of dumpster sites, provision of notice to neighborhood and location of on-site fire service system. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: (6-26-86) The discussion on this item centered on those items raised by staff and Water Works. The applicant was instructed to review options on location of dumpsters, provide information on the hillside cut -and the rear drive. This information should be prepared for presentation to the Commission on the 8th. Wastewater reports that a main extension is required. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (7-8-86) The Planning Commission was advised by staff that the applicant had mailed notices with an error in the date of hearing. The Commission recommended that deferrral until August 12, 1986, is in order. A motion to defer was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (7-31-86) There was no further review of the item. WATER WORKS - On-site fire protection is required plus a pro rata charge of $12 per feet. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant, Mr. Ralph Boseman, was present. He reported that he had submitted the requested contour and water retaining studies. He explained that they were short of the landscaping plan which would be provided before the City Board meeting. Ms. Virginia Valmar of 117 Point West Circle, spoke for the neighborhood. She stated their alarm at the prospect of residential property in the nieghborhood between Kanis and Point West being sold and rezoned in the future; even though this proposal was already zoned commercial. She submitted a petition of several names expressing this concern. The property is on the north side of Kanis and is currently for sale. Ms. Kay Kelly of 17 Woodhill Drive, also spoke. She pointed out that they could have opposed this rezoning, and did initially, until they took the time to speak with the applicant and express their concerns about buffering the area adjacent to Point West. She felt that he had been very cooperative in providing the wall and trees that they had August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued requested. She felt that they will vehemently oppose any other rezonings of single family or multifamily in the area. They stated that they were very pleased with the Applicant and hoped he would continue to be a good neighbor and provide a commercial center that wouldn't reduce the quality of life for his neighbors in the adjacent community. They stated support for the shopping center only because of their belief that a unified, tastefully designed development through the PUD process would be superior to patchwork development. A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H NAME: Kanis Road Shopping Center "Long -Form PCD" (Z -4663-A) LOCATION: North Side of Kanis, 1500' West of Bowman Road DEVELOPER: ARruTmFrm. Investment Dev. Concepts Bozeman, Wooldridge & Assoc. 320 Executive Court 320 Executive Ct., Suite 301 Suite 301 Little Rock, AR 72205 Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: 227-9490 Phone: 227-9490 AREA: 7.05 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW ST.: ZONING: PRnpn.qF.n TTRT.'C . Shopping Center A. Developmental Concept (1) To develop a site to protect the privacy of the adjoining neighbors. (2) To develop a nicely designed center that will have a positive impact on the neighborhood, and provide the residents with needed shopping facilities. B. Development Proposal (1) The construction of a one-story front arcade commercial shopping center. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued (2) Quantitative Data Total Parking Spaces - 242 C. Analysis The applicant has been asked to renotify the neighborhood, submit a grading plan, provide stormwater detention volume calculations, and an 801'right-of-way on Kanis Road. Sidewalks are required. The entrance needs to be redesigned to 18' to 20' and the landscaping plan approved for year round quality of screening. There should be low level lighting directed toward the pavement. Please provide information on the percentage -of food sales - grocery or restaurant. Finally, rear building or roofing treatment may be provided by use of a Mansard roof that hangs down 3" or 4" and hides air and heating equipment. D. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to resolving issues raised and modifying the site plan to add those solutions plus location of dumpster sites, provision of notice to neighborhood and location of on-site fire service system. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: (6-26-86) The discussion on this item centered on those items raised by staff and Water Works. The applicant was instructed to review options on location of dumpsters, provide information on the hillside cut -and the rear drive. This information should be prepared for presentation to the Commission on the 8th. Wastewater reports that a main extension is required. Sq. Ft. Acreage Lot Size 307,098 7.05 Building Coverage - Leasable 63,657 1.46 Arcade (covered walks) 5,744 0.13 Paved Area 134,752 3.09 Landscaped Area 102,945 2.37 Total Parking Spaces - 242 C. Analysis The applicant has been asked to renotify the neighborhood, submit a grading plan, provide stormwater detention volume calculations, and an 801'right-of-way on Kanis Road. Sidewalks are required. The entrance needs to be redesigned to 18' to 20' and the landscaping plan approved for year round quality of screening. There should be low level lighting directed toward the pavement. Please provide information on the percentage -of food sales - grocery or restaurant. Finally, rear building or roofing treatment may be provided by use of a Mansard roof that hangs down 3" or 4" and hides air and heating equipment. D. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to resolving issues raised and modifying the site plan to add those solutions plus location of dumpster sites, provision of notice to neighborhood and location of on-site fire service system. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION: (6-26-86) The discussion on this item centered on those items raised by staff and Water Works. The applicant was instructed to review options on location of dumpsters, provide information on the hillside cut -and the rear drive. This information should be prepared for presentation to the Commission on the 8th. Wastewater reports that a main extension is required. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (7-8-86) The Planning Commission was advised by staff that the applicant had mailed notices with an error in the date of hearing. The Commission recommended that deferrral until August 12, 1986, is in order. A motion to defer was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (7-31-86) There was no further review of the item. WATER WORKS - On-site fire protection is required plus a pro rata charge of $12 per feet. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant, Mr. Ralph Boseman, was present. He reported that he had submitted the requested contour and water retaining studies. He explained that they were short of the landscaping plan which would be provided before the City Board meeting. Ms. Virginia Valmar of 117 Point West Circle, spoke for the neighborhood. She stated their alarm at the prospect of residential property in the nieghborhood between Kanis and Point West being sold and rezoned in the future; even though this proposal was already zoned commercial. She submitted a petition of several names expressing this concern. The property is on the north side of Kanis and is currently for sale. Ms. Kay Kelly of 17 Woodhill Drive, also spoke. She pointed out that they could have opposed this rezoning, and did initially, until they took the time to speak with the applicant and express their concerns about buffering the area adjacent to Point West. She felt that he had been very cooperative in providing the wall and trees that they had August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. H - Continued requested. She felt that they will vehemently oppose any other rezonings of single family or multifamily in the area. They stated that they were very pleased with the Applicant and hoped he would continue to be a good neighbor and provide a commercial center that wouldn't reduce the quality of life for his neighbors in the adjacent community. They stated support for the shopping center only because of their belief that a unified, tastefully designed development through the PUD process would be superior to patchwork development. A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.