HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4550-C Staff AnalysisOctober 5, 1993
_+.TEM NO.: FILE NO.: Z -4550-C
NAME: FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH NAPA VALLEY DRIVE PARKING LOT -
SITE PLAN REVIEW
OCATION: The east side of Napa Valley Drive, approximately
0.1 mile south of Hinson Road.
:t?EVELQPER : ENGINEER:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH Pat McGetrick
C/o Bud Finley MCGETRICK ENGINEERING
650 S. Shackleford Rd., 11225 Huron Lane,
Suite 231 Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72211 Little Rock, AR 72211
224-3353 223-9900
AREA: 0.995 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT, NEW STREET: 133.4
ZONING: 0-2
PLANNING DISTRICT: 2
CENSUS TRACT: 22.05
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
PROPOSED USES: Church parking
None
The applicant, Fellowship Bible
of additional parking facilities
parking on its site across Napa
existing residential structure 1
guest house. This site is propo
to the east for which Site Plan
conducted and approved. A 2-sto
parking war reviewed and approve
A. PROPOSAW REQUEST:
Church, proposes the construction
on this lot to supplement
Valley Drive, and to utilize the
ocated on the lot as a Church
sed to be combined with the site
review has previously been
ry building with associated
d on that site.
The applicant requests Site Plan review for a lot which
abuts and is south of the Terry Branch Library on Napa
Valley Drive. This lot is proposed to be utilized for
church parking, with the existing 2 -story residence located
on the property to be utilized for church guest housing.
This lot is proposed to be combined with the site to the
east on which a site plan review was previously conducted
and which involves a 2 -story church offices and classroom
building and associated parking. Improvements to Napa
Valley Drive are proposed. No variances are requested.
October 5, 1993
5L!BDIVISIQN
ITEM NO.: (Continm FILE NO.: Z-4550-C
B. EXISTING CONDITI
The site is zoned 0-2, with 0-2 property to the east and
north. The property to the south is zoned R-2, with a PRD
located at the south-east corner of the tract. Across Napa
Valley Drive is the applicant's church facility located in
an R-2 zone. The site is wooded and a 2 -story residence is
located about mid -way back on the lot. The ground generally
falls about 5 feet from north to south, with a 5-7 foot rise
from west to east.
ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENT
Engineering comments that the driveway access is to be
restricted to right turn out only. Construction of an
island on the driveway as designed by Traffic Engineering is
to be accomplished. The Detention and Excavation ordinances
are applicable.
Water Works reports that the proposed fire hydrant must be
accessible to the Fire Department and within 8 feet of a
curb that will not be blocked by a parked car. A pro -rata
charge of $2.50 per foot applies for connections off of Napa
Valley Drive.
Wastewater Utility reports that the present building on the
site is on a septic tank and will have to be connected to
sewer. Sewer is available, but the sewer main serving the
Library is a private main and cannot be tied onto.
The Fire Department commended that an additional fire
hydrant will be required for the proposed development.
Site Plan Review reports that the west landscape buffer
needs to be increased to 32 feet in depth.
APDL will require an easement along the south and east
property line.
Southwestern Bell approved the submittal without comment.
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DEIGN:
The site represented by this item was a recently acquired
tract, and the site plan review previously conducted on the
main portion of the tract to the east had, at the hearing,
also included the tract represented by this application.
However, the added tract was not included when the
application was filed and the legal ad published. This
tract, then, is to be included with the remaining primary
site to the east. Rather than have the site plan review
2
October 5, 1993
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 9 Continued FILL NO.: Z -4550-C
include the entire tract, necessitating a review of the
major portion of the site a second month in a review, the
current application included only the additional site.
E. ANALYSIS•
There are no major deficiencies noted, and the applicant has
indicated that all concerns will be addressed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the application.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:
(September 16, 1993)
Representatives of the applicant were present. The comments
contained in the discussion outline were presented by the staff.
Since the Committee had seen the site plan previously, there was
little discussion, and the Committee forwarded the request to the
Commission for final resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(OCTOBER 5, 1993)
The item was included on the consent agenda for approval and
was passed by the Planning Commission with the vote of 8 ayes,
no nays, 2 absent, no abstentions, and 1 open position.
3
,October 5, 1993
ITEM NO.: 9 FILE _NQ • Z -45.51=C
NAME: FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH NAPA VALLEY DRIVE PARKING LOT -
SITE PLAN REVIEW
LOCATION: The east side of Napa Valley Drive, approximately
0.1 mile south of Hinson Road.
DEVELQPER:
ENGINEER:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH Pat McGetrick
C/o Bud Finley MCGETRICK ENGINEERING
650 S. Shackleford Rd., 11225 Huron Lane,
Suite 231 Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72211 Little Rock, AR 72211
224-3353 223-9900
AREA: 0.995 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT, NEW STREET: 133.4
ZONING: 0-2 PROPOSED USES: Church parking
PLANNING DISTRICT: 2
_QEN,5US TRACT: 22.05
VARIANCES REDUE$TED: None
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant, Fellowship Bible Church, proposes the construction
of additional parking facilities on this lot to supplement
parking on its site across Napa Valley Drive, and to utilize the
existing residential structure located on the lot as a Church
guest house. This site is proposed to be combined with the site
to the east for which Site Plan review has previously been
conducted and approved. A 2 -story building with associated
parking war reviewed and approved on that site.
A. PROPOSAL(REQUEST:
The applicant requests Site Plan review for a lot which
abuts and is south of the Terry Branch Library on Napa
Valley Drive. This lot is proposed to be utilized for
church parking, with the existing 2 -story residence located
on the property to be utilized for church guest housing.
This lot is proposed to be combined with the site to the
east on which a site plan review was previously conducted
and which involves a 2 -story church offices and classroom
building and associated parking. Improvements to Napa
Valley Drive are proposed. No variances are requested.
>October 5, 1993
allBDIVISION
ITEM in FILE -4 -
B. EXISTING CONDI
The site is zoned 0-2, with 0-2 property to the east and
north. The property to the south is zoned R-2, with a PRD
located at the south-east corner of the tract. Across Napa
Valley Drive is the applicant's church facility located in
an R-2 zone. The site is wooded and a 2 -story residence is
located about mid -way back on the lot. The ground generally
falls about 5 feet from north to south, with a 5-7 foot rise
from west to east.
ENGINEERING1UTILITY COMMENT
Engineering comments that the driveway access is to be
restricted to right turn out only. Construction of an
island on the driveway as designed by Traffic Engineering is
to be accomplished. The Detention and Excavation ordinances
are applicable.
Water Works reports that the proposed fire hydrant must be
accessible to the Fire Department and within 8 feet of a
curb that will not be blocked by a parked car. A pro -rata
charge of $2.50 per foot applies for connections off of Napa
Valley Drive.
Wastewater Utility reports that the present building on the
site is on a septic tank and will have to be connected to
sewer. Sewer is available, but the sewer main serving the
Library is a private main and cannot be tied onto.
The Fire Department commended that an additional fire
hydrant will be required for the proposed development.
Site Plan Review reports that the west landscape buffer
needs to be increased to 32 feet in depth.
APDL will require an easement along the south and east
property line.
Southwestern Bell approved the submittal without comment.
D. I E5/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
The site represented by this item was a recently acquired
tract, and the site plan review previously conducted on the
main portion of the tract to the east had, at the hearing,
also included the tract represented by this application.
However, the added tract was not included when the
application was filed and the legal ad published. This
tract, then, is to be included with the remaining primary
site to the east. Rather than have the site plan review
2
s
October 5, 1993 '
OUBBIVISIQ1![
ITEM NO.; 9 (CQtinued) _ FILE N9._: Z -4550--C
include the entire tract, necessitating a review of the
major portion of the site a second month in a review, the
current application included only the additional site.
E. ANALYSIS•
There are no major deficiencies noted, and the applicant has
indicated that all concerns will be addressed.
TAFF RE MME ATI
Staff recommends approval of the application.
BDIVISIgN COMMITTEE C MME T: (September 16, 1993)
Representatives of the applicant were present. The comments
contained in the discussion outline were presented by the staff.
Since the Committee had seen the site plan previously, there was
little discussion, and the Committee forwarded the request to the
Commission for final resolution.
3